Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

A History of the Ecological Sciences, Part 32: Humboldt, Nature's Geographer

2009; Ecological Society of America; Volume: 90; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1890/0012-9623-90.3.253

2327-6096

Frank N. Egerton,

Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation

Click here for all previous articles in the History of the Ecological Sciences series by F. N. Egerton Historians of geography claim F. W. H. Alexander von Humboldt (1769–1859) and Carl Ritter (1779–1859) as the two founders of modern geography (Kish 1978:402–419, James and Martin 1981:112–126, Minguet 1997), and there are more places named for Humboldt than for anyone else (Oppitz 1969). During the 1800s several specialized ecological sciences arose, the first of which was Humboldt's vegetational plant geography, in contrast to the floristic plant geography of Linnaeus (Grisebach 1872, Stearn 1968:116–128, Nicolson 1987, Castrillon 1992, Bowler 1993:272–273, Acot 2003). Although Larson (1986:469–472) emphasizes Humboldt's debts to his predecessors, Humboldt was the most important founder of ecological sciences between Linnaeus and Charles Darwin. He was also a great rarity—a wealthy aristocrat who turned his back on the comfort and privilege that he inherited and devoted his life and wealth to science. That he lived almost 90 years was remarkable, given his travels in the tropics and Siberia, and his longevity was a great boon for science. Humboldt's scientific interests and contributions were extremely broad, encompassing practically all of science, and consequently the historical literature on him is vast. The scope of this part of my history seems quite broad, but it only touches a limited part of that literature. There are recent guides to that broader literature: Biermann 1972, Stafleu and Cowan 1976–1988, II:363–371, Hein 1987:310–326, Rupke 2000, Travers 2003; for a bibliography of his 138 scientific papers and six coauthored papers, see the Royal Society of London's Catalogue of Scientific Papers (1800–1863) (1869:462–467). Humboldt's numerous biographies include four in English: Bruhns 1873, Terra 1955, Kellner 1963, Botting 1973. The most authoritative biography is in German (Beck 1959–1961). Rupke (2005) provides a survey and critique of Humboldt biographies. There is as yet no collected edition of Humboldt's enormous correspondence, but Heim's bibliography (1987:314) cites 24 published collections. It missed articles that publish only a few letters, such as four to Filippo Parlatore (Rodolico 1968) or just one to Charles Darwin (Barrett and Corcos 1972), and another collection of letters appeared after Heim's bibliography (Humboldt 1993). Early in his life at his parents' estate near Berlin, he developed a strong interest in natural history, but this did not lead to studies of science, which was unimportant in a German curriculum of the day. He compensated by reading books on exploration, and he especially liked mathematician-explorer Louis Antoine Bouganville's Voyage autour du monde (1771), describing his circumnavigation of the world in 1766–1769 (George 1970), and Georg Adam Forster's A Voyage Round the World (1777). Forster (1754–1794) had accompanied his father Johann Reinhold Forster, naturalist on Captain James Cook's second voyage, 1772–1775 (Hoare 1972, Lenz 1980). Karl Ludwig Willdenow (1765–1812) published his Florae Berolinensis in 1787, and this book became Humboldt's introduction to botany. In 1788 they met, became close friends, and occasionally collaborated. Willdenow influenced Humboldt's development of an interest in plant geography (Hein 1959, Bylebyl 1976, Browne 1983:38–40, Larson 1986:466–470, Bowler 1993:176–177). When Humboldt went to Göttingen University in 1789, he met Forster, and they also became close friends (Ackerknecht 1955). …plant geography traces the connections and relations by which all plants are bound together among themselves, designates in what lands they are found, in what atmospheric conditions they live, and tells of the destruction of rocks and stones by what primitive forms of the most powerful algae, by what roots of trees, and describes the surface of the earth in which humus is prepared. Hartshorne said that this was in Humboldt's first major publication; Nicolson (1987:174, 1996:290) states that this was where “Humboldt first publicly set out his programme for a new form of plant geography in 1793.” Hanno Beck, in his fine edition of Humboldt's studies on plant geography, discovered other writings by Humboldt on this topic going back to 1790 (Humboldt 1989:33–36). When Humboldt finished his studies in 1792, he joined the Prussian Department of Mines as an inspector. This gave him an opportunity to study the geological strata in mining areas. He had a great appreciation of measurement and of scientific instruments (Théodoridès and Destombes 1969, Bourguet 1998, Jacques et al. 2003), and he was also adept at devising respirators and safety lamps for miners (illustrated in Botting 1973:30, Kümmel 1987:204). He had never intended to make mining supervision into a career, and after his mother died in 1796, he resigned to pursue science and exploration. In 1796–1797 he planned a trip to the West Indies (Beck 1958). In 1798 he planned to explore Egypt and traveled to Paris to obtain scientific instruments. Neither trip materialized, but while in Paris he met Bougainville, who was planning another voyage around the world and wanted Humboldt to join him. Humboldt was thrilled, but war aborted that voyage, as it had his plans for Egypt. Nevertheless, Humboldt met Aimé Jacques Alexandre Bonpland (1773–1858), recruited as expedition botanist (Sarton 1943, Stafleu and Cowan 1976–1988, I:274–276, Trystram 1995, Ceraruti 2003, Lourteig 2003), who was as disappointed as Humboldt at their aborted expedition. Together, they set out on their own expedition, to Spain, where a German ambassador introduced them to the royal family. Carlos IV was charmed by Humboldt's personality, knowledge, and his fluency in Spanish and readily agreed to allow him and Bonpland to explore Spanish America—at their own expense. George Basalla (1967) explains that the extent to which science developed in any colony was proportionate to the level of scientific activity in the mother country. There were a significant number of natural history studies being made in Latin America, but since science was poorly supported in Spain, few of these studies were published (Pennell 1945:35–40, Glick and Quinlan 1975:75–77, Canizares-Esquerra 2003:75–77, Canizares-Esquerra 2005). An exception was a study by Felix de Azara, but his publication owed much to the fact that his brother was Spain's ambassador to France and that he could therefore go to Paris to publish it in a French translation (see below). On the other hand, the natural history studies in South America by the Frenchman Alcide d'Orbigny (1802–1857) were readily published, since he lived in Paris (Tobin 1974). I shall try to find out how the forces of nature interact upon one another and how the geographic environment influences plant and animal life. In other words, I must find out about the unity of nature. Humboldt gathered perhaps the most sophisticated armamentarium of scientific instruments ever before assembled. Each of the forty-two instruments, nestled in its own velvet-lined box, was the most accurate and most portable of its kind yet devised. There were thermometers for measuring the temperature of air and water, barometers for fixing elevation above sea level, quadrants and sextants for determining geographic position (including a sextant small enough to fit in a pocket), telescopes, microscopes, a balance scale, chronometers, compasses, a rain gauge, substances for performing chemical assays, electric batteries, electrometers (for measuring electric current), a Leyden jar (a glass vessel capable of storing static electricity), theodolites (surveyors' instruments for measuring vertical and horizontal angles), hygrometers (for measuring atmospheric moisture), a dip needle (for measuring variations in the orientation of the earth's magnetic field), and eudiometers (for measuring the amount of oxygen in the air). Humboldt's own discussion of these instruments runs to seven pages (1818–1829:34–40). After their ship, Pizarro, reached the Canary Islands on 18 June, they began investigating Teneriffe, the largest island. They ascended Pico de Teide, a volcano 11,500 feet high, and then descended inside to see and smell a recently active volcano. This was the first of Humboldt's many ascents of volcanoes (Sachs 2006:42). Elsewhere they measured the 45-foot circumference of a dragon tree (Dracaena draco). Ever the geographer, Humboldt provided a table on the population of the seven islands for 1678, 1745, 1768, and 1790 (1818–1829:I, 288). The islands suffered from a dearth of fresh water, but wherever there were springs or opportunity for irrigation, crops grew well in fertile soil. The area of all the islands was only one-seventh the size of Corsica, yet the Canaries supported a comparable population. He did not expect these islands to suffer the overpopulation that Malthus discussed (1818–1829:I, 292). On the rest of the voyage they observed flying fish that left the water to escape voracious dolphins, only to be caught by frigatebirds (Fregata magnificens) and albatrosses, reminding Humboldt (when writing his memoirs) of herds of South American capybara that fled the water to escape crocodiles, only to be caught by jaguars (1818–1829, II:14–15). Their five-year expedition in Spanish America covered four geographic regions: (1) the rain forest and mountains of what is now Venezuela, (2) the northern Andes, (3) Cuba, and (4) Mexico. During their travels in the first two regions, their focus was on the flora, fauna, and the environment. Humboldt's field method consisted of four principal commandments: explore, collect, measure, connect. His typical tasks during the expedition were to observe the forms and habits of the vegetation, take and calculate geophysical measurements, take exact geographical bearings, and collect plants, animals, and minerals. In the countryside, he found that less acreage was planted in crops in proportion to the population than was the case in Europe, and his explanation was that plantains, cassava, yams, and maize yielded much more food per acre than did European crops (1818–1829, III:13–14). He compared the pearl fishery at Cumaná with that of Ceylon (Sri Lanka), and he suspected that the natives of Spanish America were over-fishing. In Ceylon, natives only harvested one month per year, but in Spanish America natives harvested all year. Oysters live 9–10 years, and only in the fourth year do pearls begin to grow. When the Spanish began the pearl fishery, pearls were much bigger than the ones being harvested while Humboldt was in Cumaná (Humboldt 1818–1829, II:274–277, Egerton 1970:344–345). Their first expedition out of Cumaná, in September, was to the highlands south of town, though they went through some rain forest to get there. One interesting place they explored was a cave near the Mission of Caripe, famous as the nesting place for many guacharos (the oilbird, Steatornis caripensis), which Humboldt said was the only known nocturnal frugiferous bird. Indians invaded the cave annually and slaughtered thousands of nestlings for the missionaries, who had the nestlings' fat melted into cooking oil. Humboldt thought the birds there had not been exterminated because the Indians were afraid to go as deeply into the cave as did some of the nesting birds (Humboldt 1818–1829, III:125–130, Egerton 1970:345–346) that navigate in the dark as easily as bats (Griffin 1953). The guacharo's range was broader than Humboldt could have known, encompassing the Guianas, Trinidad, Venezuela, Columbia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia (de Schawensee and Eisnmann 1966:146). A detail Humboldt could have discovered was clutch size: two to four eggs, with median of 2.7; some pairs raise two broods a year (Snow 1961, 1962). The next expedition, to Rio Orinoco, left in March, 1800. Near Calabozo, they heard of the local five foot long electric “eel” (actually a knifefish), which Linnaeus had named Gymnotus electricus. Back in Germany, Humboldt had conducted numerous electrical experiments (Jahn 1969:51–121), and he was eager to explore this fish's electrical organ for hunting and protection. The Indians had an inhumane way of capturing them, but Humboldt was glad to obtain them nevertheless: they herded some 30 horses and mules into pools where the fish lived, which provoked electrical discharges by the fish that sometimes killed the victims or caused them to drown, but also exposed the fish to capture. He and Bonpland conducted experiments, using as victims frogs, turtles, and themselves. Humboldt's instruments failed to detect any electricity or magnetism (Humboldt 1806Humboldt 1818–1829, IV:345–377, 1819, Théodoridès 1970:100), but by the 1900s electrical instruments were sensitive enough to measure it (Cutright 1940:278–279, Keynes and Martins-Ferreira 1953). In 1801, on Rio Magdalena, he found a similar species he named G. equilabiatus, which did not use electric shocks. He explored more aspects of aquatic life than can be surveyed here, but Stelleanu (1959) has discussed that research. An even more disturbing annual harvest than that of guacharo eggs was of the eggs of the Arrau turtle (Podocnemis expansa) at several islands in the Rio Orinoco near its merger with the Rio Apure. The annual take was converted into 5000 jars of oil, which Humboldt calculated (allowing for broken eggs) represented 33,000,000 eggs from 30,000 turtles (1818–1829, IV:479–494, Egerton 1970:346–347). Indians also took eggs from P. dumerilliana, but since females of this species laid in isolation, not communally, their eggs seemed less vulnerable. In 1850 Henry Walter Bates witnessed an annual harvest of turtle eggs along the Amazon even larger than that which Humboldt had seen along the Orinoco (Bates 1864:345–349, 363–365, Cutright 1940:222). It was impossible for naturalists to ignore mosquitoes, and Humboldt thought an entomologist should study the tropical species. He started the project by naming and describing in Latin five new species (1818–1829, V:97–98). Missionaries observed that the different species do not associate together, and that different species are active at different times of day. Bites that cause little inflammation in Indians produce large swellings in whites. At the Rio Magdalena some people thought that mosquito bites were a healthful bleeding of the body, but “at the [Rio] Oroonoko, the banks of which are very dangerous to health, the sick accuse the moschettoes of all the evils they experience” (1818–1829, V:90–113, quotation, 109). Humboldt agreed with the latter and urged use of mosquito nets. He and Bonpland had escaped malignant fevers (so far), which he thought were not contagious (1818–1829, V:629–630). One goal of their trip up the Rio Orinoco was to verify Charles-Marie de LaCondamine's second-hand report of the existence of a natural canal between that river, flowing north, and Rio Negro, flowing south (Von Hagen 1945:120–124, 1948:128–129). If it existed, it might become important for river commerce. They found the Cassiquiare Canal (Fig. 2), which is 50 leagues (180 miles) long. Christian settlements along it were sparse, with only 200 inhabitants. Humboldt suspected the canal's population was larger before missionaries arrived; their presence probably caused many Indians to withdraw into the woods (1818–1829, V:420). While traveling east for the length of the canal, Humboldt bought a pet black-headed cacajao from the Indians, and he sketched it. After it died from an upset stomach, he kept the skin, and a published illustration (Fig. 7) is in the same pose as his sketch. He listed 46 species of monkey known in America (1811–1833, I:353–368), which is almost half the known species (Cutright 1940:141). Humboldt as a college student. Daniel Caffe (1756–1815). From De Terra 1955:facing 19. Theodolite by Edward Nairne, late 1700s, London. Humboldt and Bonpland's routes in northern South America. Von Hagen 1945:164. Humboldt and Bonpland with some of their baggage. By Eduard Ender. Institut für Geographie und Geoökologie, Leipzig. Guacharo or oilbird, Steatornis caripensis. After Humboldt's sketch, engraved by Jean Louis Denis Coutant in 1817. Humboldt and Bonpland 1811–1833, II: Plate 44. Two Gymnotus (now Electrophorus) species: side view of equilabiatus and cross section of electricus. Drawn by Leopold Müller from Humboldt's sketches, engraved by Louis Bouquet. Humboldt and Bonpland 1811–1833, II: Plate 10. Black-headed Cacajao (Simia melanocephala), by Huet. Humboldt and Bonpland 1811–1833, I: Plate 29. On 24 November 1800 they left Venezuela for Havana to ship their collections to Europe, but found this endeavor complicated by a British blockade. During more than three months in Cuba, they visited various places, for which Humboldt determined latitude and longitude. His memoirs discuss human populations in great detail, and his observations on them are examined closely by Charles Minguet (1997:23–371). While in Havana they read in an American newspaper that the French expedition on which they had wanted to sail had finally left France, but under Captain Nicolas Baudin, not Bouganville. They decided to travel to Lima to join it. On 8 March 1801 they left Cuba for Cartagena, now in Columbia (Fig. 2), on a voyage that usually took little more than a week, but this time lasted 25 days. They stayed three weeks in Cartagena. Volume 7 of the English edition of Humboldt's memoirs is mostly on the Cuban economy, but its last chapter (Chapter 29) is on the voyage and the geography of the Cartagenan region. It is 105 pages long, hardly what one would expect from a short, though time-consuming voyage, and just another geographical essay on a limited region. However, Humboldt was not one to waste time during their delay at sea; this chapter is his contribution to the oceanography and meteorology of the Caribbean Sea (Dove 1872, Körber 1959, Richardson 1980, Verstraete 2003). It was probably the most important contribution to those subjects since Benjamin Franklin had discussed them about a half-century earlier (Chaplin 2006:196–200, 209–212). That chapter ended his memoirs. Humboldt published his memoirs in French, Relation historique du voyage aux regions équinoxiales du nouveau continent (1814–1825), in three volumes, and planned a fourth that never appeared. It would have included their overland trip to Lima, which they reached on 22 October 1802, some 18 months later. Along the way, they learned that Bauhin would not stop in Lima, so they lost their initial sense of urgency. Lacking volume four, his biographers and historians have pieced together accounts of that trip from his other writings, especially Vues des Cordillères by him and Bonpland (1810), and Humboldt's correspondence. Although Humboldt's memoirs do discuss plants and vegetation of Venezuela, botany and plant geography were treated in greater detail in other works (Grisebach 1872, Coats 1969:337–341, 368–370, Dobat 1987:176–183). Humboldt and Bonpland collected 60,000 plant specimens and discovered about 3600 new species. Systematic botanists have published fairly exact itineraries of the four parts of their Latin American explorations to identify where they collected plant specimens (Stearn 1968:69–115). They struggled up the Andes to Bogatá, 8600 feet elevation, which they reached on 6 July, and were treated like the aristocrats that Humboldt was, but preferred to ignore. They spent two months with physician–botanist José Celestino Mutis (1732– 1808), a Spanish immigrant, whose work was well known in Europe (Coats 1969:362–363, Goodman 1972:223–227, Botting 1973:146–148, Stafleu and Cowan 1976–1988, III:676–677, Vernet 1978, Frías Núñez 1994, Tepaske 1996, Honigsbaum 2001:51–54, Cañizares-Esguerra 2006:122–123). In 1763 Mutis proposed to Carlos III an expedition to study cinchona and other useful plants, and in 1783 he was finally put in charge of the Real Expeditió Botánica del Nuevo Reino de Granada, with a staff of 18, which explored much of what is now Columbia, collecting 20,000 plants. Mutis used powder of cinchona bark to cure Bonpland, who by then suffered from malaria. Humboldt and Bonpland compared plants they had collected with Mutis' vast herbarium. Humboldt named one of his and Bonpland's discoveries Mutisia grandiflora, in honor of their host. Later, Humboldt also studied cinchona trees and clearly distinguished three species that even Mutis had confused (Honigsbaum 2001:58–61). As they traveled south to Popayán, or after arriving there, Humboldt heard about a largely self-taught naturalist-scholar, Francisco José Caldas (1768–1816), from that town, who had independently discovered a way to determine altitude by the boiling point temperature of water (a method already known in Europe). Caldas met Humboldt and Bonpland in Ibarra on 31 December 1801, and they compared their altitude determinations for several places and found impressively close agreement (Arbeláez 1971, Appel 1994, Cañizares-Esquerra 2006:113–116, 124–125). Caldas gave Humboldt a copy of a map he had drawn of Timaná, and in return Humboldt taught Caldas how to use instruments which he had not previously seen, and Bonpland taught him botany. Caldas asked to join Humboldt's expedition, and after Humboldt declined, Caldas joined Mutis' ongoing expedition and made his own important studies on cinchona (Honnigsbaum 2001:53–54). Caldas also made his own phytographic profile of Andes mountains, as he had learned to do from Humboldt (reproduced in Appel 1994:56–57). However, Caldas never published either his cinchona findings nor his phytographic profile, as Spanish authorities executed him in 1816 for participating in an independence uprising. (Humboldt likely would have supported that uprising had it occurred while he was in Spanish America.) A naturalist whom Humboldt did not meet was Félix de Azara (1742–1821), because he had left South America in 1801 (Alvarez Lopez 1935, Guerra 1970, Goodman 1972:238–242, Beddall 1975, 1983, Glick and Quinlan 1975). He had studied the natural history of Paraguay and Rio Plata, and after stopping over in Spain, he went on to Paris, where his brother was the Spanish ambassador. That connection facilitated the translation of his manuscript on mammals into French and its publication in Paris (1801). Having gained French recognition, he returned to Madrid and succeeded in publishing a revised and enlarged edition in Spanish (two volumes, 1804). In 1809, he published his Voyages dans l'Amerique meridionale (four volumes, Paris) that included his natural history in volumes three and four, a work that Darwin cited repeatedly in his own works. An extract from the mammal volume, translated into English in 1837, is reprinted by von Hagen (1948:131–144). Humboldt and Bonpland climbed over Quindio Pass, almost 12,000 feet high, to reach Quito, where they stayed six months. A red mimosa (Fig. 8) was a small shrub growing on the slopes of Páramo de Saraguru. Red mimosa, Inga (now Calliandra) taxifolia. Water color by Pierre Jean François Turpin. Humboldt, Bonpland, and Kunth 1829–1835:Plate 20. On this trip Humboldt and party indulged his fascination with volcanoes. Although not the most important founder of the science of volcanology, he was its most widely traveled founder (Laudan 1987:188–193, Sigurdsson 1999:124, 164, 224). The most famous episode of the entire four years was his party's ascent of Mount Chimborazo (20,702 feet, 6310 m elevation), south of Quito, which was the tallest known mountain whose elevation had been determined (Figs. 2, 9). Mount Chimborazo. Humboldt 1850:frontispiece. This is a small copy of the larger illustration in Humboldt and Bonpland 1810, engraved by Jean-Thomas Thibaut from Humboldt's sketch. The man in the right foreground picking a flower is probably either Humboldt or Bonpland. They did so on 23 June 1802 and ascended to 18,096 feet (Von Hagen 1945:144–148). It was a pity that Humboldt's memoirs ended before this climactic event. In 1837 he realized this and published an account of Bonpland's and his experiences during their ascent. It includes a description of the vegetation through which they rode (up to the snow line; they then continued on foot). The feral llamas they saw probably had escaped from captivity after a devastating earthquake on 4 February 1797, which had killed 45,000 people (Humboldt 1837:294–296). Bonpland captured a butterfly at 15,000 feet and saw a fly at 16,600 feet. The last green moss was at 14,320 feet, and lichens were found above the snow line at 16,920 feet (Löwenberg 1873:311–315). Humboldt provided details on the Andean Condor's natural history in his and Bonpland's Recueil d'observations de zoologie et d'anatomie compare (1811–1833), including observations on its ability, in search of food, to soar into very thin air, measured at 20,834 feet elevation, and yet it could quickly descend to sea level when it saw food. It is the largest flying bird, with a wingspan of up to 11 feet, and he concluded that “Of all living beings, it is without doubt the one that can rise at will to the greatest distance from the earth's surface” (Humboldt 1829). Although primarily a scavenger, condors reportedly preyed at times on young sheep, goats, cattle, alpaca, vicuna, and guanacos (Humboldt and Bonpland 1811–1833, I:26–45, Humboldt 1850:210, 239). Humboldt was unimpressed by Lima, yet they stayed there for two months. He learned that Andean farmers used bird guano for fertilizer, and when he visited a pelican colony (Fig. 10) on one of the Lobos de Afuera Islands off the Peruvian coast, he suspected that guano accumulated on such desert islands could become a valuable fertilizer for Europe. Andean Condor Vultur gryphus. Humboldt and Bonpland 1811–1833, I: Plate 8. Illustration by Louis Bouquet. Samples he sent to Europe for testing confirmed his idea, and it did become valuable, thanks to his publicizing the possibility (von Hagen 1945:154–155, Jouanin 2003). Previous published reports of guano fertilizer in accounts of Peru or Chile had not led to its introduction into Europe or North America (Murphy 1936, I:286–288). On 5 December 1802 they left for Guayaquil (Fig. 2), which they reached on 9 January 1803. During that voyage, he determined the exact location of several places along the coast, and he first measured the temperature and speed of an already well-known current that now bears his name. Because of the Humboldt Current, the surface temperature at Callao was only 60°, whereas the air on land was 73°. He later explained that since the moist air from the ocean expanded when it blew inland, its moisture-holding capacity increased and rain did not fall, leading to desert conditions (Humboldt 1817a, 1820–1821, von Hagen 1945:156, de Terra 1955:144–146, Goodman 1972:260). When they had attempted, unsuccessfully, to reach the crater of Cotopaxi (18,876 feet, 5896 m elevation) the previous September, it had been inactive, but now, as they sailed along the Ecuadorian coast, they could hear its eruption, 200 miles away. They reached Acapulco on 23 March, and then spent a year exploring central Mexico (map in Helferich 2004:264, Terra 1955:150), visiting volcanoes, mines, and archeological sites. Humboldt also spent much time in the government archives gathering material for his book on the Mexican economy (1811). The Mexicans were so impressed by him that he was offered a ministerial position in the government. It was tempting, but he needed to prepare his findings and collections for publication, and Paris was best for that. Before sailing to France, he and Bonpland spent a rewarding five weeks in Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Washington with American scientists and our most scientifically informed president, Thomas Jefferson (Sellers 1980:160–166, Schoenwaldt 1987, Bedini 1990). Jefferson was very interested in their discoveries, and Humboldt left a copy of his map of New Spain (Mexico) in Washington. Humboldt and Bonpland then sailed to France, reached Bordeaux on 1 August 1804, and soon settled in Paris to organize their vast collections and notes and to publish 30 volumes of their findings (Limoges 1980:212). Those volumes were written largely by Humboldt, but Bonpland's name appears as coauthor of about a third of them. This ever-faithful field naturalist did good work on some of the early volumes (Stafleu and Cowan 1976–1988, I:274–276, Drouin and Huet 2002), but he disliked preparing field notes for publication and eventually abandoned the task (Hossard 2001:23–50). It seems fair to just speak here of Humboldt and his ideas without also referring to Bonpland's ideas. Since they had 60,000 American plant specimens to consider, Humboldt realized he needed another botanical collaborator, and in 1813 he brought to Paris from Berlin Carl Sigismund Kunth (1788–1850) to study the collections and publish systematic accounts (Stearn 1968:140–151, Stafleu and Cowan 1976–1988, II:692–698). Liberated, Bonpland returned to South America in 1816 (Coats 1969:356–357, Hossard 2001). Humboldt's (and Bonpland's) first volume, Essai sur la géographie des plantes, accompagné d'un tableau physique des regions équinoxiales, et servant d'introduction à l'ouvrage 1807, has only 155 pages. By “introduction to the work,” he meant to all the following volumes. Humboldt certainly began with a dramatic flourish, because facing the title page of the Essai is a foldout “tableau” (Humboldt's word in the French version) of Chimborazo and Cotopaxi, as a visual introduction to what historians now call “Humboldtian science” (Cannon 1978:73–110, Dettelbach 1994), a science of correlations. It was probably the most original and most important diagram for ecological sciences in the 1800s (Fig. 13). In most copies of the Essai it is uncolored, but one could pay extra for a colored copy. Pelican colony on one of the Lobos de Afuera Islands. Photo: Loren McInt