Inclusive Fitness and Group Size with a Reconsideration of Group Sizes in Lions and Wolves
1981; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 118; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/283819
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsInclusive Fitness and Group Size with a Reconsideration of Group Sizes in Lions and WolvesPeter S. RodmanPeter S. RodmanPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 118, Number 2Aug., 1981 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283819 Views: 26Total views on this site Citations: 53Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1981 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:I. Benamara, A. El Abdllaoui, J. Mikram Impact of time delay and cooperation strategy on the stability of a predator–prey model with Holling type III functional response, International Journal of Biomathematics 16, no.0303 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524522500899Kristoffer Nordli, Petter Wabakken, Ane Eriksen, Håkan Sand, Camilla Wikenros, Erling Maartmann, Barbara Zimmermann Spatial and temporal cohesion of parents and offspring in a social large carnivore, Animal Behaviour 197 (Mar 2023): 155–167.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.12.006Basaznew Belew, Dawit Melese, Qiankun Song Modeling and Analysis of Predator-Prey Model with Fear Effect in Prey and Hunting Cooperation among Predators and Harvesting, Journal of Applied Mathematics 2022 (Dec 2022): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2776698Joonghwan Jeon Group Size, (Apr 2021): 3567–3572.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2708Joonghwan Jeon Group Size Optimality and Stability, (Apr 2021): 3572–3574.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2709Marine Lehue, Claire Detrain, Bertrand Collignon Nest Entrances, Spatial Fidelity, and Foraging Patterns in the Red Ant Myrmica rubra: A Field and Theoretical Study, Insects 11, no.55 (May 2020): 317.https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050317Z. Muller, I. C. Cuthill, S. Harris Group sizes of giraffes in Kenya: the influence of habitat, predation and the age and sex of individuals, Journal of Zoology 306, no.22 (May 2018): 77–87.https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12571Joonghwan Jeon Group Size Optimality and Stability, (Feb 2018): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2709-1S. M. Vairavel, P. S. Easa Group Size and Composition of Gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus) in Relation to Environmental Factors in Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, (Feb 2018): 111–126.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6605-4_5Jacob Hochard, David Finnoff Cross-jurisdictional management of a trophy-hunted species, Journal of Theoretical Biology 420 (May 2017): 41–52.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.001John F. Benson, Karen M. Loveless, Linda Y. Rutledge, Brent R. Patterson Ungulate predation and ecological roles of wolves and coyotes in eastern North America, Ecological Applications 27, no.33 (Mar 2017): 718–733.https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1499Joonghwan Jeon Group Size, (May 2017): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2708-1Kira A. Cassidy, Daniel R. MacNulty, Daniel R. Stahler, Douglas W. Smith, L. David Mech Group composition effects on aggressive interpack interactions of gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park, Behavioral Ecology 26, no.55 (Jun 2015): 1352–1360.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv081 References, (Jan 2014): 263–302.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407228-2.16001-9Jorge Peña GROUP-SIZE DIVERSITY IN PUBLIC GOODS GAMES, Evolution 66, no.33 (Dec 2011): 623–636.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01504.xTharmalingam Ramesh, Kalyanasundaram Sankar, Qamar Qureshi, Riddhika Kalle Group Size and Population Structure of Megaherbivores (Gaur Bos gaurus and Asian Elephant Elephas maximus ) in a Deciduous Habitat of Western Ghats, India, Mammal Study 37, no.11 (Mar 2012): 47–54.https://doi.org/10.3106/041.037.0106Tharmalingam Ramesh, Kalyanasundaram Sankar, Qamar Qureshi, Riddhika Kalle Group size, sex and age composition of chital (Axis axis) and sambar (Rusa unicolor) in a deciduous habitat of Western Ghats, Mammalian Biology 77, no.11 (Jan 2012): 53–59.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2011.09.003Simon T. Powers, Alexandra S. Penn, Richard A. Watson THE CONCURRENT EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION AND THE POPULATION STRUCTURES THAT SUPPORT IT, Evolution 65, no.66 (Mar 2011): 1527–1543.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01250.xMarco Campenní, Federico Cecconi Quasi-PSO Algorithm for Modeling Foraging Dynamics in Social Mammals, International Journal of Agent Technologies and Systems 3, no.11 (Jan 2011): 27–38.https://doi.org/10.4018/jats.2011010103Loren D. Hayes, Adrian S. Chesh, Rodrigo A. Castro, Liliana Ortiz Tolhuysen, Joseph Robert Burger, Joydeep Bhattacharjee, Luis A. Ebensperger Fitness consequences of group living in the degu Octodon degus, a plural breeder rodent with communal care, Animal Behaviour 78, no.11 (Jul 2009): 131–139.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.022Joel L. Sachs, Colin R. Hughes, Gary L. Nuechterlein, Deborah Buitron, D. B. Lank Evolution of Coloniality in Birds: A Test of Hypotheses With the Red-Necked Grebe (Podiceps Grisegena), The Auk 124, no.22 (Apr 2007): 628–642.https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/124.2.628H. Seno Group size determined by fusion and fission A mathematical modelling with inclusive fitness, Journal of Mathematical Biology 52, no.11 (Sep 2005): 70–92.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-005-0341-7Gary L. Nuechterlein, Deborah Buitron, Joel L. Sachs, Colin R. Hughes Red-Necked Grebes Become Semicolonial When Prime Nesting Substrate is Available, The Condor 105, no.11 (Feb 2003): 80–94.https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/105.1.80Noriyuki Yamaguchi, Tetsukazu Yahara Factors causing variation in flock size: Decision making to join a foraging flock, Ecological Research 17, no.33 (Jul 2002): 361–371.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00494.xOliver P. Honer, Bettina Wachter, Marion L. East, Heribert Hofer The response of spotted hyaenas to long-term changes in prey populations: functional response and interspecific kleptoparasitism, Journal of Animal Ecology 71, no.22 (Mar 2002): 236–246.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00596.xR D Hayes, A M Baer, U Wotschikowsky, A S Harestad Kill rate by wolves on moose in the Yukon, Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, no.11 (Feb 2000): 49–59.https://doi.org/10.1139/z99-187 Leticia Avilés and Paul Tufiño Colony Size and Individual Fitness in the Social Spider Anelosimus eximius Avilés & Tufiño, The American Naturalist 152, no.33 (Jul 2015): 403–418.https://doi.org/10.1086/286178Marc Bélisle FORAGING GROUP SIZE: MODELS AND A TEST WITH JAEGERS KLEPTOPARASITIZING TERNS, Ecology 79, no.66 (Sep 1998): 1922–1938.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1922:FGSMAA]2.0.CO;2A. H. Harcourt Does primate socioecology need nonprimate socioecology?, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 7, no.11 (Jan 1998): 3–7.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)7:1 3.0.CO;2-H Paul A. Schmidt and L. David Mech Wolf Pack Size and Food Acquisition Schmidt & Mech, The American Naturalist 150, no.44 (Jul 2015): 513–517.https://doi.org/10.1086/286079Scott Creel, Nancy Marusha Creel Communal hunting and pack size in African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus, Animal Behaviour 50, no.55 (Jan 1995): 1325–1339.https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80048-4Masahiko Higashi, Norio Yamamura Resolution of evolutionary conflict: a general theory and its applications, Population Ecology 36, no.11 (Nov 2018): 15–22.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515080Bruce H. Rannala, Charles R. Brown Relatedness and conflict over optimal group size, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9, no.44 (Apr 1994): 117–119.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90172-4Luc-Alain Giraldeau, Thomas Caraco Genetic relatedness and group size in an aggregation economy, Evolutionary Ecology 7, no.44 (Jul 1993): 429–438.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237874John M. Marzlufi, Bernd Heinrich Foraging by common ravens in the presence and absence of territory holders: an experimental analysis of social foraging, Animal Behaviour 42, no.55 (Nov 1991): 755–770.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80121-6A. Rus Hoelzel Killer whale predation on marine mammals at Punta Norte, Argentina; food sharing, provisioning and foraging strategy, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29, no.33 (Oct 1991): 197–204.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166401C. BARRETTE The size of Axis deer fluid groups in Wilpattu national park, Sri Lanka, Mammalia 55, no.22 (Jan 1991).https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1991.55.2.207 C. Packer , D. Scheel , and A. E. Pusey Why Lions Form Groups: Food is Not Enough, The American Naturalist 136, no.11 (Oct 2015): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1086/285079James C. Bednarz Cooperative Hunting Harris' Hawks ( Parabuteo unicinctus ), Science 239, no.48474847 (Mar 1988): 1525–1527.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.239.4847.1525Luc-Alain Giraldeau THE STABLE GROUP AND THE DETERMINANTS OF FORAGING GROUP SIZE, (Jan 1988): 33–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-648780-0.50007-4Peter S. Rodman RESOURCES AND GROUP SIZES OF PRIMATES, (Jan 1988): 83–108.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-648780-0.50009-8 Michael Earle A Flexible Body Mass in Social Carnivores, The American Naturalist 129, no.55 (Oct 2015): 755–760.https://doi.org/10.1086/284670Colin W. Clark The lazy, adaptable lions: a Markovian model of group foraging, Animal Behaviour 35, no.22 (Apr 1987): 361–368.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80259-2Colin W. Clark, Marc Mangel Markovian Foraging Models, (Jan 1987): 60–69.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93360-8_6Colin W. Clark Behavioral Modelling and Resource Management, (Jan 1987): 11–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93365-3_2Colin W. Clark, Marc Mangel The evolutionary advantages of group foraging, Theoretical Population Biology 30, no.11 (Aug 1986): 45–75.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(86)90024-9Marc Bekoff, Michael C. Wells Social Ecology and Behavior of Coyotes, (Jan 1986): 251–338.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60193-XK. G. Van Orsdol, Jeannette P. Hanby, J. D. Bygott Ecological correlates of lion social organization ( Panthers, leo ), Journal of Zoology 206, no.11 (Aug 2009): 97–112.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb05639.xEric Alden Smith Inuit foraging groups: some simple models incorporating conflicts of interest, relatedness, and central-place sharing, Ethology and Sociobiology 6, no.11 (Jan 1985): 27–47.https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(85)90039-1Jim Moore Female transfer in primates, International Journal of Primatology 5, no.66 (Dec 1984): 537–589.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692285Deborah R. R. Smith Ecological costs and benefits of communal behavior in a presocial spider, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 13, no.22 (Aug 1983): 107–114.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293800L.M. Gosling Book review, Animal Behaviour 31, no.33 (Aug 1983): 953–954.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80256-5Marco Campenní, Federico Cecconi Quasi-PSO Algorithm for Modeling Foraging Dynamics in Social Mammals, (): 276–288.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1565-6.ch017
Referência(s)