Evaluating Models of Sexual Selection: Genitalia as a Test Case
1993; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 142; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/285556
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsEvaluating Models of Sexual Selection: Genitalia as a Test CaseWilliam G. EberhardWilliam G. EberhardPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 142, Number 3Sep., 1993 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/285556 Views: 14Total views on this site Citations: 68Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1993 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Laurie S. Stevison, Nick P. Bailey, Zachary A. Szpiech, Taylor E. Novak, Don J. Melnick, Ben J. Evans, Jeffrey D. Wall Evolution of genes involved in the unusual genitals of the bear macaque, Macaca arctoides, Ecology and Evolution 12, no.55 (May 2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8897Matilda Brindle Postcopulatory Selection, (May 2022): 5472–5475.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55065-7_1919Jérôme Cortot, Jean-Pierre Farine, Benjamin Houot, Claude Everaerts, Jean-François Ferveur Experimental Introgression To Evaluate the Impact of Sex Specific Traits on Drosophila melanogaster Incipient Speciation, G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 9, no.88 (Aug 2019): 2561–2572.https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400385Shelley S. Langton‐Myers, Gregory I. Holwell, Thomas R. Buckley Weak premating isolation between Clitarchus stick insect species despite divergent male and female genital morphology, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 32, no.55 (Mar 2019): 398–411.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13424Álvaro Zúñiga-Reinoso, Marco A. Méndez Hidden and cryptic species reflect parallel and correlated evolution in the phylogeny of the genus Callyntra (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) of Central Chile, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 127 (Oct 2018): 405–415.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.04.022Eliana Buenaventura, Thomas Pape Phylogeny, evolution and male terminalia functionality of Sarcophaginae (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 183, no.44 (Dec 2017): 808–906.https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx070Manuel I. Stefanini, Pablo Milla Carmona, Patricia P. Iglesias, Eduardo M. Soto, Ignacio M. Soto Differential Rates of Male Genital Evolution in Sibling Species of Drosophila, Evolutionary Biology 45, no.22 (Jan 2018): 211–222.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-018-9444-0Matilda Brindle Postcopulatory Selection, (Nov 2017): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1919-1Matilda Brindle Postcopulatory Selection, (Dec 2017): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1919-2Michelle Noboa, William Viera, Ana Díaz, Wilson Vásquez, Lenin Ron Genitalic Differentiations in Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Gueneé) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Associated with Solanaceae Crops in Ecuador, Insects 8, no.33 (Aug 2017): 91.https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8030091Matilda Brindle, Christopher Opie Postcopulatory sexual selection influences baculum evolution in primates and carnivores, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283, no.18441844 (Dec 2016): 20161736.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1736Jeyaraney Kathirithamby, Michael Hrabar, Juan A. Delgado, Francisco Collantes, Stefan Dötterl, Donald Windsor, Gerhard Gries We do not select, nor are we choosy: reproductive biology of Strepsiptera (Insecta), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 116, no.11 (Jun 2015): 221–238.https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12585Anna Nele Herdina, Diane A. Kelly, Helena Jahelková, Peter H. C. Lina, Ivan Horáček, Brian D. Metscher Testing hypotheses of bat baculum function with 3D models derived from microCT, Journal of Anatomy 226, no.33 (Feb 2015): 229–235.https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12274Maydianne C. B. Andrade, Emily C. MacLeod Potential for CFC in Black Widows (Genus Latrodectus): Mechanisms and Social Context, (May 2015): 27–53.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17894-3_2K. Grieshop, M. Polak Evaluating the post-copulatory sexual selection hypothesis for genital evolution reveals evidence for pleiotropic harm exerted by the male genital spines of Drosophila ananassae, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27, no.1212 (Nov 2014): 2676–2686.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12524Clint D. Kelly Sexual selection, phenotypic variation, and allometry in genitalic and non-genitalic traits in the sexually size-dimorphic stick insect Micrarchus hystriculeus, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 113, no.22 (Jul 2014): 471–484.https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12344Leigh W. Simmons, Renée C. Firman EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE MAMMALIAN BACULUM BY SEXUAL SELECTION, Evolution 68, no.11 (Aug 2013): 276–283.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12229Hélène LeVasseur-Viens, Amanda J. Moehring Individual Genetic Contributions to Genital Shape Variation between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana, International Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2014 (Jan 2014): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/808247Wolfgang Arthofer, Hannes Rauch, Barbara Thaler-Knoflach, Karl Moder, Christoph Muster, Birgit C. Schlick-Steiner, Florian M. Steiner How diverse is Mitopus morio ? Integrative taxonomy detects cryptic species in a small-scale sample of a widespread harvestman, Molecular Ecology 22, no.1414 (Jun 2013): 3850–3863.https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12340Bradley J. Sinclair, Scott E. Brooks, Jeffrey M. Cumming Male terminalia of Diptera (Insecta): a review of evolutionary trends, homology and phylogenetic implications, Insect Systematics & Evolution 44, no.3-43-4 (Jan 2013): 373–415.https://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-04401001Karl Grieshop, Michal Polak THE PRECOPULATORY FUNCTION OF MALE GENITAL SPINES IN DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE[DOLESCHALL] (DIPTERA: DROSOPHILIDAE) REVEALED BY LASER SURGERY, Evolution 66, no.88 (May 2012): 2637–2645.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01638.xCHARLOTTE DE BUSSCHERE, LÉON BAERT, STEVEN MARCEL VAN BELLEGHEM, WOUTER DEKONINCK, FREDERIK HENDRICKX Parallel phenotypic evolution in a wolf spider radiation on Galápagos, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 106, no.11 (Feb 2012): 123–136.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01848.xMARTIN SCHWENTNER, BRIAN V. TIMMS, STEFAN RICHTER An integrative approach to species delineation incorporating different species concepts: a case study of Limnadopsis (Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 104, no.33 (Oct 2011): 575–599.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01746.xA. F. Safonkin Polygamous strategies of insects, Biology Bulletin Reviews 1, no.66 (Dec 2011): 536–541.https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086411060077Emile van Lieshout Male genital length and mating status differentially affect mating behaviour in an earwig, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, no.22 (Aug 2010): 149–156.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1021-1Zachariah Gompert, Lauren K. Lucas, James A. Fordyce, Matthew L. Forister, Chris C. Nice Secondary contact between Lycaeides idas and L. melissa in the Rocky Mountains: extensive admixture and a patchy hybrid zone, Molecular Ecology 19, no.1515 (Jul 2010): 3171–3192.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04727.xGregory I. Holwell, Claire Winnick, Tom Tregenza, Marie E. Herberstein Genital shape correlates with sperm transfer success in the praying mantis Ciulfina klassi (Insecta: Mantodea), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64, no.44 (Nov 2009): 617–625.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0879-2Hojun Song, Sibyl R. Bucheli Comparison of phylogenetic signal between male genitalia and non-genital characters in insect systematics, Cladistics 26, no.11 (Feb 2010): 23–35.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00273.xWilliam G. Eberhard Evolution of genitalia: theories, evidence, and new directions, Genetica 138, no.11 (Mar 2009): 5–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-009-9358-yDominique Joly, Michele Schiffer Coevolution of male and female reproductive structures in Drosophila, Genetica 138, no.11 (Aug 2009): 105–118.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-009-9392-9Carlos A. C. Andrade, R. D. Vieira, G. Ananina, Louis B. Klaczko Evolution of the male genitalia: morphological variation of the aedeagi in a natural population of Drosophila mediopunctata, Genetica 135, no.11 (Feb 2008): 13–23.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-008-9247-9I. M. Soto, M. H. Manfrin, E. Hasson Host-dependent phenotypic plasticity of aedeagus morphology in a pair of cactophilic sibling Drosophila species of the repleta group (Diptera, Drosophilidae), Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 46, no.44 (Nov 2008): 368–373.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2008.00467.x Steven A. Ramm Sexual Selection and Genital Evolution in Mammals: A Phylogenetic Analysis of Baculum Length. S. A. Ramm, The American Naturalist 169, no.33 (Jul 2015): 360–369.https://doi.org/10.1086/510688BRYAN C. CARSTENS, L. LACEY KNOWLES Shifting distributions and speciation: species divergence during rapid climate change, Molecular Ecology 16, no.33 (Nov 2006): 619–627.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03167.xCHRISTOPHER A. TAYLOR, JASON H. KNOUFT Historical influences on genital morphology among sympatric species: gonopod evolution and reproductive isolation in the crayfish genus Orconectes (Cambaridae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 89, no.11 (Aug 2006): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00637.xM. Mutanen, A. Kaitala, M. Monkkonen Genital variation within and between three closely related Euxoa moth species: testing the lock-and-key hypothesis, Journal of Zoology 268, no.22 (Feb 2006): 109–119.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2005.00029.xTORU USAMI, JUN YOKOYAMA, KOHEI KUBOTA, MASAKADO KAWATA Genital lock-and-key system and premating isolation by mate preference in carabid beetles (Carabus subgenus Ohomopterus), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 87, no.11 (Jan 2006): 145–154.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00562.xCarlos A.C. Andrade, Luciane M. Hatadani, Louis B. Klaczko Phenotypic plasticity of the aedeagus of Drosophila mediopunctata: Effect of the temperature, Journal of Thermal Biology 30, no.77 (Oct 2005): 518–523.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2005.05.011A. BERTIN, D. J. FAIRBAIRN One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, no.44 (Jul 2005): 949–961.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00913.xR. Brian Langerhans, Craig A. Layman, Thomas J. DeWitt Male genital size reflects a tradeoff between attracting mates and avoiding predators in two live-bearing fish species, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, no.2121 (May 2005): 7618–7623.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500935102S. LÜPOLD, A. G. MCELLIGOTT, D. J. HOSKEN Bat genitalia: allometry, variation and good genes, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 83, no.44 (Nov 2004): 497–507.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00407.xAlfredo V. Peretti Functional morphology of spermatophores and female genitalia in bothriurid scorpions: genital courtship, coercion and other possible mechanisms, Journal of Zoology 261, no.22 (Feb 2006): 135–153.https://doi.org/10.1017/S095283690300400XRussil Durrant, Bruce J. Ellis Evolutionary Psychology, (Apr 2003).https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0301 A. Córdoba‐Aguilar Sensory Trap as the Mechanism of Sexual Selection in a Damselfly Genitalic Trait (Insecta: Calopterygidae). A. Córdoba‐Aguilar, The American Naturalist 160, no.55 (Jul 2015): 594–601.https://doi.org/10.1086/342819J. Stone, M. Björklund Delayed prezygotic isolating mechanisms: evolution with a twist, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269, no.14931493 (Apr 2002): 861–865.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1934Michael D. Jennions, Clint D. Kelly Geographical variation in male genitalia in Brachyrhaphis episcopi (Poeciliidae): is it sexually or naturally selected?, Oikos 97, no.11 (Apr 2002): 79–86.https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970108.xJosé A. Andrés, Göran Arnqvist Genetic divergence of the seminal signal—receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution?, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268, no.14651465 (Feb 2001): 399–405.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1392L. Lacey Knowles Genealogical portraits of speciation in montane grasshoppers (genus Melanoplus ) from the sky islands of the Rocky Mountains, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268, no.14641464 (Feb 2001): 319–324.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1364Göran Arnqvist, Martin Edvardsson, Urban Friberg, Tina Nilsson Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97, no.1919 (Sep 2000): 10460–10464.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.19.10460Clint D Kelly, Jean-Guy J Godin, Ghada Abdallah Geographical variation in the male intromittent organ of the Trinidadian guppy ( Poecilia reticulata ), Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, no.99 (Sep 2000): 1674–1680.https://doi.org/10.1139/z00-080Claudia Palestrini, Antonio Rolando, Paola Laiolo Allometric relationships and character evolution in Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, no.77 (Jul 2000): 1199–1206.https://doi.org/10.1139/z00-056L. Lacey Knowles, D. Otte Phylogenetic Analysis of Montane Grasshoppers from Western North America (Genus Melanoplus, Acrididae: Melanoplinae), Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93, no.33 (May 2000): 421–431.https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0421:PAOMGF]2.0.CO;2L. Lacey Knowles TESTS OF PLEISTOCENE SPECIATION IN MONTANE GRASSHOPPERS (GENUS MELANOPLUS) FROM THE SKY ISLANDS OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA, Evolution 54, no.44 (Jan 2000): 1337.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1337:TOPSIM]2.0.CO;2Alex Córdoba-Aguilar Male copulatory sensory stimulation induces female ejection of rival sperm in a damselfly, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 266, no.14211421 (Apr 1999): 779–784.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0705Göran Arnqvist, Ingela Danielsson COPULATORY BEHAVIOR, GENITAL MORPHOLOGY, AND MALE FERTILIZATION SUCCESS IN WATER STRIDERS, Evolution 53, no.11 (May 2017): 147–156.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05340.xTeiji Sota, Kohei Kubota GENITAL LOCK-AND-KEY AS A SELECTIVE AGENT AGAINST HYBRIDIZATION, Evolution 52, no.55 (May 2017): 1507–1513.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02033.xMARJORY C TOBIAS, GEOFFREY E HILL A test of sensory bias for long tails in the house finch, Animal Behaviour 56, no.11 (Jul 1998): 71–78.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0740Göran Arnqvist Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection, Nature 393, no.66876687 (Jun 1998): 784–786.https://doi.org/10.1038/31689Anders Pope Møller Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, (Jan 1998): 55–90.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50027-1William G. Eberhard Female Roles in Sperm Competition, (Jan 1998): 91–116.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50028-3Nico K. Michiels Mating Conflicts and Sperm Competition in Simultaneous Hermaphrodites, (Jan 1998): 219–254.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50032-5L.W. Simmons, M.T. Siva-Jothy Sperm Competition in Insects: Mechanisms and the Potential for Selection, (Jan 1998): 341–434.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50035-0Göran Arnqvist The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60, no.33 (Jan 2008): 365–379.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01501.xANDREAS TADLER Functional morphology of genitalia of four species of julidan millipedes (Diplopoda: Nemasomatidae; Julidae), Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 118, no.11 (Jun 2008): 83–97.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1996.tb01263.xMalte Andersson, Yoh Iwasa Sexual selection, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, no.22 (Feb 1996): 53–58.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)81042-1Jae C. Choe Courtship feeding and repeated mating in Zorotypus barberi (Insecta: Zoraptera), Animal Behaviour 49, no.66 (Jun 1995): 1511–1520.https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)90072-1Laurent Keller, Hudson K. Reeve Why Do Females Mate with Multiple Males? The Sexually Selected Sperm Hypothesis, (Jan 1995): 291–315.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60397-6William G. Eberhard EVIDENCE FOR WIDESPREAD COURTSHIP DURING COPULATION IN 131 SPECIES OF INSECTS AND SPIDERS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE, Evolution 48, no.33 (May 2017): 711–733.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01356.x
Referência(s)