Eighteenth-Century Attempts to Resolve the Vis viva Controversy
1965; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 56; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/349997
ISSN1545-6994
Autores Tópico(s)History of Science and Natural History
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessEighteenth-Century Attempts to Resolve the Vis viva ControversyThomas L. HankinsThomas L. HankinsPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 56, Number 3Autumn, 1965 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/349997 Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 46Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1965 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Steffen Ducheyne, Jip van Besouw 's Gravesande's Foundations for Mechanics, (Aug 2022): 1837–1844.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31069-5_40Boris Kožnjak Bošković, Rugjer Josip, (Aug 2022): 222–224.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31069-5_463J. Brian Pitts Conservation of Energy: Missing Features in Its Nature and Justification and Why They Matter, Foundations of Science 26, no.33 (Apr 2020): 559–584.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09657-1Katherine Brading, Marius Stan How physics flew the philosophers' nest, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 88 (Aug 2021): 312–320.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.06.010Danilo Capecchi Classical Mechanics, (Aug 2020): 161–298.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52852-2_3Jane Wess Colin Maclaurin (1698–1746) and his contemporaries on wind and water: the local and the universal, British Journal for the History of Mathematics 35, no.11 (Jan 2020): 63–83.https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2019.1701861Steffen Ducheyne, Jip van Besouw 's Gravesande's Foundations for Mechanics, (May 2020): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_40-1Boris Kožnjak Bošković, Rugjer Josip, (Dec 2019): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_463-1Idan Shimony Chapter 3. Locke and Leibniz on matter and solidity, (Aug 2019): 49–67.https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.15.04shiHéctor A Múnera Neo-Cartesian unified fluid and field theory: from Klein-Gordon equation to de Broglie's Lorentz invariant mechanics, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1251 (Jun 2019): 012038.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1251/1/012038Eric Watkins Kant on Laws, 3 (Apr 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683026Laurynas Adomaitis Cause and Effect in Leibniz's Brevis demonstratio, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 9, no.11 (Dec 2018): 120–134.https://doi.org/10.1086/701044H A Múnera General relativity as a unified fluid and field theory, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1051 (Jul 2018): 012024.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1051/1/012024Andrea Reichenberger Émilie Du Châtelet's interpretation of the laws of motion in the light of 18th century mechanics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 69 (Jun 2018): 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.01.006Jürgen Renn, Peter Damerow, Matthias Schemmel, Christoph Lehner, Matteo Valleriani Mental Models as Cognitive Instruments in the Transformation of Knowledge, (Oct 2018): 3–28.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90345-3_1Jip van Besouw The wedge and the vis viva controversy: how concepts of force influenced the practice of early eighteenth-century mechanics, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 35 (Oct 2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-016-0182-3Steffen Ducheyne 's Gravesande's Appropriation of Newton's Natural Philosophy, Part II: Methodological Issues, Centaurus 56, no.22 (Jan 2014): 97–120.https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12050Steffen Ducheyne 's Gravesande's Appropriation of Newton's Natural Philosophy, Part I: Epistemological and Theological Issues, Centaurus 56, no.11 (Jan 2014): 31–55.https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12040Colin Gauld Using History to Teach Mechanics, (Dec 2013): 57–95.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_3Andrea Reichenberger Leibniz's Quantity of Force: A 'Heresy'? Emilie du Châtelet's Institutions in the Context of the Vis Viva Controversy, (Sep 2011): 157–171.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2093-0_6Brian Hepburn Euler, vis viva, and equilibrium, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41, no.22 (Jun 2010): 120–127.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.011George E. Smith The vis viva dispute: A controversy at the dawn of dynamics, Physics Today 59, no.1010 (Oct 2006): 31–36.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2387086J Roche What is momentum?, European Journal of Physics 27, no.55 (Jul 2006): 1019–1036.https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/27/5/002Knud Haakonssen The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, (Mar 2008).https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521867429Sarah Hutton Emilie du Châtelet's Institutions de physique as a document in the history of French Newtonianism, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35, no.33 (Sep 2004): 515–531.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2004.06.005Peter Hanns Reill The Legacy of the "Scientific Revolution": Science and the Enlightenment, (Mar 2003): 21–43.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.003Olivier Darrigol God, waterwheels, and molecules: Saint-Venant's anticipation of energy conservation, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 31, no.22 (Mar 2001): 285–353.https://doi.org/10.1525/hsps.2001.31.2.285Knud Haakonssen The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, (Mar 2008).https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521867436Pierre Kerszberg Natural Philosophy, (Jan 2000): 873–902.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521867436.011Elizabeth Garber Vibrating Strings and Eighteenth-Century Mechanics, (Jan 1999): 31–62.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1766-4_2Simon Schaffer The show that never ends: perpetual motion in the early eighteenth century, The British Journal for the History of Science 28, no.22 (Jan 2009): 157–189.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400032957Alan Q. Morton Concepts of power: natural philosophy and the uses of machines in mid-eighteenth-century London, The British Journal for the History of Science 28, no.11 (Jan 2009): 63–78.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400032696Colin Gauld Newton's Third Law after Newton, Research in Science Education 24, no.11 (Dec 1994): 93–101.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356333 Simon Schaffer Machine Philosophy: Demonstration Devices in Georgian Mechanics, Osiris 9, no.11 (Oct 2015): 157–182.https://doi.org/10.1086/368735George Berkeley Editor's Introduction, (Jan 1992): 3–42.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2592-5_1S. P. Fullinwider Darwin faces Kant: a study in nineteenth-century physiology, The British Journal for the History of Science 24, no.11 (Jan 2009): 21–44.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400028430Robert Palter Saving Newton's text: Documents, readers, and the ways of the world, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18, no.44 (Dec 1987): 385–439.https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(87)90001-XDale M. Johnson The problem of the invariance of dimension in the growth of modern topology, part I, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 20, no.22 (Jan 1979): 97–188.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327627P. M. Heimann >>Geometry and Nature<<: Leibniz and Johann Bernoulli's Theory of Motion, Centaurus 21, no.11 (Mar 1977): 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0498.1977.tb00343.xDavid Papineau The vis viva controversy: Do meanings matter?, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 8, no.22 (Jan 1977): 111–142.https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(77)90011-5Carolyn Iltis Madame du Châtelet's metaphysics and mechanics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 8, no.11 (Jan 1977): 29–48.https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(77)90017-6E.J. Barbeau, P.J. Leah Euler's 1760 paper on divergent series, Historia Mathematica 3, no.22 (May 1976): 141–160.https://doi.org/10.1016/0315-0860(76)90030-6Carolyn Iltis The Leibnizian-Newtonian Debates: Natural Philosophy and Social Psychology, The British Journal for the History of Science 6, no.44 (Jan 2009): 343–377.https://doi.org/10.1017/S000708740001253XEdward G. Ruestow 's Gravesande and Musschenbroek: Newtonianism at Leiden, (Jan 1973): 113–139.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2463-1_7Carolyn Iltis D'Alembert and the vis viva controversy, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 1, no.22 (Aug 1970): 135–144.https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(70)90002-6JÜRGEN RENN, PETER DAMEROW Mentale Modelle als kognitive Instrumente der Transformation von technischem Wissen, ().https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110896657.311
Referência(s)