Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Density-Dependent Selection on Polymorphic Prey -- Some Data

1977; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 111; Issue: 979 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/283189

1537-5323

Laurence M. Cook, Patricia R. Miller,

Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Previous articleNext article No AccessLetters to the EditorsDensity-Dependent Selection on Polymorphic Prey -- Some DataLaurence M. Cook and Patricia MillerLaurence M. Cook Search for more articles by this author and Patricia Miller Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 111, Number 979May - Jun., 1977 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283189 Views: 5Total views on this site Citations: 33Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1977 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Adrian Surmacki, Agata Ożarowska-Nowicka, Zuzanna M. Rosin Color polymorphism in a land snail Cepaea nemoralis (Pulmonata: Helicidae) as viewed by potential avian predators, Naturwissenschaften 100, no.66 (May 2013): 533–540.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1049-yH. Ajuria Ibarra, T. Reader Reasons to be different: do conspicuous polymorphisms in invertebrates persist because rare forms are fitter?, Journal of Zoology 290, no.22 (Mar 2013): 81–95.https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12034Yumiko Ishii, Masakazu Shimada The effect of learning and search images on predator–prey interactions, Population Ecology 52, no.11 (Dec 2009): 27–35.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-009-0185-xMarinela Capanu, Gregory A. Jones, Ronald H. Randles Testing for preference using a sum of Wilcoxon signed rank statistics, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 51, no.22 (Nov 2006): 793–796.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2005.12.017David Punzalan, F. Helen Rodd, Kimberly A. Hughes Perceptual Processes and the Maintenance of Polymorphism Through Frequency-dependent Predation, Evolutionary Ecology 19, no.33 (May 2005): 303–320.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-005-2777-zJUAN L. CELIS-DIEZ, RAMIRO O. BUSTAMANTE Frequency-dependent seed size selection on Cryptocarya alba (Mol.) Looser (Lauraceae): testing the effect of background, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84, no.11 (Dec 2004): 137–142.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00420.xL. M. Cook A two–stage model for Cepaea polymorphism, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 353, no.13751375 (Oct 1998): 1577–1593.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0311John A. Allen, Helen E. Raison, Michael E. Weale The influence of density on frequency–dependent selection by wild birds feeding on artificial prey, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 265, no.14001400 (Jun 1998): 1031–1035.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0395Miguel Â. Marini, Michael E. Weale Density- and frequency-dependent predation of artificial bird nests, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 62, no.22 (Jan 2008): 195–208.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01622.xAnn Smithson, Mark R. Macnair Density-dependent and frequency-dependent selection by bumblebees Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60, no.33 (Jan 2008): 401–417.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01503.xG. M. TUCKER, J. A. ALLEN Selection by humans searching for computer-generated prey images: the effect of prey density, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 44, no.22 (Jan 2008): 169–174.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00614.xL M Cook, G Kenyon Frequency-dependent selection with background heterogeneity, Heredity 66, no.11 (Feb 1991): 67–73.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1991.9J. A. Allen, J. M. Cooper Experimenting with apostatic selection, Journal of Biological Education 22, no.44 (Dec 1988): 255–262.https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1988.9654997 Frequency-dependent selection by predators, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences 319, no.11961196 (Jan 1997): 485–503.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1988.0061 Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences 319, no.11961196 (Jan 1997): 505–523.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1988.0062G M Tucker, J A Allen Apostatic selection by humans searching for computer-generated images on a colour monitor, Heredity 60, no.33 (Jun 1988): 329–334.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1988.50 Robert P. Gendron Models and Mechanisms of Frequency-Dependent Predation, The American Naturalist 130, no.44 (Oct 2015): 603–623.https://doi.org/10.1086/284733David G. Reid Natural selection for apostasy and crypsis acting on the shell colour polymorphism of a mangrove snail, Littoraria filosa (Sowerby) (Gastropoda: Littorinidae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 30, no.11 (Jan 2008): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb00284.xL. M. Cook Polymorphic snails on varied backgrounds, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 29, no.22 (Jun 2008): 89–99.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1986.tb01824.xDAVID L. PEARSON The function of multiple anti-predator mechanisms in adult tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae), Ecological Entomology 10, no.11 (Feb 1985): 65–72.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1985.tb00535.xJohn A Allen Wild birds prefer to eat the more familiar of artificial morphs that are similar in colour, Heredity 53, no.33 (Dec 1984): 705–715.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1984.128JEREMY J. D. GREENWOOD, JOHN P. JOHNSTON, GILES E. THOMAS Mice prefer rare food, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23, no.2-32-3 (Jan 2008): 201–210.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00138.xJ. M. COOPER Apostatic selection on prey that match the background, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23, no.2-32-3 (Jan 2008): 221–228.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00140.xJOHN A. ALLEN, KEITH P. ANDERSON Selection by passerine birds is anti-apostatic at high prey density, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23, no.2-32-3 (Jan 2008): 237–246.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00142.xMark D. Rausher, Daniel R. Papaj Host plant selection by Battus philenor butterflies: Evidence for individual differences in foraging behaviour, Animal Behaviour 31, no.22 (May 1983): 341–347.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80052-9Mayke Visser Prey selection by the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.), Oecologia 55, no.33 (Dec 1982): 395–402.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376928 John W. Glasser A Theory of Trophic Strategies: The Evolution of Facultative Specialists, The American Naturalist 119, no.22 (Oct 2015): 250–262.https://doi.org/10.1086/283906MAYKE VISSER Prediction of Switching and Counter-Switching Based on Optimal Foraging, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 55, no.22 (Apr 2010): 129–138.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1981.tb01264.xA. Jane Willis, John W.T. McEwan, Jeremy J.D. Greenwood, Robert A. Elton Food selection by chicks: Effects of colour, density and frequency of food types, Animal Behaviour 28, no.33 (Aug 1980): 874–879.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80147-3J.A. Bishop, L.M. Cook Industrial Melanism and the Urban Environment, (Jan 1980): 373–404.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60270-6 Timothy G. Fullick , and Jeremy J. D. Greenwood Frequency Dependent Food Selection in Relation to Two Models, The American Naturalist 113, no.55 (Oct 2015): 762–765.https://doi.org/10.1086/283433B. Clarke Some Contributions of Snails to the Development of Ecological Genetics, (Jan 1978): 159–170.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-6330-2_9Ian C. Colquhoun Anti-Predator Strategies of Cathemeral Primates: Dealing with Predators of the Day and the Night, (): 146–172.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34810-0_7