The Rationality of U. S. Regulation of the Broadcast Spectrum
1990; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 33; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/467202
ISSN1537-5285
Autores Tópico(s)Legal and Policy Issues
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Rationality of U. S. Regulation of the Broadcast SpectrumThomas W. HazlettThomas W. Hazlett Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 33, Number 1Apr., 1990 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467202 Views: 28Total views on this site Citations: 94Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1990 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Thomas W. Hazlett Free speech and the challenge of efficiency, Telecommunications Policy 46, no.99 (Oct 2022): 102409.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102409Naim Kapucu, Brittany Haupt, Thomas Quint, Mostafizur Rahman, Murat Yuksel Polycentric Governance and Decentralized Decision-Making for Pervasive Spectrum Sharing, International Journal of Public Administration 52 (Dec 2021): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2010752Robert Corn-Revere The Mind of the Censor and the Eye of the Beholder, 31 (Oct 2021).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417065ІННА СПАСИБО-ФАТЄЄВА Погляди на підстави переосмислення доктрини права власності, Право України , no.2021/052021/05 (Jan 2021): 13.https://doi.org/10.33498/louu-2021-05-013Amy Sindik, Heather Polinsky Federal Communications Commission reverse incentive spectrum auction: outcomes and impact on the broadcast industry, Journal of Media Business Studies 17, no.3-43-4 (Mar 2020): 276–293.https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2020.1739365Babette E. Boliek Populist Antitrust and the 1927 Radio Act, Review of Industrial Organization 56, no.11 (Feb 2019): 5–16.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-019-09692-8Thomas W. Hazlett The 1927 Radio Act as Pre-emption of Common Law Property Rights, Review of Industrial Organization 56, no.11 (Jun 2019): 17–35.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-019-09707-4Philip M. Napoli User Data as Public Resource: Implications for Social Media Regulation, Policy & Internet 11, no.44 (Jul 2019): 439–459.https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.216Richard N. Langlois Hunting the Big Five: Twenty-First Century Antitrust in Historical Perspective, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3124356Martin B H Weiss, Prashant Krishnamurthy, Marcela M. Gomez How can polycentric governance of spectrum work?, (Mar 2017): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1109/DySPAN.2017.7920756 Editor's Introduction: Nature, Economy, and Equity: Sacred Water, Profane Markets, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 75, no.55 (Oct 2016): 1049–1063.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12168Ben Wagner The Public Sector and Content Regulation: Focussing on Pornography and Child Sexual Abuse Material, (Sep 2016): 63–95.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33513-1_4Martin B. H. Weiss, Prashabnt Krishnamurthy, Marcela M. Gomez How Can Polycentric Governance of Spectrum Work?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2756667Fernando Beltrrn A Review of the Evolution of Auctions As a Method for Radio Spectrum Assignment, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2828543Richard A. Epstein Possession and licenses: the FCC, weak spectrum rights, and the LightSquared debacle, (May 2015): 237–265.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316017814.010Sandip Sukhtankar The Impact of Corruption on Consumer Markets: Evidence from the Allocation of Second-Generation Wireless Spectrum in India, The Journal of Law and Economics 58, no.11 (Sep 2015): 75–109.https://doi.org/10.1086/682909Thomas W. Hazlett The Rationality of U.S. Regulation of the Broadcast Spectrum in the 1934 Communications Act, Review of Industrial Organization 45, no.33 (Aug 2014): 203–220.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-014-9429-9 정필운 A Critical Analysis of Justifications for Telecommunications Regulation, Public Law Journal 15, no.33 (Aug 2014): 79–110.https://doi.org/10.31779/plj.15.3.201408.003Liu Cui, Marcela M. Gomez, Martin B. H. Weiss Dimensions of cooperative spectrum sharing: Rights and enforcement, (Apr 2014): 416–426.https://doi.org/10.1109/DySPAN.2014.6817825Kristen Woyach, Anant Sahai The need for a new model of trust in spectrum and the case for spectrum jails, (Apr 2014): 427–438.https://doi.org/10.1109/DySPAN.2014.6817826Kevin Werbach The Death and Life of a Great American Agency, Critical Studies in Media Communication 31, no.22 (Jun 2014): 160–165.https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2014.913804BENOÎT PIERRE FREYENS, CHRIS JONES Efficient Allocation of Radio Spectrum, Journal of Public Economic Theory 16, no.11 (Jun 2013): 1–23.https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12045Laurence Brooks, Ahmed Bello Mohammed eVoting in Nigeria, (Jan 2014): 127–136.https://doi.org/10.1145/2729104.2729106Ben Wagner Governing Internet Expression: How Public and Private Regulation Shape Expression Governance, Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10, no.44 (Oct 2013): 389–403.https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2013.799051 The Last Progressive, (Jun 2013): 210–228.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507691.021 정필운 A Critical Analysis of Making a Broadcasting and Telecommunication Business Integration Act, 과학기술법연구 19, no.22 (Jun 2013): 57–88.https://doi.org/10.32430/ilst.2013.19.2.57 Selected Bibliography, (Jan 2013): 588–634.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445693.biblioAllan J. Lichtman The Election of 1920, (Jan 2013): 551–565.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445693.ch28Martin B.H. Weiss, Liu Cui The hinges of destiny: A decision analysis of spectrum users' choices, (Oct 2012): 171–179.https://doi.org/10.1109/DYSPAN.2012.6478128J. Pierre de Vries, Kaleb A. Sieh Reception-oriented radio rights: Increasing the value of wireless by explicitly defining and delegating radio operating rights, Telecommunications Policy 36, no.77 (Aug 2012): 522–530.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.12.009J. M. Dempsey, Eric Gruver “The Public Interest Must Dominate”: Herbert Hoover and the Public Interest, Convenience, and Necessity, Journal of Radio & Audio Media 19, no.11 (Apr 2012): 96–109.https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2012.667020Shafi Al-Shafi Free Wireless Internet Park Services, (Jan 2012): 429–447.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0981-5.ch019Pietro Crocioni, Luigi Alberto Franzoni Transmitters and receivers' investment to avoid interference: Is there an optimal regime?, Telecommunications Policy 35, no.66 (Jul 2011): 568–578.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.04.003Luigi A. Franzoni, Pietro Crocioni Transmitters and Receivers’ Investment to Avoid Interference: Is There an Optimal Regime?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1825806J. Pierre de Vries, Kaleb August Sieh Reception-Oriented Radio Rights: Increasing the Value of Wireless by Explicitly Defining and Delegating Radio Operating Rights, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1907813Thomas W. Hazlett Tragedy T.V.: Rights Fragmentation and the Junk Band Problem, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1533499Philip M. Napoli Media Policy, (Nov 2009).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecm047Bruce M. Owen Old Media Policy Failures, New Media Policy Challenges, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1444077J. Pierre De Vries De-Situating Spectrum: Rethinking Radio Policy Using Non-Spatial Metaphors, (Oct 2008): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1109/DYSPAN.2008.63Thomas W. Hazlett Property Rights and Wireless License Values Hazlett, The Journal of Law and Economics 51, no.33 (Jul 2015): 563–598.https://doi.org/10.1086/589674Thomas W Hazlett Optimal Abolition of FCC Spectrum Allocation, Journal of Economic Perspectives 22, no.11 (Feb 2008): 103–128.https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.1.103J. Pierre de Vries De-Situating Spectrum: Rethinking Radio Policy Using Non-Spatial Metaphors, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1241342Dean Lueck, Thomas J. Miceli Chapter 3 Property Law, (Jan 2007): 183–257.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01003-1Rajen Akalu EU spectrum reform and the Wireless Access Policy for Electronic Communications Services (WAPECS) concept, info 8, no.66 (Nov 2006): 31–50.https://doi.org/10.1108/14636690610707473Charles Tillinghast Origins of American Broadcast Regulation: A Revisionist Theory, Journal of Radio Studies 13, no.11 (May 2006): 129–145.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_9Michael J. Zarkin Microeconomic Ideas, Policy Epistemologies, and the Politics of Spectrum Licensing, 1922–1997, Polity 38, no.22 (Nov 2016): 174–193.https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300034Sandra Braman The micro- and macroeconomics of information, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 40, no.11 (Sep 2007): 3–52.https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440400108Robert B. Horwitz On Media Concentration and the Diversity Question, The Information Society 21, no.33 (Jul 2005): 181–204.https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490951908Thomas W. Hazlett, Bruno E. Viani Legislators v. Regulators: The Case of Low Power FM Radio, Business and Politics 7, no.11 (Jan 2017): 1–31.https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1104Thomas W. Hazlett Property Rights and Wireless License Values, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2004).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.519602Richard A. Epstein The Optimal Complexity of Legal Rules, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2004).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.546103David A. Moss, Michael R. Fein Radio Regulation Revisited: Coase, the FCC, and the Public Interest, Journal of Policy History 15, no.44 (Apr 2009): 389–416.https://doi.org/10.1353/jph.2003.0025Thomas W. Hazlett Liberalizing US spectrum allocation, Telecommunications Policy 27, no.77 (Aug 2003): 485–499.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(03)00049-1Jongwook Kim, Joseph T. Mahoney Resource-based and property rights perspectives on value creation: the case of oil field unitization, Managerial and Decision Economics 23, no.4-54-5 (Jan 2002): 225–245.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1063Milton L. Mueller Names, Numbers, and Global Governance, (Jan 2002): 73–94.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3575-8_6Harvey Jassem A Plan for Reregulating “Broadcasting” & Spectrum-Based Public Communication, Free Speech Yearbook 40, no.11 (Dec 2012): 35–55.https://doi.org/10.1080/08997225.2002.10556282Productivity Commission Radiocommunications, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.402580Elizabeth Kruse From Free Privilege to Regulation: Wireless Firms and the Competition for Spectrum Rights before World War I, Business History Review 76, no.44 (Dec 2011): 659–703.https://doi.org/10.2307/4127706Matthew L. Spitzer Freedom of Expression, (Jan 2017): 825–830.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_155Barry Keating Economic dimensions of telecommunications access, International Journal of Social Economics 28, no.10/11/1210/11/12 (Dec 2001): 879–898.https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006130Lawrence J. White “Propertyzing” The Electromagnetic Spectrum: Why It’s Important, And How To Begin, (Jan 2001): 111–143.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1521-0_6Günther Ortmann, Marco Zimmer Strategisches Management, Recht und Politik, (Jan 2001): 301–349.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90403-4_11Philip M. Napoli Social responsibility and commercial broadcast television: An assessment of public affairs programming, International Journal on Media Management 3, no.44 (Jan 2001): 226–233.https://doi.org/10.1080/14241270109389971Philip M. Napoli Chapter 2: The Federal Communications Commission and the Communications Policymaking Process: Theoretical Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Research, Communication Yearbook 25, no.11 (Jan 2001): 44–77.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15567419cy2501_2Thomas W. Hazlett, Matthew L. Spitzer Digital Television and the Quid Pro Quo, Business and Politics 2, no.22 (Jan 2017): 115–159.https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1006Philip M. Napoli The unique nature of communications regulation: Evidence and implications for communications policy analysis, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43, no.44 (Sep 1999): 565–581.https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364510W. Russell Neuman Broadcasting and Bandwidth, (Jan 1999): 215–236.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4971-0_13 By Thomas W. Hazlett Assigning Property Rights to Radio Spectrum Users: Why Did FCC License Auctions Take 67 Years? Hazlett, The Journal of Law and Economics 41, no.S2S2 (Jul 2015): 529–576.https://doi.org/10.1086/467402 By Howard A. Shelanski and Peter W. Huber Administrative Creation of Property Rights to Radio Spectrum Shelanski & Huber, The Journal of Law and Economics 41, no.S2S2 (Jul 2015): 581–609.https://doi.org/10.1086/467404 By Arthur De Vany Implementing a Market‐Based Spectrum Policy De Vany, The Journal of Law and Economics 41, no.S2S2 (Jul 2015): 627–646.https://doi.org/10.1086/467406 By Dean Lueck Auctions, Markets, and Spectrum Ownership: Comment on Moreton and Spiller Lueck, The Journal of Law and Economics 41, no.S2S2 (Jul 2015): 717–726.https://doi.org/10.1086/467409 By Eli Noam Spectrum Auctions: Yesterday's Heresy, Today's Orthodoxy, Tomorrow's Anachronism. Taking the Next Step to Open Spectrum Access Noam, The Journal of Law and Economics 41, no.S2S2 (Jul 2015): 765–790.https://doi.org/10.1086/467412 By Timothy J. Brennan The Spectrum as Commons: Tomorrow's Vision, Not Today's Prescription Brennan, The Journal of Law and Economics 41, no.S2S2 (Jul 2015): 791–804.https://doi.org/10.1086/467413 By Thomas W. Hazlett Spectrum Flash Dance: Eli Noam's Proposal for “Open Access” to Radio Waves Hazlett, The Journal of Law and Economics 41, no.S2S2 (Jul 2015): 805–820.https://doi.org/10.1086/467414Don Lloyd Cook Earthquakes and Aftershocks: Implications for Marketers and Advertisers in Reno v. ACLU and the Litigation of the Communications Decency Act, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 17, no.11 (Dec 2018): 116–123.https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569801700112Thomas W. Hazlett The Dual Role of Property Rights in Protecting Broadcast Speech, Social Philosophy and Policy 15, no.22 (Jan 2009): 176–208.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500001989Ramiro Tovar Landa Policy reform in networks infrastructure. The case of Mexico, Telecommunications Policy 21, no.88 (Oct 1997): 721–732.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(97)00042-6Eli Noam Beyond spectrum auctions. Taking the next step to open spectrum access, Telecommunications Policy 21, no.55 (Jun 1997): 461–475.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(97)00028-1R. L. Beck, J. M. Connolly Some empirical evidence on rent-seeking, Public Choice 87, no.1-21-2 (Apr 1996): 19–33.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00151727Andrew N. Kleit, Bruce H. Kobayashi Market failure or market efficiency?, Research in Transportation Economics 4 (Jan 1996): 1–32.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(96)80003-5Linda Steiner, Milton Mueller Critical challenges to mass communication scholarship, Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12, no.44 (Dec 1995): 455–472.https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039509366951E.M. Noam Taking the next step beyond spectrum auctions: open spectrum access, IEEE Communications Magazine 33, no.1212 (Dec 1995): 66–73.https://doi.org/10.1109/35.476925 Dean Lueck The Rule of First Possession and the Design of the Law, The Journal of Law and Economics 38, no.22 (Oct 2015): 393–436.https://doi.org/10.1086/467337Harmeet Sawhney Universal service: Prosaic motives and great ideals, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 38, no.44 (Sep 1994): 375–395.https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159409364274Duncan H. Brown The academy's response to the call for a marketplace approach to broadcast regulation, Critical Studies in Mass Communication 11, no.33 (Sep 1994): 257–273.https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039409366901Timothy J. Brennan Integrating communication theory into media policy, Telecommunications Policy 16, no.66 (Aug 1992): 460–474.https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-5961(92)90070-6Toby Miller An editorial introduction for radio, Continuum 6, no.11 (May 2009): 5–13.https://doi.org/10.1080/10304319209359375Eric Rasmusen, Mark Zupan Extending the economic theory of regulation to the form of policy, Public Choice 72, no.2-32-3 (Dec 1991): 167–191.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123743 J. Harold Mulherin , Jeffry M. Netter , and James A. Overdahl Prices Are Property: The Organization of Financial Exchanges from a Transaction Cost Perspective, The Journal of Law and Economics 34, no.2, Part 22, Part 2 (Oct 2015): 591–644.https://doi.org/10.1086/467237Thomas W. Hazlett THE DEMAND TO REGULATE FRANCHISE MONOPOLY: EVIDENCE FROM CATV RATE DEREGULATION IN CALIFORNIA, Economic Inquiry 29, no.22 (Apr 1991): 275–296.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1991.tb01271.xThomas W. Hazlett Rent-seeking in the telco/ cable cross-ownership controversy, Telecommunications Policy 14, no.55 (Oct 1990): 425–433.https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-5961(90)90083-4Milton Mueller Internet domain names: Property rights and institutional innovation, (): 93–131.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-4736(00)12004-1Jessica Leight, Edward Balleisen, David Moss Public Choice: A Critical Reassessment, (): 213–255.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657504.008Daniel Carpenter, David A. Moss Introduction, (): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565875.002
Referência(s)