"Practice vs. Theory": The British Electrical Debate, 1888-1891
1983; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 74; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/353303
ISSN1545-6994
Autores Tópico(s)Australian Indigenous Culture and History
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No Access"Practice vs. Theory": The British Electrical Debate, 1888-1891Bruce J. HuntBruce J. Hunt Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 74, Number 3Sep., 1983 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/353303 Views: 19Total views on this site Citations: 16Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1983 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Aristotle Tympas “Like the Poor, the Harmonics Will Always Be with Us”, (Jan 2018): 75–122.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-742-4_4Heather Ellis Marconi, masculinity and the heroic age of science: wireless telegraphy at the British Association meeting at Dover in 1899, History and Technology 32, no.22 (Aug 2016): 120–136.https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2016.1218955Jonathan Harwood Engineering Education between Science and Practice: Rethinking the Historiography, History and Technology 22, no.11 (Mar 2006): 53–79.https://doi.org/10.1080/07341510500497210Walter G. Vincenti, David Bloor Boundaries, Contingencies and Rigor, Social Studies of Science 33, no.44 (Jun 2016): 469–507.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312703334001Juan Miguel Campanario The parallelism between scientists' and students' resistance to new scientific ideas, International Journal of Science Education 24, no.1010 (Nov 2010): 1095–1110.https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126702Alfred Nordmann Heinrich Hertz — A Bibliography, (Jan 1998): 281–305.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8855-3_16Bruce J. Hunt Scientists, engineers and Wildman Whitehouse: measurement and credibility in early cable telegraphy, The British Journal for the History of Science 29, no.22 (Jan 2009): 155–169.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400034208Kathryn M. Olesko Precision, Tolerance, and Consensus: Local Cultures in German and British Resistance Standards, (Jan 1996): 117–156.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1784-2_4Helge Kragh Telephone Technology and its Interaction with Science and the Military, CA. 1900–1930, (Jan 1996): 37–67.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0671-9_2Ido Yavetz Oliver Heaviside and the significance of the British electrical debate, Annals of Science 50, no.22 (Aug 2006): 135–173.https://doi.org/10.1080/00033799300200171Jörg Meya Elektrodynamik im 19. Jahrhundert — Zeitgeist und Theorieentwicklung, (Jan 1990): 60–248.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14626-1_3Anthony S. Travis Science as Receptor of Technology: Paul Ehrlich and the Synthetic Dyestuffs Industry, Science in Context 3, no.22 (Sep 2008): 383–408.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700000879Bruce J. Hunt The Origins of the FitzGerald Contraction, The British Journal for the History of Science 21, no.11 (Jan 2009): 67–76.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400024389M. Norton Wise Mediating Machines, Science in Context 2, no.11 (Sep 2008): 77–113.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700000508Paul J. Nahin Oliver Heaviside, Fractional Operators, and the Age of the Earth, IEEE Transactions on Education 28, no.22 (May 1985): 94–104.https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.1985.4321749D.W. Jordan The cry for useless knowledge: education for a new Victorian technology, IEE Proceedings A Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education, Reviews 132, no.88 (Jan 1985): 587.https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-a-1.1985.0100
Referência(s)