
Evaluation of Biologic Effective Dose and Schedule of Fractionation for Preoperative Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: Meta-Analyses and Meta-Regression
2010; Elsevier BV; Volume: 80; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.008
ISSN1879-355X
AutoresGustavo Arruda Viani, Eduardo Jose Stefano, Francisco V Soares, Sérgio Luís Afonso,
Tópico(s)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
ResumoPurpose To evaluate whether the risk of local recurrence depends on the biologic effective dose (BED) or fractionation dose in patients with resectable rectal cancer undergoing preoperative radiotherapy (RT) compared with surgery alone. Methods and Materials A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. The MEDLINE, Embase, CancerLit, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for evidence. To evaluate the dose–response relationship, we conducted a meta-regression analysis. Four subgroups were created: Group 1, RCTs with a BED >30 Gy10 and a short RT schedule; Group 2, RCTs with BED >30 Gy10 and a long RT schedule; Group 3, RCTs with BED ≤30 Gy10 and a short RT schedule; and Group 4, RCTs with BED ≤30 Gy10 and a long RT schedule. Results Our review identified 21 RCTs, yielding 9,097 patients. The pooled results from these 21 randomized trials of preoperative RT showed a significant reduction in mortality for groups 1 (p = .004) and 2 (p = .03). For local recurrence, the results were also significant in groups 1 (p = .00001) and 2 (p = .00001).The only subgroup that showed a greater sphincter preservation (SP) rate than surgery was group 2 (p = .03). The dose–response curve was linear (p = .006), and RT decreased the risk of local recurrence by about 1.7% for each Gy10 of BED. Conclusion Our data have shown that RT with a BED of >30 Gy10 is more efficient in reducing local recurrence and mortality rates than a BED of ≤30 Gy10, independent of the schedule of fractionation used. A long RT schedule with a BED of >30 Gy10 should be recommended for sphincter preservation. To evaluate whether the risk of local recurrence depends on the biologic effective dose (BED) or fractionation dose in patients with resectable rectal cancer undergoing preoperative radiotherapy (RT) compared with surgery alone. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. The MEDLINE, Embase, CancerLit, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for evidence. To evaluate the dose–response relationship, we conducted a meta-regression analysis. Four subgroups were created: Group 1, RCTs with a BED >30 Gy10 and a short RT schedule; Group 2, RCTs with BED >30 Gy10 and a long RT schedule; Group 3, RCTs with BED ≤30 Gy10 and a short RT schedule; and Group 4, RCTs with BED ≤30 Gy10 and a long RT schedule. Our review identified 21 RCTs, yielding 9,097 patients. The pooled results from these 21 randomized trials of preoperative RT showed a significant reduction in mortality for groups 1 (p = .004) and 2 (p = .03). For local recurrence, the results were also significant in groups 1 (p = .00001) and 2 (p = .00001).The only subgroup that showed a greater sphincter preservation (SP) rate than surgery was group 2 (p = .03). The dose–response curve was linear (p = .006), and RT decreased the risk of local recurrence by about 1.7% for each Gy10 of BED. Our data have shown that RT with a BED of >30 Gy10 is more efficient in reducing local recurrence and mortality rates than a BED of ≤30 Gy10, independent of the schedule of fractionation used. A long RT schedule with a BED of >30 Gy10 should be recommended for sphincter preservation.
Referência(s)