Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Biology
1928; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 3; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/394294
ISSN1539-7718
Autores Tópico(s)History of Science and Medicine
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessRecent Developments in the Philosophy of BiologyJoseph NeedhJoseph Needh Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Quarterly Review of Biology Volume 3, Number 1Mar., 1928 Published in association with Stony Brook University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/394294 Views: 2Total views on this site Citations: 11Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article: Bibliography of Joseph Needham, (Feb 2021): 87–112.https://doi.org/10.3917/kime.gazag.2021.01.0085J. Keith Simpson, Kenneth J. Young Vitalism in contemporary chiropractic: a help or a hinderance?, Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 28, no.11 (Jun 2020).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-00307-8Erik L. Peterson, Crystal Hall “What is Dead May Not Die”: Locating Marginalized Concepts Among Ordinary Biologists, Journal of the History of Biology 36 (Sep 2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-020-09618-1Max Dresow Re-forming Morphology: Two Attempts to Rehabilitate the Problem of Form in the First Half of the Twentieth Century, Journal of the History of Biology 53, no.22 (May 2020): 231–248.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-020-09603-8Jan Baedke O Organism, Where Art Thou? Old and New Challenges for Organism-Centered Biology, Journal of the History of Biology 52, no.22 (Nov 2018): 293–324.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9549-4Nils Roll-Hansen Organicism and Lysenkoism, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 65 (Oct 2017): 30–34.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.06.009Daniel J. Nicholson, Richard Gawne Neither logical empiricism nor vitalism, but organicism: what the philosophy of biology was, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37, no.44 (Oct 2015): 345–381.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-015-0085-7Daniel J. Nicholson, Richard Gawne Rethinking Woodger’s Legacy in the Philosophy of Biology, Journal of the History of Biology 47, no.22 (Jul 2013): 243–292.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-013-9364-xDaniel J. Nicholson The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology, Philosophy Compass 9, no.55 (Apr 2014): 347–359.https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12128Manfred Drack, Wilfried Apfalter, and David Pouvreau On the Making of a System Theory of Life: Paul A Weiss and Ludwig von Bertalanffy's Conceptual Connection Drack, Apfalter, and Pouvreau, The Quarterly Review of Biology 82, no.44 (Jul 2015): 349–373.https://doi.org/10.1086/522810P. G. Abir-Am The Philosophical Background of Joseph Needham’s Work in Chemical Embryology, (Jan 1991): 159–180.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6823-0_8
Referência(s)