The Tiebout Model: Bring Back the Entrepreneurs
1985; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 93; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/261298
ISSN1537-534X
Autores Tópico(s)Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Tiebout Model: Bring Back the EntrepreneursJ. Vernon HendersonJ. Vernon HendersonPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 93, Number 2Apr., 1985 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/261298 Views: 36Total views on this site Citations: 115Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1985 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Richard W. Tresch Optimal Federalism, (Jan 2023): 481–499.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822864-7.00027-0Matthew Wilson Government market power and public goods provision in a federation, International Tax and Public Finance 28, no.11 (Jun 2020): 68–89.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-020-09614-5Levon Barseghyan, Stephen Coate Community development by public wealth accumulation, Journal of Urban Economics 121 (Jan 2021): 103297.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2020.103297Marc H. Vatter Stratified zoning in central cities, Journal of Housing Economics 50 (Dec 2020): 101716.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2020.101716Frankie J. Weinberg How and When Is Role Modeling Effective? The Influence of Mentee Professional Identity on Mentoring Dynamics and Personal Learning Outcomes, Group & Organization Management 44, no.22 (Apr 2019): 425–477.https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601119838689Kangoh Lee Absentee ownership, land taxation and surcharge, The Annals of Regional Science 62, no.11 (Oct 2018): 47–68.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-018-0880-7Ivan Jankovic 1776 Strikes Back—Anti-federalist Critics of the Constitution, (Dec 2018): 167–193.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03733-8_7Tidiane Ly Sub-metropolitan tax competition with household and capital mobility, International Tax and Public Finance 25, no.55 (Apr 2018): 1129–1169.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9490-7Christophe Feder Decentralization and spillovers: A new role for transportation infrastructure, Economics of Transportation 13 (Mar 2018): 36–47.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2017.09.002Dennis Epple Tiebout Hypothesis, (Feb 2018): 13641–13645.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1372Sunhyung Lee Differential Effects of Fiscal Decentralization: Local Revenue Share vs. Local Fiscal Autonomy, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205509Perry Burnett OVERPOPULATION, OPTIMAL CITY SIZE AND THE EFFICIENCY OF URBAN SPRAWL, Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies 28, no.33 (Apr 2016): 143–161.https://doi.org/10.1111/rurd.12051Andrew C. Barr and Thomas S. Dee PROPERTY TAXES AND POLITICIANS: EVIDENCE FROM SCHOOL BUDGET ELECTIONS, National Tax Journal 69, no.33 (Mar 2021): 517–544.https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2016.3.02Tidiane Ly Sub-Metropolitan Tax Competition with Household and Capital Mobility, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2815823Agustin Leon-Moreta Municipal Incorporation: Socioeconomic and Policy Factors of Influence, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2948750Agustin Leon-Moreta Municipal incorporation in the United States, Urban Studies 52, no.1616 (Oct 2014): 3160–3180.https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014556588Agustin Leon-Moreta Municipal Incorporation, State and Local Government Review 47, no.44 (Jan 2016): 255–270.https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X15624129Agustín León-Moreta Local Government: Municipal Incorporations, (Jul 2016): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1081/E-EPAP3-120053287David R. Agrawal, William F. Fox, Joel Slemrod Competition and Subnational Governments: Tax Competition, Competition in Urban Areas, and Education Competition, National Tax Journal 68, no.3S3S (Jul 2015): 701–734.https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.3S.01David Stadelmann, Steve Billon Capitalization of fiscal variables persists over time, Papers in Regional Science 94, no.22 (Jan 2014): 347–363.https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12075Richard W. Tresch Optimal Federalism, (Jan 2015): 447–465.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415834-4.00027-3Marius Brülhart, Sam Bucovetsky, Kurt Schmidheiny Taxes in Cities, (Jan 2015): 1123–1196.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59531-7.00017-XSiqi Zheng, Weizeng Sun, Rui Wang LAND SUPPLY AND CAPITALIZATION OF PUBLIC GOODS IN HOUSING PRICES: EVIDENCE FROM BEIJING, Journal of Regional Science 54, no.44 (Dec 2013): 550–568.https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12095Cameron Gordon Scale, Scope, Efficiency and Equity in Public Service Provision: How Might We Analyse the 1898 Consolidation of New York City?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2388550David R. Agrawal, William F. Fox, Joel B. Slemrod Competition and Subnational Governments: Tax Competition, Competition in Urban Areas, and Education Competition, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2515584Agustin Leon-Moreta Municipal Incorporations, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3124528Erik Johnson, Randall Walsh The effect of property taxes on vacation home growth rates: Evidence from Michigan, Regional Science and Urban Economics 43, no.55 (Sep 2013): 740–750.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.06.001Cameron Gordon An Economic Theory Perspective on Optimal Design of Government of Regional Infrastructure in Australia: The Case of National Transport, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2389209Jyh-Fa Tsai, Fu-Chuan Lai Urban Configurations with Suburban Employment by a Monopoly Vendor, International Regional Science Review 35, no.44 (Oct 2012): 424–441.https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017611415267David Stadelmann, Steve Billon Capitalisation of Fiscal Variables and Land Scarcity, Urban Studies 49, no.77 (Aug 2011): 1571–1594.https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011415433Roger D. Congleton Why local governments do not maximize profits: on the value added by the representative institutions of town and city governance, Public Choice 149, no.1-21-2 (Jul 2011): 187–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9835-6Roger D. Congleton Why Local Governments Do Not Maximize Profits: On the Value Added by the Representative Institutions of Town and City Governance, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1764266Steven Deller, Craig Maher Government, Effectiveness, Performance, and Local Property Values, International Journal of Public Administration 32, no.1313 (Nov 2009): 1182–1212.https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690903267091Ryo Itoh Dynamic control of rural–urban migration, Journal of Urban Economics 66, no.33 (Nov 2009): 196–202.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.07.001Tracy M. Gordon Bargaining in the shadow of the ballot box: causes and consequences of local voter initiatives, Public Choice 141, no.1-21-2 (Apr 2009): 31–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9434-ySteven Heubeck Competitive sprawl, Economic Theory 39, no.33 (Feb 2008): 443–460.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0341-0Per Pettersson-Lidbom Do Parties Matter for Economic Outcomes? A Regression-Discontinuity Approach, Journal of the European Economic Association 6, no.55 (Sep 2008): 1037–1056.https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.5.1037Stacy Sirmans, Dean Gatzlaff, David Macpherson The History of Property Tax Capitalizationin Real Estate, Journal of Real Estate Literature 16, no.33 (Jun 2020): 327–344.https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2008.12090233Marc H. Vatter The Cause and Effect of Exclusionary Zoning in Central Cities, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.636962Dennis Epple Tiebout Hypothesis, (Mar 2017): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1372-2Paul Thorsnes, John W. Reifel TIEBOUT DYNAMICS: NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE TO A CENTRAL-CITY/SUBURBAN HOUSE-PRICE DIFFERENTIAL, Journal of Regional Science 47, no.44 (Oct 2007): 693–719.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00526.xSTEVEN HEUBECK Preemptive Competition in City Development, Journal of Public Economic Theory 9, no.44 (Jul 2007): 641–651.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2007.00323.xPartha Gangopadhyay, Shyam Nath Globalization, Sub-national Governments and Urban Crises in the Developing World, (Jan 2006): 68–86.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502567_5Per Pettersson-Lidbom Do Parties Matter for Economic Outcomes? A Regression-Discontinuity Approach, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.988343William A. Fischel Politics In A Dynamic View Of Land-Use Regulations: Of Interest Groups And Homevoters, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 31, no.44 (Sep 2005): 397–403.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-005-3289-xErik T. Verhoef, Peter Nijkamp Spatial Externalities and the Urban Economy, (Mar 2015): 88–120.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0573-8555(2005)0000266005Richard Arnott Does the Henry George Theorem Provide a Practical Guide to Optimal City Size?, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 63, no.55 (Dec 2004): 1057–1090.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2004.00334.xRichard C. Box, Juliet Ann Musso Experiments with Local Federalism, The American Review of Public Administration 34, no.33 (Jul 2016): 259–276.https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004267848Asher Vaturi, Boris A. Portnov, Moshe Schwartz Internal migration and fiscal capacity of local authorities: a case study of the greater Tel Aviv metropolitan area, 1985–97, Space and Polity 8, no.11 (Oct 2010): 61–85.https://doi.org/10.1080/13562570410001678833Erik T. Verhoef, Peter Nijkamp Spatial Externalities and the Urban Economy, (Jan 2004): 87–120.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0573-8555(04)66004-4Gilles Duranton, Diego Puga Chapter 48 Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies, (Jan 2004): 2063–2117.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1Robert W. Helsley Chapter 54 Urban political economics, (Jan 2004): 2381–2421.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80011-7Dennis Epple, Thomas Nechyba Chapter 55 Fiscal decentralization, (Jan 2004): 2423–2480.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80012-9Masahisa Fujita, Jacques-François Thisse Références, (Oct 2003): 533–552.https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.masah.2003.01.0533Kangoh Lee Should land and capital be taxed at a uniform rate?, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 36, no.22 (Apr 2004): 350–372.https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5982.t01-1-00004David M. Brasington Edge Versus Center: Finding Common Ground in the Capitalization Debate, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.424168Emmanuel Duguet, Megan MacGarvie How Well Do Patent Citations Measure Flows of Technology? Evidence from French Innovation Surveys, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.452000David M. Brasington Edge versus center: finding common ground in the capitalization debate, Journal of Urban Economics 52, no.33 (Nov 2002): 524–541.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00532-6Richard W. Tresch Optimal federalism, (Jan 2002): 855–891.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012699051-5.50031-5Suzanne Scotchmer Chapter 29 Local public goods and clubs, (Jan 2002): 1997–2042.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(02)80008-8Donald R. Haurin, Robert D. Dietz, Bruce A. Weinberg The Impact of Neighborhood Homeownership Rates: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.303398Ryosuke Okamoto The system of towns with spatial public goods, Regional Science and Urban Economics 30, no.66 (Dec 2000): 627–637.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00047-8Yoshitsugu Kanemoto Price and quantity competition among heterogeneous suppliers with two-part pricing: applications to clubs, local public goods, networks, and growth controls, Regional Science and Urban Economics 30, no.66 (Dec 2000): 587–608.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00054-5Yorgos Y Papageorgiou, David Pines Externalities, Indivisibility, Nonreplicability, and Agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics 48, no.33 (Nov 2000): 509–535.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2000.2178Joachim Henkel, Konrad Stahl, Uwe Walz Coalition Building in a Spatial Economy, Journal of Urban Economics 47, no.11 (Jan 2000): 136–163.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1999.2139Komei Sasaki Local public goods and their capital-gain effects, Regional Science and Urban Economics 30, no.11 (Jan 2000): 45–57.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(99)00031-9William A. Fischel Municipal Corporations, Homeowners, and the Benefit View of the Property Tax, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.233210C. Tsuriel Somerville The Industrial Organization of Housing Supply: Market Activity, Land Supply and the Size of Homebuilder Firms, Real Estate Economics 27, no.44 (Sep 2003): 669–694.https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00788William H. Hoyt Leviathan, local government expenditures, and capitalization, Regional Science and Urban Economics 29, no.22 (Mar 1999): 155–171.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(98)00027-1Joseph Gyourko, Matthew Kahn, Joseph Tracy Chapter 37 Quality of life and environmental comparisons, (Jan 1999): 1413–1454.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(99)80006-6Stephen Ross, John Yinger Chapter 47 Sorting and voting: A review of the literature on urban public finance, (Jan 1999): 2001–2060.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(99)80016-9Darin Wohlgemuth, Maureen Kilkenny Firm Relocation Threats and Copy Cat Costs, International Regional Science Review 21, no.22 (Jul 2016): 139–162.https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769802100203Ronald C. Fisher, Robert W. Wassmer Economic Influences on the Structure of Local Government in U.S. Metropolitan Areas, Journal of Urban Economics 43, no.33 (May 1998): 444–471.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2054Steven Garasky, Donald R. Haurin Tiebout Revisited: Redrawing Jurisdictional Boundaries, Journal of Urban Economics 42, no.33 (Nov 1997): 366–376.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2028William H Hoyt, Stuart S Rosenthal Household Location and Tiebout: Do Families Sort According to Preferences for Locational Amenities?, Journal of Urban Economics 42, no.22 (Sep 1997): 159–178.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2019Charles A.M de Bartolomé, Stuart S Rosenthal Opposites Attract: The Effect of the Federal Income Tax Code on Community Composition, Journal of Urban Economics 42, no.11 (Jul 1997): 18–41.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2012John Douglas Wilson Property taxation, congestion, and local public goods, Journal of Public Economics 64, no.22 (May 1997): 207–217.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(96)01605-2Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, Mark Rider, Mary Beth Walker Race and the Structure of School Districts in the United States, Journal of Urban Economics 41, no.22 (Mar 1997): 281–300.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2003Vernon Henderson, Arindam Mitra The new urban landscape: Developers and edge cities, Regional Science and Urban Economics 26, no.66 (Dec 1996): 613–643.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(96)02136-9Graham Crampton Local Government Structure and Urban Residential Location, Urban Studies 33, no.77 (Aug 1996): 1061–1076.https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989650011500David E. Wildasin, John Douglas Wilson Imperfect mobility and local government behaviour in an overlapping-generations model, Journal of Public Economics 60, no.22 (May 1996): 177–198.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(95)01533-7Eric J. Heikkila Are municipalities Tieboutian clubs?, Regional Science and Urban Economics 26, no.22 (Apr 1996): 203–226.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02112-4Juliet A. Musso, John M. Quigley Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in California: A Critical Evaluation, (Jan 1996): 97–123.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80266-9_7J. Vernon Henderson Will homeowners impose property taxes?, Regional Science and Urban Economics 25, no.22 (Apr 1995): 153–181.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(94)02078-URobert W. Helsley, William C. Strange City formation with commitment, Regional Science and Urban Economics 24, no.33 (Jun 1994): 373–390.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(93)02042-2J.Vernon Henderson Community choice of revenue instruments, Regional Science and Urban Economics 24, no.22 (Apr 1994): 159–183.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(93)02036-3R. Krelove The persistence and inefficiency of property tax finance of local public expenditures, Journal of Public Economics 51, no.33 (Jul 1993): 415–435.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90074-4J.M. Pogodzinski, David L. Sjoquist Alternative tax regimes in a local public good economy, Journal of Public Economics 50, no.11 (Jan 1993): 115–141.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90063-YSteven C. Deller, David L. Chicoine Representative Versus Direct Democracy: a Test of Allocative Efficiency in Local Government Expenditures, Public Finance Quarterly 21, no.11 (Aug 2016): 100–114.https://doi.org/10.1177/109114219302100105Thomas J. Miceli Optimal fiscal zoning when the local government is a discriminating monopolist, Regional Science and Urban Economics 22, no.44 (Nov 1992): 579–596.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(92)90003-JWilliam H. Hoyt Market power of large cities and policy differences in metropolitan areas, Regional Science and Urban Economics 22, no.44 (Nov 1992): 539–558.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(92)90001-HCharles A.M. de Bartolome The fiscal effect of community composition on public services and welfare, Journal of Urban Economics 32, no.22 (Sep 1992): 140–158.https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(92)90002-3R. Krelove Do local governments use their tax bases efficiently?, Journal of Urban Economics 31, no.33 (May 1992): 285–300.https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(92)90057-RRandall Crane On welfare measurement in cities, Journal of Urban Economics 31, no.33 (May 1992): 375–387.https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(92)90063-QWilliam H. Hoyt Competitive jurisdictions, congestion, and the Henry George Theorem, Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, no.33 (Nov 1991): 351–370.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90063-SDavid Pines Tiebout without politics, Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, no.33 (Nov 1991): 469–489.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90068-XCharles A.M. de Bartolome Redistributive state aid to local communities, Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, no.33 (Nov 1991): 511–528.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90070-4John Douglas Wilson Urban economic theory: Land use and city size, Regional Science and Urban Economics 20, no.44 (Feb 1991): 575–582.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90047-QBruce W. Hamilton Tiebout Hypothesis, (Jan 1991): 672–677.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21315-3_93Steven C. Deller An application of a test for allocative efficiency in the local public sector, Regional Science and Urban Economics 20, no.33 (Nov 1990): 395–406.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(90)90018-XCharles A. M. de Bartolome Equilibrium and Inefficiency in a Community Model With Peer Group Effects, Journal of Political Economy 98, no.11 (Oct 2015): 110–133.https://doi.org/10.1086/261671STEVEN C.DELLER Pareto‐Efficiency and the Provision of Public Goods Within a Rural Setting, Growth and Change 21, no.11 (Jul 2006): 30–39.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1990.tb00508.xDavid Pines Handbook of regional and urban economics, volume 2: Urban economics,, Regional Science and Urban Economics 19, no.44 (Dec 1989): 646–658.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(89)90025-2Dennis Epple, Thomas Romer On the flexibility of municipal boundaries, Journal of Urban Economics 26, no.33 (Nov 1989): 307–319.https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(89)90004-1Joseph Gyourko, Joseph Tracy On the political economy of land value capitalization and local public sector rent seeking in a Tiebout model, Journal of Urban Economics 26, no.22 (Sep 1989): 152–173.https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(89)90014-4Joseph Gyourko, Joseph Tracy Local public sector rent-seeking and its impact on local land values, Regional Science and Urban Economics 19, no.33 (Aug 1989): 493–516.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(89)90016-1Timothy J. Goodspeed A re-examination of the use of ability to pay taxes by local governments, Journal of Public Economics 38, no.33 (Apr 1989): 319–342.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(89)90062-5Alain Mingat, Pierre Salmon Alterable electorates in the context of residential mobility, Public Choice 59, no.11 (Oct 1988): 67–82.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119450Anwar Chaudry‐Shah CAPITALIZATION AND THE THEORY OF LOCAL PUBLIC FINANCE: AN INTERPRETIVE ESSAY, Journal of Economic Surveys 2, no.33 (Oct 2006): 209–243.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1988.tb00045.xDennis Epple, Thomas Romer, Radu Filimon Community development with endogenous land use controls, Journal of Public Economics 35, no.22 (Mar 1988): 133–162.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(88)90051-5Daniel L. Rubinfeld Chapter 11 The economics of the local public sector, (Jan 1987): 571–645.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(87)80006-XDavid E. Wildasin Chapter 29 Theoretical analysis of local public economics, (Jan 1987): 1131–1178.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(87)80015-9Bruce W. Hamilton Tiebout Hypothesis, (Nov 2016): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1372-1Suzanne Scotchmer Local public goods in an equilibrium, Regional Science and Urban Economics 16, no.44 (Nov 1986): 463–481.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(86)90018-9Partha Gangopadhyay Liberalisation, democratisation and the distribution of urban local public goods, (): 57–72.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-8323(08)05005-4
Referência(s)