Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Additive Utility Functions with Double-Log Consumer Demand Functions

1972; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 80; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/259864

1537-534X

Kazuo Sato,

Economic theories and models

Previous articleNext article No AccessAdditive Utility Functions with Double-Log Consumer Demand FunctionsKazuo SatoKazuo Sato Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 80, Number 1Jan. - Feb., 1972 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/259864 Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 41Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1972 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Raghuram Iyengar, Young-Hoon Park, Qi Yu The Impact of Subscription Programs on Customer Purchases, Journal of Marketing Research 80 (Apr 2022): 002224372210801.https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437221080163Feixiang Zhang, Xiangwei Zhou, Xianghui Cao Location-Oriented Evolutionary Games for Price-Elastic Spectrum Sharing, IEEE Transactions on Communications (Jan 2016): 1–1.https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2016.2590418Arthur Snow, Ronald S. Warren Pigou’s Law and the proportionality of income and price elasticities of demand, Economics Letters 132 (Jul 2015): 136–138.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.05.002Saloua Sehili, Jorge Martinez-Vazquez Lindahl Fiscal Incidence and the Measurement of Coercion, (May 2014): 201–247.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107280847.012Luca Mulazzani, Luca Camanzi, Giulio Malorgio Price formation and geographic market integration: An empirical investigation of Adriatic small pelagic species, Fisheries Research 119-120 (May 2012): 99–107.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.12.013Stavros A. Drakopoulos The paradox of happiness: towards an alternative explanation, Journal of Happiness Studies 9, no.22 (Apr 2007): 303–315.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9054-5Gary R. Saxonhouse Kazuo Sato and Korean and Japanese managers and workers in colonial Korea, Journal of Asian Economics 16, no.55 (Oct 2005): 770–779.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2005.08.001Supriya Lahiri, Mustafa Babiker, Richard S. Eckaus The Burden of Emissions Restrictions, NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy 13, no.33 (Nov 2003): 283–293.https://doi.org/10.2190/EJBH-TQXE-F9CV-891HGilles Dufrénot, Laurent Mathieu Non Linear Dynamics and Utility Functions in Overlapping Generations Models, (Jan 1998): 83–110.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58901-0_5Pekka Ilmakunnas Use of macroeconomic forecasts in corporate forecasting: a note on aggregation problems, International Journal of Forecasting 12, no.33 (Sep 1996): 383–388.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(96)00672-3S. A. Drakopoulos HIERARCHICAL CHOICE IN ECONOMICS, Journal of Economic Surveys 8, no.22 (Jun 1994): 133–153.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1994.tb00097.xRoger McCain The hierarchy of need and moral economics, Forum for Social Economics 22, no.22 (Jan 1993): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02826153Alan A. Powell Sato's insight on the relationship between the Frisch ‘parameter’ and the average elasticity of substitution, Economics Letters 40, no.22 (Oct 1992): 173–175.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(92)90218-NNisha Agrawal, Alan A. Powell MAIDS Under Additive Preferences: Some Early Estimates, (Jan 1992): 3–23.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12221-9_1Jayatilleke S. Bandara COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODELS FOR DEVELOPMENT POLICY ANALYSIS IN LDCs, Journal of Economic Surveys 5, no.11 (Mar 1991): 3–69.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1991.tb00126.xRoger A. McCain Impulse-Filtering: A New Model of Freely Willed Economic Choice, Review of Social Economy 48, no.22 (Jun 1990): 125–143.https://doi.org/10.1080/00346769000000012Yu Hsing On the variable elasticity of the demand for gasoline, Energy Economics 12, no.22 (Apr 1990): 132–136.https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(90)90047-JDean C. Mountain A quadratic quasi Cobb-Douglas extension of the multi-input CES formulation, European Economic Review 33, no.11 (Jan 1989): 143–158.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(89)90042-1Richard T. Froyen, Roger N. Waud REAL BUSINESS CYCLES AND THE LUCAS PARADIGM, Economic Inquiry 26, no.22 (Apr 1988): 183–201.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01488.xV.Kerry Smith Harberger versus Marshall, Economics Letters 25, no.22 (Jan 1987): 123–126.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(87)90047-4Andre Plourde, David Ryan On the Use of Double-Log Forms in Energy Demand Analysis, The Energy Journal 6, no.44 (Oct 1985).https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol6-No4-8David L. Ortmeyer, Peter Fortune An application of the life-cycle linear expenditure system to the South Korean household sector, 1962–1976, Journal of Development Economics 18, no.2-32-3 (Aug 1985): 361–379.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(85)90062-8W.J. Keller, J. Van Driel Differential consumer demand systems, European Economic Review 27, no.33 (Jan 1985): 375–390.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(85)80021-0A. Andrikopoulos, J. Brox, E. Carvalho Substitution in Demand for Protein Commodities: The Canadian Experience, 1958 to 1981, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie 32, no.11 (Nov 2008): 141–150.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.1984.tb02006.xJ. Moreh Optimal Taxation and Public Goods, Public Finance Quarterly 11, no.22 (Aug 2016): 181–201.https://doi.org/10.1177/109114218301100203 References, (Jan 1983): 309–324.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-86531-1.50019-6Robert P. Inman On setting the agenda for Pennsylvania school finance reform: An exercise in giving policy advice, (Jan 1981): 71–96.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7398-5_7Robert P. Inman On setting the agenda for Pennsylvania school finance reform: An exercise in giving policy advice, Public Choice 36, no.33 (Jan 1981): 449–474.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128729Roger R. Betancourt An econometric analysis of peak electricity demand in the short run, Energy Economics 3, no.11 (Jan 1981): 14–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(81)90003-7Horst Glaus Regktenwald und, Karl-Dieter GrÜske* JUSTITIA DISTRIBUTIVA DURCH UMVERTEILUNG?, Kyklos 33, no.11 (Feb 1980): 16–62.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1980.tb02620.xJames M. Dean Benefit Incidence Methodology for Mixed Goods, Public Finance Quarterly 8, no.11 (Aug 2016): 69–96.https://doi.org/10.1177/109114218000800105Robert P. Inman Testing political economy’s ‘as if’ proposition: is the median income voter really decisive?, Public Choice 33, no.44 (Dec 1978): 45–65.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187595Egon Smeral Ein Entscheidungsmodell f�r Konsumieren und Sparen, Empirica 5, no.22 (Jan 1978): 243–277.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924898Franz Bekerle Nachfragesysteme f�r �sterreich, Empirica 5, no.11 (Jan 1978): 3–31.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00925218James Barth, Arthur Kraft, John Kraft The ‘moneyness’ of financial assets, Applied Economics 9, no.11 (Mar 2007): 51–61.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036847700000005Robert D Willig Integrability implications for locally constant demand elasticities, Journal of Economic Theory 12, no.33 (Jun 1976): 391–401.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90035-1John Kraft, Arthur Kraft Mode choice characteristics as determinants of interurban transport demand, Transportation Research 10, no.11 (Feb 1976): 31–35.https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(76)90099-XConstantino Lluch, Alan Powell International comparisons of expenditure patterns, European Economic Review 6, no.33 (Jul 1975): 275–303.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(75)90013-6Arthur Kraft, John Kraft SPECIFICATION OF COMMODITY SUBSETS FOR SEPARABLE UTILITY FUNCTIONS, Metroeconomica 27, no.11 (Feb 1975): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.1975.tb00220.xErik Biørn Estimating the flexibility of the marginal utility of money, European Economic Review 5, no.22 (Aug 1974): 177–185.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(74)90022-1ARTHUR KRAFT PREFERENCE ORDERINGS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE LABOR FORCE BEHAVIOR OF MARRIED WOMEN, Economic Inquiry 11, no.33 (Sep 2007): 270–284.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1973.tb01061.x