Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral Competition
1982; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 44; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2307/2130286
ISSN1468-2508
AutoresJames M. Enelow, Melvin J. Hinich,
Tópico(s)Politics and Society in Latin America
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessArticlesNonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral CompetitionJames M. Enelow, and Melvin J. HinichJames M. Enelow, and Melvin J. HinichPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 44, Number 1Feb., 1982 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2130286 Views: 81Total views on this site Citations: 99Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1982 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Patricio Navia, Lucas Perelló, Vaclav Masek Demand without supply? Mass partisanship, ideological attachments, and the puzzle of Guatemala's electoral market failure, International Area Studies Review 25, no.22 (Jan 2022): 99–120.https://doi.org/10.1177/22338659211072939Arye L. Hillman, Ngo Van Long Immigrants as future voters, Public Choice 190, no.1-21-2 (Oct 2021): 149–174.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00927-5Laurent Bouton, Paola Conconi, Francisco Pino, Maurizio Zanardi The Tyranny of the Single-Minded: Guns, Environment, and Abortion, The Review of Economics and Statistics 103, no.11 (Mar 2021): 48–59.https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00897Ingrid Mauerer The Neglected Role and Variability of Party Intercepts in the Spatial Valence Approach, Political Analysis 28, no.33 (Jan 2020): 303–317.https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.41Jonathan D. Klingler, Gary E. Hollibaugh, Adam J. Ramey What I Like About You: Legislator Personality and Legislator Approval, Political Behavior 41, no.22 (Apr 2018): 499–525.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9460-xTaylor C. Boas, F. Daniel Hidalgo, Marcus André Melo Norms versus Action: Why Voters Fail to Sanction Malfeasance in Brazil, American Journal of Political Science 63, no.22 (Dec 2018): 385–400.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12413Mauricio Yoshida Izumi Ideologia, sofisticação política e voto no Brasil, Opinião Pública 25, no.11 (May 2019): 29–62.https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0191201925129Dominic Nyhuis, Carolina Plescia The nonideological component of coalition preferences, Party Politics 24, no.66 (Feb 2017): 686–697.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817690933Franz Urban Pappi, Thomas Bräuninger Elektorale Responsivität als Kriterium zur Beurteilung des deutschen Bundestagswahlrechts, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 59, no.22 (May 2018): 199–219.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0086-8Jack Blumenau and Benjamin E. Lauderdale Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste: Agenda Setting and Legislative Voting in Response to the EU Crisis, The Journal of Politics 80, no.22 (Jan 2018): 462–478.https://doi.org/10.1086/694543Luigi Curini Political Corruption and Valence Issues, (Jul 2017): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56735-8_1Luigi Curini The Ideological Incentive for Campaigning on Corruption Issues: The Two-Party Case, (Jul 2017): 29–80.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56735-8_2David Austen-Smith Political Competition, (Feb 2018): 10391–10400.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2114Roman Chytilek Can (Inter-party) Politics "Disappear"?, Sociální studia / Social Studies 13, no.11 (Sep 2016): 23.https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2016-1-23Lukas Rudolph and Thomas Däubler Holding Individual Representatives Accountable: The Role of Electoral Systems, The Journal of Politics 78, no.33 (May 2016): 746–762.https://doi.org/10.1086/685378Maria Gallego, Norman Schofield Do parties converge to the electoral mean in all political systems?, Journal of Theoretical Politics 28, no.22 (Apr 2016): 288–330.https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629815586878Susumu Shikano, Konstantin Käppner Valenz im ideologischen Parteienwettbewerb während des Bundestagswahlkampfes 2013, (Mar 2016): 245–270.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11206-6_12Jonathan Klingler, Gary E. Hollibaugh What I Like About You: Legislator Personality and Legislator Approval, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2814391Luigi Curini An Italian Leitmotiv? Corruption and Competence in the Debates of the Italian Chamber of Deputies (1946–2014), South European Society and Politics 20, no.44 (Nov 2015): 509–531.https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2015.1108585Jon X. Eguia and Kenneth A. Shepsle Legislative Bargaining with Endogenous Rules, The Journal of Politics 77, no.44 (Oct 2015): 1076–1088.https://doi.org/10.1086/682389Luigi Curini, Paolo Martelli A case of valence competition in elections, Party Politics 21, no.55 (Sep 2015): 686–698.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813491540Fabio Franchino, Francesco Zucchini Voting in a Multi-dimensional Space: A Conjoint Analysis Employing Valence and Ideology Attributes of Candidates, Political Science Research and Methods 3, no.22 (Oct 2014): 221–241.https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.24Woojin Moon Positional effects of partisan attachments on candidate position taking, Electoral Studies 37 (Mar 2015): 99–108.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.12.002Luigi Curini The Conditional Ideological Inducement to Campaign on Character Valence Issues in Multiparty Systems, Comparative Political Studies 48, no.22 (Feb 2015): 168–192.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014534197Susumu Shikano Wählerverhalten und Parteienwettbewerb, (Oct 2014): 823–852.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01164-2_29Chad Kendall, Tommaso Nannicini, Francesco Trebbi How Do Voters Respond to Information? Evidence from a Randomized Campaign, American Economic Review 105, no.11 (Jan 2015): 322–353.https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131063Seonghui Lee Party Responsiveness to the Collective Judgment of the Electorate, Comparative Political Studies 47, no.1414 (Dec 2014): 1973–1999.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013520523Donald Wittman Strategic Behavior and Organizational Structure in Religions, British Journal of Political Science 44, no.44 (Jun 2013): 717–739.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000161Paul Chaney Mixed-methods analysis of political parties׳ manifesto discourse on rail transport policy: Westminster, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish elections 1945–2011, Transport Policy 35 (Sep 2014): 275–285.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.06.002 Moon Woojin Political Polarization, Marketization of Political Competition, and Political Institutions: A Spatial Analysis and Implications, National Strategy 20, no.22 (May 2014): 139–174.https://doi.org/10.35390/sejong.20.2.201406.005Michael Clark Understanding Parties' Policy Shifts in Western Europe: The Role of Valence, 1976–2003, British Journal of Political Science 44, no.22 (Feb 2013): 261–286.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000622Francisco Martínez-Mora, M. Socorro Puy The determinants and electoral consequences of asymmetric preferences, European Journal of Political Economy 33 (Mar 2014): 85–97.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.11.007Volker Dreier Zur logischen Struktur der räumlichen Theorie der Wahl. Ein Beitrag zur Repräsentation politikwissenschaftlicher Theorien im metatheoretischen Strukturalismus, (Jul 2014): 45–82.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05008-5_2Susumu Shikano, Simon Munzert, Thomas Schübel, Michael Herrmann, Peter Selb Eine empirische Schätzmethode für Valenz-Issues auf der Basis der Kandidatenbeurteilung am Beispiel der Konstanzer Oberbürgermeisterwahl 2012, (Jul 2014): 113–131.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05008-5_4Shane Singh Linear and quadratic utility loss functions in voting behavior research, Journal of Theoretical Politics 26, no.11 (Jan 2014): 35–58.https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629813488985 Moon Woojin Political Consumption, Political Investment, and Policy Positions: Theory of Political Transaction and Its Institutional Implications, National Strategy 19, no.11 (Feb 2013): 5–29.https://doi.org/10.35390/sejong.19.1.201303.001Maria E. Gallego, Norman J. Schofield The Convergence Coefficient Across Political Systems, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364477Norman Schofield, Maria Gallego, Jeeseon Jeon, Marina Muskhelishvili Modelling Elections in the Caucasus, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 22, no.22 (Apr 2012): 187–214.https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2012.666554LUIGI CURINI Negative Campaigning in No-Cabinet Alternation Systems: Ideological Closeness and Blames of Corruption in Italy and Japan Using Party Manifesto Data, Japanese Journal of Political Science 12, no.33 (Nov 2011): 399–420.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109911000181Justin Buchler The proximity paradox: the legislative agenda and the electoral success of ideological extremists, Public Choice 148, no.1-21-2 (Apr 2010): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9643-4 Moon Woojin Political Information, Political Parties, Electoral Rules, and Income Inequality, Korean Political Science Review 45, no.22 (Jun 2011): 73–97.https://doi.org/10.18854/kpsr.2011.45.2.004Norman Schofield, Christopher Claassen, Ugur Ozdemir, Alexei Zakharov Estimating the effects of activists in two-party and multi-party systems: comparing the United States and Israel, Social Choice and Welfare 36, no.3-43-4 (Nov 2010): 483–518.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0507-0VINCENZO GALASSO, TOMMASO NANNICINI Competing on Good Politicians, American Political Science Review 105, no.11 (Feb 2011): 79–99.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000535Norman Schofield, Christopher Claassen, Maria Gallego, Ugur Ozdemir Empirical and Formal Models of the United States Presidential Elections in 2000 and 2004, (May 2011): 217–258.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19519-8_10Coughlin Peter Probabilistic and Spatial Models of Voting, (Jan 2011): 833–896.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)00026-2Ernesto Calvo, Timothy Hellwig Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives under Different Electoral Systems, American Journal of Political Science 55, no.11 (Oct 2010): 27–41.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00482.xMichael K Miller Seizing the mantle of change: Modeling candidate quality as effectiveness instead of valence, Journal of Theoretical Politics 23, no.11 (Jan 2011): 52–68.https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629810391074Norman J. Schofield, Maria E. Gallego, JeeSeon Jeon, Marina Muskhelishvili Modelling Elections in the Caucasus, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1938392Luigi Curini, Paolo Martelli Ideological proximity and valence competition. Negative campaigning through allegation of corruption in the Italian legislative arena from 1946 to 1994, Electoral Studies 29, no.44 (Dec 2010): 636–647.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.06.004Micael Castanheira, Benoît Crutzen, Nicolas Sahuguet The Impact of Party Organization on Electoral Outcomes, Revue économique Vol. 61, no.44 (Jul 2010): 677–695.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.614.0677Stephen A. Jessee Partisan Bias, Political Information and Spatial Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election, The Journal of Politics 72, no.22 (Jul 2015): 327–340.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990764Manuel Abellanas, Ma Dolores López, Javier Rodrigo Searching for equilibrium positions in a game of political competition with restrictions, European Journal of Operational Research 201, no.33 (Mar 2010): 892–896.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.04.002Michael Peress The spatial model with non-policy factors: a theory of policy-motivated candidates, Social Choice and Welfare 34, no.22 (May 2009): 265–294.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-009-0396-2Michael Clark Valence and electoral outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–1998, Electoral Studies 28, no.11 (Mar 2009): 111–122.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.009Alexei V. Zakharov A model of electoral competition with abstaining voters, Mathematical and Computer Modelling 48, no.9-109-10 (Nov 2008): 1527–1553.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.05.021Jane Green, Sara B. Hobolt Owning the issue agenda: Party strategies and vote choices in British elections, Electoral Studies 27, no.33 (Sep 2008): 460–476.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003David Austen-Smith Political Competition, (Dec 2016): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2114-1Jane Green When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition, Political Studies 55, no.33 (Oct 2007): 629–655.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.xDonald Wittman Candidate quality, pressure group endorsements and the nature of political advertising, European Journal of Political Economy 23, no.22 (Jun 2007): 360–378.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.01.004Arianna Degan CANDIDATE VALENCE: EVIDENCE FROM CONSECUTIVE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, International Economic Review 48, no.22 (May 2007): 457–482.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2007.00434.xSubhadip Chakrabarti A NOTE ON NEGATIVE ELECTORAL ADVERTISING: DENIGRATING CHARACTER VS. PORTRAYING EXTREMISM, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 54, no.11 (Feb 2007): 136–149.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2007.00408.xT. Groseclose 'One and a Half Dimensional' Preferences and Majority Rule, Social Choice and Welfare 28, no.22 (May 2006): 321–335.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0166-3Donald Wittman Valence characteristics, costly policy and the median-crossing property: A diagrammatic exposition, Public Choice 124, no.3-43-4 (Sep 2005): 365–382.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-2053-3Timothy R. Johnson, Jason M. Roberts Pivotal Politics, Presidential Capital, and Supreme Court Nominations, Congress & the Presidency 32, no.11 (Mar 2005): 31–48.https://doi.org/10.1080/07343460509507695Donald Wittman Candidate Quality, Pressure Group Endorsements, and the Nature of Political Advertising, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.672524Steven I. Wilkinson Votes and Violence, 432 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510458Bernard Grofman DOWNS AND TWO-PARTY CONVERGENCE, Annual Review of Political Science 7, no.11 (May 2004): 25–46.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104711Jeff Gill, George Casella Dynamic Tempered Transitions for Exploring Multimodal Posterior Distributions, Political Analysis 12, no.44 (Jan 2017): 425–443.https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph027Manfred Dix, Rudy Santore Campaign Contributions with Swing Voters, Economics and Politics 15, no.33 (Nov 2003): 285–301.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00125Arianna Degan A Dynamic Model of Voting, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.534822Manfred Dix, Rudy Santore Candidate ability and platform choice, Economics Letters 76, no.22 (Jul 2002): 189–194.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00047-2Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca How Can Governments Be Accountable If Voters Vote Ideologically?, (Jan 2001): 45–81.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611414.004Donald Wittman A Valence Model of Elections and The Median-Crossing Property:A Diagrammatic Exposition, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2001).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.288985W. Balzer and V. Dreier The Structure of the Spatial Theory of Elections, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, no.44 (Dec 2020): 613–638.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/50.4.613Samuel Merrill A Probabilistic Model for the Spatial Distribution of Party Support in Multiparty Electorates, Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, no.428428 (Feb 2012): 1190–1197.https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476858James W. Endersby Nonpolicy issues and the spatial theory of voting, Quality & Quantity 28, no.33 (Aug 1994): 251–265.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098943Elisabeth R. Gerber, John E. Jackson Endogenous Preferences and the Study of Institutions, American Political Science Review 87, no.33 (Sep 2013): 639–656.https://doi.org/10.2307/2938741James W. Endersby, Melvin J. Hinich The stability of voter perceptions: A comparison of candidate positions across time using the spatial theory of voting, Mathematical and Computer Modelling 16, no.8-98-9 (Aug 1992): 67–83.https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(92)90088-3Melvin J. Hinich, Michael C. Munger A Spatial Theory of Ideology, Journal of Theoretical Politics 4, no.11 (Jan 1992): 5–30.https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692892004001001Kenneth C. Williams Advertising and Political Expenditures in a Spatial Election Game: An Experimental Investigation, Simulation & Gaming 22, no.44 (Aug 2016): 421–442.https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878191224001Robert S. Erikson, David W. Romero Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioral Model of the Vote, American Political Science Review 84, no.44 (Aug 2014): 1103–1126.https://doi.org/10.2307/1963255Lilliard E. Richardson, Michael C. Munger Shirking, representation, and Congressional behavior: Voting on the 1983 amendments to the Social Security Act, Public Choice 67, no.11 (Oct 1990): 11–33.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01890154PETER J. COUGHLIN, DENNIS C. MUELLER, PETER MURRELL ELECTORAL POLITICS, INTEREST GROUPS, AND THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT, Economic Inquiry 28, no.44 (Oct 1990): 682–705.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1990.tb00826.xPeter J. Coughlin MAJORITY RULE AND ELECTION MODELS, Journal of Economic Surveys 4, no.22 (Jun 1990): 157–188.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1990.tb00084.xCharles M. Cameron, Albert D. Cover, Jeffrey A. Segal Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model, American Political Science Review 84, no.22 (Aug 2014): 525–534.https://doi.org/10.2307/1963533James M. Enelow, Melvin J. Hinich A general probabilistic spatial theory of elections, Public Choice 61, no.22 (May 1989): 101–113.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115657 James M. Enelow , Nancy R. Mendell , and Subha Ramesh A Comparison of Two Distance Metrics Through Regression Diagnostics of a Model of Relative Candidate Evaluation, The Journal of Politics 50, no.44 (Oct 2015): 1057–1071.https://doi.org/10.2307/2131392Allan M. Feldman, Kyung-Ho Lee Existence of electoral equilibria with probabilistic voting, Journal of Public Economics 35, no.22 (Mar 1988): 205–227.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(88)90054-0Assar Lindbeck, J�rgen W. Weibull Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition, Public Choice 52, no.33 (Jan 1987): 273–297.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116710Larry Samuelson A test of the revealed-preference phenomenon in congressional elections, Public Choice 54, no.22 (Jan 1987): 141–169.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123003Sandra Davis A test of candidate equilibrium, Political Behavior 9, no.11 (Jan 1987): 29–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987277 James M. Enelow , Melvin J. Hinich , and Nancy R. Mendell An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Spatial Models of Elections, The Journal of Politics 48, no.33 (Oct 2015): 675–693.https://doi.org/10.2307/2131172 Gary W. Cox , and Mathew D. McCubbins Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game, The Journal of Politics 48, no.22 (Oct 2015): 370–389.https://doi.org/10.2307/2131098 James M. Enelow , and Melvin J. Hinich Probabilistic Voting and the Importance of Centrist Ideologies in Democratic Elections, The Journal of Politics 46, no.22 (Oct 2015): 459–478.https://doi.org/10.2307/2130970D Austen-Smith The Spatial Theory of Electoral Competition: Instability, Institutions, and Information, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 1, no.44 (Nov 2016): 439–460.https://doi.org/10.1068/c010439Samuel Long Abstracts of Documents in this Supplement, (Jan 1983): 1–590.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5956-0_1James M. Enelow, Melvin J. Hinich Ideology, Issues, and the Spatial Theory of Elections, American Political Science Review 76, no.33 (Aug 2014): 493–501.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400188367James M. Enelow, Melvin J. Hinich Ideology, Issues, and the Spatial Theory of Elections, American Political Science Review 76, no.33 (Sep 1982): 493–501.https://doi.org/10.2307/1963727Norman Schofield Divergence in the Spatial Stochastic Model of Voting, (): 259–287.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73382-9_14
Referência(s)