Artigo Revisado por pares

Networks of Commerce and Knowledge in the Iron Age: The Case of the Phoenicians

2007; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 22; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1080/09518960701539232

ISSN

1743-940X

Autores

Michael Sommer,

Tópico(s)

Culture, Economy, and Development Studies

Resumo

Abstract Regarding the Phoenicians' expansion in the Iron Age, controversy continues over chronology, areas affected, scale of migration, organization of trade, modes of interaction between Phoenician traders/colonists and the respective indigenous populations and means of maintaining contact and of transmitting information between ‘colonial’ settlements and the mother cities in the Levant. Critical problems arise from the textual evidence from the Phoenicians' neighbours; the archaeological material is also ambiguous regarding the ethnic and cultural identities of the populations involved. The paper uses available evidence to construct a model of how a diasporic network of commodity, population and information exchange could arise and be maintained in the power vacuum of the Early Iron Age Mediterranean, how it was adapted to political and economic change, so as to provide a tertium comparationis to the Greek model of ‘colonization’. Keywords: PhoeniciansLong-distance TradeColoniesMediterranean Acknowledgements This is the revised version of my conference paper. I am very grateful to Hans Georg Niemeyer for his critical reading and detailed discussion of the archaeology of the Phoenician expansion in the west. This study owes a great deal to his recent work. I am also thankful to Christy Constantakopoulou and Katerina Panagopoulou for the splendid organization of a conference which opened up a wealth of thoughts and information of which I was barely aware. Notes [1] August. Epist. 13. [2] Referring perhaps to the colour red and the artisanship of purple dyeing. In the Hebrew bible, Canaan is the son of Ham and the father of Sidon (Genesis 9:18; 10:15). [3] Heliod. 10.323. For additional information on the author and his work Nesselrath Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther. 1997. “Heliodor”. In Lexikon antiker Autoren, Edited by: Schütze, Oliver. Stuttgart and Weimer: J.B. Metzler. [Google Scholar], ‘Heliodor’. [4] Marcus 7:25–26. [5] The notion of the Mediterranean as a common ground of the people living next to it, very present in Braudel Braudel, Fernand. 1992. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, London: Harper Collins. [Google Scholar], Mediterranean, has recently been revitalized and universalized by Horden Horden, Peregrine and Purcell, Nicholas. 2000. The Corrupting Sea. A Study of Mediterranean History, Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar] and Purcell, Corrupting Sea. Cf. the instructive review by Shatzmann Shatzmann, Israel. 2004. Review of The Corrupting Sea, by Peregrine Horden and Nicholas Purcell. Sripta Classica Israelica, 23: 279–83. [Google Scholar]. [6] On the Phoenician expansion in the Mediterranean in general, among others, see Whittaker Whittaker, Charles R. 1974. The Western Phoenicians. Colonisation and Assimilation. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 200: 58–79. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], ‘Western Phoenicians’; Sznycer Sznycer, Maurice. 1976. “L'expansion phénico-punique dans la Méditerranée occidentale. Problèmes et méthodes”. In Actes du 2e Congrès international d'études des cultures de la Méditerranée occidentale Alger [Google Scholar], ‘L'expansion’; Bunnens Bunnens, Guy. 1979. L'expansion phénicienne en Méditerranée. Essai d'interprétation fondé sur une analyse des traditions littéraires, Brussels and Rome: Institut Historique Belge de Rome. [Google Scholar], L'expansion; Aubet Aubet, Maria Eugenia. 1993. The Phoenicians and the West. Politics, Colonies, and Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar], Phoenicians; Sommer Sommer, Michael. 2000. Europas Ahnen. Ursprünge des Politischen bei den Phönikern, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. [Google Scholar], Europas Ahnen, 99–121; Sommer Sommer, Michael. 2005. Die Phönizier. Handelsherren zwischen Orient und Okzident, Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner. [Google Scholar], Phönizier, 113–43. [7] For the pottery, see Schreiber Schreiber, Nicola. 2003. The Cypro-Phoenician Pottery of the Iron Age, Leiden: Brill. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Cypro-Phoenician Pottery. [8] Niemeyer Niemeyer, Hans G. 2004. Phoenician or Greek? Is there a Reasonable Way Out of the Al Mina Debate?. Ancient West and East, 3: 38–50. [Google Scholar], ‘Phoenicians in the Mediterranean’; Niemeyer, ‘Phoenician or Greek’, 45–46. Although the importance of agriculture in the Phoenico-Punic west has been re-emphasized in recent years (by among others Ameling, Karthago), the typological differences between the Greek and the Phoenician ‘colonial’ diasporas in this respect are quite straightforward. Even though Carthage relied heavily on agricultural production for its subsistence, the city was never dominated by an elite of landholders. For a survey of Carthage's economic and political patterns, see Sommer, Europas Ahnen, 221–22 and 248–49. [9] See pars pro toto Boardman Boardman, John. 1999. The Greeks Overseas. Their Early Colonies and Trade, London: Thames and Hudson. 4 [Google Scholar], Greeks Overseas, 8, where Phoenicians figure merely as ‘powerful rivals’ of the Greeks. [10] For an excellent summary see Rauner Rauner Max. ‘Ziemlich verknotet.’ Die Zeit, no. 10, 26 February 2004. [Google Scholar], ‘Ziemlich verknotet’. On the development of social network analysis as a sub-discipline of the social sciences, see Scott Scott, John. 1991. Social Network Analysis. A Handbook, London: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar], Social Network Analysis, 7–38. For more detail on network theory, see Ian Rutherford's paper in this volume. [11] Newman Newman, Mark E. J. 2003. The Structure and Function of Complex Networks. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Review, 45: 167–256. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], ‘Structure’, 167: ‘A network is a set of items, which we will call vertices or sometimes nodes, with connections between them, called edges. Systems taking the form of networks (also called ‘graphs’ in much of the mathematical literature) abound in the world. Examples include the Internet, the World Wide Web, social networks of acquaintance or other connections between individuals, organizational networks and networks of business relations between companies, neural networks, metabolic networks, food webs, distribution networks such as blood vessels or postal delivery routes, networks of citations between papers, and many others.” [12] The so-called Dunbar Dunbar, Robin. 2003. Social Network Size in Humans. Human Nature, 14: 53–72. [Crossref], [PubMed] , [Google Scholar]'s number; see Dunbar, ‘Social Network Size’. [13] ‘Community structure’ is a property shared by most social networks: Vertices are not distributed equally and homogeneously within the network, but they form clusters (‘groups’, ‘communities’) which again are linked to each other. The links between individuals are usually more frequent than links between groups. Newman, ‘Structure’, 17–19. [14] Powell Powell, Walter W. 1990. Neither Market nor Hierarchy. Network Forms of Organisation. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 12: 295–336. [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], ‘Neither Market’, 300–305. [15] On weak ties and the accelerated spread of ideas within open networks, Granovetter Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 76: 1360–80. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], ‘Weak Ties’; Granovetter Granovetter, Mark S. 1983. The Strength of Weak Ties. A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1: 201–33. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], ‘Revisited’, 214–20. The innovative forces of open networks is now best exemplified by the rapid distribution of open-source software via the internet. [16] Scott, Social Network Analysis, 166–75. [17] Beckmann Beckmann, Martin J. 1972. Von Thünen Revisited. A Neo-Classical Land Use Model. Swedish Journal of Economics, 74: 1–7. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], ‘Von Thünen’; Mills Mills, Edwin S. 1970. The Efficiency of Spatial Competition. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 25: 71–82. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], ‘Efficiency’. [18] Catling Catling, Hector W. 1977. The Knossos Area 1974–76, Athens: British School at Athens. [Google Scholar], Knossos Area; Coldstream Coldstream, John N. 1982. “Greeks and Phoenicians in the Aegean”. In Phönizier im Westen, Edited by: Niemeyer, H. G. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern. [Google Scholar], ‘Greeks and Phoenicians’; Niemeyer Niemeyer, Hans G. 2002. “Die Phönizier am Mittelmeer. Neue Forschungen zur frühen Expansion”. In Die nahöstlichen Kulturen und Griechenland an der Wende vom 2. zum 1. Jahrtausend v. Chr. Kontinuität und Wandel von Strukturen und Mechanismen, Edited by: Braun-Holzinger, Eva and Matthäus, Hartmut. Möhnesee: Bibliopolis. [Google Scholar], ‘Die phönizischen Niederlassungen’, 46–47. [19] On the collapse, see Liverani Liverani, Mario. 1987. “The Collapse of the Near Eastern Regional System at the End of the Bronze Age: The Case of Syria”. In Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World, Edited by: Rowlands, Michael, Trolle Larsen, Mogens and Kristiansen, Kristian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar], ‘Collapse’; Zaccagnini Zaccagnini, Carlo. 1987. “Aspects of Ceremonial Exchange in the Near East During the Late Second Millennium BC”. In Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World, Edited by: Rowlands, Michael, Trolle Larsen, Mogens and Kristiansen, Kristian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar], ‘Ceremonial Exchange’; Sommer Sommer, Michael. 2001. Der Untergang des hethitischen Reiches. Anatolien und der östliche Mittelmeerraum um 1200 v. Chr.. Saeculum, 52: 157–76. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], ‘Untergang’. On the resurgence of the Mediterranean trade in the Early Iron Age, see Liverani Liverani, Mario. 1988. Antico Oriente. Storia–società–economia, Bari: Laterza. [Google Scholar], Antico Oriente, 629–60; Sommer, Europas Ahnen, 97–99. [20] Popham Popham, M. R., Sackett, L. H. and Themelis, P. G. 1980. Lefkandi. Vol. I: The Iron Age Settlement, the Cemeteries, Text (British School at Athens Supplementary Volume), London: Thames and Hudson. [Google Scholar] et al., Lefkandi I. [21] Gehrig Gehrig, Ulrich. 1990. “Die Phönizier in Griechenland”. In Die Phönizier im Zeitalter Homers, Edited by: Gehrig, Ulrich and Georg Niemeyer, Hans. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern. [Google Scholar], ‘Phönizier’, 27–31. [22] Niemeyer Niemeyer, Hans G. 1989. Das frühe Karthago und die phönizische Expansion im Mittelmeerraum, Göttingen and Zürich: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht. [Google Scholar], Das frühe Karthago, 23–25; Niemeyer Niemeyer, Hans G. 2004. “The Phoenicians and the Birth of a Multinational Mediterranean Society”. In Commerce and Monetary Systems in the Ancient World. Means of Transmission and Cultural Interaction, Edited by: Rollinger, Robert and Ulf, Christoph. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. [Google Scholar], ‘Phönizier am Mittelmeer’; Aubet, Phoenicians, 172–84; Sommer, Phönizier, 113–15. [23] The Homeric epics are, of course, not historical writing in the proper sense; like their origin, their historical context is still the subject of fierce debate, but they can be read as reflections of basic social and mental patterns of the period when they came into being. Equally, Homer's Phoenicians are not historical figures, and even as fictitious protagonists they would make sense in their literary context only if they were recognizable to the contemporary audience (for a critical assessment see Latacz Latacz, Joachim. 1990. “Die Phönizier bei Homer”. In Die Phönizier im Zeitalter Homers, Edited by: Gehrig, Ulrich and Georg Niemeyer, Hans. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern. [Google Scholar], ‘Phönizier’; Winter Winter Irene J. ‘Homer's Phoenicians. History, Ethnography or Literary Trope?’. In The Ages of Homer: A Tribute to Emily Townsend Vermeule, edited by Jane B. Carter and Sarah P. Morris. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1995. [Google Scholar], ‘Homer's Phoenicians’; Sommer Sommer, Michael. 2004. “Die Peripherie als Zentrum. Die Phöniker und der interkontinentale Fernhandel der Eisenzeit”. In Commerce and Monetary Systems in the Ancient World. Means of Transmission and Cultural Interaction, Edited by: Rollinger, Robert and Ulf, Christoph. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. [Google Scholar], ‘Peripherie’). No less disputed is the historicity of the Hebrew bible. Modern scholarship tends towards a sceptical point of view which puts emphasis on the narrative's functioning as ‘intentional’ history. The bulk of the texts was compiled during, and in the aftermath of, the Babylonian Exile, i.e., centuries after the period in which the events described supposedly happened (most notably now, Liverani Liverani, Mario. 2003. Oltre la bibbia. Storia antica di Israele, Bari: Laterza. [Google Scholar], Oltre la bibbia). This does, however, not basically rule out the inclusion of earlier texts into the corpus, such as the ‘Lament over Tyre’ (Ezekiel 27, see below). [24] Od. 15.388–483. [25] Counter to the opinion of Aubet, Phoenicians, 77–118, who believes that the model of centralized palace organization played a major role in the process of Phoenician expansion overseas. The details cannot be discussed here, but the author's point of view is exposed in Sommer, Phönizier, 97–105. [26] A possible typological parallel is the Hanseatic League in northern-central Europe in its period of expansion. On the Hanseatic merchants and their operation, see Dollinger Dollinger, Philippe. 1966. Die Hanse, Stuttgart: Kröner. [Google Scholar], Hanse, 17–24; Schildhauer Schildhauer, Johannes, Fritze, Konrad and Stark, Walter. 1977. Die Hanse, Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften. [Google Scholar] et al., Hanse, 38–67; Friedland Friedland, Klaus. 1991. Die Hanse, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. [Google Scholar], Hanse, 36–71. For a detailed structural comparison, based on Weber Weber, Max. 1999. Die Stadt (Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Die Wirtschaft und die gesellschaftlichen Ordnungen und Mächte, Teilband 5), Edited by: Nippel, Wilfried. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck. [Google Scholar], Die Stadt, see Sommer, Europas Ahnen, 156–72. [27] Il. 23.741–52. [28] This view is corroborated by a famous honorific inscription (367 BCE) for Straton, king of Sidon, with whom the demos of Athens agrees to exchange the symbola. Austin and Vidal-Naquet, Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft, 241–42. [29] This stage of the Mediterranean long-distance trade network seems appropriately illustrated by the ‘peer polity interaction’ model, once popular in the archaeologies and used as a panacea to explain the internal forces of change within a given system of societies (‘peer polities’). Renfrew Renfrew, Colin. 1986. “Introduction”. In Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change, Edited by: Renfrew, Colin and Cherry, John F. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar], ‘Introduction’. [30] In more detail, Sommer, ‘Peripherie als Zentrum’, 233–35. [31] For the account and commentary see Goedicke Goedicke, Hans. 1975. The Report of Wenamun, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar], Report. [32] 2 Chr 9:21; 2 Chr 20:36–37; Ps 72:10. With reference to the Tarshish ships: 1 Kings 22:49; 2 Chr 9:21; Jes 2:16. [33] 1 Kings 5–7. [34] On Francavilla Marittima, see Maaskant-Kleibrink Maaskant-Kleibrink, Marianne. 2000. “Early Cults at the Athenaion at Francavilla Marittima as Evidence for a Pre-Colonial Circulation of nostoi Stories”. In Die Ägäis und das westliche Mittelmeer. Beziehungen –Wechselwirkungen, 8. bis 5. Jh. v. Chr., Edited by: Krinzinger, Fritz. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. [Google Scholar], ‘Early Cults’. On the adaption of oriental pottery styles in Iron Age Italy, see Piergrossi Piergrossi, Alessandra, Kortenaar, Silvia and Acconcia, Valeria. 2004. “Lo sviluppo e la circolazione della ceramica di impasto rosso in Etruria meridionale e nel Lazio”. In Metodi e approcci archeologici. L'industria e il commercio nell'Italia antica, Edited by: De Sena, Eric C. and Dessales, Hélène. Oxford: Archaeopress. [Google Scholar] et al., ‘Sviluppo’; Niemeyer Niemeyer, Hans G. 2002. “Die Phönizier am Mittelmeer. Neue Forschungen zur frühen Expansion”. In Die nahöstlichen Kulturen und Griechenland an der Wende vom 2. zum 1. Jahrtausend v. Chr. Kontinuität und Wandel von Strukturen und Mechanismen, Edited by: Braun-Holzinger, Eva and Matthäus, Hartmut. Möhnesee: Bibliopolis. [Google Scholar], ‘Die phönizischen Niederlassungen’, 50–55; Niemeyer Niemeyer, Hans G. 1990. “Die phönizischen Niederlassungen im Mittelmeerraum”. In Die Phönizier im Zeitalter Homers, Edited by: Gehrig, Ulrich and Georg Niemeyer, Hans. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern. [Google Scholar], Das frühe Karthago, 23. [35] Archaeological evidence for use in dating the settlements is scarce. Niemeyer, Das frühe Karthago, 24–26; Docter Docter, Roald F., Hans Georg, Diemeyer, Albert, Nijboer and Hans van der, Plicht. 2001. Radiocarbon Dates of Animal Bones in the Earliest Levels of Carthage. Mediterranea, 1: 557–77. [Google Scholar] et al., ‘Radiocarbon Dates’, 568–70. [36] Aubet, Phoenicians, 56–59. [37] Frankenstein Frankenstein, Susan. 1979. “The Phoenicians in the Far West. A Function of Neo-Assyrian Imperialism”. In Power and Propaganda. A Symposium on Ancient Empires, Edited by: Trolle Larsen, Mogens. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag. [Google Scholar], ‘Phoenicians’; Gittin Gittin, Seymour. 1997. “The Neo-Assyrian Empire and its Western Periphery. The Levant, with a Focus on Philistine Ekron”. In Assyria 1995, Edited by: Parpola, Simo and Whiting, Robert M. Helsinki: Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project. [Google Scholar], ‘Neo-Assyrian Empire’; more skeptical are Oded Oded, Bustany. 1974. The Phoenician Cities and the Assyrian Empire in the Time of Tiglath-pileser III. Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästinavereins, 90: 38–49. [Google Scholar], ‘Phoenician Cities’; Garbini Garbini, Giovanni. 1980. “I fenici in occidente”. In I fenici. Storia e religione, Edited by: Garbini, Giovanni. Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale. [Google Scholar], ‘Fenici in Occidente’, 128–37. Contra, with strong arguments and with chronological considerations in mind, are Niemeyer, ‘Phönizier am Mittelmeer’, 188; Niemeyer Niemeyer, Hans G. 2004. Phoenician or Greek? Is there a Reasonable Way Out of the Al Mina Debate?. Ancient West and East, 3: 38–50. [Google Scholar], ‘The Phoenicians and the Birth’, 245–46. [38] On the political institutions of the Phoenician city-states, see Sommer, Phönizier, 203–19. On the Levatine bronze age cities, see Liverani Liverani, Mario. 1991. “The Trade Network of Tyre According to Ezek. 27”. In Ah, Assyria… (Festschrift Hayyîm Tadmor), Edited by: Cogan, Mordechai and Eph'al, Israel. Jerusalem: Hebrew University Magnes Press. [Google Scholar], Antico Oriente, 546–61. [39] And possibly even direct control over Kition and its vicinity. For a detailed reconstruction of the political history, mainly based on the literary evidence, see Katzenstein Katzenstein,, H Jacob. 1973. History of Tyre. From the Beginning of the Second Millennium B.C.E. Until the Fall of the Neo-Babylonian Empire in 538 B.C.E., Jerusalem: The Schocken Institute for Jewish Research. [Google Scholar], History of Tyre, 102–10. See also Aubet, Phoenicians, 27–35; Sommer, Europas Ahnen, 96–97; Sommer, Phönizier, 159–65 and the TAVO TAVO. Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients, edited by Sonderforschungsbereich 19 Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients der Universität, Tübingen. [Google Scholar] map by Röllig et al. [40] Ciasca Ciasca, Antonio. 1988. “Fenicia”. In I Fenici, Edited by: Moscati, S. Milano: Bompiani. [Google Scholar], ‘Fenicia’, 145–47. [41] Pritchard Pritchard, James B. 1978. Recovering Sarepta, a Phoenician City. Excavations at Sarafand, Lebanon, 1969–1974, Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar], Sarepta, 111. [42] Ezek 27:8–13. [43] For a thorough analysis of the Ezekiel passage, see Liverani, ‘Trade Network’. [44] Or, in my opinion, less likely Tarsos in southern Anatolia. See Koch Koch, Michael. 1984. Tarschisch und Hispanien. Historisch-geographische und namenkundliche Untersuchungen zur Kolonisation der iberischen Halbinsel, Berlin: de Gruyter. [Google Scholar], Tarschisch. [45] On Melqart as a focal point of urban identity throughout the Mediterranean Garbini Garbini, Giovanni. 1980. “Continuità e innovazioni nella religione fenicia”. In I fenici. Storia e religione, Edited by: Garbini, Giovanni. Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale. [Google Scholar], ‘Continuità e innovazioni’, 154–55; Bonnet Bonnet, Corinne. 1986. “Le culte de Melqart à Carthage. Un cas de conservatisme religieux”. In Religio Phoenicia, Edited by: Corinne Bonnet. Namur: Societé des études classicques. [Google Scholar], ‘Culte’; Bonnet Bonnet, Corinne. 1992. “Héraclès en Orient. Interprétations et syncrétismes”. In Héraclès. D'une rive à l'autre de la Méditerranée, Edited by: Bonnet, Corinne. Brussels: Institut Historique Belge de Rome. [Google Scholar], Melqart; Bonnet Bonnet, Corinne. 1988. Melqart. Cultes et mythes de l'Héraclès Tyrien en Méditerranée, Leuven: Peeters. [Google Scholar], ‘Héraclès’. On the cult of Melqart in Thasos, see Berchem, ‘Sanctuaires’. The importance of Heracles-Melqart as a syncretistic mythic figure in the Mediterranean ‘middle ground’ is now highlighted by Malkin Malkin, Irad. 2005. “Herakles and Melqart. Greeks and Phoenicians in the Middle Ground”. In Cultural Borrowings and Ethnic Appropriations in Antiquity, Edited by: Gruen, Erich. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. [Google Scholar], ‘Herakles’. On Delphi as a centre of communication and information in Archaic Greece, see Dunbabin Dunbabin, Thomas J. 1948. The Western Greeks. The History of Sicily and South Italy from the Foundation of the Greek Colonies to 480 BC, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar], Western Greeks, 26–39. [46] For an outline, see Huss Huss, Werner. 1994. Die Karthager, München: C.H. Beck. 2nd edn [Google Scholar], Karthager, 28–38; Moscati, Chi furono, 132–37; Garbini, ‘Fenici in Occidente’, 128–29, who speaks of ‘occidentalizzazione’ and a process of ‘trapianto’ towards the west. A truly comprehensive history of the Mediterranean in the period preceding the Roman expansion is still much desired. [47] Though there may be traces of tofetim even in the east: for Tyre see Seden Seden, Helga. 1991. A Tophet in Tyre?. Berytus, 39 Available from http://almashriq.hiof.no/ddc/projects/archaeology/berytus-back/berytus39/seeden-tophet/ [Google Scholar], ‘Tophet’, for Cyprus (Amathus) see Karageorghis Karageorghis, Vassos. 1995. “Cyprus and the Phoenicians: Achievement and Perspectives”. In I fenici. Ieri, oggi, domani. Ricerche, scoperte, progetti, Roma: Istituto per la Civiltà Fenicia e Punica. [Google Scholar], ‘Cyprus’. [48] See Karageorghis Karageorghis, Vassos. 1995. “Cyprus and the Phoenicians: Achievement and Perspectives”. In I fenici. Ieri, oggi, domani. Ricerche, scoperte, progetti, Roma: Istituto per la Civiltà Fenicia e Punica. [Google Scholar], 155–56; Moscati Moscati, Sabatino. 1991. Gli adoratori di Moloch. Indagine su un celebre rito cartaginese, Milano: Jaca Book. [Google Scholar], Adoratori; Moscati Moscati, Sabatino. 1992. Chi furono i fenici, Torino: Società Editrice Internazionale. [Google Scholar], Chi furono, 63–64. For the archaeology of the tofet, see Moscati Moscati, Sabatino and Uberti, Maria L. 1985. Scavi al tofet di Tharros. I monumenti lapidei, Roma: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. [Google Scholar] and Uberti, Scavi al tofet. [49] Garbini, ‘Fenici in Occidente’, 136–37. [50] Garbini, ‘Fenici in occidente’, 136–37. [51] Garbini, ‘Fenici in occidente’, 135–36. [52] SAA 2 SAA 2: Parpola, Simo, and Kazuko Watanabe. 1988. Neo-Assyrian Treaties and Loyalty Oaths (State Archives of Assyria. Vol. 2), Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. [Google Scholar], §5. [53] Katzenstein, History of Tyre, 322–34. [54] Elayi Elayi, Josette. 1990. Les cités phéniciennes entre liberté et sujetion. Dialogues d'Histoire Ancienne, 16(2): 93–113. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], ‘Cités phéniciennes’; Économie; Sidon; ‘Phoenician Cities’.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX