MODELS, MEANINGS AND MISUNDERSTANDINGS: SOME ISSUES IN APPLYING RASCH'S THEORY
1977; Wiley; Volume: 14; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1745-3984.1977.tb00040.x
ISSN1745-3984
Autores Tópico(s)Behavioral and Psychological Studies
ResumoJournal of Educational MeasurementVolume 14, Issue 3 p. 227-235 MODELS, MEANINGS AND MISUNDERSTANDINGS: SOME ISSUES IN APPLYING RASCH'S THEORY SUSAN E. WHITELY, Corresponding Author SUSAN E. WHITELY University of Kansas The author would like to thank Rene V. Dawis, Isaac J. Bejar, Kenneth O. Doyle and David L. Pass-more for their comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript and David Thissen for his consultation on some of the technical issues. Although the viewpoints expressed in this manuscript are not necessarily those of these individuals, their assistance was invaluable.WHITELY, SUSAN E. Address: Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045. Title: Assistant Professor of Psychology. Degrees: B.A., Ph.D. University of Minnesota. Specialization: Measurement; Individual Differences.Search for more papers by this author SUSAN E. WHITELY, Corresponding Author SUSAN E. WHITELY University of Kansas The author would like to thank Rene V. Dawis, Isaac J. Bejar, Kenneth O. Doyle and David L. Pass-more for their comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript and David Thissen for his consultation on some of the technical issues. Although the viewpoints expressed in this manuscript are not necessarily those of these individuals, their assistance was invaluable.WHITELY, SUSAN E. Address: Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045. Title: Assistant Professor of Psychology. Degrees: B.A., Ph.D. University of Minnesota. Specialization: Measurement; Individual Differences.Search for more papers by this author First published: September 1977 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1977.tb00040.xCitations: 15 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL REFERENCES ANDERSON, J., KEARNEY, G.E., & EVERETT, A.V. An evaluation of Rasch's structural model for test items. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1968, 21, 231– 238. BIRNBAUM, A. Some latent trait models. In F. LORD & M. NOVICK (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading , Mass. : Addison, Wesley & Co., 1968. BROOKS, R. D. An empirical investigation of the Rasch ratio-scale model for item difficulty in-dexes. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1965). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms No. 65-434. CRONBACH, L. J., & MEEHL, P. E. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 1955, 52, 281– 302. KEARNEY, G. E. Some aspects of the general cognitive ability of various aboriginal Australians as assessed by the Queensland Test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Australia, 1966. SAX, G., & KARR, A. An investigation of response sets on altered parallel forms. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 1962, 22, 371– 376. TORGERSON, W. S. Theory and methods of scaling. New York : John Wiley & Sons, 1958. WHITELY, S. E., & DAWIS, R. V. The nature of the objectivity with the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1974, 11, 163– 178. WHITELY, S. E., & DAWIS, R. V. The influence of test context on item difficulty. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976, 36, 329– 337. WRIGHT, B. Sample-free test calibration and person measurement. Proceedings of the 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1968, 85– 101. WRIGHT, B. Misunderstanding the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977, 14, (pp. 000– 000). WRIGHT, B., & PANCHAPAKESAN, N. A procedure for sample free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1969, 29, 23– 48. Citing Literature Volume14, Issue3September 1977Pages 227-235 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)