Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Carrier Generation and Collection in CdS/CdSe-Sensitized SnO 2 Solar Cells Exhibiting Unprecedented Photocurrent Densities

2011; American Chemical Society; Volume: 5; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1021/nn200315b

1936-086X

Md. Anower Hossain, James R. Jennings, Zhen Yu Koh, Qing Wang,

Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

CdS/CdSe-sensitized nanostructured SnO(2) solar cells exhibiting record short-circuit photocurrent densities have been fabricated. Under simulated AM 1.5, 100 mW cm(-2) illumination, photocurrents of up to 17.40 mA cm(-2) are obtained, some 32% higher than that achieved by otherwise identical semiconductor-sensitized solar cells (SSCs) employing nanostructured TiO(2). An overall power conversion efficiency of 3.68% has been achieved for the SnO(2)-based SSCs, which compares very favorably to efficiencies obtained by the TiO(2)-based SSCs. The characteristics of these SSCs were studied in more detail by optical measurements, spectral incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) measurements, and impedance spectroscopy (IS). The apparent conductivity of sensitized SnO(2) photoanodes is apparently too large to be measured by IS, yet for otherwise identical TiO(2) electrodes, clear electron transport features could be observed in impedance spectra, tacitly implying slower charge transport in TiO(2). Despite this, electron diffusion length measurements suggest that charge collection losses are negligible in both kinds of cell. SnO(2)-based SSCs exhibit higher IPCEs compared with TiO(2)-based SSCs which, considering the similar light harvesting efficiencies and the long electron diffusion lengths implied by IS, is likely to be due to a superior charge separation yield. The resistance to charge recombination is also larger in SnO(2)-based SSCs at any given photovoltage, and open-circuit photovoltages under simulated AM 1.5, 100 mW cm(-2) illumination are only 26-56 mV lower than those obtained for TiO(2)-based SSCs, despite the conduction band minimum of SnO(2) being hundreds of millielectronvolts lower than that of TiO(2).