On Adaptive Search and Optimal Stopping in Sequential Mate Choice
1994; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 144; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/285680
ISSN1537-5323
AutoresYuri Dombrovsky, Nicolas Perrin,
Tópico(s)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsOn Adaptive Search and Optimal Stopping in Sequential Mate ChoiceY. Dombrovsky and N. PerrinY. Dombrovsky and N. PerrinPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 144, Number 2Aug., 1994 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/285680 Views: 18Total views on this site Citations: 58Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1994 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Anna Waffender, Jonathan M. Henshaw Long‐term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 36, no.11 (Dec 2022): 45–56.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14127Jeffrey Winking, Jeremy Koster Timing, Initiators, and Causes of Divorce in a Mayangna/Miskito Community in Nicaragua, Social Sciences 10, no.66 (Jun 2021): 212.https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10060212Samuel Aguilar-Arguello, Alex H. Taylor, Ximena J. Nelson Jumping spiders attend to information from multiple modalities when preparing to jump, Animal Behaviour 171 (Jan 2021): 99–109.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.11.013Anna-Lena Cory, Jutta M. Schneider Males of a sexually cannibalistic spider chemically assess relative female quality, BMC Evolutionary Biology 20, no.11 (Jul 2020).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-020-01657-wGeorgy Yu. Sofronov An Optimal Double Stopping Rule for a Buying-Selling Problem, Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 22, no.11 (Nov 2018): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-018-9684-6Nicholas Furl, Bruno B. Averbeck, Ryan T. McKay Looking for Mr(s) Right: Decision bias can prevent us from finding the most attractive face, Cognitive Psychology 111 (Jun 2019): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.02.002Philip H. Crowley, Pete C. Trimmer, Orr Spiegel, Sean M. Ehlman, William S. Cuello, and Andrew Sih Predicting Habitat Choice after Rapid Environmental Change, The American Naturalist 193, no.55 (Mar 2019): 619–632.https://doi.org/10.1086/702590Daniel P. Neelon, Rafael L. Rodríguez, Gerlinde Höbel On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286, no.18971897 (Feb 2019): 20182830.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2830Ana Cristina R. Gomes, Gonçalo C. Cardoso Choice of high‐quality mates versus avoidance of low‐quality mates, Evolution 72, no.1212 (Nov 2018): 2608–2616.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13630Charlotte H. Chang, Sarah E. Drohan Should I shoot or should I go? Simple rules for prey selection in multi‐species hunting systems, Ecological Applications 28, no.88 (Oct 2018): 1940–1947.https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1796Jonathan M. Henshaw Finding the one: optimal choosiness under sequential mate choice, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 31, no.88 (Jun 2018): 1193–1203.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13296Natasha Mhatre, Daniel Robert The Drivers of Heuristic Optimization in Insect Object Manufacture and Use, Frontiers in Psychology 9 (Jun 2018).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01015Ismail Saglam A New Heuristic in Mutual Sequential Mate Search, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2976502François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont, Thomas Brom, Frank Cézilly Opportunity costs resulting from scramble competition within the choosy sex severely impair mate choosiness, Animal Behaviour 114 (Apr 2016): 249–260.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.019Raymond Cheng, Steven M. Seubert, Daniel D. Wiegmann Mate choice and the evolutionary stability of a fixed threshold in a sequential search strategy, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 10, no.1616 (Jun 2014): 8–11.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2014.05.002Rittik Deb, Rohini Balakrishnan The opportunity for sampling: the ecological context of female mate choice, Behavioral Ecology 25, no.44 (May 2014): 967–974.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru072Michael S. Reichert Patterns of variability are consistent across signal types in the treefrog Dendropsophus ebraccatus, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 109, no.11 (Feb 2013): 131–145.https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12028Georgy Sofronov An optimal sequential procedure for a multiple selling problem with independent observations, European Journal of Operational Research 225, no.22 (Mar 2013): 332–336.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.042Ivonne Meuche, Oscar Brusa, K Linsenmair, Alexander Keller, Heike Pröhl Only distance matters – non-choosy females in a poison frog population, Frontiers in Zoology 10, no.11 (Jan 2013): 29.https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-10-29Bram Kuijper, Ido Pen, Franz J. Weissing A Guide to Sexual Selection Theory, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 43, no.11 (Dec 2012): 287–311.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160245Lise Cats Myhre, Karen de Jong, Elisabet Forsgren, and Trond Amundsen Sex Roles and Mutual Mate Choice Matter during Mate Sampling., The American Naturalist 179, no.66 (Jul 2015): 741–755.https://doi.org/10.1086/665651Sergio Castellano, Giorgia Cadeddu, Paolo Cermelli Computational mate choice: Theory and empirical evidence, Behavioural Processes 90, no.22 (Jun 2012): 261–277.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.010Gerlind U C Lehmann Weighing costs and benefits of mating in bushcrickets (Insecta: Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae), with an emphasis on nuptial gifts, protandry and mate density, Frontiers in Zoology 9, no.11 (Jan 2012): 19.https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-9-19Steven M. Seubert, Gordon A. Wade, Daniel D. Wiegmann The variability of male quality and female mate choice decisions: second-order stochastic dominance and the behavior of searchers under a sequential search strategy, Journal of Mathematical Biology 63, no.66 (Jan 2011): 1121–1138.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-010-0399-8David Laloi, Christophe Eizaguirre, Pierre Fédérici, Manuel Massot Female choice for heterozygous mates changes along successive matings in a lizard, Behavioural Processes 88, no.33 (Nov 2011): 149–154.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.08.011Oliver M. Beckers, William E. Wagner Mate sampling strategy in a field cricket: evidence for a fixed threshold strategy with last chance option, Animal Behaviour 81, no.33 (Mar 2011): 519–527.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.022Amanda S. Izzo, David A. Gray Heterospecific courtship and sequential mate choice in sister species of field crickets, Animal Behaviour 81, no.11 (Jan 2011): 259–264.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.015DAVID M. RAMSEY A LARGE POPULATION, GAME THEORETIC MODEL OF JOB-SEARCH WITH DISCOUNTING, International Game Theory Review 11, no.0303 (Sep 2009): 301–320.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198909002339Simone Immler, Michael Taborsky Sequential polyandry affords post-mating sexual selection in the mouths of cichlid females, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63, no.88 (Mar 2009): 1219–1230.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0744-3Alison M. Bell, Shala J. Hankison, Kate L. Laskowski The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis, Animal Behaviour 77, no.44 (Apr 2009): 771–783.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.022Gad Saad, Aliza Eba, Richard Sejean Sex differences when searching for a mate: A process-tracing approach, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 22, no.22 (Apr 2009): 171–190.https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.620Tim W. Fawcett, Colin Bleay Previous experiences shape adaptive mate preferences, Behavioral Ecology 20, no.11 (Sep 2008): 68–78.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn116Shawn M. Wilder, Ann L. Rypstra Prior encounters with the opposite sex affect male and female mating behavior in a wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62, no.1111 (Jun 2008): 1813–1820.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0610-8M. J. Draud, J. N. Verga, M. P. Haley, M. Itzkowitz Mate inspection patterns in the female beaugregory damselfish (Stegastes leucostictus), acta ethologica 11, no.11 (Nov 2007): 6–15.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-007-0036-8Daniel D. Wiegmann, Lisa M. Angeloni Mate choice and uncertainty in the decision process, Journal of Theoretical Biology 249, no.44 (Dec 2007): 654–666.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.08.027Gerlind U. C. Lehmann Density-dependent plasticity of sequential mate choice in a bushcricket (Orthoptera:Tettigoniidae), Australian Journal of Zoology 55, no.22 (Jan 2007): 123.https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO06105Edmund J. Collins, John M. McNamara, David M. Ramsey Learning rules for optimal selection in a varying environment: mate choice revisited, Behavioral Ecology 17, no.55 (Jun 2006): 799–809.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl008Mats Björklund Mate choice for indirect benefits displayed by a large ornament: simulations using a neural network, Animal Behaviour 71, no.33 (Mar 2006): 549–553.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.018Eileen A. Hebets, Wayne P. Maddison Xenophilic mating preferences among populations of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis Griswold, Behavioral Ecology 16, no.66 (Aug 2005): 981–988.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ari079Hanna Kokko, Johanna Mappes SEXUAL SELECTION WHEN FERTILIZATION IS NOT GUARANTEED, Evolution 59, no.99 (Jan 2005): 1876.https://doi.org/10.1554/05-218.1John M.C. Hutchinson, Konrad Halupka Mate choice when males are in patches: optimal strategies and good rules of thumb, Journal of Theoretical Biology 231, no.11 (Nov 2004): 129–151.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.06.009Joshua J. Schwartz, Kenneth Huth, Timothy Hutchin How long do females really listen? Assessment time for female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor, Animal Behaviour 68, no.33 (Sep 2004): 533–540.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.09.016Eileen A. Hebets Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: Exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, no.2323 (Nov 2003): 13390–13395.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2333262100Trevor E. Pitcher, Bryan D. Neff, F. Helen Rodd, Locke Rowe Multiple mating and sequential mate choice in guppies: females trade up, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270, no.15241524 (Aug 2003): 1623–1629.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2280Tim W. Fawcett, Rufus A. Johnstone Optimal assessment of multiple cues, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270, no.15241524 (Aug 2003): 1637–1643.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2328M Kavaliers, D.D Colwell, W.J Braun, E Choleris Brief exposure to the odour of a parasitized male alters the subsequent mate odour responses of female mice, Animal Behaviour 65, no.11 (Jan 2003): 59–68.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.2043MATS BJÖRKLUND Optimal Mate Choice in a Neural Network, Journal of Theoretical Biology 218, no.22 (Sep 2002): 149–154.https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.3063George W Barlow How behavioural studies contribute to the species problem: a piscine perspective, Fish and Fisheries 3, no.33 (Oct 2002): 197–212.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2002.00083.x J. Albert C. Uy , Gail L. Patricelli , and Gerald Borgia Complex Mate Searching in the Satin Bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. J. A. C. Uy et al., The American Naturalist 158, no.55 (Jul 2015): 530–542.https://doi.org/10.1086/323118William E. Wagner, Matthew R. Smeds, Daniel D. Wiegmann Experience Affects Female Responses to Male Song in the Variable Field Cricket Gryllus lineaticeps (Orthoptera, Gryllidae), Ethology 107, no.99 (Dec 2001): 769–776.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00700.xRUSSELL BONDURIANSKY The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence, Biological Reviews 76, no.33 (Mar 2007): 305–339.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793101005693Daniel D. Wiegmann Search behaviour and mate choice by female field crickets, Gryllus integer, Animal Behaviour 58, no.66 (Dec 1999): 1293–1298.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1243David A. Gray, William H. Cade QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE FIELD CRICKET, GRYLLUS INTEGER, Evolution 53, no.33 (May 2017): 848–854.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05378.x Paul J. Watson , Robert R. Stallmann Göran Arnqvist , and Sexual Conflict and the Energetic Costs of Mating and Mate Choice in Water Striders Watson, Stallmann, Arnqvist, The American Naturalist 151, no.11 (Jul 2015): 46–58.https://doi.org/10.1086/286101 Mary L. Reid and Judy A. Stamps Female Mate Choice Tactics in A Resource‐Based Mating System: Field Tests of Alternative Models Reid & Stamps, The American Naturalist 150, no.11 (Jul 2015): 98–121.https://doi.org/10.1086/286058MICHAEL D. JENNIONS, MARION PETRIE VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES, Biological Reviews 72, no.22 (Jan 2007): 283–327.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00015.xRobert M Gibson, Tom A Langen How do animals choose their mates?, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, no.1111 (Nov 1996): 468–470.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)10050-1Marc Mangel, George W. Swan, Thomas G. Hallam Book reviews, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 57, no.33 (May 1995): 499–506.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460637
Referência(s)