A revised tsunami source model for the 1707 Hoei earthquake and simulation of tsunami inundation of Ryujin Lake, Kyushu, Japan
2011; American Geophysical Union; Volume: 116; Issue: B2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1029/2010jb007918
ISSN2156-2202
AutoresTakashi Furumura, Kentaro Imai, Takuto Maeda,
Tópico(s)Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
ResumoJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid EarthVolume 116, Issue B2 SeismologyFree Access A revised tsunami source model for the 1707 Hoei earthquake and simulation of tsunami inundation of Ryujin Lake, Kyushu, Japan Takashi Furumura, Takashi Furumura [email protected] Center for Integrated Disaster Information Research, Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorKentaro Imai, Kentaro Imai Center for Integrated Disaster Information Research, Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Now at Tsunami Engineering Laboratory, Disaster Control Research Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.Search for more papers by this authorTakuto Maeda, Takuto Maeda Center for Integrated Disaster Information Research, Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this author Takashi Furumura, Takashi Furumura [email protected] Center for Integrated Disaster Information Research, Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorKentaro Imai, Kentaro Imai Center for Integrated Disaster Information Research, Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Now at Tsunami Engineering Laboratory, Disaster Control Research Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.Search for more papers by this authorTakuto Maeda, Takuto Maeda Center for Integrated Disaster Information Research, Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this author First published: 16 February 2011 https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007918Citations: 91AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract [1] Based on many recent findings such as those for geodetic data from Japan's GEONET nationwide GPS network and geological investigations of a tsunami-inundated Ryujin Lake in Kyushu, we present a revised source rupture model for the great 1707 Hoei earthquake that occurred in the Nankai Trough off southwestern Japan. The source rupture area of the new Hoei earthquake source model extends further, to the Hyuga-nada, more than 70 km beyond the currently accepted location at the westernmost end of Shikoku. Numerical simulation of the tsunami using a new source rupture model for the Hoei earthquake explains the distribution of the very high tsunami observed along the Pacific coast from western Shikoku to Kyushu more consistently. A simulation of the tsunami runup into Ryujin Lake using the onshore tsunami estimated by the new model demonstrates a tsunami inundation process; inflow and outflow speeds affect transport and deposition of sand in the lake and around the channel connecting it to the sea. Tsunamis from the 684 Tenmu, 1361 Shokei, and 1707 Hoei earthquakes deposited sand in Ryujin Lake and around the channel connecting it to the sea, but lesser tsunamis from other earthquakes were unable to reach Ryujin Lake. This irregular behavior suggests that in addition to the regular Nankai Trough earthquake cycle of 100–150 years, there is a hyperearthquake cycle of 300–500 years. These greater earthquakes produce the largest tsunamis from western Shikoku to Kyushu. 1. Introduction [2] Great interplate earthquakes have occurred at the Nankai Trough at a recurrence interval of approximately 100 to 150 years due to the subduction of the Philippine Sea plate beneath southwestern Japan. The Nankai Trough extends from Suruga Bay to the Hyuga-nada. Its total length is approximately 800 km. The history of Nankai Trough earthquake occurrences can be traced through 11 events, beginning with the Hakuho Nankai earthquake in AD 684 [e.g., Ishibashi, 2004; Ando, 1975]. The earthquake occurrence pattern can be characterized by three fault segments: the Nankai, the Tonankai, and the Tokai, from west to east. The fault rupture pattern is described as either simultaneous or individual ruptures of each earthquake segment. [3] Figure 1 illustrates the Nankai Trough earthquake occurrence pattern for three recent events, the 1944 Tonankai (M7.9) and 1946 Nankai (M8.0) earthquakes, the 1854 Ansei Nankai (M8.4) and Ansei Tokai (M8.4) earthquakes, and the 1707 Hoei earthquake (M8.4). The spread of the source area of the 1944 Tonankai earthquake was rather short and stopped before the Tokai earthquake fault segment. Thus, a Tokai earthquake has not occurred for more than 150 years since the 1854 Ansei Tokai earthquake. Since more than 60 years have been passed since the former earthquake cycle we expect that next earthquake sequence might occur along the Nankai Trough in the next 30 years. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Source rupture areas of recent three Nankai Trough earthquake cycles: (a) the 1944 Tonankai and 1946 Nankai earthquakes, (b) the 1854 Ansei Nankai and Tokai earthquakes, and (c) the 1707 Hoei earthquake. (d) An index map illustrating major place names. [4] In the recorded history of the Nankai Trough earthquakes the 1707 Hoei earthquake (hereafter called the Hoei earthquake) was the largest shock in modern Japanese history. It killed more than 20,000 people due to its strong ground motion and the tsunami associated with the earthquake [Usami, 1996, 2003]. The fault rupture area of the Hoei earthquake has been thought to spread from Suruga Bay to the westernmost end of Shikoku, i.e., the whole extent of the 1854 Ansei Tokai and the 1854 Ansei Nankai earthquake source segments. Therefore, the Hoei earthquake is often referred as a worst case scenario for earthquakes occurring in the Nankai Trough. This source model is often used for assessing earthquake-induced damage expected for future Nankai Trough earthquakes. [5] The source rupture histories of the recent 1944 Tonankai and 1946 Nankai earthquakes were examined extensively based on the analysis of modern instrumental data, such as tide gauge records of tsunami waveforms [Aida, 1981; Tanioka, 2001; Tanioka and Satake, 2001; Baba et al., 2002, 2006], seismograms of regional strong ground motions and teleseismic waveforms [Ichinose et al., 2003; Murotani, 2007; Yamanaka, 2004], geodetic data derived from leveling surveys [Fitch and Scholz, 1971; Kanamori, 1972; Ando, 1975; Ishibashi, 1981; Sagiya and Thatcher, 1999], and combinations of these data [Satake, 1993]. Source models of historical events such as the Hoei earthquake, on the other hand, have mostly been deduced from descriptions of earthquake phenomenon in ancient documents such as shaking felt by humans, damage to houses, and visual measurements of tsunami inundation or tsunami runup height. Ando [1975] deduced the source model of the Hoei earthquake using various data sets, including the vertical movements of ground surface associated with the earthquake [Kawasumi, 1950], the distribution pattern of seismic intensities [Omori, 1913], and comparisons between these phenomena and measurements from the recent 1944 Tonankai and 1946 Tokai earthquakes. Aida [1981] deduced a source model for the Hoei earthquake based on tsunami data compiled by Hatori [1966, 1974] and presented a better source model that explains distribution of the tsunami height along the Pacific coast from Shikoku to Suruga Bay. An'naka et al. [2003] modified the source model of Aida [1981] and improved the agreement between tsunami simulations and observed tsunami height distributions. [6] The source model for the Hoei earthquake deduced by Ando [1975], Aida [1981], and An'naka et al. [2003] determined that the source rupture area of this event extends from Suruga Bay to the westernmost end of Shikoku, i.e., the whole extent of the source area of the 1856 Ansei Tokai and the Ansei Nankai earthquakes. However, it should be kept in mind that objective data, such as shaking intensities and tsunami heights in Kyushu, were rather limited at that time and thus, these data may not well incorporated in their analysis. Thus, further supporting evidence is needed to develop a reliable and detailed source rupture history for the Hoei earthquake. [7] Recently, there have been numerous works reporting geological surveys of earthquake-related lacustrine sediment in seashore lakes along the Pacific coast from Shikoku to Kyushu. These studies endeavor to clarify the tsunami history of the historical and prehistorical Nankai Trough earthquakes [e.g., Tsukuda et al., 1999; Okamura et al., 1997, 2000, 2003, 2004; Tsuji et al., 1998, 2002; Nanayama and Shigeno, 2004; Komatsubara and Fujiwara, 2007; Matsuoka and Okamura, 2009]. Ryujin Lake is one such onshore lake that has tsunami-induced oceanic deposits (hereafter called tsunami lakes), located along the coast of the Hyuga-nada in Kyushu. Ryujin Lake has a thick cover of marine deposits, including coarse-grained sea sands and marine sediments containing oceanic plankton carried by Nankai Trough earthquake. It should also be noted that such tsunami-induced onshore deposits have not accrued regularly in Ryujin Lake due to the Nankai earthquakes that occur every 100 to 150 years, but were only deposited in the 1707 Hoei earthquake, the 1361 Shohei earthquake, and the 684 Tenmu earthquake, which are probably associated with larger tsunamis than the other Nankai earthquakes [Matsuoka and Okamura, 2009; Okamura et al., 2004]. Recent findings in the historical documents claim that the height of the tsunami during the Hoei earthquake at the village of Yonouzu, near Ryujin Lake, was more than 10 m, which is very much larger than the tsunamis associated with the 1854 and 1946 events [Chida et al., 2003; Chida and Nakayama, 2006]. [8] Recent developments of the Japanese GEONET nation-wide GPS network illustrating the pattern of present ground deformation which is considered to be undergoing recovery process of post-Nankai Trough earthquake. Also, studies on interplate coupling along the Nankai Trough based on the GEONET data [e.g., Ichitani et al., 2010; Hashimoto et al., 2009; Nishimura et al., 1999; T. Hashimoto, http://www.jamstec.go.jp/esc/projects/fy2009/12-hashi.html] reveal an area where strong interplate coupling occurs along the Nankai Trough subduction zone. [9] Following these new findings and supporting instrumental data, we will reexamine the source model for the Hoei earthquake. Our belief based on detail tsunami simulation is that the source rupture area of the Hoei earthquake extended an additional 70 km eastward to the Hyuga-nada from the westernmost end of Shikoku. Thus, the Hoei earthquake was not a linkage occurrence of the 1854 Ansei Nankai and the Ansei Tokai earthquakes but a much larger event. Similar discussion on the possible extension of the Hoei earthquake source area was also discussed by Harada and Ishibashi [2006] based on tsunami simulation. Our new source model with the source rupture area extended to the Hyuga-nada explains the large tsunami observed in Kyushu more consistently than previous models. The tsunami inundated Ryujin Lake, acting together with subsidence of the coastline associated with the earthquake is also explained by the new source model very effectively. [10] In section 2, we first simulate the tsunami and ground deformation patterns from the Hoei earthquakes to show the applicability and limitations of the current source model of, e.g., An'naka et al. [2003]. We compare the simulation results with observed heights of the tsunami along the Pacific coast of the Nankai Trough, especially from western Shikoku to Kyushu [Hatori, 1974, 1985; Murakami et al., 1996]. We then reexamine the source model of the Hoei earthquake based on recent objective data derived by the geological and geodetic investigations mentioned above. Finally, we simulate the tsunami runup and inundation of Ryujin Lake using a high-resolution bathymetric model to demonstrate the effectiveness of our new Hoei model in duplicating observed data due to the earthquake and to understand how the tall tsunami generated by the Hoei earthquake transported oceanic sand into Ryujin Lake. 2. Tsunami Simulation for the 1707 Hoei Earthquake [11] We first conducted tsunami simulation for the Hoei earthquake using a source model of An'naka et al. [2003] to examine the effectiveness of the present source model for reproducing observed height of the tsunami along the Pacific coast of the Nankai Trough [Hatori, 1974, 1985; Murakami et al., 1996]. Deformation of the Ground Surface in the Hoei Earthquake [12] The source model of the Hoei earthquake deduced by An'naka et al. [2003] consists of four fault segments (N1 to N4), which extend from Suruga Bay to the westernmost end of Shikoku, a total length of 605 km. The geometry and source parameters of each segment are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Fault Parameters for the 1707 Hoei Earthquake Described by Subfault Segments N1 to N4a Segment Fault Location (Latitude (°N)/Longitude (°E)) Length (km) Width (km) Depth (km) Strike (deg) Dip (deg) Rake (deg) Slip (m) N1 35.120/138.706 120 50 6.4 193 20 71 5.6 N2 33.823/138.235 205 100 4.1 246 10 113 7.0 N3 33.006/136.074 155 100 7.8 251 12 113 5.6 N4 32.614/134.481 125 120 10.1 250 8 113 9.2 a After An'naka et al. [2003]. The fault location indicates east corner of each subfault. [13] Figure 2 illustrates the calculated vertical ground deformation due to fault rupture of the N1 through N4 fault segments for the Hoei earthquake, derived following Mansinha and Smylie [1971]. Large slips over the shallowly dipping N1 through N4 fault planes over the subducting Philippine Sea plate develop coseismic deformations on the Earth's surface with upheaval and subsidence of several tens of centimeters to meters in height extending along the source rupture area. Such deformations of the ground surface associated with large subduction zone earthquakes are known to produce marine terraces by upheaval and onshore lakes by subsidence. Postseismic deformations of the ground surface during interearthquake cycles gradually resolve such earthquake-induced deformation to a normal level over tens of years. Large ground upheavals of up to 2 m have been confirmed above the shallowest end of the source fault segment on the trench side. Such ground surface upheaval occurs mostly at sea but some can be found on land, including at Cape Muroto, Cape Shiono, and along the coast of Suruga Bay. On the other hand, large surface subsidence of as much as 2 m is found widely on land in a narrow belt zone extending from Shizuoka to the westernmost end of Shikoku. Such ground deformations caused by the rupture of the N1 to N4 segments is consistent with the observed ground deformation pattern of the Hoei earthquake compiled by Kawasumi [1950], which includes large vertical upheavals of 2 to 2.5 m at Cape Muroto, 1 m at Omaezaki, and subsidence of 2 m at Kochi. Figure 2Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Surface displacement for the 1707 Hoei earthquake calculated using the source model of An'naka et al. [2003] with ground surface subsidence (blue) and upheaval (red). The contour interval is 0.5 m. Triangles show locations of the lakes that have tsunami deposits from the Nankai Trough earthquakes. Tsunami Simulation [14] Using the results of the coseismic ground deformation pattern, we conducted a tsunami simulation for the Hoei earthquake. The area of the tsunami simulation is 540 km by 860 km, which covers the entire Pacific Coast from Honshu to Kyushu where the large tsunami hit during the Hoei earthquake. We used a nested mesh model that connects gradually 30 m, 90 m, and 270 m mesh model to allow efficient simulation of the tsunami in heterogeneous bathymetry (Figure 3). The bathymetric model of each resolution was provided by the Central Disaster Mitigation Council, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Subfault segments N1 to N4 of the source model of the Hoei earthquake are divided into small pieces 1 km by 1 km in size. The source rupture is assumed to start in the Kumano Sea off the Kii Peninsula, spreading bilaterally toward Kyushu and Suruga Bay at a rupture speed of Vr = 2.7 km/s. The rupture of each subfault takes 5 s. For simplicity, we assumed that the shape of the initial tsunami on the sea surface is identical to the sea bottom deformation associated with the earthquake. The model of bathymetric and topography model just after the earthquake are modified using resultant vertical ground deformation pattern (Figure 2) due to the earthquake. Then propagation of the tsunami over the sea taking heterogeneous bathymetry into account and tsunami runup on heterogeneous topography are calculated based on a finite difference method (FDM) of a nonlinear, long-wave tsunami model [Goto and Ogawa, 1997], assuming Manning's roughness coefficients of 0.025 m−1/3 s and 0.04 m−1/3 s in the sea and on land, respectively. The computational time step is set at Dt = 0.6 s to satisfy FDM simulation stability conditions. Figure 3Open in figure viewerPowerPoint The area of tsunami simulation and mesh configuration connecting gradually from coarser 270 m (R1) to finer 90 m (R2) and 30 m (R3) mesh models. R4 indicates the area of tsunami inundation simulation in the area surrounding Ryujin Lake (Figure 10). [15] Snapshots of tsunami propagation obtained from the simulation of the Hoei earthquake are illustrated in Figure 4 at time T = 1, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 min from the time the earthquake started in Animation S1. In Figure 4a (T = 1 min) the development of tsunami above the Hoei earthquake source segment (N1–4) is very striking, with an uplift of the sea surface of approximately 3 m over the Nankai Trough. As time passes, the raised mass of seawater gradually spreads bilaterally as two tsunamis, one propagating toward the seashore and the other to the open ocean at a faster speed. Figure 4b (T = 5.0 min) illustrates two such peaks of elevated sea surface parallel to the trough. Radiation of tsunamis from rectangular fault sources has been confirmed to be very strong in the direction perpendicular to the trough axis, while it is very weak in the direction parallel to the trough. As the tsunami approaches the shore, its speed decreases suddenly and its height increases very drastically. The onshore height of the tsunami, more than 8 m, is several times larger than the height of the initial tsunami above the source area. The later snapshot (Figures 4d and 4e; T = 20 and 40 min) illustrate the arrival of the large tsunami along the Pacific coast from the westernmost end of Shikoku to Hyuga-nada. The tsunami lasts for several tens of minutes after the earthquake. A number of tsunami trains are captured within Tosa Bay (Figure 4f). Figure 4Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Snapshots of the tsunami associated with the 1707 Hoei earthquake at (a) T = 1.0 min, (b) T = 5.0 min, (c) T = 10.0 min, (d) T = 20.0 min, (e) T = 40.0 min, and (f) T = 80.0 min after the earthquake origin time. Red and blue colors indicate uplift and subsidence of the sea surface, respectively. [16] Figure 5 illustrates the distribution of maximum simulated tsunami height for An'naka et al. [2003] Hoei earthquake source model. From historical records, tsunami heights of 9 m at Tosa Shimizu and Ashizuri Cape and more than 4 m along the coast from Ashizuri Cape to Hyuga-nada are known to have occurred (shown as circles in Figure 5 [Murakami et al., 1996]). The simulated maximum tsunami height along the Pacific coast from Tosa Bay to Suruga Bay generally agrees well with observed tsunami runup during the Hoei earthquake [e.g., Hatori, 1974, 1985; Murakami et al., 1996]. However, the height of the simulated tsunami from western Shikoku to Hyuga-nada in Kyushu is less than half of the actual height observed. For example, historical archives document that at Yonouzu village, at the northern end of Hyuga-nada, the tsunami was more than 10 m and killed 18 people [Chida et al., 2003; Chida and Nakayama, 2006]. The height of the tsunami during the Hoei earthquake at Yonouzu was several times larger than that experienced during the 1854 Ansei earthquake. Yet the simulated tsunami height at Yonouzu is less than 4 m, which is comparable to the tsunami caused by the 1854 Ansei Nankai earthquake but much shorter than the tsunami experienced with the Hoei earthquake. Figure 5Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Maximum tsunami height along the Pacific coast of Japan. The map on the top shows the Pacific coastline from Hyuga-nada to Suruga Bay with representative locations. The bottom four plots show the distribution of maximum tsunami height calculated using the simulation of the Hoei earthquake by An'naka et al. [2003]. Circles denote observed tsunami heights during the earthquake [Hatori, 1974, 1985; Murakami et al., 1996]. 3. Revision of the 1707 Hoei Earthquake Source Model [17] In order to better explain the size of the Hoei earthquake tsunami from Cape Ashizuri to Hyuga-nada, we revised the present source model of the Hoei earthquake developed by An'naka et al. [2003] by modifying the structure of the subfault segments off Shikoku based on the findings of a number of recent geodetic and geological investigations of the Nankai Trough. Recent Geological Investigations and Tsunami Lakes [18] Recently, a number of geological experiments of onshore lakes have been carried out to study tsunami-induced deposits on the Pacific coast of central and southwestern Japan in order to better understand the sequence of historical and prehistorical Nankai Trough earthquakes [e.g., Tsukuda et al., 1999; Okamura et al., 1997, 2000, 2004; Tsuji et al., 1998, 2002; Nanayama and Shigeno, 2004; Komatsubara and Fujiwara, 2007; Matsuoka and Okamura, 2009]. Distribution of tsunami lakes such as Hamana Lake at Enshu-nada [e.g., Okamura et al., 2000], Suwa Lake on the Kii Peninsula [e.g., Tsuji et al., 2002], and Tadasuga Lake in Shikoku [e.g., Okamura et al., 2003] are marked by triangles in Figure 2. [19] Tsunami lakes on the shoreline of the Pacific coast along the Nankai Trough are aligned linearly over the area where large ground subsidence has occurred during Nankai Trough earthquakes (Figure 2). It is thought that ground surface subsidence due to the earthquakes results in particularly deep tsunami inundation on land, which transports sea sand into onshore lakes very effectively. Then, for several tens of years after the earthquake, gradual upheaval of the ground surface occurs and it recovers the subsided ground surface to a normal level and preserves tsunami deposits by protecting from erosion by sea waves or rains for the long periods of time during the interearthquake cycle. The tsunami lakes distributed along the Nankai Trough shoreline lie along a larger zone that subsides during the Nankai Trough earthquakes have developed and preserved in such way. Ryujin Lake, however, recently observed by Okamura et al. [2004] at the Hyuga-nada seashore in Kyushu, is not in a location typical of other tsunami lakes in Shikoku and Honshu where large ground subsidence is considered to have occurred during Nankai Trough earthquakes. The pattern of earthquake ground deformation shows that the area of coseismic ground deformation terminates at the westernmost end of Shikoku, approximately 100 km farther east from Ryujin Lake (Figure 2). This implies that the source rupture area of the Nankai subfault segments might not stop at the westernmost end of Shikoku as most source models assume [Ando, 1975; Aida, 1981; An'naka et al., 2003], but may extend further, to Hyuga-nada. [20] We therefore examined other findings supporting our hypothesis of an extended source of the Hoei earthquake. The C14 age determination for the sedimentation of Ryujin Lake revealed that three sheets of sand layers sandwiched between muddy host sediments were developed during the 1707 Hoei, the 1361 Shohei, and the 684 Tenmu earthquakes [Okamura et al., 2003, 2004]. On the other hand tsunami deposits from the other Nankai Trough earthquakes, which have occurred every 100 to 150 years, do not exist in Ryujin Lake. This implies that unusually large earthquakes associated with larger tsunamis than usual have struck there during the 1707 Hoei, the 1361 Shohei, and the 684 Tenmu earthquakes. The maximum water depth of the lake is approximately 3 m in the center, and a narrow channel or waterway southwest of the lake connects it to the sea. Okamura et al. [2003, 2004] noted that the tsunami deposits are very thick at the southwest side of the lake where the channel connects it to the sea and become thinner toward the center of the lake, implying an another important constraint that tsunami height at the Ryujin Lake was not as tall as overlying beach hill of 10 m surrounding the lake. Ground Deformation and Interplate Coupling Pattern Derived From GPS Data [21] Ten years of data from the nationwide GEONET GPS network illustrates the current pattern of ground deformation (Figure 6). The pattern of vertical ground deformation derived from GEONET data indicates areas where ground upheaval larger than 2 mm/yr has occurred over the past 10 years. A wide upheaval area extends on land from Enshu-nada to Hyuga-nada, roughly covering the area that suffered subsidence due to the Hoei earthquake (Figure 2). Also, sporadic areas of large (>2 mm/yr) ground subsidence appear on land along the shoreline of the Pacific coast such as at Cape Ashizuri, Cape Muroto, Cape Shiono, and Omaezaki. These correspond to ground upheaval areas associated with the Hoei earthquake (Figure 2). This pattern of vertical ground movement is considered to illustrate the process of recovery of ground surface deformation due to the Nankai Trough earthquakes. Figure 6Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Pattern of average vertical movements of uplift (red) and subsidence (blue) derived using the GEONET GPS data from August 1999 to August 2009 are illustrated by blue-red color scale. The triangle at the top right indicates the reference point used in this analysis. Thick solid and dashed contour lines illustrate slip delay and advance rate at the plate boundary derived by analysis of GPS data by Hashimoto et al. [2009] with a contour interval of 2 cm/yr. [22] If we assume that gentle ground upheaval has continued in the area around Ryujin Lake at a rate of roughly 2 mm/yr until now, the change in ground elevation is estimated to be 60 cm in the past 300 years since the Hoei earthquake in 1707. Because the water level in Ryujin lake is now at mean sea level, it is reasonable to conclude that a large ground subsidence of roughly 60 cm occurred there due to the Hoei earthquake. [23] We also consulted recent studies on the spatial distribution of interplate coupling rates along the Nankai Trough [e.g., Hashimoto et al., 2009; Ichitani et al., 2010; Nishimura et al., 1999; T. Hashimoto, http://www.jamstec.go.jp/esc/projects/fy2009/12-hashi.html]. Figure 7 illustrates one such result obtained by Hashimoto et al. [2009] based on the inversion of horizontal and vertical ground movement data from the GEONET. It shows that an area of strong interplate coupling with high coupling ratios is found from Suruga Bay to Hyuga-nada, more than 100 km beyond the westernmost end of Shikoku which we have considered to be the boundary of the source rupture area for the Nankai Trough earthquake. Similar patterns of plate coupling properties are demonstrated in other studies. Ichitani et al. [2010] and Nishimura et al. [1999] support the evidence that seismic energy is now accumulating there that may cause a large earthquake in the future. Figure 7Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Vertical ground surface deformation derived by the revised 1707 Hoei earthquake source model: (a) an extended source model produced by adding a new N5 subfault segment at the Hyuga-nada and (b) a subfault model with segment N5′ shortened in the direction perpendicular to the trench. Red and blue denote ground surface upheaval and subsidence, respectively. Location of Ryujin Lake is shown by the triangle. Revision of the Hoei Earthquake Source Model [24] Following these new findings, we revised the source rupture model for the Hoei earthquake and extended the border of the Hoei earthquake source segments of An'naka et al. [2003] and others from the westernmost end of Shikoku to Hyuga-nada, where strong interplate coupling has been found by studies using the GEONET data. We worked to match the ground deformation pattern due to the Hoei earthquake and the present ground deformation field shown by the GEONET data, assuming that the significant ground deformation associated with the Hoei earthquake is still influencing the present deformation field. [25] We first set a 70 km by 120 km subfault segment, N5, on the west of the N4 subfault segment and extended the source rupture area of the Hoei earthquake to Hyuga-nada (Figure 7). Other source parameters, including strike, dip, rake and slip were assumed to be the same as for the N4 subfault segmen
Referência(s)