Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Experience with transdermal testosterone replacement therapy for hypogonadal men

1999; Wiley; Volume: 50; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00596.x

1365-2265

Susan Parker, Mary Armitage,

Sexual function and dysfunction studies

BACKGROUND None of the existing options for long‐term testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) for hypogonadal men are ideal. Depot replacement at frequent intervals and implants are effective but invasive and inconvenient for the patient. Oral therapy results in poor hormone levels. Both are associated with undesirable metabolic changes. A transdermal formulation therefore represents a potential therapeutic advance for testosterone replacement. OBJECTIVE To carry out a clinical audit of the acceptability and efficacy as a treatment for hypogonadism of the first transdermal testosterone therapy available in the UK (Andropatch, SmithKline Beecham) compared with existing androgen replacement options. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS Serum testosterone and questionnaire data on treatment efficacy, side‐effects, therapy preference, sexual dysfunction and partner's attitudes to therapy were obtained from 50 hypogonadal men prescribed long‐term testosterone replacement. RESULTS Eighty per cent of the men returned analysable questionnaires. Eighty‐four per cent experienced adverse effects with transdermal therapy, most commonly dermatological problems; 22% of the sample elected to continue with transdermal therapy, 72% returned to depot and 5% returned to oral therapy. The reservoir patches were judged to be too large, uncomfortable, visually obtrusive and noisy. Testosterone levels were comparable to those obtained with depot replacement with the added advantage of a more physiological pharmacokinetic profile. Men taking oral preparations were consistently under‐replaced. CONCLUSIONS Adverse events were substantially higher than reported from clinical trials but in keeping with the spectrum of yellow card reports received by the Committee on Safety of Medicines. The pharmacokinetic advantages are thus largely outweighed by low patient acceptability. In its present form transdermal therapy remains an expensive option for those who cannot tolerate depot testosterone replacement.