Genotyping Method to Screen Individual Drosophila Embryos Prior to RNA Extraction
2006; Future Science Ltd; Volume: 41; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2144/000112267
ISSN1940-9818
Autores Tópico(s)CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
ResumoBioTechniquesVol. 41, No. 4 BenchmarksOpen AccessGenotyping method to screen individual Drosophila embryos prior to RNA extractionMurad Ghanim & Kevin P. WhiteMurad GhanimThe Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel & Kevin P. White*Address correspondence to Kevin White, The Institute for Genomics & Systems Biology, and the Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago and Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. e-mail: E-mail Address: kpwhite@uchicago.eduUniversity of Chicago and Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USAPublished Online:21 May 2018https://doi.org/10.2144/000112267AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit The zygotic activation of genes involved in Drosophila embryonic pattern formation occurs within the first several hours of embryogenesis (1). Among these genes are segmentation factors, such as fushi tarazu (ftz) and even-skipped (eve), and homeotic genes such as Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and Antennapedia (Antp) (1). Mutations in these genes are embryonic lethal for ftz and eve, and larval lethal for Ubx and Antp. The genomic effects on transcription observed due to these mutations are best studied during the times when their gene products are active (2). The activity of proteins encoded by genes such as ftz and eve begins in late stage 4/early stage 5 of embryogenesis (about 2 h after fertilization). However, current methods for sorting wild-type from mutant embryos are based on markers, such as activation of green fluorescent protein (GFP), that cannot be scored effectively until stage 9 (about 5 h after embryogenesis begins and 3 h after FTZ and EVE protein activity in the epidermis) (3,4). An automatic embryo sorter capable of isolating embryos based on GFP fluorescence after embryonic stage 9 has previously been described (3,4); however the problem of identifying homozygous embryos in earlier stages has not been tackled, and thus expression profiling [i.e., using microarrays or reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) in early stages] has not been possible. To overcome this technical obstacle, we have developed a simple genotyping procedure for directly scoring the presence or absence of the GFP or lacZ balancer chromosomes in individual homozygous embryos. Establishing a linear RNA amplification protocol (5) has allowed us the use of <10 embryos to perform a microarray or RT-PCR experiments.Drosophila lethal mutations are usually maintained as heterozygotes, in trans to balancer chromosomes that are used to suppress recombination, thus allowing stable strains heterozygous for mutant genes to be cultured easily (Figure 1A). ftz and eve mutations (6,7) were established in trans to balancer chromosomes carrying a transgene encoding GFP, while Ubx and Antp mutations were established in trans to balancer chromosomes carrying a transgene encoding the lacZ gene. The progeny of balanced ftz and eve embryos were hand-sorted under a dissecting microscope at stage 5 cellular blastoderm and were genotyped. To collect stage 7 embryos, stage 5 embryos were aged to that stage at 24°C and then genotyped. The progeny of balanced Ubx and Antp embryos were collected as early as stage 5 and were aged to stages 7 and 9 at 24°C and then genotyped.Figure 1. Genetic crosses, genotyping, and RNA sample collections.(A) Balancer chromosomes (GFP or lacZ) are used to suppress recombination and allow stable maintaining of heterozygous population for the mutation. Twenty-five percent of the offspring are homozygous lethal (G/G) and are identified by genotyping. (B) Genotyping embryos is done through three steps: (1) homogenization of single embryos, (2) preserving the majority of the sample and genotyping the rest, and (3) pooling the homozygous embryos for the mutation based on the genotyping. G, genotype; GFP, green fluorescent protein.Heterozygous flies carrying each mutation in the genes ftz, eve, Ubx, and Antp (Figure 1 A, G) were allowed to lay eggs on grape-agar plates for 1 h. The laid embryos of each genotype contained a mixed population: one-quarter homozygotes for the mutation and lacking the GFP or lacZ chromosome (Figure 1A, boxed genotype G/G), half heterozygotes with one copy of the GFP or lacZ chromosome, and one-quarter homozygous for the balancer chromosome, and therefore with two copies of GFP or lacZ (Figure 1 A). The collected embryos were rapidly dechorionated in 100% bleach for 3 min, and stage 5 single embryos (8) were identified under a light microscope. For genotyping, each embryo was directly transferred into a 0.2-mL PCR tube containing 14.5 L extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.2, 1 mM EDTA, and 25 mM NaCl). Twenty to twenty-five embryos were handled as one batch, each in a single tube. Every individual embryo was homogenized using a pipettor tip. Eleven microliters from the single-embryo extract were stored individually in 96-well plate wells, each containing 30 L TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to preserve RNA (Figure 1B, step 1), and each batch was directly stored in -20°C. Proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to the remaining 3.5 L extract to a final concentration of 200 g/mL (from a stock of 2 mg/mL), and samples were then incubated at 28°C for 30 min, followed by 95°C for 2 min (Figure 1B, step 1). After incubation with proteinase K, the extract was used in PCR containing 5 L 10× PCR buffer supplemented with 15 mM MgCl2 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 0.5 mM mixture dNTP (final concentration 0.125 mM for each nucleoside), 20 pmol each GFP forward and reverse primers (or lacZ primers), 20 pmol each X primer, and 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (see Table 1 for the primers) in a total reaction volume of 25 L. The X primers were designed to specifically amplify a genomic fragment of the CG9650 gene on the X chromosome as a positive control. The PCR conditions were as follows: one cycle of 95°C for 3 min, 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1.5 min, and one cycle of 72°C for 10 min. Ten micro-liters each PCR were run on a 1.2% agarose gel [0.5× Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer]. Embryos were directly scored for the presence or absence of GFP or lacZ chromosomes (indicated by the presence of the X control band and absence of GFP or lacZ specific band) (Figure 1B, step 2). Homozygous mutant extracts preserved in TRIZOL were then pooled (Figure 1B, step 3), and total RNA extraction, amplification, and microarray expression profiling or RT-PCR could then be performed using standard protocols. Table 2 shows all the collections made from the different genotypes studied for one replicate, the total number of embryos assayed, and the amounts of RNA obtained before and after amplification. The expected one-quarter percentage of homozygous embryos to the mutation was observed in all collections made. The amounts of RNA obtained after each total RNA extraction were enough to perform one round of RNA amplification (1–2 g total RNA are needed for one round of RNA amplification) (Table 2). The amounts after RNA amplification were enough to perform at least three micro-array hybridizations (5 g amplified RNA are needed for labeling to perform one microarray hybridization) (Table 2).Table 1. PCR Primers for GenotypingTable 2. Collections and Genotyping Results from Different Genotypes of One ReplicateOur method for the extraction of enough amounts of RNA from homozygous Drosophila embryos during very early stages of pattern formation will be helpful to supplement many expression studies aimed at studying factors activated during this important time in development. Furthermore, our protocol is potentially helpful for workers in other systems where marked chromosomes are available or being developed.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), W.M. Keck Foundation, and the Beckman Foundaton to K.P.W. and a postdoctoral fellowship from U.S.-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development (BARD) fund to M. G.Competing Interests StatementThe authors declare no competing interests.References1. Lawrence, P. 1992. The Making of a Fly: The Genetics of an Animal Design. Blackwell Scientific, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar2. Hughes, S.C. and H.M. Krause. 2001. Establishment and maintenance of para-segmental compartments. Development 128:1109–1118.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar3. Furlong, E.E., D. Profitt, and M.P. Scott. 2001. Automated sorting of live transgenic embryos. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:153–156.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar4. Furlong, E.E., E.C. Andersen, B. Null, K.P. White, and M.P. Scott. 2001. Patterns of gene expression during Drosophila mesoderm development. Science 293:1629–1633.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar5. Baugh, L.R., A.A. Hill, E.L. Brown, and C.P. Hunter. 2001. Quantitative analysis of mRNA amplification by in vitro transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:E29.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar6. Weiner, A.J., M.P. Scott, and T.C. Kaufman. 1984. A molecular analysis of fushi tarazu, a gene in Drosophila melanogaster that encodes a product affecting embryonic segment number and cell fate. Cell 37:843–851.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7. Frasch, M., R. Warrior, J. Tugwood, and M. Levine. 1988. Molecular analysis of even-skipped mutants in Drosophila development. Genes Dev. 2:1824–1838.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar8. Ashburner, M., K.G. Golic, and R.S. Hawley. 2004. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. CSH Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByCF2 transcription factor is involved in the regulation of Mef2 RNA levels, nuclei number and muscle fiber size15 June 2017 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 12, No. 6Target genes of Dpp/BMP signaling pathway revealed by transcriptome profiling in the early D. melanogaster embryoGene, Vol. 591, No. 1Spatial and temporal distribution of Patched-related protein in the Drosophila embryoGene Expression Patterns, Vol. 19, No. 1-2Non-molting glossy / shroud encodes a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase that functions in the 'Black Box' of the ecdysteroid biosynthesis pathwayDevelopment, Vol. 137, No. 12Tissue-specific gene silencing by RNA interference in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vol. 37, No. 7 Vol. 41, No. 4 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics History Received 6 July 2006 Accepted 8 August 2006 Published online 21 May 2018 Published in print October 2006 Information© 2006 Author(s)AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), W.M. Keck Foundation, and the Beckman Foundaton to K.P.W. and a postdoctoral fellowship from U.S.-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development (BARD) fund to M. G.Competing Interests StatementThe authors declare no competing interests.PDF download
Referência(s)