Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

"How Do Mādhyamikas Think?" Revisited

2013; University of Hawaii Press; Volume: 63; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1353/pew.2013.0041

1529-1898

Tom J. F. Tillemans,

Eurasian Exchange Networks

Here, Tom Tillemans revisits his 2009 article "How do Mādhyamikas Think" and once again argues for a limited dialetheism that could apply to certain early Buddhist texts. The contradictions would only be of a non-adjunctive variety, that is, there would be assertions of p and assertions of not- p , but never of p and not-p . A non-adjunctive dialetheism would further Madhyamaka's quietism, in that the same asserted statements would also be negated, thus leaving little possibility for the Buddhist to hold a philosophical thesis as to how things are. On the other hand, adjunction of p with not- p would naturally tend to result in the quasi-Hegelian position that things are in fact contradictory. It is not clear that the adjunctive dialetheism of Deguchi, Garfield, and Priest could further a quietist Madhyamaka philosophy.