Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: on the role of external stakeholders for member identification
2006; Wiley; Volume: 15; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00440.x
ISSN1467-8608
Autores Tópico(s)Management and Organizational Studies
ResumoBusiness Ethics: A European ReviewVolume 15, Issue 2 p. 171-182 Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: on the role of external stakeholders for member identification Mette Morsing, Mette Morsing Associate Professor and Director of the CBS Center for Corporate Values and Responsibility, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author Mette Morsing, Mette Morsing Associate Professor and Director of the CBS Center for Corporate Values and Responsibility, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author First published: 09 March 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00440.xCitations: 157AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Ashforth, B. and Humphrey, R. (1993). 'Emotional labour in service roles: the influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 1, 88–115. 10.2307/258824 Web of Science®Google Scholar Ashforth, B. and Mael, F. 1989. 'Social identity and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14: 1, 20–39. 10.2307/258189 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bergami, M. and Bagozzi, R.P. 2000. 'Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 4, 555–577. 10.1348/014466600164633 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Broms, H. and Gahmberg, H. 1983. 'Communication to self in organizations and cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 3, 482–495. 10.2307/2392254 Web of Science®Google Scholar Brown, T.J. and Dacin, P.A. 1997. 'The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61: 1, 68–84. 10.2307/1252190 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar Campbell, A. 1997. 'Stakeholders: the case in favor. Long Range Planning, 30: 3, 446–449. 10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00003-4 Web of Science®Google Scholar Christensen, L.T. 1997. 'Marketing as auto-communication. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 1: 3, 197–227. 10.1080/10253866.1997.9670299 Google Scholar Christensen, L.T. and Cheney, G. 2000. ' Self-absorption and self-seduction in the corporate identity game'. In M.J. Hatch, M. Schultz and M.H. Larsen (Eds.), The Expressive Organization: 256–270. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Christensen, L.T. and Morsing, M. 2005. Behind Corporate Communication (Bagom Corporate Communication). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur. Google Scholar Crook, C. 2005. 'The good company'. The Economist, 22 January. Google Scholar de Chernatony, L. 2002. 'Would a brand smell any sweeter by a corporate name? Corporate Reputation Review, 5: 2/3, 114–132. 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540169 Google Scholar Dimaggio, P. and Powell, W. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. 1995. 'The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 1, 65–91. 10.2307/258887 Web of Science®Google Scholar Dutton, J. and Dukerich, J. 1992. 'Keeping an eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 3, 517–554. 10.2307/256405 Web of Science®Google Scholar Dutton, J., Dukerich, J. and Harquail, C.V. 1994. 'Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 2, 239–263. 10.2307/2393235 Web of Science®Google Scholar Fombrun, C. and Rindova, V. 2000. ' The road to transparency: reputation management at Royal Dutch/Shell'. In M. Schultz, M.J. Hatch and M.H. Larsen (Eds.), The Expressive Organisation. Linking Identity, Reputation and the Corporate Brand: 77–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Fombrun, C. and van Riel, C. 2004. Fame and Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Google Scholar Ford, G.T., Smith, D.B. and Swasy, J.L. 1990. 'Consumer skepticism of advertising claims: testing hypotheses from economics of information. Journal of Consumer Research, 16: 4, 433–441. 10.1086/209228 Web of Science®Google Scholar Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish. Birth of the Prison. London: Sheridan. Google Scholar Froud, J., Haslam, C., Suckdrev, J., Shaoul, J. and Williams, K. 1996. 'Stakeholder capitalism and one national socialism. Renewal, 4: 1, 23–32. Google Scholar Ginzel, L.E., Kramer, R.M. and Sutton, R.I. 1993. 'Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: the neglected role of the organizational audience. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 227–266. Web of Science®Google Scholar Gioia, D.A. and Chittipeddi, K. 1991. 'Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 6, 433–448. 10.1002/smj.4250120604 Web of Science®Google Scholar Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. 2001. 'Are the strategic stars aligned for your corporate brand? Harvard Business Review, 79: 2, 128–134. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hockerts, K. and Moir, L. 2004. 'Communicating corporate responsibility to investors: the changing role of the investor relations function. Journal of Business Ethics, 52: 1, 85–98. 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033109.35980.16 Web of Science®Google Scholar Kitchen, P.J. 1999. Marketing Communications – Principles and Practice. London: International Thomson Business Press. Google Scholar P.J. Kitchen and D.E. Schultz (Eds.) 2001. Raising the Corporate Umbrella: Corporate Communications in the 21st Century. Houndsmills: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230554580 Google Scholar Kramer, R. 1991. 'Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: the role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 191–207. Web of Science®Google Scholar Lotman, Y.M. 1990. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: I.B. Tauris. Google Scholar Maignan, I. and Ferrell, O.C. 2004. 'Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32: 1, 3–19. 10.1177/0092070303258971 Web of Science®Google Scholar Marsden, C. 2006. ' In defence of corporate responsibility'. In A. Kakabadse and M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility – Reconciling Managerial Strategies Towards the 21st Century: 24–39. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B. and Wood, D. 1997. 'Toward a stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 4, 853–886. 10.2307/259247 Web of Science®Google Scholar Morsing, M. 2005a. 'Message in a bottle: communicating responsibility. Business Strategy Review, 6: 2, 84–88. Google Scholar Morsing, M. 2005b. 'Corporate values – why do companies communicate their identity in stereotype, abstract and banal values?' Paper presented at the European Academy of Management Conference. EURAM, Munich, 5–7 May. Google Scholar Morsing, M. 2006. 'Corporate moral brands – the question of aligning employees. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11: 2. 10.1108/13563280610661642 Google Scholar Morsing, M., Schultz, M. and Nielsen, K.U. 2005. 'The Catch-22 of communicating CSR: findings from a reputation study of Danish companies'. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Corporate Reputation, Identity and Competitiveness. Madrid, 20–22 May. Google Scholar Novo Nordisk Sustainability Report. 2002. Sustainability Report. Google Scholar Novo Nordisk Sustainability Report. 2003. What Does Being There Mean to You? Google Scholar Novo Nordisk Annual Report. 2004. Integrated Financial, Environmental and Social Report. Google Scholar Paine, L.S. 2003. Value Shift: Why Companies Must Merge Social and Financial Imperatives to Achieve Superior Performance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M. 2002. 'The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80: 12, 56–68. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Post, J.E., Preston, L.E. and Sachs, S. 2002. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503619692 Google Scholar Royle, T. 2005. 'Realism or idealism? Corporate social responsibility and the employee stakeholder in the global fast-food industry. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14: 1, 42–55. 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2005.00385.x Google Scholar Scott, S.G. and Lane, V.R. 2000. 'A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25: 1, 43–62. 10.2307/259262 Web of Science®Google Scholar Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C.B. 2001. 'Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38: 2, 225–243. 10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838 Web of Science®Google Scholar Senneth, R. 1999. Flexible Man: The Corrosion of Character. New York, NY: Norton and Company. Google Scholar Smith, J. 2004. 'A précis of a communicative theory of the firm. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13: 4, 317–331. 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2004.00373.x Google Scholar Smith, N.C. 2003. 'Corporate social responsibility: whether or how? California Management Review, 45: 4, 52–76. 10.2307/41166188 Web of Science®Google Scholar Spencer-Brown, G. 1972. Laws of Form, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Crown Publisher. Google Scholar Stoney, C. and Winstanley, D. 2001. 'Stakeholding: confusion or utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrain. Journal of Management Studies, 38: 5, 603–626. 10.1111/1467-6486.00251 Web of Science®Google Scholar Tan, S.J. 2002. 'Can consumers' scepticism be mitigated by claim objectivity and claim extremity. Journal of Marketing Communications, 8: 1, 45–64. 10.1080/13527260210122097 Google Scholar Van Riel, C.B.M. 1995. Principles of Corporate Communication. London: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar Zadek, S. 2001. The Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship. London: Earthscan. Web of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume15, Issue2April 2006Pages 171-182 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)