Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Ectopic transgene expression in butterfly imaginal wing discs using vaccinia virus

2006; Future Science Ltd; Volume: 40; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2144/000112109

1940-9818

David L. Lewis, Craig R. Brunetti,

Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

BioTechniquesVol. 40, No. 1 BenchmarksOpen AccessEctopic transgene expression in butterfly imaginal wing discs using vaccinia virusDavid L. Lewis & Craig R. BrunettiDavid L. LewisMirus Bio Corporation, Madison, WI, USA & Craig R. Brunetti*Address correspondence to Craig R. Brunetti, Trent University, Department of Biology, 1600 East Bank Dr., Peterborough, ON K9J 7B8, Canada. e-mail: E-mail Address: craigbrunetti@trentu.caTrent University, Peterborough, ON, CanadaPublished Online:21 May 2018https://doi.org/10.2144/000112109AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail The rich diversity of wing color patterns within and between butterfly species makes butterflies an attractive system for studying the development and evolution of pattern formation. Study of the molecular and genetic basis of pattern formation in butterflies has revealed that a number of developmentally important genes possess expression patterns in the developing wing that correlate with the wing color patterns of the adult. For example, genes including engrailed/invected, distal-less, cubitus interruptis, hedgehog, Notch, and spalt have expression patterns in the fifth larval instar and pupal wing imaginal discs that correlate with the formation of the eyespot, a color pattern composed of a series of concentric rings (1–5). Although these data suggest that these genes play a role in eyespot formation, the evidence is indirect. One way to directly determine the role that these and other genes play would be to ectopically express genes in the developing wings.Currently, there are two viral vectors that enable transgene expression in vivo in arthropods, Sindbis virus (6) and baculovirus (7). In addition, transposon-based technology has also achieved ectopic expression in butterflies (8). Because baculoviruses naturally infect and can be potentially lethal to butterflies, their utility as a gene expression tool is limited. Furthermore, although Sindbis virus has been used as a gene expression vector in butterflies (6), this is an RNA virus and thus possesses a high mutation rate that could possibly impact expression of the gene of interest. In an effort to create an alternative viral system for ectopically expressing transgenes in butterfly pupal and larval wing tissue, we examined the use of vaccinia virus.It has been reported that vaccinia virus, a vertebrate poxvirus, is able to infect gypsy moth cell lines in vitro (9). The vaccinia virus enters the gypsy moth cells and carries out both early and late viral protein synthesis as well as viral DNA replication (9). However, processing of viral late proteins does not occur, and therefore infectious virions are not produced. In this study, we set out to determine whether vaccinia virus could be used as a gene expression vector to ectopically express transgenes on the wings of butterflies in vivo.To test this, we subcutaneously injected fifth instar Junonia coenia larva with vaccinia virus designed to express enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (10) through the larval cuticle in the area of the wing disc with 1–5 µL [approximately 105 plaque forming units (pfus)] vaccinia virus EGFP diluted in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium along with 1% fetal bovine serum. The injected larva was maintained at 28°C. Either fifth instar larval or 24-h pupal wing tissue were isolated, stained for 7 min with 100 nM nuclear marker ToPro-3 (blue; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and then examined for GFP expression (green) using a Model MRC600 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). There was dramatic GFP expression in pupal stage butterfly wing tissue (Figure 1). Therefore, vaccinia virus can be used to ectopically express genes in J. coenia pupal stage wing tissue. However, we were unable to detect GFP expression in fifth instar stage wing discs (data not shown). Similar results were obtained with Sindbis virus, which was able to infect pupal, but not larval, wing discs of subcutaneously injected insects (Reference 6 and data not shown).Figure 1. Vaccinia virus enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) can infect and ectopically express a transgene in Junonia pupal wing tissue.Vaccinia virus-infected cells are shown in green (GFP), while cell nuclei are shown in blue (ToPro-3) using a MRC600 laser-scanning confocal microscope.Although the ability to infect pupal stage wing tissue would allow the study of late stage patterning processes, such as induction of specific pigmentation genes, experimental evidence has shown that the majority of the prepat-terning events that ultimately lead to the wing color pattern occur prior to the pupal stage (11). Thus study of prepatterning events requires ectopic expression during the prepupal stage of wing development. The data described above indicates that simply injecting virus into the larval hemolymph will not result in infection and transgene expression in the larval wing disc. It is possible that a physical barrier prevents infection of wing disc during this developmental stage. Viral particles likely infect pupal wing tissue by migrating through the wing tracheal system. Because the tracheal system is not fully developed in the larval stage wing discs (11), virus would not be able to use the tracheal system for dissemination to this tissue.To circumvent the problem of viral accessibility to the wing tissue, we modified surgical techniques that had been used to manipulate butterfly wings either through ablation (1)(12–14) or wing disk transplantation (15). However, instead of physically removing the wing discs or damaging the wing, we used the surgical technique to expose the larval wing disc tissue so that it could be directly injected with viral particles. The technique involved anesthetizing fifth instar J. coenia larva by immersion in cold water for 10 min. The larva were removed from the water and covered with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in a dissecting tray. A small incision was made along the midline of either the second (forewing) or third (hindwing) thoracic segment. Using tweezers, the wing disc was partially exteriorized, being sure not to damage the connecting tissue or trachea of the wing disc (Figure 2A). The wing discs were injected with approximately 10 nL (approximately 100 pfus) of vaccinia virus EGFP in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium along with 1% fetal bovine serum. The injection was done with a pulled glass needle (Figure 2B, yellow arrow) attached to a micromanipulator and microinjector set-up (Narishige, East Meadow, NY, USA). After the needle was removed, the wing disc was carefully placed back inside of the body wall, and the hemolymph was allowed to melanize and close the surgical opening (Figure 2C, yellow arrow). After 48 h, the wing discs were removed, stained for 7 min with 100 nM ToPro-3, and GFP expression was visualized using the MRC600 laser-scanning confocal microscope. This technique resulted in 100% survival of the larva, and over 75% of the surgically manipulated larva produced phenotypically normal adult wing tissue without signs of damage (data not shown). When larval wing discs were examined 48 h after direct injection, over 50% of the injected animals showed detectable GFP expression (Figure 2, D–F), demonstrating that viral infection of the wing discs had occurred. In addition, the GFP expression was localized to the site of injection, suggesting that this technique could be used to target gene expression to specific sites on the wing disc.Figure 2. Ectopic expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) upon direct injection of Junonia fifth instar larval wing discs.(A) The hindwing of a fifth instar Junonia coenia larva was partially exteriorized. (B) The wing disc was then injected with vaccinia virus enhanced GFP (EGFP) with a pulled glass needle (yellow arrow). (C) The wing disc was placed back inside of the body wall, and the hemolymph was allowed to melanize and close the surgical opening (yellow arrow). (D–F) After 48 h, the wing discs were removed, and GFP (green) was visualized using a MRC600 laser-scanning confocal microscope. (D and E) Cell nuclei were visualized with ToPro-3 (blue).In this report, we have shown that vaccinia virus can be used to ectopically express a transgene in butterflies. The vaccinia viral vector and reporter gene used appeared to have no overt effect on the health of the insect or wing color pattern formation, an important property if vaccinia virus is to be used to express genes thought to be involved in this process. In addition, the fact that vaccinia virus, which is a vertebrate poxvirus, has the ability to infect butterflies in vivo as well as gypsy moth cells in vitro (9), suggests that vaccinia virus will also be a useful gene expression tool in other arthropod species for which classical genetic methods are either impractical or unavailable.We have also described the development and use of direct injection techniques as a means of vector delivery to larval wing imaginal discs. Because vaccinia virus does not productively infect insect cells (9), and thus the infections will be centered around the initial site of inoculation only, the ability to inject specific sites of the larval wing disc will allow us to directly target gene expression to particular areas of the wing at specific developmental times. This will enable us to further define the roles that a specific gene plays during color pattern formation. In addition, the development of surgical techniques to manipulate butterfly wing discs can be used for a variety of other experimental approaches to study pattern formation. For example, this method could be used to directly deliver antisense molecules such as morpholinos (16), as well as small interfering RNA (siRNA), expression plasmid constructs, or even purified proteins thought to be involved in color pattern formation such as decapentaplegic, wingless, or hedgehog. Together, the use of vaccinia viral-mediated transgene delivery and the direct injection techniques described here will make possible a wide range of in vivo manipulations to determine the molecular and genetic basis of butterfly wing color pattern development.AcknowledgmentsWe thank Sean Carroll for his advice and support and in whose laboratory this work was performed.Competing Interests StatementThe authors declare no competing interests.References1. Brakefield, P.M., J. Gates, D. Keys, F. Kesbeke, P. Wijngaarden, A. Monteiro, V. French, and S.B. Carroll. 1996. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 384:236–242.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar2. Brunetti, C.R., J.E. Selegue, A. Monteiro, V. French, P.M. Brakefield, and S.B. Carroll. 2001. The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns. Curr. Biol. 11:1578–1585.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar3. Carroll, S.B., J. Gates, D.N. Keys, S.W. Paddock, G.E. Panganiban, J.E. Selegue, and J.A. Williams. 1994. Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 265:109–114.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar4. Keys, D.N., D.L. Lewis, J.E. Selegue, B.J. Pearson, L.V. Goodrich, R.L. Johnson, J. Gates, M.P. Scott, and S.B. Carroll. 1999. Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science 283:532–534.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar5. Reed, R.D. and M.S. Serfas. 2004. Butterfly wing pattern evolution is associated with changes in a Notch/Distal-less temporal pat tern formation process. Curr. Biol. 14:1159–1166.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar6. Lewis, D.L., M.A. DeCamillis, C.R. Brunetti, G. Halder, V.A. Kassner, J.E. Selegue, S. Higgs, and S.B. Carroll. 1999. Ectopic gene expression and homeotic trans formations in arthropods using recombinant Sindbis viruses. Curr. Biol. 9:1279–1287.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7. Oppenheimer, D.I., A.M. MacNicol, and N.H. Patel. 1999. Functional conservation of the wingless-engrailed interaction as shown by a widely applicable baculovirus misexpres-sion system. Curr. Biol. 9:1288–1296.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar8. Marcus, J.M., D.M. Ramos, and A. Monteiro. 2004. Transformation of the but terfly Bicyclus anynana. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Lett. 27:263–265.Crossref, Google Scholar9. Li, Y., S. Yuan, and R.W. Moyer. 1998. The non-permissive infection of insect (gypsy moth) LD-652 cells by vaccinia virus. Virology 248:74–82.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar10. Wu, G.-Y., D.-J. Zou, T. Koothan, and H.T. Cline. 1995. Infection of frog neurons with vaccinia virus permits in vivo expression of foreign proteins. Neuron 14:681–684.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar11. Nijhout, H.F. 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar12. Hojyo, T. and H. Fujiwara. 1997. Reciprocal transplantation of wing discs between a wing deficient mutant (fl) and wild type of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Dev. Growth Differ. 39:599–606.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar13. Brakefield, P.M. and V. French. 1995. Eyespot development on butterfly wings: the epidermal response to damage. Dev. Biol. 168:98–111.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar14. French, V. and P.M. Brakefield. 1995. Eyespot development on butterfly wings: the focal signal. Dev. Biol. 168:112–123.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar15. Nijhout, H.F. 1980. Pattern formation on lep-idopteran wings: determination of an eyespot. Dev. Biol. 80:267–274.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar16. Angerer, L.M. and R.C. Angerer. 2004. Disruption of gene function using antisense morpholinos. Methods Cell Biol. 74:699–711.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByThe Taxonomy and Population Structure of the Buckeye Butterflies (Genus Junonia , Nymphalidae: Nymphalini) of Florida, USAJournal of the Lepidopterists' Society, Vol. 72, No. 2A new A-P compartment boundary and organizer in holometabolous insect wings27 November 2017 | Scientific Reports, Vol. 7, No. 1Taxonomy as a hypothesis: testing the status of the Bermuda buckeye butterfly Junonia coenia bergi (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)19 October 2016 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 42, No. 1Molecular Population Structure of Junonia Butterflies from French Guiana, Guadeloupe, and MartiniquePsyche: A Journal of Entomology, Vol. 2014System-dependent regulations of colour-pattern development: a mutagenesis study of the pale grass blue butterfly6 August 2013 | Scientific Reports, Vol. 3, No. 1Baculovirus-mediated gene transfer in butterfly wings in vivo: an efficient expression system with an anti-gp64 antibody25 March 2013 | BMC Biotechnology, Vol. 13, No. 1Butterfly genomics eclosing7 February 2007 | Heredity, Vol. 100, No. 2Transgenic approaches to study wing color pattern development in LepidopteraMolecular BioSystems, Vol. 3, No. 8 Vol. 40, No. 1 STAY CONNECTED Metrics History Received 7 October 2005 Accepted 21 November 2005 Published online 21 May 2018 Published in print January 2006 Information© 2006 Author(s)AcknowledgmentsWe thank Sean Carroll for his advice and support and in whose laboratory this work was performed.Competing Interests StatementThe authors declare no competing interests.PDF download