Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Beyond the Four Percent Solution: explaining the consequences of China's rise

2011; Routledge; Volume: 20; Issue: 72 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1080/10670564.2011.604501

1469-9400

Bruce Gilley,

Political Conflict and Governance

Abstract Debates about the consequences of China's rise have focused mainly on China's foreign policy in security affairs and have been offered mostly within a realist framework; yet this limited approach to the problem ignores non-security issues, non-realist frameworks, and non-China sources of system-level outcomes. Policy-makers and scholars should significantly broaden their descriptive and explanatory frameworks in order to understand the consequences of a rising China. Using this broader approach will direct attention to systemic and ideational factors in explaining whether China's rise is peaceful or not. Notes *Bruce Gilley is an Associate Professor of Political Science in the Mark O. Hatfield School of Government at Portland State University. His research centers on questions of democracy, legitimacy, and global politics. His books include The Right to Rule (2009) and China's Democratic Future (2004). He can be reached by email at gilleyb@pdx.edu 1. Rudra Sil and Peter Katzenstein, ‘Analytic eclecticism in the study of world politics: reconfiguring problems and mechanisms across research traditions’, Perspectives on Politics 8(2), (2010), pp. 411–431. 2. Brantly Womack, China's Rise in Historical Perspective (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010). 3. Nicholas Eberstadt, ‘Will China (continue to) rise?’, in Gary James Schmitt, ed., The Rise of China: Essays on the Future Competition (New York: Encounter Books, 2009), pp. 131–154. 4. SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, United States Office of the Secretary of Defense, Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China (Washington, DC: US Department of Defense, 2010). 5. Correlates of War, ‘National material capabilities V3.02’, in Correlates of War Project, National Material Capabilities V3.02 (2005). 6. Gregory F. Treverton and Seth G. Jones, Measuring National Power (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2005). 7. Dylan Kissane, ‘2015 and the rise of China: power cycle analysis and the implications for Australia’, Security Challenges 1(1), (2005), pp. 105–121 at p. 117. 8. Sheena Chestnut and Alastair Iain Johnston, ‘Is China rising?’, in Eva Paus, Penelope B. Prime and Jon W. Western, eds, Global Giant: Is China Changing the Rules of the Game? (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 237–260. 9. Shaun Breslin, ‘Power and production: rethinking China's global economic role’, Review of International Studies 31(4), (2005), pp. 735–753; Steve Chan, ‘Is there a power transition between the US and China? The different faces of national power’, Asian Survey 45(5), (2005), pp. 687–701; Xuetong Yan, ‘The rise of China and its power status’, Chinese Journal of International Politics 1(1), (2006), pp. 5–33; Yangsheng Zhong, The Economic Theory of Developing Countries' Rise: Explaining the Myth of Rapid Economic Growth in China (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2010). 10. Daniele Archibugi, Mario Denni and Andrea Filippetti, The Global Innovation Scoreboard 2008: The Dynamics of the Innovative Performances of Countries (Rome: Italian National Research Council, CNR-IRPPS, 2009). 11. Hyung Min Kim, ‘Comparing measures of national power’, International Political Science Review 31(4), (2010), pp. 405–427; Hyung Min Kim, ‘Introducing the new concept of national power: from the network perspective’, Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy 15(1), (2009). 12. Economist Intelligence Unit, ‘A new ranking of the world's most innovative countries’, Economist Magazine (London), (2009). 13. Young Nam Cho and Jong Ho Jeong, ‘China's soft power: discussions, resources, and prospects’, Asian Survey 48(3), (2008), pp. 453–472; Yanzhong Huang and Sheng Ding, ‘Dragon's underbelly: an analysis of China's soft power’, East Asia: An International Quarterly 23(4), (2006), pp. 22–44; Jian Wang, Soft Power in China: Public Diplomacy through Communication (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010). 14. Liang Zhang, ‘The rise of China: media perception and implications for international politics’, Journal of Contemporary China 19(64), (2010), pp. 233–254; Tao Xie and Benjamin I. Page, ‘Americans and the rise of China as a world power’, Journal of Contemporary China 19(65), (2010), pp. 479–501. 15. Jisi Wang, Ryosei Kokobun and Nihon Kokusai Kåoryåu Sentåa, The Rise of China and a Changing East Asian Order (Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange, 2004). 16. Michael Alan Brittingham, ‘China's contested rise: Sino-US relations and the social construction of great power status’, in Sujian Guo and Shiping Hua, eds, New Dimensions of Chinese Foreign Policy (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007), pp. 83–108. 17. G. John Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), p. 36. 18. Eva Paus, Penelope B. Prime and Jon W. Western, ‘China rising—a global transformation?’, in Paus et al., eds, Global Giant, pp. 3–28. 19. John Mearsheimer, ‘China's unpeaceful rise’, Current History 105(690), (2006), pp. 160–162; Schmitt, ed., The Rise of China; Avery Goldstein, ‘Power transition, institutions, and China's rise in East Asia: theoretical expectations and evidence’, in G. John Ikenberry and Chung-in Moon, eds, The United States and Northeast Asia: Debates, Issues, and New Order (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008); Ronald Tammen and Jacek Kugler, ‘Power transition and China–US conflicts’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 1(1), (2006), pp. 35–55. 20. Stephen G. Brooks and William C. Wohlforth, ‘American primacy in perspective’, Foreign Affairs 81(4), (2002), pp. 20–33. 21. Toshi Yoshihara and James R. Holmes, Red Star over the Pacific: China's Rise and the Challenge to US Maritime Strategy (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2010); Richard D. Fisher, China's Military Modernization: Building for Regional and Global Reach (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2008). 22. Ian Lustick, ‘History, historiography, and political science: multiple historical records and the problem of selection bias’, American Political Science Review 90(3), (1996), pp. 605–618. 23. G. John Ikenberry, ‘The rise of China: power, institutions, and the Western order’, in Robert S. Ross and Feng Zhu, eds, China's Ascent: Power, Security, and the Future of International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008), pp. 89–114 at p. 91. 24. Richard Bernstein and Ross H. Munro, The Coming Conflict with China (New York: A.A. Knopf, distributed by Random House, 1997); Martin Jacques, When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order (New York: Penguin Press, 2009); Bruce Cumings, ‘America's perspective on China's rise’, in Xinhuang Xiao and Zhengyi Lin, eds, Rise of China: Beijing's Strategies and Implications for the Asia–Pacific (Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge, 2009). 25. Bonnie S. Glaser and Evan S. Medeiros, ‘The changing ecology of foreign policy-making in China: the ascension and demise of the theory of “peaceful rise”’, China Quarterly 190, (2007), pp. 291–310. 26. Robert G. Sutter, China's Rise in Asia: Promises and Perils (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005), pp. 266–267. 27. Sukhee Han, ‘The rise of China, power transition and South Korea's soft hedging’, in Kok Kheng Yeoh, ed., Towards Pax Sinica?: China's Rise and Transformation: Impacts and Implications (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: University of Malaya, Institute of China Studies, 2009), pp. xi, 312. 28. Kai He, Institutional Balancing in the Asia Pacific: Economic Interdependence and China's Rise (London and New York: Routledge, 2009); Jun Tsunekawa, The Rise of China: Responses from Southeast Asia and Japan (Tokyo: National Institute for Defense Studies, Japan, 2009). 29. Michael Swaine, ‘China's regional military posture’, in David L. Shambaugh, ed., Power Shift: China and Asia's New Dynamics (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005), pp. 266–285 at p. 273. 30. Evan S. Medeiros, Reluctant Restraint: The Evolution of China's Nonproliferation Policies and Practices, 1980–2004 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007); Wendy Frieman, China, Arms Control, and Nonproliferation (London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004); Denny Roy and Asia–Pacific Center for Security Studies, Going Straight, but Somewhat Late: China and Nuclear Nonproliferation (Honolulu, HI: Asia–Pacific Center for Security Studies, 2006); Shirley Kan, China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues (Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2009). 31. Guoguang Wu and Helen Lansdowne, eds, China Turns to Multilateralism: Foreign Policy and Regional Security (Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2007). 32. Paul J. Bolt, Changhe Su and Sharyl Cross, The United States, Russia, and China: Confronting Global Terrorism and Security Challenges in the 21st Century (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2008). 33. Daniel Rosen, ‘China and the impracticality of closed regionalism’, in Kent E. Calder and Francis Fukuyama, eds, East Asian Multilateralism: Prospects for Regional Stability (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008); Edward J. Lincoln, East Asian Economic Regionalism (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2004). 34. Wei Liang, ‘China's WTO commitment compliance: a case study of the US–China semiconductor trade dispute’, in Ka Zeng, ed., China's Foreign Trade Policy: The New Constituencies (New York: Routledge, 2007). 35. Jing Gu, John Humphrey and Dirk Messner, ‘Global governance and developing countries: the implications of the rise of China’, World Development 36(2), (2008), pp. 274–292 at p. 284. 36. M. Sornarajah and Jiangyu Wang, China, India, and the International Economic Order (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010). 37. Warwick J. McKibbin and Wing Thye Woo, ‘The consequences of China's WTO accession for its neighbors’, Asian Economic Papers 2(2), (2003), pp. 1–38; David L. Shambaugh, ‘Return to the middle kingdom? China and Asia in the early 21st century’, in Shambaugh, ed., Power Shift, pp. 23–47; Daniel Burstein and Arne J. De Keijzer, Big Dragon: China's Future: What It Means for Business, the Economy, and the Global Order (New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 1998). 38. Rosen, ‘China and the impracticality of closed regionalism’; Christopher M. Dent, East Asian Regionalism (London and New York: Routledge, 2008); Ren Xiao, ‘Between adapting and shaping: China's role in Asian regional cooperation’, Journal of Contemporary China 18(59), (2009), pp. 303–320. 39. Yoshiaki Sato, ‘Open regionalism: creating multi-layered orders in world governance’, in Tamio Nakamura, ed., East Asian Regionalism from a Legal Perspective: Current Features and a Vision for the Future (London and New York: Routledge, 2009), pp. xxv, 286. 40. Injoo Sohn, ‘Learning to co-operate: China's multilateral approach to Asian financial co-operation’, China Quarterly 194, (2008), pp. 309–326. 41. Takashi Terada, ‘The origins of ASEAN+6 and Japan's initiatives: China's rise and the agent–structure analysis’, Pacific Review 23(1), (2010), pp. 71–92. 42. Andrew Nathan and Andrew Scobell, ‘Human rights and China's soft power expansion’, China Rights Forum no. 4, (2009), pp. 10–23 at p. 20. 43. Richard H. Cooper and Juliette Voïnov Kohler, The Responsibility to Protect: The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008). 44. Hiro Katsumata, ‘ASEAN and human rights: resisting Western pressure or emulating the West?’, Pacific Review 22(5), (2009), pp. 619–637; David Martin Jones, ‘Security and democracy: the ASEAN Charter and the dilemmas of regionalism in South-East Asia’, International Affairs 84(4), (2008), pp. 735–756; Maria-Gabriela Manea, ‘How and why interaction matters: ASEAN's regional identity and human rights’, Cooperation & Conflict 44(1), (2009), pp. 27–49. 45. Edward Friedman, ‘The challenge of a rising China: another Germany?’, in Robert J. Lieber, ed., Eagle Adrift: American Foreign Policy at the End of the Century (New York: Longman, 1997), pp. 215–245; Yoshihara and Holmes, Red Star over the Pacific. 46. Ashley Tellis, ‘China's grand strategy: the quest for comprehensive national power and its consequences’, in Schmitt, ed., The Rise of China, pp. 25–52. 47. Robert Sutter, ‘China's regional strategy and why it may not be good for America’, in Shambaugh, ed., Power Shift, pp. 289–305 at p. 292; C. Fred Bergsten, China: The Balance Sheet: What the World Needs to Know Now About the Emerging Superpower (New York: Public Affairs, 2006), p. 14; Mark Frazier, ‘China's domestic policy fragmentation and grand strategy in global politics’, Asia Policy 10, (2010), pp. 87–101 at p. 64. 48. Ikenberry, ‘The rise of China’, p. 91. 49. Richard Ned Lebow, The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests, and Orders (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003); John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton, 2001). 50. Susan L. Shirk, China, Fragile Superpower: How China's Internal Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007); R. P. Peerenboom, China Modernizes: Threat to the West or Model for the Rest? (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007); Herbert S. Yee and Ian Storey, The China Threat: Perceptions, Myths and Reality (London and New York: Routledge, 2002). 51. Daniel C. Lynch, Rising China and Asian Democratization: Socialization to ‘Global Culture’ in the Political Transformations of Thailand, China, and Taiwan (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006); David L. Rousseau, Identifying Threats and Threatening Identities: The Social Construction of Realism and Liberalism (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006). 52. Robert Powell, In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999); Charles Kupchan, ‘After Pax Americana: benign power, regional integration, and the sources of stable multipolarity’, International Security 23(2), (1998), pp. 40–79; Vesna Danilovic and Joe Clare, ‘Global power transitions and regional interests’, International Interactions 33(3), (2007), pp. 289–304. 53. Peter H. Koehn and Xiao-huang Yin, The Expanding Roles of Chinese Americans in US–China Relations: Transnational Networks and Trans-Pacific Interactions (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2002); Shaochun Liu, ‘Economic and political reform supports China's peaceful rise’ [‘Zhidu Chuangxin Zhiwo Zhongguo Heping Jueqi’], Journal of Huanghe Science and Technology University [Huanghe keji daxue xuebao] 8(1), (2006), pp. 60–63 at p. 63. 54. Hongying Wang, ‘National image building and Chinese foreign policy’, China: An International Journal 1(1), (2003), pp. 46–72; Ann Kent, ‘China's international socialization: the role of international organizations’, Global Governance 8(3), (2002), pp. 343–365. 55. Examples include: Avery Goldstein, ‘Power transitions, institutions, and China's rise in East Asia: theoretical expectations and evidence’, Journal of Strategic Studies 30(4/5), (2007), pp. 639–682; Robert S. Ross, Chinese Security Policy: Structure, Power and Politics (London and New York: Routledge, 2009). 56. Aaron Friedberg, ‘The future of US–China relations: is conflict inevitable?’, International Security 30(2), (2005), pp. 7–45. 57. Allen Carlson and J. J. Suh, ‘The value of rethinking East Asian security: denaturalizing and explaining a complex security dynamic’, in J. J. Suh, Peter J. Katzenstein and Allen Carlson, eds, Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power, and Efficiency (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004), pp. 209–234. 58. Ross and Zhu, eds, China's Ascent. 59. A mistake made elsewhere. See for instance Robert Art, ‘The United States and the rise of China: implications for the long haul’, Political Science Quarterly 125(3), (2010), pp. 359–391. 60. Charles L. Glaser, ‘Realists as optimists: cooperation as self-help’, International Security 19(3), (1992), pp. 50–90. 61. Avery Goldstein, Rising to the Challenge: China's Grand Strategy and International Security (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005), p. 35; David Lampton, ‘China's rise in Asia need not be at America's expense’, in Shambaugh, ed., Power Shift, pp. 306–326 at p. 37. 62. M. Taylor Fravel, ‘International relations theory and China's rise: assessing China's potential for territorial expansion’, International Studies Review 12(4), (2010), pp. 505–532. 63. David M. Lampton, The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform, 1978–2000 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001). 64. Guoli Liu and Su Hao, ‘Civil society and Chinese foreign policy’, in Yufan Hao and Lin Su, eds, China's Foreign Policy Making: Societal Force and Chinese American Policy (Aldershot, Hampshire and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2005), pp. 169–186; Denny Roy, ‘China's democratised foreign policy’, Survival 51(2), (2009), pp. 25–40; Michael Alan Brittingham, ‘The “role” of nationalism in Chinese foreign policy: a reactive model of nationalism & conflict’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 12(2), (2007), pp. 147–166. 65. Jean-Pierre Cabestan, ‘Taiwan: an internal affair! How China's domestic politics and foreign policy interact on the Taiwan issue’, East Asia: An International Quarterly 26(1), (2009), pp. 1–20. 66. Shambaugh, ‘Return to the middle kingdom?’, p. 28. 67. Jianwei Wang, ‘Hu Jintao's “new thinking” on cross-Strait relations’, American Foreign Policy Interests 29(1), (2007), pp. 23–34. 68. Medeiros, Reluctant Restraint; Wyn Q. Bowen, Ben Rhode and Shen Dingli, ‘How China can strengthen international nuclear security’, Survival 52(3), (2010), pp. 11–17. 69. Thomas J. Christensen, ‘Chinese realpolitik’, Foreign Affairs 75(5), (1996), pp. 37–52. 70. Alastair I. Johnston, Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008), p. 32. 71. Michael Hsiao and Alan Yang, ‘Transformations in China's soft power toward ASEAN’, China Brief 8(22), (2008); Muthiah Alagappa, Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003); Kevin J. Cooney and Yoichiro Sato, The Rise of China and International Security: America and Asia Respond (New York, NY: Routledge, 2008); Mike M. Mochizuki, ‘Japan's shifting strategy toward the rise of China’, Journal of Strategic Studies 30(4/5), (2007), pp. 739–776; Jae Ho Chung, ‘East Asia responds to the rise of China: patterns and variations’, Pacific Affairs 82(4), (2009), pp. 657–675. 72. Raymond Hinnebusch, ‘Hegemonic stability theory reconsidered: implications of the Iraq War’, in Raymond Hinnebusch and Rick Fawn, eds, The Iraq War: Causes and Consequences (London: Lynn Reinner, 2006), pp. 283–322. 73. Fabrice Lehmann and Jean-Pierre Lehmann, Peace and Prosperity through World Trade (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010); Margaret McCown and Tongil Yonguwon, Political Economy of the Northeast Asian Regionalism: Linkages between Economic and Security Cooperation (Seoul: Korea Institute for National Unification, 2006). 74. Erik Gartzke, ‘The capitalist peace’, American Journal of Political Science 51(1), (2007), pp. 166–191; Erich Weede, ‘The capitalist peace and the rise of China: establishing global harmony by economic interdependence’, International Interactions 36(2), (2010), pp. 206–213. 75. Quansheng Zhao, ‘Managed great power relations: do we see “one-up and one-down”?’, Journal of Strategic Studies 30(4/5), (2007), pp. 609–637. 76. David C. Kang, ‘Getting Asia wrong: the need for new analytic frameworks’, International Security 27(4), (2003), pp. 57–85; David C. Kang, China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008); Amitav Acharya and Evelyn Goh, Reassessing Security Cooperation in the Asia–Pacific: Competition, Congruence, and Transformation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006); Steve Chan, ‘An odd thing happened on the way to balancing: East Asian states’ reactions to China's rise', International Studies Review 12(3), (2010), pp. 387–412. 77. Aaron Friedberg, ‘Are we ready for China?’, Commentary 123(10), (2007), pp. 39–43. 78. Robert Z. Lawrence, ‘China and the multilateral trading system’, in Barry J. Eichengreen, Yong-chol Pak and Charles Wyplosz, eds, China, Asia, and the New World Economy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 145–167 at p. 147. 79. Gang Fan, ‘Combining policies to benefit from globalization: the case of China’, in Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de León, ed., The Future of Globalization: Explorations in Light of Recent Turbulence (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. xvii, 410. 80. Edward S. Steinfeld, Playing Our Game: Why China's Rise Doesn't Threaten the West (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010). 81. Zeng, ed., China's Foreign Trade Policy; Zhimin Chen, ‘Coastal provinces and China's foreign policy making’, in Yufan Hao and Lin Su, eds, China's Foreign Policy Making, pp. 187–207; Scott Kennedy, The Business of Lobbying in China (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005); Liu and Hao, ‘Civil society and Chinese foreign policy’; Thomas Moore, ‘Racing to integrate or cooperating to compete? Liberal and realist interpretations of China's new multilateralism’, in Wu and Lansdowne, eds, China Turns to Multilateralism; Hongyi Lai, The Domestic Sources of China's Foreign Policy: Regimes, Leadership, Priorities and Process (New York: Routledge, 2010). 82. Frazier, ‘China's domestic policy fragmentation and grand strategy in global politics’, pp. 89, 97. 83. Margaret Pearson, ‘Domestic institutional constraints on China's leadership in East Asian economic cooperation mechanisms’, Journal of Contemporary China 19(66), (2010), pp. 621–633. 84. Sohn, ‘Learning to co-operate’. 85. Rosemary Foot, ‘China's policies towards the Asia–Pacific region: changing perceptions of self and changing others’ perceptions of China?', in Xiao and Lin, eds, Rise of China, pp. xiv, 312; Lampton, ‘China's rise in Asia need not be at America's expense’, p. 341. 86. Shaun Breslin, ‘Understanding China's regional rise: interpretations, identities and implications’, International Affairs 85(4), (2009), pp. 817–835. 87. Giovanni Facchini, Marcelo Olarreaga, Peri A. Silva and Gerald Willmann, Substitutability and Protectionism: Latin America's Trade Policy and Imports from China and India (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2007). 88. C. Fred Bergsten, ‘A partnership of equals: how Washington should respond to China's economic challenge’, Foreign Affairs 87(4), (2008). 89. Michael Smith and Huaixian Xie, ‘The European Union, China, and the United States: complex interdependence and bi-multilateralism in commercial relations’, European Studies 27(1), (2009), pp. 167–185; Feng Zhu, ‘China's rise will be peaceful: how unipolarity matters’, in Ross and Zhu, eds, China's Ascent, pp. 34–54 at pp. 53–54. 90. Wenhua Shan, ‘Redefining Chinese concept of sovereignty’, in Gungwu Wang and Yongnian Zheng, eds, China and the New International Order (Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2008); Jeremy T. Paltiel, The Empire's New Clothes: Cultural Particularism and Universal Value in China's Quest for Global Status (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007); Jihong Mo, Guo Ji Ren Quan Gong Yue Yu Zhongguo [International Conventions on Human Rights and China] (Beijing: World Knowledge Press, 2005). 91. Lai-Ha Chan, Pak K. Lee and Gerald Chan, ‘Rethinking global governance: a China model in the making?’, Contemporary Politics 14(1), (2008), pp. 3–19. 92. Koji Watanabe and Nihon Kokusai Koryu Senta, Humanitarian Intervention: The Evolving Asian Debate (Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange, 2003). 93. Gregory Chin and Ramesh Thakur, ‘Will China change the rules of global order?’, Washington Quarterly 33(4), (2010), pp. 119–138. 94. Alastair Iain Johnston, ‘Is China a status quo power?’, International Security 27(4), (2003), pp. 5–56 at pp. 21–22. 95. Lai-Ha Chan, China Engages Global Health Governance: Responsible Stakeholder or System-Transformer? (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010). 96. Scott Kennedy, ‘The myth of the Beijing Consensus’, Journal of Contemporary China 19(65), (2010), pp. 461–477. 97. Dingding Chen, ‘Explaining China's human rights foreign policy: an identity-based approach’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, 2007, Chicago; Dingding Chen, ‘Opening the black box: domestic sources and China's human rights foreign policy’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, 2006; Ming Wan, ‘Democracy and human rights in Chinese foreign policy’, in Yong Deng and Fei-Ling Wang, eds, China Rising: Power and Motivation in Chinese Foreign Policy (Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005), pp. 279–303; Chengqiu Wu, ‘Sovereignty, human rights, and responsibility: changes in China's response to international humanitarian crises’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 15(1), (2010), pp. 71–97. 98. Allen Carlson, Unifying China, Integrating with the World: Securing Chinese Sovereignty in the Reform Era (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005), pp. 247, 231, 231. 99. Rosemary Foot, Rights Beyond Borders: The Global Community and the Struggle over Human Rights in China (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 224. 100. D. C. Thomas, The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001); T. Risse, S. C. Ropp and K. Sikkink, The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). 101. C. Raja Mohan, ‘Balancing interests and values: India's struggle with democracy promotion’, Washington Quarterly 30(3), (2007), pp. 99–115 at p. 104. 102. Stefan A. Halper, The Beijing Consensus: How China's Authoritarian Model Will Dominate the Twenty-First Century (New York: Basic Books, 2010). 103. Jeffrey Legro, ‘Purpose transitions: China's rise and the American response’, in Ross and Zhu, eds, China's Ascent, pp. 163–190 at p. 167. 104. Jeffrey Legro, Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005). 105. Xinning Song, ‘European “models” and their implications to China: internal and external perspectives’, Review of International Studies 36(3), (2010), pp. 755–775. 106. Kok Kheng Yeoh, ‘China's rise and transformation’, in Kok Kheng Yeoh, ed., Towards Pax Sinica?. 107. Kent, ‘China's international socialization’. 108. Kelly Erickson, ‘Rising powers and system stability: the determinants of peaceful versus conflictual rise’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, 2006, San Diego. 109. William A. Callahan, ‘China and the globalisation of IR theory’, Journal of Contemporary China 10(26), (2001), pp. 75–88. 110. Xinning Song, ‘Building international relations theory with Chinese characteristics’, Journal of Contemporary China 10(26), (2001), pp. 61–74; Xiao Ren, ‘Toward a Chinese school of international relations?’, in Wang and Zheng, eds, China and the New International Order; Kang, ‘Getting Asia wrong’; James C. Hsiung, ‘The changing intellectual and political climate in the China debate and the future of international relations theory’, American Foreign Policy Interests 30(1), (2008), pp. 1–12. 111. See for instance the critiques of Chu and Huang in Yun-han Chu and Min-Hua Huang, ‘Exploring theoretical implications of the rise of China: a critique on mainstream IR perspectives’, in Quansheng Zhao and Guoli Liu, eds, Managing the China Challenge: Global Perspectives (New York, NY: Routledge, 2008), pp. 48–49. 112. Jeffrey Legro, ‘What China will want: the future intentions of a rising power’, Perspectives on Politics 5(3), (2007), pp. 515–534 at p. 527. 113. Friedberg, ‘The future of US–China relations’, p. 41.