How Attrition Impacts the Internal and External Validity of Longitudinal Research
2005; Wiley; Volume: 75; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00035.x
ISSN1746-1561
Autores Tópico(s)Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
ResumoJournal of School HealthVolume 75, Issue 7 p. 267-270 How Attrition Impacts the Internal and External Validity of Longitudinal Research Adam E. Barry, Adam E. BarrySearch for more papers by this author Adam E. Barry, Adam E. BarrySearch for more papers by this author First published: 11 August 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00035.xCitations: 59 Adam E. Barry, MS, Research Assistant, 159 Read Bldg, Division of Health and Safety, Mail Stop 4243, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843–4243. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References 1 R Gomm, G Needham, A Bullman, eds. Evaluating Research in Health and Social Care. London: Sage; 2001. 2 Goodman JS, Blum TC. Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition. J Manag. 1996; 22(4): 627– 652. 3 Plewis I. Analysing Change: Measurement and Explanation Using Longitudinal Data. New York, NY: Wiley; 1985. 4 Ashurst JT, De La Rocha O, Tobis J. Analysis of collateral data: a method for assessing and correcting the effects of attrition on internal validity. J Exp Educ. 1993; 60(3): 215– 234. 5 Larzelere RE, Klein DM. Methodology. In: MB Sussman, SK Steinmetz, eds. Handbook of Marriage and the Family. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1987: 125– 155. 6 Huck SW. Reading Statistics and Research. Boston, Mass: Pearson; 2004. 7 Boys A, Marsden J, Stillwell G, Hatchings K, Griffiths P, Farrell M. Minimizing respondent attrition in longitudinal research: practical implications from a cohort study of adolescent drinking. J Adolesc. 2003; 26: 363– 373. 8 Dodds S, Furlong A, Croxford L. Quality and quantity: tackling non-contact attrition in a longitudinal survey. Sociology. 1989; 23: 275– 284. 9 Miller RB, Wright DW. Detecting and correcting attrition bias in longitudinal family research. J Marriage Fam. 1995; 57: 921– 929. 10 Riecken H, Boruch RF. Social Experimentation: A Method for Planning and Evaluating Social Intervention. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1974. 11 Ribisl KM, Walton MA, Mowbray CT, Luke DA, Davidson WS, Bootsmiller BJ. Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: review and recommendations. Eval Program Plann. 1996; 19(1): 1– 25. 12 Vanable PA, Carey MP, Carey KB, Maisto SA. Predictors of participation and attrition in a health promotion study involving psychiatric outpatients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002; 70(2): 362– 368. 13 St Pierre R, Proper EC. Attrition: identification and exploration in the natural follow through evaluation. Eval Q. 1978; 2(1): 153– 166. 14 Moser CA, Kalton G. Survey Methods in Social Investigation. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1972. 15 Shadish WR, Hu X, Glaser RR, Kownacki R, Wong S. A method for exploring the effects of attrition in randomized experiments with dichotomous outcomes. Psychol Methods. 1998; 3(1): 3– 22. 16 Stout RL, Brown PJ, Longabaugh R, Noel N. Determinants of research follow-up participation in an alcohol treatment outcome trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996; 64(3): 614– 618. Citing Literature Volume75, Issue7September 2005Pages 267-270 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)