Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

THE EFFECTS OF NEIGHBORS ON THE DEMOGRAPHY OF A DOMINANT DESERT SHRUB ( AMBROSIA DUMOSA )

2001; Wiley; Volume: 71; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0491

1557-7015

Maria N. Miriti, S. Joseph Wright‬, Henry F. Howe,

Rangeland and Wildlife Management

Ecological MonographsVolume 71, Issue 4 p. 491-509 Regular Article THE EFFECTS OF NEIGHBORS ON THE DEMOGRAPHY OF A DOMINANT DESERT SHRUB (AMBROSIA DUMOSA) Maria N. Miriti, Maria N. Miriti University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Biological Sciences (M/C 066), 845 W. Taylor St., Chicago, Illinois 60607-7060 USA Present address: State University of New York at Stony Brook, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5245 USA.Search for more papers by this authorS. Joseph Wright, S. Joseph Wright Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948 USASearch for more papers by this authorHenry F. Howe, Henry F. Howe University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Biological Sciences (M/C 066), 845 W. Taylor St., Chicago, Illinois 60607-7060 USASearch for more papers by this author Maria N. Miriti, Maria N. Miriti University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Biological Sciences (M/C 066), 845 W. Taylor St., Chicago, Illinois 60607-7060 USA Present address: State University of New York at Stony Brook, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5245 USA.Search for more papers by this authorS. Joseph Wright, S. Joseph Wright Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948 USASearch for more papers by this authorHenry F. Howe, Henry F. Howe University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Biological Sciences (M/C 066), 845 W. Taylor St., Chicago, Illinois 60607-7060 USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 November 2001 https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0491:TEONOT]2.0.CO;2Citations: 57 Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Abstract We used patch-specific matrix models to test the influence of neighboring plants on the demography of Ambrosia dumosa, a dominant perennial shrub of the Colorado Desert in southern California. In the desert literature, the presence or absence of neighboring plants is reported to influence plant growth and survival and has long been associated with plant–plant interactions that range from extreme competition to facilitation. Here we consider the less addressed question of how neighbor-defined population subsets contribute differently to overall population dynamics. Demographic data collected from >6000 individual plants from a permanently mapped hectare over 10 yr were used to divide this A. dumosa population into subsets that were defined by the presence or absence of neighbors. By partitioning the population in this way, we documented differences in population growth, elasticity structure, and stable size structure among the distinct patch types, and evaluated the contributions of each patch type to overall population dynamics. Population growth was consistently higher for population subsets of plants that were isolated throughout their ontogeny, compared to those with close neighbors throughout their ontogeny. Further, overall population growth was proportionally more sensitive to perturbations involving isolated adults, despite the projected persistence of plants with close neighbors. In short, changes in survival of isolated adults had a greater influence on population growth than changes in survival of adults with neighbors. We used life table response experiments (LTREs) to test for spatiotemporal effects of neighbors. The LTRE was consistent with the elasticity analyses in showing that dynamics among adult members made the greatest contribution to the observed differences in population growth among the neighbor-defined population subsets during each census period. Neighbor effects among adults were greater and more important than temporal variation in drought levels in decreasing population growth relative to a pooled 10-yr reference matrix that ignored neighbor effects. Although neighbor effects contributed greatly to differences in population growth among the models projected, the LTRE revealed that, relative to the reference matrix, transitions among juvenile size classes decreased population growth for the predominantly drought free 1984–1989 census interval and increased population growth for the 1989–1994 interval, which included four winters of extreme drought. We hypothesize that higher mortality during periods of high rainfall was due to increased competition among plants, especially in favor of adults at the expense of juveniles. The drought period was also characterized by increased recruitment of new adults, probably reflecting diminished competition from adults for well-established juveniles capable of growing into reproductive condition after elimination of smaller juveniles during 1984–1989. Our habitat-specific partitioning of this population revealed dramatic differences in the demographic behavior of this population and showed that neighbor status is a structuring force in this plant community. Neighbor effects were shown to be dependent on plant size and suggest that conspicuous clumped distributions of adults reflect leftover individuals with diminished demographic influence remaining in a population that is largely driven by isolated adults. Citing Literature Supporting Information Filename Description https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3308961 Research data pertaining to this article is located at figshare.com: Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Volume71, Issue4November 2001Pages 491-509 RelatedInformation