Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Within-Hospital and 30-Day Outcomes in 107,994 Patients Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography With Different Low-Osmolar Iodinated Contrast Media

2012; Elsevier BV; Volume: 109; Issue: 11 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.380

1879-1913

Troy LaBounty, Manan Shah, Subha V. Raman, Fay Y. Lin, Daniel S. Berman, James K. Min,

Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

Comparative clinical outcomes after exposure to alternate low osmolar contrast media (LOCM) during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been incompletely examined. From a retrospective multicenter observational study, we identified 107,994 adults without previous hemodialysis undergoing ICA and/or PCI with iohexol, iopamidol, or ioversol. We created a propensity score for contrast media type using age, gender, coverage status, route of hospitalization, illness severity, physician specialty, co-morbidities, and procedure type. Propensity matching was performed in a 1:1 fashion for iohexol (n = 10,204) and iopamidol (n = 10,204) and in a 1:1 fashion for iohexol (n = 19,482) and ioversol (n = 19,482). Groups were examined for differences in in-hospital mortality or subsequent hemodialysis, length of stay, and 30-day readmission for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Compared to patients exposed to iohexol, no differences were observed for patients exposed to iopamidol or ioversol for in-hospital hemodialysis (0.5% vs 0.4%, p = 0.45; 0.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.05), in-hospital mortality (0.7% vs 0.6%, p = 0.60; 0.5% vs 0.6%, p = 0.42), or composite hemodialysis or mortality (1.1% vs 1.0%, p = 0.58; 0.8% vs 1.0%, p = 0.06); for hospital length of stay (2.9 ± 2.7 vs 2.9 ± 2.7 days, p = 0.05; 2.8 ± 2.6 vs 2.9 ± 3.1 days, p = 0.35); or for 30-day readmission for CIN (0.1% vs 0.1%, p = 0.82; 0.1% vs 0.1%, p = 0.52). In conclusion, for patients undergoing ICA and/or PCI exposed to alternate LOCM, in-hospital death, need for hemodialysis, or readmission for CIN are uncommon, with no apparent clinical advantage among LOCM agents. Comparative clinical outcomes after exposure to alternate low osmolar contrast media (LOCM) during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been incompletely examined. From a retrospective multicenter observational study, we identified 107,994 adults without previous hemodialysis undergoing ICA and/or PCI with iohexol, iopamidol, or ioversol. We created a propensity score for contrast media type using age, gender, coverage status, route of hospitalization, illness severity, physician specialty, co-morbidities, and procedure type. Propensity matching was performed in a 1:1 fashion for iohexol (n = 10,204) and iopamidol (n = 10,204) and in a 1:1 fashion for iohexol (n = 19,482) and ioversol (n = 19,482). Groups were examined for differences in in-hospital mortality or subsequent hemodialysis, length of stay, and 30-day readmission for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Compared to patients exposed to iohexol, no differences were observed for patients exposed to iopamidol or ioversol for in-hospital hemodialysis (0.5% vs 0.4%, p = 0.45; 0.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.05), in-hospital mortality (0.7% vs 0.6%, p = 0.60; 0.5% vs 0.6%, p = 0.42), or composite hemodialysis or mortality (1.1% vs 1.0%, p = 0.58; 0.8% vs 1.0%, p = 0.06); for hospital length of stay (2.9 ± 2.7 vs 2.9 ± 2.7 days, p = 0.05; 2.8 ± 2.6 vs 2.9 ± 3.1 days, p = 0.35); or for 30-day readmission for CIN (0.1% vs 0.1%, p = 0.82; 0.1% vs 0.1%, p = 0.52). In conclusion, for patients undergoing ICA and/or PCI exposed to alternate LOCM, in-hospital death, need for hemodialysis, or readmission for CIN are uncommon, with no apparent clinical advantage among LOCM agents.