Artigo Revisado por pares

Timing of posterior urethral valve diagnosis and its impact on clinical outcome

2010; Elsevier BV; Volume: 7; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.08.002

ISSN

1873-4898

Autores

Yusuf Kibar, Richard Ashley, Christopher C. Roth, Dominic Frimberger, Bradley P. Kropp,

Tópico(s)

Urinary Tract Infections Management

Resumo

Our goals were to assess long-term outcome for patients with posterior urethral valves (PUV) and determine the impact of the timing of diagnosis.We reviewed the hospital records for patients with PUV treated in 1994-2008. Only those patients diagnosed, treated surgically, and followed clinically at our center were included.There were 52 patients with PUV. Thirty-nine were diagnosed by 1 year of age (early diagnosis cohort), while 13 were diagnosed after 1 year (late diagnosis cohort). Mean follow up after valve operation was 7.2 years (range 15 months-14 years). Chronic renal failure rates were not statistically different between the early and late diagnosis groups after surgical intervention: 48% (14/29) vs 25% (3/12), P = 0.30. Among the early diagnosis cases, 10% (3/29) eventually required renal transplant, while no child in the late diagnosis group has developed end-stage renal disease to date (P = 0.55).Gestational age at diagnosis is an important predictor of postnatal renal outcome. Our results suggest that diagnosis after 1 year of age is associated with a lower risk of developing renal insufficiency on long-term follow up.

Referência(s)