Prognostic Significance of Bone or Cartilage Invasion of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers
2010; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 33; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1097/coc.0b013e3181bead63
ISSN1537-453X
AutoresLy Do, Nisar Syed, Ajmel Puthawala, Samar Azawi, Richard P. Williams, Nayana Vora,
Tópico(s)Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
ResumoPurpose/Objective(s): Locally advanced squamous cell cancers of the head and neck with bone and cartilage invasion (BCI) traditionally have been treated with resection followed up with radiotherapy or less commonly definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, it is unclear whether bone or cartilage invasion confers a worse prognosis in comparison with each other. Materials/Methods: T4N0–3M0 squamous cell cancers of the head and neck patients underwent CRT or radical resection followed up with postoperative CRT. Oral cavity, oropharynx, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell cancers were included. Radiotherapy ranged from 59.4 to 72 Gy. Concurrent chemotherapy was platinum based. Results: Forty-six patients with BCI were treated. When treated with CRT, 5-year local control was 55% and 43% for BCI, respectively (P = 0.23). Five-year overall survival for these patients was 54% and 29% for BCI, respectively (P = 0.99). When treated with upfront resection, 5-year local control was not significantly different (P = 0.60) nor was 5-year overall survival (P = 0.15). Conclusions: This study suggests similar outcomes between patients with bone or cartilage invasion treated with upfront CRT or resection followed by CRT. Concurrent CRT may be viable alternative to resection in patients with either bone or cartilage invasion.
Referência(s)