Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

IMPLANTATION OF INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE CORPOREAL FIBROSIS: INTRODUCTION OF A NEW PENILE CAVERNOTOME

1999; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 162; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68099-8

1527-3792

Michael Mooreville, Sorin Adrian, John R. Delk, Steven K. Wilson,

Sexual Differentiation and Disorders

No AccessJournal of UrologyCLINICAL UROLOGY: Urologists at Work1 Dec 1999IMPLANTATION OF INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE CORPOREAL FIBROSIS: INTRODUCTION OF A NEW PENILE CAVERNOTOME MICHAEL MOOREVILLE, SORIN ADRIAN, JOHN R. DELK, and STEVEN K. WILSON MICHAEL MOOREVILLEMICHAEL MOOREVILLE , SORIN ADRIANSORIN ADRIAN , JOHN R. DELKJOHN R. DELK , and STEVEN K. WILSONSTEVEN K. WILSON View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68099-8AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Implantation of penile prosthetic cylinders into scarred corpora remains a challenge in the field of prosthetic urology. We describe a new penile cavernotome, which allows for easier dilation of fibrotic corpora cavernosa and facilitates inflatable penile prosthesis cylinder insertion. Materials and Methods: A set of 5 cavernotomes between 6 and 13 mm. in diameter are used to drill a space in fibrotic corpora with controlled 1 mm. cuts. The cavernotomes are advanced in an oscillating fashion and also allow shaving of severely stenotic areas for easier cavity development. They were used in 16 patients with fibrotic corpora secondary to different etiologies. A high transverse scrotal incision was used in all cases. Of the 16 patients 14 received downsized cylinders. Results: Implantation of both cylinders of an inflatable 3-piece device was successful in all cases. Proximal crural perforation occurred intraoperatively in 5 patients and was corrected by attaching the rear tip extender to the tunica with nonabsorbable suture. Postoperatively, distal tunical perforation of the corpora in 4 patients was repaired with natural tissue. Operative time was reduced compared to our previous experience with implantation in cases of corporeal fibrosis using extensive corporotomies or the Carrion-Rossello cavernotomes. In no case was the procedure terminated for urethral laceration or inadequate dilation for cylinder insertion. No grafting materials were necessary to close the corporotomy. Conclusions: The new cavernotomes along with the high transverse scrotal incision and downsized prostheses resulted in successful implantation in all of our cases. Dilation of fibrotic corpora was easier and quicker with the new cavernotomes because extensive corporeal resection was not necessary. Complications were acceptable for these difficult cases and prosthesis survival is 100% to date. References 1 : Penile prostheses. In: . Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, Co.1994: 257. chapt. 19. Google Scholar 2 : Management of penile implant complications. In: . New York: Williams & Wilkins1997: 241. chapt. 14. Google Scholar 3 : Distal corporoplasty for lateral extrusion of penile prosthesis cylinders. J. Urol.1999; 161: 193. Link, Google Scholar 4 : Penile prosthesis reimplantation. J. Urol.1987; 137: 46. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Coring fibrotic corpora for penile implants. Urology1984; 24: 73. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 6 : New technique for difficult penile implants. Urology1986; 27: 463. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 7 : Operative approach for secondary placement of penile prosthesis. Urology1986; 28: 108. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 8 : Improved implant survival in patients with severe corporal fibrosis: a new technique without necessity grafting. J. Urol.1995; 153: 359A. abstract 524. Google Scholar 9 : Use of penile prosthetic implants in patients with penile fibrosis. Urol. Clin. N. Amer.1995; 22: 847. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 10 : Simultaneous Ultrex® penile prosthesis reimplantation and Gore-Tex® grafting corporoplasty: functional outcomes of a surgical challenge. J. Urol.1995; 153: 36. abstract 530. Google Scholar 11 : Management of nondilatable cavernous fibrosis with the use of a downsized inflatable penile prosthesis. J. Urol.1995; 153: 366. Link, Google Scholar 12 : The prosthesis salvage operation: immediate replacement of the infected penile prosthesis. J. Urol.1996; 155: 155. Link, Google Scholar From the Mercy Medical Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Southwest Impotency Center, Van Buren, Arizona© 1999 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Quesada-Olarte J, Nelwan D, Donato U, Fernandez-Crespo R, Parker J and Carrion R (2022) Penile Implant Instrument InnovationsCurrent Urology Reports, 10.1007/s11934-022-01136-3, VOL. 24, NO. 2, (59-67), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023. Krughoff K, Bearelly P, Apoj M, Munarriz N, Thirumavalavan N, Pan S, Gross M and Munarriz R (2020) Multicenter surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement in patients with corporal fibrosis and review of the literatureInternational Journal of Impotence Research, 10.1038/s41443-020-00373-9, VOL. 34, NO. 1, (86-92), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022. Dropkin B, Chertack N, Nealon S, Joice G and Morey A (2022) The Hostile Penis: Managing the Patient with Corporal Fibrosis Penile Implant Surgery, 10.1007/978-3-030-82363-4_7, (97-123), . Di Pierro G, Lemma A, Di Lascio G, El Motassime A, Grande P, Di Giulio I, Salciccia S, Maggi M, Antonini G, De Berardinis E, Cristini C and Sciarra A (2021) Primary versus revision implant for inflatable penile prosthesis: A propensity score‐matched comparisonAndrologia, 10.1111/and.14240, VOL. 53, NO. 11, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021. Wilson S, Simhan J and Gross M (2020) Cylinder insertion into scarred corporal bodies: prosthetic urology's most difficult challenge: some suggestions for making the surgery easierInternational Journal of Impotence Research, 10.1038/s41443-020-0282-0, VOL. 32, NO. 5, (483-494), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2020. Lledó García E, González García F, Martínez Holguin E, Hernandez Cavieres J, Polanco Pujol L, Jara Rascón J and Hernández Fernández C (2020) Surgical implant options in patients with penile fibrosis due to infection or previous explantsActas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition), 10.1016/j.acuroe.2020.05.005, VOL. 44, NO. 5, (268-275), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020. Moncada I, Ascensios J, López I, Subirá D and Krishnappa P (2020) Intraoperative and postoperative complications of penile implant surgery. Diagnosis and treatmentActas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition), 10.1016/j.acuroe.2020.01.009, VOL. 44, NO. 5, (357-366), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020. Moncada I, Ascensios J, López I, Subirá D and Krisnappa P (2020) Complicaciones intraoperatorias y postoperatorias de la cirugía de prótesis de pene. Diagnóstico y tratamientoActas Urológicas Españolas, 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.01.014, VOL. 44, NO. 5, (357-366), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020. Lledó García E, González García F, Martínez Holguin E, Hernandez Cavieres J, Polanco Pujol L, Jara Rascón J and Hernández Fernández C (2020) Opciones quirúrgicas de implante en pacientes con fibrosis peneana por infección o explantes previosActas Urológicas Españolas, 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.10.001, VOL. 44, NO. 5, (268-275), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020. Helo S, Clavell-Hernandez J, Wilson S and Köhler T (2020) Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Complex and Previously Failed Settings Textbook of Male Genitourethral Reconstruction, 10.1007/978-3-030-21447-0_46, (589-611), . Faix A, Graziana J and Blion C (2019) Impianti penieni: indicazioni e tecnicheEMC - Tecniche Chirurgiche - Chirurgia Generale, 10.1016/S1636-5577(19)42583-2, VOL. 19, NO. 1, (1-19), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019. Welliver C (2019) Optimizing Outcomes in the Virgin Penile Implant PatientCurrent Urology Reports, 10.1007/s11934-019-0876-6, VOL. 20, NO. 3, Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019. Krzastek S and Smith R (2019) An update on the best approaches to prevent complications in penile prosthesis recipientsTherapeutic Advances in Urology, 10.1177/1756287218818076, VOL. 11, (175628721881807), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019. Hartman R, Kawashima A, Takahashi N, LeRoy A and King B (2016) Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP): diagnosis of complicationsAbdominal Radiology, 10.1007/s00261-016-0686-y, VOL. 41, NO. 6, (1187-1196), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016. Trost L, Wanzek P and Bailey G (2015) A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placementNature Reviews Urology, 10.1038/nrurol.2015.270, VOL. 13, NO. 1, (33-46), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016. DeLay K and Köhler T (2016) Penile Prosthesis Contemporary Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction, 10.1007/978-3-319-31587-4_15, (209-220), . Trost L, Patil M and Kramer A (2015) Critical Appraisal and Review of Management Strategies for Severe Fibrosis During Penile Implant SurgeryThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10.1111/jsm.12985, VOL. 12, NO. Supplement_7, (439-447), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2015. Mulcahy J (2015) The Prevention and Management of Noninfectious Complications of Penile ImplantsSexual Medicine Reviews, 10.1002/smrj.41, VOL. 3, NO. 3, (203-213), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2015. Vitarelli A, Divenuto L, Palminteri E, Lorusso G and Pagliarulo A (2014) Urethral Injuries Secondary to Implantation of Penile Prosthesis. Analysis of the Causes, Prevention and TreatmentUrologia Journal, 10.5301/urologia.5000056, VOL. 81, NO. 3, (139-143), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2014. Wilson S and Terrell J (2014) New Advances in Penile Implant Surgery Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery, 10.1007/978-1-4614-7708-2_47, (675-696), . Sadeghi-Nejad H and Fam M (2019) Penile prosthesis surgery in the management of erectile dysfunctionArab Journal of Urology, 10.1016/j.aju.2013.05.002, VOL. 11, NO. 3, (245-253), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013. Henry G and Laborde E (2012) A Review of Surgical Techniques for Impending Distal Erosion and Intraoperative Penile Implant Complications: Part 2 of a Three‐part Review Series on Penile Prosthetic SurgeryThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02606.x, VOL. 9, NO. 3, (927-936), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2012. Montague D (2012) Prosthetic Surgery for Erectile Dysfunction Campbell-Walsh Urology, 10.1016/B978-1-4160-6911-9.00027-X, (780-791.e2), . Martínez-Salamanca J, Mueller A, Moncada I, Carballido J and Mulhall J (2011) Penile Prosthesis Surgery in Patients with Corporal Fibrosis: A State of the Art ReviewThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02281.x, VOL. 8, NO. 7, (1880-1889), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011. Rodríguez-Tolrà J, Rodríguez J, Barea V, Pérez D and Miranda E (2009) Nuestra experiencia en el implante de prótesis de pene de dos componentes tipo Ambicor®Revista Internacional de Andrología, 10.1016/S1698-031X(09)73388-6, VOL. 7, NO. 4, (210-214), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009. Lane B and Montague D (2009) Non-pharmacologic Erectile Dysfunction Treatments After Prostate Cancer Therapy Sexual Function in the Prostate Cancer Patient, 10.1007/978-1-60327-555-2_14, (209-231), . Shaeer O and Shaeer K (2008) Penile prosthesis surgery for the fibrotic penisCurrent Sexual Health Reports, 10.1007/s11930-008-0032-7, VOL. 5, NO. 4, (179-183), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2008. Shaeer O (2008) Implantation of Penile Prosthesis in Cases of Corporeal Fibrosis: Modified Shaeer's Excavation TechniqueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00912.x, VOL. 5, NO. 10, (2470-2476), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008. Kansal N, Henry G and Mulcahy J (2008) Salvage surgery for penile prosthesis infectionCurrent Sexual Health Reports, 10.1007/s11930-008-0021-x, VOL. 5, NO. 3, (115-119), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2008. Ulloa E, Silberbogen A and Brown K (2008) Preoperative Psychosocial Evaluation of Penile Prosthesis CandidatesAmerican Journal of Men's Health, 10.1177/1557988307313439, VOL. 2, NO. 1, (68-75), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008. Faix A and Wilson S (2008) Indicaciones y técnicas de los implantes de peneEMC - Urología, 10.1016/S1761-3310(08)70052-5, VOL. 40, NO. 1, (1-13), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2008. Henry G and Wilson S (2007) Updates in Inflatable Penile ProsthesesUrologic Clinics of North America, 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.08.015, VOL. 34, NO. 4, (535-547), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2007. Faix A and Wilson S (2007) Implants péniens. Indications et techniquesAnnales d'Urologie, 10.1016/j.anuro.2007.09.003, Online publication date: 1-Oct-2007. Hatzimouratidis K, Koliakos N, Koutsogiannis I, Moisidis K, Giakoumelos A and Hatzichristou D (2007) Removal of a Detached Head of the Brooks Dilator from the Corpora Cavernosa During Penile Prosthesis ImplantationThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00506.x, VOL. 4, NO. 4, (1179-1181), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007. Shaeer O (2007) ORIGINAL RESEARCH—SURGERY: Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Cases of Fibrosis: Ultrasound-Guided Cavernotomy and Sheathed Trochar ExcavationThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00467.x, VOL. 4, NO. 3, (809-814), Online publication date: 1-May-2007. Sadeghi-Nejad H (2007) Penile Prosthesis Surgery: A Review of Prosthetic Devices and Associated ComplicationsThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00434.x, VOL. 4, NO. 2, (296-309), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2007. Shaeer O and Shaeer A (2007) ORIGINAL RESEARCH—SURGERY: Corporoscopic Excavation of the Fibrosed Corpora Cavernosa for Penile Prosethesis Implantation: Optical Corporotomy and Trans-Corporeal Resection, Shaeer's TechniqueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00348.x, VOL. 4, NO. 1, (218-225), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007. Faix A and Wilson S (2007) Impianti penieni. Indicazioni e tecnicheEMC - Tecniche Chirurgiche - Chirurgia Generale, 10.1016/S1636-5577(07)70589-8, VOL. 7, NO. 1, (1-13), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007. Wilson S, Delk J, Mulcahy J, Cleves M and Salem E (2006) ORIGINAL RESEARCH—SURGERY: Upsizing of Inflatable Penile Implant Cylinders in Patients with Corporal FibrosisThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00263.x, VOL. 3, NO. 4, (736-742), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2006. Wilson S and Mulcahy J Penile Implants Male Sexual Function, 10.1007/978-1-59745-155-0_16, (331-379) Henry G (2005) Management of intraoperative penile implant complicationsCurrent Sexual Health Reports, 10.1007/s11930-005-0006-y, VOL. 2, NO. 2, (64-68), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2005. Sadeghi-Nejad H and Seftel A (2004) Vacuum Devices and Penile Implants Male and Female Sexual Dysfunction, 10.1016/B978-0-7234-3266-1.50013-9, (129-143), . Rodríguez Tolrá J, Franco Miranda E, Arbelaez Arango S, Trilla Herrera E and Serrallach Milá N (2002) Nuestra experiencia en el implante de prótesis integradas de un solo componente (HYDROFLEX – DYNAFLEX)Actas Urológicas Españolas, 10.1016/S0210-4806(02)72770-8, VOL. 26, NO. 4, (261-265), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2002. Volume 162Issue 6December 1999Page: 2054-2057 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1999 by American Urological Association, Inc.Keywordspenile prosthesispenisfibrosisMetricsAuthor Information MICHAEL MOOREVILLE More articles by this author SORIN ADRIAN More articles by this author JOHN R. DELK More articles by this author STEVEN K. WILSON More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...