Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

HSF4 is required for normal cell growth and differentiation during mouse lens development

2004; Springer Nature; Volume: 23; Issue: 21 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1038/sj.emboj.7600435

1460-2075

Mitsuaki Fujimoto, Hanae Izu, Keisuke Seki, Ken Fukuda, Teruo Nishida, Shuichi Yamada, Kanefusa Kato, Shigenobu Yonemura, Sachiye Inouye, Akira Nakai,

Connexins and lens biology

Article14 October 2004free access HSF4 is required for normal cell growth and differentiation during mouse lens development Mitsuaki Fujimoto Mitsuaki Fujimoto Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Hanae Izu Hanae Izu Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Keisuke Seki Keisuke Seki Department of Biomolecular Recognition and Ophthalmology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Ken Fukuda Ken Fukuda Department of Biomolecular Recognition and Ophthalmology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Teruo Nishida Teruo Nishida Department of Biomolecular Recognition and Ophthalmology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Shu-ichi Yamada Shu-ichi Yamada Department of Cell Biology, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan Search for more papers by this author Kanefusa Kato Kanefusa Kato Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan Search for more papers by this author Shigenobu Yonemura Shigenobu Yonemura Laboratory for Cellular Morphogenesis, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan Search for more papers by this author Sachiye Inouye Sachiye Inouye Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Akira Nakai Corresponding Author Akira Nakai Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Mitsuaki Fujimoto Mitsuaki Fujimoto Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Hanae Izu Hanae Izu Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Keisuke Seki Keisuke Seki Department of Biomolecular Recognition and Ophthalmology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Ken Fukuda Ken Fukuda Department of Biomolecular Recognition and Ophthalmology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Teruo Nishida Teruo Nishida Department of Biomolecular Recognition and Ophthalmology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Shu-ichi Yamada Shu-ichi Yamada Department of Cell Biology, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan Search for more papers by this author Kanefusa Kato Kanefusa Kato Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan Search for more papers by this author Shigenobu Yonemura Shigenobu Yonemura Laboratory for Cellular Morphogenesis, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan Search for more papers by this author Sachiye Inouye Sachiye Inouye Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Akira Nakai Corresponding Author Akira Nakai Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan Search for more papers by this author Author Information Mitsuaki Fujimoto1, Hanae Izu1, Keisuke Seki2, Ken Fukuda2, Teruo Nishida2, Shu-ichi Yamada3, Kanefusa Kato4, Shigenobu Yonemura5, Sachiye Inouye1 and Akira Nakai 1 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan 2Department of Biomolecular Recognition and Ophthalmology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan 3Department of Cell Biology, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan 4Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan 5Laboratory for Cellular Morphogenesis, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan *Corresponding author. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Minami-Kogushi 1-1-1, Ube 755-8505, Japan. Tel.: +81 836 22 2214; Fax: +81 836 22 2315; E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2004)23:4297-4306https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600435 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info The heat shock transcription factor (HSF) family consists of three members in mammals and regulates expression of heat shock genes via a heat shock element. HSF1 and HSF2 are required for some developmental processes, but it is unclear how they regulate these processes. To elucidate the mechanisms of developmental regulation by HSFs, we generated mice in which the HSF4 gene is mutated. HSF4-null mice had cataract with abnormal lens fiber cells containing inclusion-like structures, probably due to decreased expression of γ-crystallin, which maintains protein stability. Furthermore, we found increased proliferation and premature differentiation of the mutant lens epithelial cells, which is associated with increased expression of growth factors, FGF-1, FGF-4, and FGF-7. Unexpectedly, HSF1 competed with HSF4 for the expression of FGFs not only in the lens but also in other tissues. These findings reveal the lens-specific role of HSF4, which activates γ-crystallin genes, and also indicate that HSF1 and HSF4 are involved in regulating expression of growth factor genes, which are essential for cell growth and differentiation. Introduction All organisms respond to elevated temperatures by inducing a set of heat shock proteins (Hsps). This response is regulated mainly at the level of transcription by heat shock transcription factor (HSF), which binds to a heat shock element (HSE), which is composed of at least three inverted repeats of consensus sequence nGAAn (Wu, 1995). The HSF family consists of four members (HSF1–4) in vertebrates, whereas a single HSF is present in yeast, nematode, and the fruit fly (Morimoto, 1998). HSF1 and HSF2 are ubiquitous among vertebrate species, whereas HSF3 and HSF4 have been characterized only in avians and in mammals, respectively (Nakai, 1999). All of the HSFs have a DNA-binding domain and a leucine zipper-like trimerization domain (HR-A/B), and HSF trimers bind to HSE with high affinity. There is another leucine zipper-like domain (HR-C) that suppresses trimer formation except in HSF4. Therefore, HSFs stay as monomers or dimers under normal growth conditions and are converted to trimers when they are activated (Morimoto, 1998). In mammals, HSF1 is necessary for induction of heat shock genes under heat shock conditions and for acquisition of thermotolerance (McMillan et al, 1998; Zhang et al, 2002). In addition to the role in the activation of gene expression in response to various stresses, HSFs have been shown to be involved in cell growth and differentiation (Morano and Thiele, 1999; Pirkkala et al, 2001). In Drosophila, a single HSF is necessary for oogenesis and early larval development (Jedlicka et al, 1997). Likewise, mouse HSF1 is required for oogenesis, placental development, and normal growth (Xiao et al, 1999; Christians et al, 2000; Zhang et al, 2002). Furthermore, HSF1 plays a role in eliminating injured male germ cells when these cells are exposed to stress (Nakai et al, 2000; Izu et al, 2004). Remarkably, these developmental functions of HSF1 are not mediated through the induction of Hsps. HSF2 is also involved in oogenesis, spermatogenesis, and brain formation (Kallio et al, 2002; Wang et al, 2003). Furthermore, HSF1-null or HSF2-null male mice are fertile (Xiao et al, 1999; Kallio et al, 2002; McMillan et al, 2002; Zhang et al, 2002; Wang et al, 2003; Izu et al, 2004), whereas mice deficient in both HSF1 and HSF2 are sterile with severe defects in spermatogenesis (Wang et al, 2004). This observation indicates the complementary roles of HSF1 and HSF2 in spermatogenesis. Although comprehensive chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis revealed that HSF1 binds to many genes in vivo in human cells under normal growth conditions (Trinklein et al, 2004), it is yet unclear how HSF1 and HSF2 regulate the developmental processes and which target genes are responsible for the development. In contrast to HSF1 and HSF2 proteins, which are expressed in most tissues, the expression level of HSF4 protein is too low to be detected in many tissues except in the brain and lung (Tanabe et al, 1999). There are at least two isoforms, HSF4a and HSF4b, which are derived by alternative RNA splicing events. HSF4b has the potential to activate transcription, whereas HSF4a does not have this potential (Nakai et al, 1997; Tanabe et al, 1999; Frejtag et al, 2001; Zhang et al, 2001). Both isoforms lack an HR-C domain that inhibits the trimer formation. Therefore, HSF4 is constitutively a trimer that binds to HSE, suggesting that HSF4 may have physiological roles during development (Nakai, 1999). It was shown recently that mutations of HSF4 are associated with dominant inherited cataracts in human (Bu et al, 2002). In this study, we found that HSF4 has a major HSE-binding activity specifically in the lens extract. As the lens consists of only two cell populations, it provides an excellent model of cell growth and differentiation (McAvoy et al, 1999). To elucidate the roles of HSFs in these processes, we generated mice in which the HSF4 gene was mutated. We found anomalies of the lens, and revealed novel HSF4 target genes that are essential for cell growth and differentiation. Result HSF4 consists of a major HSE-binding activity in the lens In the absence of stress, there are weak, but distinct, HSE-binding activities in many tissues. Antibody supershift experiments showed that most of the HSE-binding activities consist of HSF1 and HSF2 (Fiorenza et al, 1995). HSF4 mRNA is expressed ubiquitously at low levels (Nakai et al, 1997; Tanabe et al, 1999), and HSF4 protein has been detected in the brain and lung, and cell lines such as C2C12 (Tanabe et al, 1999). To detect HSE-binding activity of HSF4, we performed gel shift assay using extracts isolated from various tissues including the skin, inner ear, and nasal cavity. HSE-binding activity was composed mostly of HSF1 in the tissue extracts as in the brain and lung extracts (Figure 1A, data not shown). Exceptionally, the HSE-binding activity in the lens extract was exclusively composed of HSF4 (Figure 1A). Furthermore, the expression level of HSF4 protein was much higher in the lens compared to those in the brain and lung, whereas the expression level of HSF1 protein was lower in the lens (Figure 1B). These results suggest unique roles of HSF4 in the lens. Figure 1.HSF4 consists of a major HSE-binding activity in the mouse lens. (A) Gel shift assay in the presence or absence of antibody for HSF1, HSF2, or HSF4. Whole tissue extracts were prepared from the lens, brain, and lung in 6-week-old mice, and were mixed with the binding reaction containing a 32P-labeled HSE oligonucleotide and antibody. HSF indicates the complexes of HSFs and an HSE probe, ns indicates nonspecific binding activity, and free indicates an unbound HSE probe. (B) Protein levels of HSF1, HSF2, and HSF4 in cells and tissues. Cell extracts (40 μg) prepared from MEF, C2C12, and α-TN4, and tissue extracts (80 μg) prepared from the lens, brain, and lung in 2-day-old mice were subjected to Western blot analysis using each specific antibody. (C) Protein levels of HSF4 in the lens at E15.5, E18.5, p2, and 6-week-old (adult) were analyzed by Western blot. Level of αA-crystallin was constant during development. (D) In situ hybridization was performed on the eye sections of E11.5 and E13.5 embryos using sense and antisense probes specific for HSF4. The sections were also stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Bar, 50 μm. Download figure Download PowerPoint We next examined the profile of HSF4 expression during lens development. We detected only a b-isoform of HSF4 (HSF4b) at any developmental stages by Western blot analysis (Figures 1C and 2D) and RT–PCR analysis (data not shown). Consistent with a previous work showing HSE-binding activity in the lens (Somasundaram and Bhat, 2000), the level of HSF4 protein reached a peak early after birth, and then decreased (Figure 1C). At embryonic day 13.5 (E13.5), cells in the posterior half of the lens vesicle elongated and differentiated to form the primary fibers. HSF4 mRNA is not expressed at E11.5, but is expressed in both epithelial cells and fiber cells at E13.5 (Figure 1D). HSF4 mRNA continued to be expressed in both cell types of the lens at least until 6 weeks after birth (data not shown). Figure 2.Cataract formation in HSF4-null mice. (A) Schematic representation of wild-type and mutant HSF4 loci together with targeting vector. The targeting vector was constructed to replace a part of exon 2 and exons 3–8 with a neomycin-resistant gene cassette. Locations of an external probe used to confirm correct targeting, and locations of PCR primers used to screen targeted ES clones (primers 1 and 2) and to identify genotype (primers 3 and 4) are shown. S, SalI; H, HindIII; Hp, HpaI; N, NotI; X, XbaI. (B) Southern blot of SalI/HindIII-digested genomic DNAs isolated from wild-type and targeted two ES clones (C39 and C49) using 32P-labeled probes described in (A). (C) PCR genotypic analysis for targeted locus. Mouse tail genomic DNA was isolated and was used to amplify DNA fragments by PCR using primers 3 and 4. (D) Western blot analysis of extracts of the lens of 6-week-old mice (+/+, +/−, −/−), 293 cells ectopically expressing HSF4a and HSF4b, and mouse lens epithelial α-TN4 cells. (E) In situ hybridization on the eye sections of E15.5 wild-type (+/+) and HSF4-null (−/−) mice using an antisense probe specific for HSF4. (F) mRNA levels of HSFs in wild-type(+/+) and HSF4-null (−/−) lens were examined by RT–PCR. (G) Whole-cell extracts were prepared from the lenses, and gel shift assay was performed using a 32P-labeled HSE oligonucleotide. Positions of free probe and probe bound by HSF are shown. (H) Lens weights in 6-week-old wild-type and mutant mice. Means and standard deviations were estimated by analyzing each of the three mice. (I) Lens opacity in 6-week-old wild-type and HSF4-null mice. Download figure Download PowerPoint Inactivation of the HSF4 gene causes abnormal lens fiber cells containing inclusion-like structures To examine the in vivo functions of HSF4, we generated targeted disruptions of the mouse HSF4 gene by homologous recombination in TT2 embryonic stem (ES) cells (Inouye et al, 2003). In the targeting vector, a region containing a part of exon 2 and exons 3–8 was substituted with a neomycin-resistant gene cassette (Figure 2A). This substitution removes amino acids at position 68 to position 248 in mouse HSF4, which contains part of the DNA-binding domain and an oligomerization domain (Tanabe et al, 1999). The ES cells were electroporated with the targeting vector, and placed under positive–negative selection (Inouye et al, 2003). The surviving 176 ES clones were screened for homologous recombination by PCR and Southern blotting (Figure 2B), and correct gene targeting occurred in 22 clones. Two lines of knockout mice were generated by injecting C35 and C49 ES clones into eight-cell embryos of ICR mice, and were maintained by mating with ICR mice. Progeny of matings between heterozygotes were analyzed by PCR to identify wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (+/−), and homozygous (−/−) mutant offspring (Figure 2C), and were found to be present at the expected Mendelian ratio (49:82:43, respectively; n=174). Body weights of HSF4-null mice were as same as those of wild-type mice at all developmental stages (data not shown). Male and female HSF4-null mice were fertile, and the histology of the testis and ovary was normal (data not shown). We detected no abnormality in the brain or lung in HSF4-null mice (data not shown). We next examined the lens, and confirmed that HSF4 expression was absent in HSF4-null mice (Figure 2D and E). Expression levels of HSF1 and HSF2 mRNAs were normal in HSF4-null lens (Figure 2F). We detected no HSE-binding activity in an extract isolated from HSF4-null lens (Figure 2G). Weight of the HSF4-null lens was lower than that of the wild-type lens (Figure 2H), and HSF4-null mice had cataract (Figure 2I). We then examined histology of the lens. In 6-week-old mice, wild-type lens fiber cells were flattened by dehydration, whereas HSF4-null fiber cells swelled (Figure 3A). Furthermore, HSF4-null fiber cells in the center of the lens contained inclusion-like structures, which were stained heavily with eosin and were possibly protein aggregates (Figure 3A, arrows in d). These abnormalities can be observed even at 2 days after birth (data not shown). However, HSF4-null lens cells normally elongated and differentiated into fiber cells until E15.5 (data not shown). The inclusion-like structures were stained with antibodies for abundant lens proteins, αB-crystallin (Figure 3Af) and αA-crystallin (data not shown). Hsp70 was not accumulated in the inclusion (data not shown). These results suggest that loss of HSF4 function may cause protein aggregates in the center of the lens. Figure 3.The lens fiber cells contain inclusion-like structures in HSF4-null mice. (A) Histological examination of the lens sections of the 6-week-old wild-type (a, c) and HSF4-null (b, d) mice stained with HE. Immunostaining of αB-crystallin was performed using the lens sections of wild-type (e) and HSF4-null (f) mice. The open arrow in (b) indicates the lesion where the structure of the fiber cells was not recognized. The legion indicated by a square in (b) was enlarged into (d). Arrows in (d, f) indicate cytoplasmic inclusion-like structures and stars indicate the nucleus. Magnification: (a, b) × 25; (c–f) × 1000. Bars, 10 μm. (B) Expression of Hsps and αA-, αB-, and γ-crystallins. Proteins isolated from the lens in 6-week-old wild-type (+/+) and mutant (+/− and −/−) mice were analyzed by Western blot analysis using each specific antibody. In the Hsp70 column, an upper band represents Hsc70 and a lower band represents an inducible Hsp70. (C) Immunohistochemistry of 6-week-old mice using antiserum for each specific antiserum. The bow regions (upper columns) and the epithelial layers (lower columns) are shown. Download figure Download PowerPoint Expression of γ-crystallins decreases in HSF4-null mice As heat shock genes are candidate targets of HSF4, we examined the expression of major Hsps in the lens. We found that Hsp27 expression in the inner layer of the lens reduced in HSF4-null mice (Figure 3B and C). However, it is unclear whether reduced expression of Hsp27 leads to protein aggregates. Unexpectedly, we found that expression of Hsp60, Hsp70, Hsp90, and Hsp110 increased (Figure 3B). Immunohistochemical analysis also showed increased expression of Hsp70 and Hsp60 in the epithelial cells of HSF4-null lens (Figure 3C). These results indicate that HSF4 suppresses expression of major Hsps in epithelial cells. As crystallins are major lens structural proteins in the lens, we examined expression of crystallins in the HSF4-null lens. The expressions of αA-crystallins, αB-crystallins, and β-crystallins were constant in the HSF4-null lens (Figure 3B, data not shown). Unexpectedly, we found that γ-crystallin expression was markedly reduced (Figure 3B and C). All six γ-crystallin gene expressions were markedly reduced in the lens of adult 6-week-old HSF4-null mice when these were estimated by semiquantitative RT–PCR analysis (Figure 4A). The expression levels were reduced even in the lens of 2-day-old HSF4-null mice, but were normal in the lens of E15.5 HSF4-null embryos. The stage at which abnormal morphology of fiber cells becomes apparent correlates with the initiation of decreased expression of the γ-crystallin genes. These results demonstrate that HSF4 is required to maintain γ-crystallin gene expression at later developmental stages. As the γ-crystallin is essential for protein stability in the lens fiber cells as described below, the abnormalities of the fiber cells are partly due to the reduced expression of γ-crystallin. Figure 4.Expression of the γ-crystallin genes is markedly reduced in HSF4-null lens. (A) RT–PCR analysis of mRNAs of the γ-crystallin genes using specific primers. Total RNAs were isolated from lenses in 6-week-old mice, 2-day-old mice (P2), and 15.5 dpc embryos (E15.5). Images of autoradiography are shown. To identify γE and γF, the PCR products amplified with the same set of primers were digested with BglII. (B) Promoter sequence alignment of the six mouse γ-crystallin genes. Sequences identical to the consensus HSE sequences are shown in gray boxes. The asterisks indicate key nucleotides essential for HSF1 binding. (C) Expression of crystallins and Hsps in 6-week-old wild-type (WT) and HSF1-null (HSF1−/−) mice examined by Western blot analysis. (D) RT–PCR analysis of mRNAs of the γ-crystallin genes using total RNAs isolated from lenses in 6-week-old mice. Images of autoradiography are shown. (E) Lenses were removed from 2-week-old wild-type (+/+) and HSF4-null (−/−) mice, and were incubated in medium at 37°C for 24 h. To damage lens cells, the lenses from wild-type mice were incubated in the presence of 1 mM H2O2. Proteins in the lens and medium were analyzed by Western blot analysis using antiserum specific for αA- or γ-crystallin. (F) ChIP-enriched DNAs from 2-week-old wild-type (+/+) and HSF4-null (−/−) lenses using preimmune serum (PI), anti-HSF1 serum (α-HSF1), and anti-HSF4 serum (α-HSF4) as well as an input DNA were amplified using primers specific for the γF-crystallin gene by PCR analysis. The DNA fragment (−349 to +6) was amplified. Download figure Download PowerPoint As we found HSE-like sequences in all six γ-crystallin genes near transcription start sites (Figure 4B), we also analyzed γ-crystallin expression in the lens of HSF1-null mice (Inouye et al, 2003). Cataract did not develop in adult HSF1-null mice (see Figure 7A), but the γ-crystallin level reduced a little (∼70% of control level) (Figure 4C). Especially, expression of the γA-crystallin gene reduced significantly (Figure 4D). The reduction of γ-crystallins was not due to the shift of γ-crystallin proteins into an insoluble fraction (data not shown) or the leakage of proteins from damaged fiber cells (Figure 4E) (Piatigorsky et al, 1978). We further analyzed the binding of HSF4 to the HSE-like sequence of the γF-crystallin gene. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that HSF4 binds to the upstream region (−349 to +6) of the γF-crystallin gene in vivo (Figure 4F). These results suggest that HSF4 directly binds and regulates expression of the γ-crystallin gene. The γ-crystallin gene expression is directly regulated by many transcription factors, including Pax-6 (Kondoh, 2002), Sox-1 (Nishiguchi et al, 1998), c-Maf (Kim et al, 1999), and Prox-1 (Lengler et al, 2001), and their regulations are essential for differentiation into fiber cells. In the HSF4-null lens, however, expression levels of these transcription factors were normal (data not shown). It is unclear why HSF4 is not required for expression of γ-crystallin genes during embryonic development, although Sox-1, c-Maf, and Prox-1 transcription factors are essential for the expression. HSF4 regulates proliferation and differentiation of lens epithelial cells by suppressing FGF expression In addition to the abnormalities of the fiber cells, we observed abnormal epithelial cell morphology. Epithelial cells were found in the anterior of the lens and had cuboidal morphology in the wild-type lens. However, the epithelial cells in adult HSF4-null mice were columnar (Figure 5A). Furthermore, the epithelial cells in the bow region, where epithelial cells differentiated into fiber cells, were highly elongated in 2- and 6-week-old mice (Figure 5A). Electron micrographs showed the columnar morphology of the epithelial cells, and also showed that fiber cells near the epithelial layer were rich in organelles such as mitochondria (Figure 5B). Denucleation in fiber cells was also inhibited (Figure 5B). Furthermore, epithelial cells detached from the capsule that was stained with PAS (see Figure 7A). Numbers of epithelial cells per section in HSF4-null mice were the same as those in wild-type mice during embryonic development, but increased even at 2 days postpartum (Figure 5C). 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU)-incorporated epithelial cells were observed throughout the epithelial layer in E18.5 mice and the number of the BrdU-positive cells increased in HSF4-null mice (Figure 5D). These results indicate increased proliferation of epithelial cells and premature differentiation of fiber cells in HSF4-null mice. Figure 5.Increased proliferation and premature differentiation of the lens epithelial cells in HSF4-null mice. (A) Histological examination of the lens sections of 6-week-old, 2-week-old, 2-day-old, E18.5, and E15.5 wild-type (+/+) and HSF4-null (−/−) mice. Sections were stained with HE and DAPI. The epithelial layer (upper columns) is only found in the anterior of the lens. The bow regions, where epithelial cells differentiate into fiber cells, are also shown in the lower columns. (B) Transmission electron microscopic analysis (upper columns) and DAPI staining (lower columns) of 2-week-old wild-type and HSF4-null lens. The nuclei of the epithelial cells are indicated as N. Bar, 2 μm. (C) Numbers of total epithelial cells per section in six lenses were counted. The stars indicate P<0.05. (D) BrdU incorporation in the lens epithelial cells of E18.5 mice. The arrows indicate cells incorporated with BrdU. Percentages of BrdU-positive cells are shown. The stars indicate P<0.01. Download figure Download PowerPoint Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) regulate growth and differentiation of lens epithelial cells (McAvoy et al, 1999). Transgenic mice expressing a low dose of FGF-1 exhibited epithelial cell hyperplasia, which is associated with premature elongation of epithelial cells (Robinson et al, 1995). These phenotypes are also observed in transgenic mice expressing FGF-4, FGF-7, FGF-8, and FGF-9 (Lovicu and Overbeek, 1998), and are similar to those observed in HSF4-null mice. Therefore, we examined expression of the FGFs by RT–PCR analysis. It clearly revealed that FGF-1, FGF-4, FGF-7, but not FGF-2, were expressed at higher levels in HSF4-null lens than those in wild-type lens (Figure 6A). In situ hybridization analysis showed high expression of FGF1 mRNA in HSF4-null epithelial cells and fiber cells (Figure 6B). To examine the roles of HSF4 in the FGF expression in other cell types, we overexpressed HSF4 into mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) cells using an adenovirus vector, and found that HSF4 suppressed FGF-7 expression (Figure 6C). Furthermore, ChIP analysis revealed that HSF4 bound to the upstream region (−615 to +10) of the FGF-7 gene in vivo in the lens (Figure 6D). This region contains five HSE consensus sequences (Finch et al, 1995; Fasciana et al, 1996). These data strongly suggest that HSF4 represses FGF expression by directly binding to FGF genes. Figure 6.Expression of FGFs is high in HSF4-null lenses. (A) RT–PCR analysis of mRNAs of the FGF-related genes using specific primers. RT–PCR was performed using total RNAs isolated from lenses of 6-week-old wild-type (+/+) and HSF4-null (−/−) mice, and DNA bands were stained with ethidium bromide. Representative data are shown. (B) In situ hybridization was performed on 6-week-old wild-type (+/+) and HSF4-null (−/−) lenses using sense and antisense probes specific for FGF-1. (C) RT–PCR analysis of mRNAs of FGF-related genes in MEF cells overexpressing HSF4b or LacZ as a control. MEF cells were transfected with adenovirus expressing HSF4b or LacZ. At 48 h after transfection, mRNA levels of FGF-7 and FGFR1 were estimated by RT–PCR. Western blot analysis of HSF4 protein is shown. (D) ChIP-enriched DNAs from 2-week-old wild-type (+/+) and HSF4-null (−/−) lenses using preimmune serum (PI), anti-HSF1 serum (α-HSF1), and anti-HSF4 serum (α-HSF4) as well as an input DNA were amplified using primers specific for the FGF7 gene by PCR analysis. The DNA fragment (−615 to +10) was amplified. Download figure Download PowerPoint Figure 7.HSF1 competes with HSF4 for the expression of FGFs. (A) Histological examination of the lens sections of 6-week-old wild-type, HSF1-null, HSF4-null, and double-null (dn) mice. Sections were stained with HE and DAPI, PAS, or immunostained using a preimmune serum (PI) or an antiserum specific for Hsp70 or Hsp60. Lens extrusion was heavily accumulated in double-null mice (arrows). (B) Numbers of total epithelial cells per section in six lenses were shown on the right. The stars indicate P<0.01. (B) In situ hybridization was performed on 6-week-old wild-type (+/+), and HSF4-null (−/−) lenses using sense and antisense probes specific for FGF-1. (C) Proteins isolated from the lenses in 6-week-old mice were analyzed by Western blot analysis using each specific antibody. (D) RT–PCR analysis of mRNAs of the FGF-related genes in wild-type, HSF1-null, HSF4-null, and double-null (dn) mice. RT–PCR analysis was performed using total RNAs isolated from lenses in 6-week-old mice. Relative FGF expression levels are estimat