Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Responses of three freshwater planktonic ciliates with different feeding modes to cryptophyte and diatom prey

1999; Inter-Research Science Center; Volume: 17; Linguagem: Inglês

10.3354/ame017049

1616-1564

H. Müller, Amnon Schlegel,

Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology

AME Aquatic Microbial Ecology Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials AME 17:49-60 (1999) - doi:10.3354/ame017049 Responses of three freshwater planktonic ciliates with different feeding modes to cryptophyte and diatom prey Helga Müller*, Anja Schlegel Limnological Institute, University of Konstanz, PO Box 5560, D-78434 Konstanz, Germany *E-mail: helga.mueller@uni-konstanz.de ABSTRACT: The filter feeding oligotrich ciliate Strobilidium lacustris, the raptorial prostome ciliate Balanion planctonicum and the diffusion feeding scuticociliate Histiobalantium bodamicum could be cultivated for months/years on a sole diet of Cryptomonas sp., whereas the diatom Stephanodiscus hantzschii did not support their growth. With Cryptomonas sp. as food, numerical responses of all ciliates followed a modified Michaelis-Menten model, which at 15°C yielded maximum growth rates of 0.96, 1.87 and 0.33 d-1 and threshold concentrations of 61, 78 and 290 ng C ml-1 for S. lacustris, B. planctonicum and H. bodamicum, respectively. Functional response patterns differed between species. In all investigated ciliates, growth rates reached a maximum earlier than ingestion rates, and there were no threshold concentrations for zero ingestion. Food selectivity depended on feeding mode. H. bodamicum was not able to ingest the non-motile diatoms. Both S. lacustris and B. planctonicum selectively preferred cryptophytes when offered a mixed diet. This effect was more pronounced in the raptorial feeder compared to the filter feeder. Our results indicate that during the phytoplankton spring bloom in Lake Constance prostome and oligotrich ciliates mainly exploit cryptophytes, and that the scuticociliate H. bodamicum, due to its slow growth, is an inferior competitor during this season. The observed threshold concentrations suggest that during the rest of the year prostomes and oligotrichs must rely on small-scale patches of this food, whereas H. bodamicum, with maximum development in late summer and autumn, presumably consumes a much larger variety of prey. KEY WORDS: Ciliate · Numerical response · Functional response · Feeding mode · Selective feeding · Cryptophyte · Diatom · Balanion · Strobilidium · Histiobalantium Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in AME Vol. 17, No. 1. Publication date: April 30, 1999 Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564 Copyright © 1999 Inter-Research.