Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

A Summary of Evidence in Favor of the Traction Fiber in Mitosis

1944; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 78; Issue: 778 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/281214

1537-5323

Ivor Cornman,

Microtubule and mitosis dynamics

Previous articleNext article No AccessA Summary of Evidence in Favor of the Traction Fiber in MitosisIvor CornmanIvor CornmanPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 78, Number 778Sep. - Oct., 1944 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/281214 Views: 5Total views on this site Citations: 41Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article: Bibliography, (Jan 2019): 497–718.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814371-1.16001-1Leocadia V. Paliulis, Arthur Forer A review of "tethers": elastic connections between separating partner chromosomes in anaphase, Protoplasma 255, no.33 (Jan 2018): 733–740.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1201-1J. McIntosh, Thomas Hays A Brief History of Research on Mitotic Mechanisms, Biology 5, no.44 (Dec 2016): 55.https://doi.org/10.3390/biology5040055 References, (Jan 2010): 383–522.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374233-9.00028-3Arthur Forer, Tim Spurck, Jeremy D. Pickett-Heaps, Paula J. Wilson Structure of kinetochore fibres in crane-fly spermatocytes after irradiation with an ultraviolet microbeam: Neither microtubules nor actin filaments remain in the irradiated region, Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 56, no.33 (Oct 2003): 173–192.https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.10144Alexey Khodjakov, Irene S. Gabashvili, Conly L. Rieder ?Dumb? versus ?smart? kinetochore models for chromosome congression during mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells, Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 43, no.33 (Jan 1999): 179–185.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1999)43:3 3.0.CO;2-4K. A. Adames, Arthur Forer Evidence for polewards forces on chromosome arms during anaphase, Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 34, no.11 (Jan 1996): 13–25.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1996)34:1 3.0.CO;2-JA. Forer, P. J. Wilson A model for chromosome movement during mitosis, Protoplasma 179, no.3-43-4 (Sep 1994).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01403947Danny N. Davis Models for the movement of mono-oriented chromosomes, Journal of Theoretical Biology 150, no.33 (Jun 1991): 305–322.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80430-8R. Bruce Nicklas Chromosomes and Kinetochores do More in Mitosis than Previously Thought, (Jan 1988): 53–74.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1037-2_2Jonathan Wells Inertial force as a possible factor in mitosis, Biosystems 17, no.44 (Jan 1985): 301–315.https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(85)90046-2ARTHUR FORER Light Microscopic Studies of Chromosome Movements in Living Cells, (Jan 1981): 135–154.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-781240-3.50010-XRobert W. Riess, John J. Biesele A Possible Mechanism of Chromosomal Movement in the Scorpion, Centruroides Vittatus (Say), Caryologia 25, no.44 (Jan 1972): 455–462.https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1972.10796499R. Bruce Nicklas Mitosis, (Jan 1971): 225–297.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9588-5_5E. Grundmann Der mitotische Zellcyclus, (Jan 1971): 282–479.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65042-0_4Hans A. Went The Behavior of Centrioles and the Structure and Formation of the Achromatic Figure, (Jan 1966): 1–109.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5571-4_1Arthur Forer Characterization of the mitotic traction system, and evidence that birefringent spindle fibers neither produce nor transmit force for chromosome movement, Chromosoma 19, no.11 (Jan 1966): 44–98.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332793Seiichiro Kinoshita, Hartmut Hoffmann-Berling Lokale kontraktion als ursache der plasmateilung von fibroblasten, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Specialized Section on Biophysical Subjects 79, no.11 (Jan 1964): 98–101.https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6577(64)90042-7A. Bajer Observations on dicentrics in living cells, Chromosoma 14, no.11 (Jan 1963): 18–30.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332608Laurence Levine Introduction, (Jan 1963): 1–2.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-395710-8.50005-XL.R. Cleveland Functions of Flagellate and Other Centrioles in Cell Reproduction, (Jan 1963): 3–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-395710-8.50006-1Andrew G. Szent-Györgyi Contractility, (Jan 1963): 227–258.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-395710-8.50014-0A. BAJER, J. MOLÈ-BAJER Cine Analysis of Some Aspects of Mitosis in Endosperm, (Jan 1963): 357–409.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3151-8.50020-8DANIEL MAZIA Mitosis and the Physiology of Cell Division, (Jan 1961): 77–412.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-123303-7.50008-9G. Östergren, J. Molè-Bajer, A. Bajer AN INTERPRETATION OF TRANSPORT PHENOMENA AT MITOSIS*, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 90, no.22 (Dec 2006): 381–408.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb23258.xHARTMUT HOFFMANN-BERLING Other Mechanisms Producing Movements, (Jan 1960): 341–370.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-395543-2.50013-8Hans H. Pfeiffer �ber die Ermittlung der kinetischen Energie von Chromosomen in der Anaphase, Protoplasma 51, no.33 (Sep 1959): 390–398.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01252473L. R. CLEVELAND A Factual Analysis of Chromosomal Movement in Barbulanympha, The Journal of Protozoology 5, no.11 (Apr 2007): 47–62.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1958.tb02526.xHans H. Pfeiffer �ber die Mitwirkung rhythmischer Oscillationen der Centrosomen bei mitotischen Chromosomenbewegungen, Protoplasma 46, no.1-41-4 (Mar 1956): 585–596.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01248902DANIEL MAZIA Materials for the Biophysical and Biochemical Study of Cell Division, (Jan 1956): 69–118.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3110-5.50007-8Sajiro Makino, Yuh H. Nakanishi A quantitative study on anaphase movement of chromosomes in living grasshopper spermatocytes, Chromosoma 7, no.11 (Jan 1955): 439–450.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329736E. Battaglia, J. W. Boyes Post-Reductional Meiosis: Its Mechanism and Causes, Caryologia 8, no.11 (Jan 1955): 87–134.https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1955.10797554Emilio Battaglia Chromosome Morphology and Terminology, Caryologia 8, no.11 (Jan 1955): 179–187.https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1955.10797556J.A. Jacquez, J.J. Biesele A study of Michel's film on meiosis in Psophus stridulus L, Experimental Cell Research 6, no.11 (Jan 1954): 17–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(54)90144-5Shinya Inou� Polarization optical studies of the mitotic spindle, Chromosoma 5, no.11 (Dec 1953): 487–500.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01271498 Teru Hayashi Surface-Spread Protein as a Basis for Cell Structure and Cell Movement, The American Naturalist 87, no.835835 (Sep 2015): 209–227.https://doi.org/10.1086/281777Franz Schrader Data contributing to an analysis of metaphase mechanics, Chromosoma 3, no.11 (Jan 1950): 22–47.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319467GUNNAR ÖSTERGREN CONSIDERATIONS ON SOME ELEMENTARY FEATURES OF MITOSIS, Hereditas 36, no.11 (Jul 2010): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1950.tb03360.xGUNNAR ÖSTERGREN LUZULA AND THE MECHANISM OF CHROMOSOME MOVEMENTS, Hereditas 35, no.44 (Jul 2010): 445–468.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1949.tb02884.xANTERO VAARAMA SPINDLE ABNORMALITIES AND VARIATION IN CHROMOSOME NUMBER IN RIBES NIGRUM, Hereditas 35, no.22 (Jul 2010): 136–162.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1949.tb02867.xGUNNAR ÖSTERGREN, ROELOF PRAKKEN BEHAVIOUR ON THE SPINDLE OF THE ACTIVELY MOBILE CHROMOSOME ENDS OF RYE, Hereditas 32, no.3-43-4 (Jul 2010): 473–494.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1946.tb02788.x