Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities*

2009; Wiley; Volume: 18; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00342.x

1467-9760

André Bächtiger, Simon Niemeyer, Michael A. Neblo, Marco R. Steenbergen, Jürg Steiner,

Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

Journal of Political PhilosophyVolume 18, Issue 1 p. 32-63 Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities* André Bächtiger, André Bächtiger University of BernSearch for more papers by this authorSimon Niemeyer, Simon Niemeyer Australian National UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorMichael Neblo, Michael Neblo Ohio State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorMarco R. Steenbergen, Marco R. Steenbergen University of BernSearch for more papers by this authorJürg Steiner, Jürg Steiner University of North Carolina and University of BernSearch for more papers by this author André Bächtiger, André Bächtiger University of BernSearch for more papers by this authorSimon Niemeyer, Simon Niemeyer Australian National UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorMichael Neblo, Michael Neblo Ohio State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorMarco R. Steenbergen, Marco R. Steenbergen University of BernSearch for more papers by this authorJürg Steiner, Jürg Steiner University of North Carolina and University of BernSearch for more papers by this author First published: 08 January 2010 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00342.xCitations: 232Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Angell, Richard B. 1964. Reasoning and Logic. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Google Scholar Austen-Smith, David. 1992. Strategic models of talk in political decision-making. International Political Science Review, 13, 124–52. 10.1177/019251219201300104 Web of Science®Google Scholar Austen-Smith, David and Timothy J. Feddersen. 2006. Deliberation, preference uncertainty, and voting Rules. American Political Science Review, 100, 209–18. 10.1017/S0003055406062113 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bächtiger, André. 2005. The Real World of Deliberation. A Comparative Study of Its Favorable Conditions in Legislatures. Bern: Paul Haupt. Google Scholar Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. Pp. 67–94 in Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9780691234168-005 Google Scholar Blaug, Ricardo. 1997. Between fear and disappointment: critical, empirical and political uses of Habermas. Political Studies, 45, 100–17. 10.1111/1467-9248.00074 Web of Science®Google Scholar Chambers, Simone. 1995. Discourse and democratic practices. Pp. 233–259 in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CCOL052144120X.010 Web of Science®Google Scholar Chambers, Simone. 2003. Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–32. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538 Web of Science®Google Scholar Cohen, Joshua. 1989. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. Pp. 67–92 in Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit (eds), The Good Polity. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar Deitelhoff, Nicole and Harald Müller 2005. Theoretical paradise – empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas. Review of International Studies, 31, 167–79. 10.1017/S0260210505006364 Web of Science®Google Scholar Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Dryzek, John S. and Christian List. 2003. Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: a reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science, 33, 1–28. 10.1017/S0007123403000012 Web of Science®Google Scholar Dryzek, John S. and Simon J. Niemeyer. 2006. Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 634–49. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Dryzek, John S. 2007. Democratization as deliberative capacity building. 〈http://deliberativedemocracy.anu.edu.au/documents/Dryzek2007_000.pdf〉. Google Scholar Edelman, Murray J. 1985. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Google Scholar Elster, Jon 1998. Introduction. Pp. 1–18 in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139175005.002 Google Scholar Erikson, Erik O. 2003. Understanding Habermas: Communicative Action and Deliberative Democracy. London: Continuum. Google Scholar Esterling, Kevin M., Michael A. Neblo and David Lazer. 2007. Means, motive and opportunity in becoming informed about politics: a deliberative field experiment. Paper presented to Midwest Political Science Association Meetings, Chicago. 〈http://polisci.osu.edu/faculty/mneblo/papers/NSFpolknow.pdf〉. Google Scholar Fung, Archon. 2003. Recipes for public spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 338–67. 10.1111/1467-9760.00181 Web of Science®Google Scholar Fung, Archon. 2005. Deliberation before the revolution: toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Political Theory, 33, 397–419. 10.1177/0090591704271990 Web of Science®Google Scholar Gerring, John, Strom C. Thacker and Carola Moreno. 2005. Centripetal democratic governance: a theory and global inquiry. American Political Science Review, 99, 567–81. 10.1017/S0003055405051889 Web of Science®Google Scholar Goodin, Robert E. 1980. Manipulatory Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar Goodin, Robert E. 2005. Sequencing deliberative moments. Acta Politica, 40, 182–96. 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500098 Web of Science®Google Scholar Goodin, Robert E. 2006. Talking politics: perils and promise. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 235–61. 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00297.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Goodin, Robert E. 2008. Deliberative lies. European Political Science, 7, 194–8. 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210188 Web of Science®Google Scholar Greve, Jens. 1999. Sprache, Kommunikation und Strategie in der Theorie von Jürgen Habermas. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 51, 232–59. Web of Science®Google Scholar Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar Habermas, Jürgen. 1983. Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar Habermas, Jürgen 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 Google Scholar Habermas, Jürgen. 2005. Concluding comments on empirical approaches to deliberative politics. Acta Politica, 40, 384–92. 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500119 Web of Science®Google Scholar Habermas, Jürgen. 2007. Kommunikative Rationalität und grenzüberschreitende Politik: eine Replik. Pp. 406–59 in Peter Niesen and Benjamin Herborth (eds), Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar Hajer, Maartin A. and Hendrik Wagenaar (eds.) 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511490934 Google Scholar Hart, Paul 't. 2007. What deliberative scholars and designers should know about group dynamics. Paper presented to Workshop on Theory and Practice of Deliberative Democracy, Australian National University. 〈http://delibdem.anu.edu.au/documents/Whatdeliberativescholarsanddesignersshouldknowaboutgroupdynamics.doc〉. Google Scholar Holzinger, Katharina. 2001. Kommunikationsmodi und Handlungstypen in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Anmerkungen zu einigen irreführenden Dichotomien. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 8, 243–86. 10.5771/0946-7165-2001-2-243 Google Scholar Janis, Irving Lester. 1972. Victims of Group-Think: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar Johnson, James. 1998. Arguing for deliberation: some skeptical considerations. Pp. 161–184 in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139175005.009 Google Scholar Landa, Dimitri and Adam Meirowitz. 2009. Game theory, information, and deliberative democracy. American Journal of Political Science (forthcoming). Google Scholar Loomis Burdett A. 1990. Dear Colleagues: Civility and Deliberation in the U.S. Senate. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Google Scholar Luskin, Robert C. and James S. Fishkin. 2002. Considered opinions: deliberative polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 455–87. Web of Science®Google Scholar Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, David Estlund, Andreas Follesdal, Archon Fung, Cristina Lafont, Bernard Manin, and José Luis Martí. 2009. The place of self-interest in deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy (forthcoming). 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00337.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Markovits, Elizabeth. 2006. The trouble with being earnest: deliberative democracy and the sincerity norm. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 249–69. 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00240.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Mattson, K. 2002. Do Americans really want deliberative democracy? Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 5, 327–29. 10.1353/rap.2002.0037 Google Scholar McLaverty, Peter and Darren Halpin. 2008. Deliberative drift: the emergence of deliberation in the policy process. International Political Science Review, 29, 197–214. 10.1177/0192512107085612 Web of Science®Google Scholar Miller, David. 1999. Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar Morris, Stephen. 2001. Political correctness. Journal of Political Economy, 109, 231–65. 10.1086/319554 Web of Science®Google Scholar Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 3, 745–58. Google Scholar Müller, Harald. 2004. Arguing, bargaining and all that: communicative action, rationalist theory and the logic of appropriateness in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 10, 395–435. 10.1177/1354066104045542 Web of Science®Google Scholar Neblo, Michael A. 2000. Thinking Through Democracy: Deliberative Politics in Theory and Practice. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms. Google Scholar Neblo, Michael A. 2005. Thinking through democracy: between the theory and practice of deliberative democracy. Acta Politica, 40, 169–81. 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500102 Web of Science®Google Scholar Neblo, Michael A. 2006. Change for the better? Linking the mechanisms of deliberative opinion change to normative theory. Paper presented to the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago. 〈http://polisci.osu.edu/faculty/mneblo/papers/ChangeC4.pdf〉. Google Scholar Neblo, Michael A. 2007. Family disputes: diversity in defining and measuring deliberation. Swiss Political Science Review, 13, 527–57. 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00088.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Neblo, Michael A., Kevin M. Esterling, Ryan P. Kennedy, David M. J. Lazer and Anand E. Sokhey. 2008a. Who wants to deliberate, and why. Program on Networked Governance Working Paper PNG No. PNG08-002. 〈http://polisci.osu.edu/faculty/mneblo/papers/CodingPaper.pdf〉. Google Scholar Neblo, Michael A., Daniel O. Davis, Robert Gulotty, Christina V. Xydias and Daniel J. Blake. 2008b. Measuring sincerity and the substantive content of agruments in deliberation. Program on Networked Governance Working Paper PNG No. PNG08-001. 〈http://polisci.osu.edu/faculty/mneblo/papers/WhoDelib.pdf〉. Google Scholar Niemeyer, Simon J. 2004. Deliberation in the wilderness: displacing symbolic politics. Environmental Politics, 13, 347–72. 10.1080/0964401042000209612 Web of Science®Google Scholar Niemeyer, Simon and John S. Dryzek. 2007. The ends of deliberation: metaconsensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes. Swiss Political Science Review, 13, 497–526. 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00087.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Parkinson, John. 2006. Deliberating in the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/019929111X.001.0001 Google Scholar Posner, Richard. 2004a. Law, Pragmatism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar Posner, Richard. 2004b. Smooth sailing. Legal Affairs, 41, 40–2. Google Scholar Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar Reykowski, Janusz. 2006. Deliberative democracy and "human nature": an empirical approach. Political Psychology, 27, 323–46. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00516.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Richardson, Henry. 2002. Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about the Ends of Policy. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Riker, William. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar Risse, Thomas. 2000. Let's argue!: communicative action in world politics. International Organization, 54, 1–39. 10.1162/002081800551109 Web of Science®Google Scholar Risse, Thomas. 2004. Global governance and communicative action. Government and Opposition, 39, 288–313. 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00124.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Rosenberg, Shawn W. 2002. The Not So Common Sense: How People Judge Social and Political Life. New Haven: Yale University Press. 10.12987/yale/9780300084276.001.0001 Google Scholar Rosenberg, Shawn W. 2005. The empirical study of deliberative democracy: setting a research agenda. Acta Politica, 40, 212–24. 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500105 Web of Science®Google Scholar Ryfe, David M. 2005. Does deliberative democracy work? Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 49–71. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633 Web of Science®Google Scholar Sanders, Lynn. 1997. Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25, 347–76. 10.1177/0090591797025003002 Web of Science®Google Scholar Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64, 1033–53. 10.2307/1958356 Web of Science®Google Scholar Schimmelfennig, F. 2001. The community trap: liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union. International Organization, 55, 47–80. 10.1162/002081801551414 Web of Science®Google Scholar Schmidt, Vivien. 2008. Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–26. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342 Web of Science®Google Scholar Schneiderhan, Erik and Shamus Khan. 2008. Reasons and inclusion: the foundation of deliberation. Sociological Theory, 26, 1–24. 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00316.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Setälä, Maija, Kimmo Grönlund and Kaisa Herne. 2007. Processes and outcomes of citizen deliberation: a comparison of voting and common statement treatments. Paper presented to the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago. 〈http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211545_index.html〉. Google Scholar Shapiro, Ian. 1999. Enough of deliberation: politics is about interests and power. Pp. 28–38 in Stephen Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Web of Science®Google Scholar Skinner, Quentin. 1974. Some problems in the analysis of political thought and action. Political Theory, 2, 277–303. 10.1177/009059177400200303 Web of Science®Google Scholar Steenbergen, Marco R., André Bächtiger, Markus Spörndli and Jürg Steiner. 2003. Measuring political deliberation. a Discourse Quality Index. Comparative European Politics, 1, 21–48. 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002 Google Scholar Steiner, Jürg, André Bächtiger, Markus Spörndli and Marco R. Steenbergen. 2004. Deliberative Politics in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Steiner, Jürg. 2008. Concept stretching: the case of deliberation. European Political Science, 7, 186–90. 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210186 Web of Science®Google Scholar Sunstein, Cass R. 2003. The law of group polarization. Pp. 80–101 in James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett (eds), Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470690734.ch4 Google Scholar Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 497–520. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555 Web of Science®Google Scholar Ulbert, Cornelia and Thomas Risse. 2005. Deliberately changing the discourse: what does make arguing effective? Acta Politica, 40, 351–67. 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500117 Web of Science®Google Scholar Warren, Mark E. 2007. Institutionalizing deliberative democracy. Pp 272–288 in Shawn Rosenberg (ed.), Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? London: Palgrave-Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230591080_13 Google Scholar Yack, Bernard. 2006. Rhetoric and public reasoning: an Aristotelian understanding of political deliberation. Political Theory, 34, 417–38. 10.1177/0090591706288232 Web of Science®Google Scholar Young, Iris Marion. 1996. Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. Pp. 120–35 in Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9780691234168-007 Google Scholar Young, Iris M. 2001. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29, 670–90. 10.1177/0090591701029005004 Web of Science®Google Scholar Young, Iris M. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0198297556.001.0001 Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume18, Issue1March 2010Pages 32-63 ReferencesRelatedInformation