Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Measurement of Attitudes toward Arithmetic with a Likert-Type Test

1968; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 68; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/460443

1554-8279

Wilbur H. Dutton, Martha Perkins Blum,

Education Practices and Challenges

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Measurement of Attitudes toward Arithmetic with a Likert-Type TestWilbur H. Dutton and Martha Perkins BlumWilbur H. Dutton and Martha Perkins BlumPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Elementary School Journal Volume 68, Number 5Feb., 1968 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/460443 Views: 20Total views on this site Citations: 57Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Mesut TABUK Matematiğe İlişkin Tutum Envanterinin Kısa Formunun Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması, Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (Apr 2018): 84–95.https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.293343A. Barragán-Ocaña, J. Zubieta-Garcia Critical Factors toward Successful R&D Projects in Public Research Centers: a Primer, Journal of Applied Research and Technology 11, no.66 (Dec 2013): 866–875.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1665-6423(13)71593-1Mustafa Baloğlu, Paul F. Zelhart Psychometric Properties of the Revised Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale, The Psychological Record 57, no.44 (Jun 2017): 593–611.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395597Scott L. Walker Development and Validation of the Test of Geography-Related Attitudes (ToGRA), Journal of Geography 105, no.44 (Jul 2006): 175–181.https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340608978683Larry Sowder Searching for Affect in the Solution of Story Problems in Mathematics, (Jan 1989): 104–113.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3614-6_8Camilla Persson Benbow Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 169–183.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049244Betsy Jane Backer, Larry V. Hedges The effects of selection and variability in studies of gender differences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 183–184.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049256Ruth Bleier The plasticity of the human brain and human potential, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 184–185.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049268Lois Bloom Boys and girls and mathematics: What is the difference?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 185–185.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004927XLila Ghent Braine Sex differences in mathematics: Is there any news here?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 185–186.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049281M. P. Bryden Cerebral organization and mathematical ability, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 186–187.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049293Sarah A. Burnett Spatial visualization and mathematical reasoning abilities, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 187–188.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004930XSusan F. Chipman Sex differences in parallax view?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 188–188.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049311Victor H. Denenberg, Albert S. Berrebi, Roslyn H. Fitch Sex, brain, and learning differences in rats, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 188–189.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049323H. J. Eysenck O Tempora, O Mores!, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 189–190.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049335Helen S. Farmer Predicting who our future scientists and mathematicians will be, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 190–191.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049347Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic, Ann S. Clark The new math: Is XY ≥ XX?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 191–191.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049359Diane F. Halpern Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Let me count the ways, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 191–192.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049360Curtis Hardyck Causes of mathematical giftedness: Beware of left-handed compliments, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 192–193.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049372Richard A. Harshman A variety of brains?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 193–194.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049384Melissa Hines Hormonal influences on human cognition: What they might tell us about encouraging mathematical ability and precocity in boys and girls, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 194–195.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049396Lloyd G. Humphreys Sex differences in variability may be more important than sex differences in means, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 195–196.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049402Earl Hunt Sex differences in mathematical talents remain unexplained, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 196–197.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049414Nancy Ewald Jackson To understand sex differences we must understand reasoning processes (and vice versa), Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 197–198.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049426Arthur R. Jensen Sex differences in arithmetic computation and reasoning in prepubertal boys and girls, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 198–199.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049438Douglas T. Kenrick Biology: Si! Hard-wired ability: Maybe no, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 199–200.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004944XDoreen Kimura Biological influences on cognitive function, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 200–200.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049451Diana Eugenie Kornbrot Creative mathematics: Do SAT-M sex effects matter?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 200–201.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049463Brian Mackenzie Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Causes, consequences, and variability, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 201–202.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049475Richard E. Mayer What we really need is a theory of mathematical ability, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 202–203.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049487Diane McGuinness Socialization versus biology: Time to move on, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 203–204.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049499Carol J. Mills Rival hypotheses about sex differences in mathematics: Problems and possibilities, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 204–205.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049505John Money Mathematics as male pathology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 205–206.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049517Nora Newcombe, Mary Ann Baenninger Nature/nurture in male/female mathematical giftedness, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 206–206.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049529Helmuth Nyborg Mathematics, sex hormones, and brain function, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 206–207.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049530Robert Rosenthal Evaluating explanations of sex differences in mathematical reasoning scores, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 207–208.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049542Barbara Sanders Mathematical ability, spatial ability, and remedial training, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 208–209.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049554Alan Searleman Neuropsychological factors and mathematical reasoning ability, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 209–210.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049566Daniel W. Smothergill Causes of things and nature of things: Advice from Hughlings Jackson, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 210–210.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049578Robert J. Steinberg The male/female difference is there: Should we care?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 210–211.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004958XHeidi H. Swanson Hormones and sexual differentiation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 211–212.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049591Donald Symons On throwing bones to environmentalists, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 212–212.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049608Lionel Tiger Sex differences in mathematics: Why the fuss?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 212–212.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004961XSteven G. Vandenberg Could these sex differences be due to genes?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 212–214.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049621Douglas Wahlsten Bias and sampling error in sex difference research, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 214–214.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049633Herbert J. Walberg Factors influencing educational productivity, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 214–215.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049645Sandra F. Witelson Neuroanatomical sex differences: Of no consequence for cognition?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 215–217.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049657Ada Zohar, Ruth Guttman The forgotten realm of genetic differences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 217–217.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049669Camilla Persson Benbow Sex-related differences in precocious mathematical reasoning ability: Not illusory, not easily explained, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.22 (Feb 2010): 217–232.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00049670Barbara G. Ferrell Evaluating the Impact of Cai on Mathematics Learning: Computer Immersion Project, Journal of Educational Computing Research 2, no.33 (Jan 1995): 327–336.https://doi.org/10.2190/P436-M422-RE07-VTMNHilary L. Schofield, K. B. Start Mathematics Attitudes and Achievement among Student Teachers, Australian Journal of Education 22, no.11 (Mar 1978): 72–82.https://doi.org/10.1177/000494417802200106Ralph D. Norman Sex Differences in Attitudes toward Arithmetic-Mathematics from Early Elementary School to College Levels, The Journal of Psychology 97, no.22 (Jul 2010): 247–256.https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1977.9923970Charles D. Gilbert A Study of the Interrelationship of Factors Affecting Sixth Grade Students in Respect to Mathematics, School Science and Mathematics 77, no.66 (Oct 1977): 489–494.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1977.tb09370.xCharles D. Gilbert, Dwight Cooper The Relationship Between Teacher/Student Attitudes and the Competency Levels of Sixth Grade Students, School Science and Mathematics 76, no.66 (Oct 1976): 469–476.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1976.tb09148.x Frank G. Hughes , and Paul C. Burns Two Methods of Teaching Multidigit Multiplication, The Elementary School Journal 75, no.77 (Oct 2015): 452–457.https://doi.org/10.1086/460933Elizabeth W. Haven FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SELECTION OF ADVANCED ACADEMIC MATHEMATICS COURSES BY GIRLS IN HIGH SCHOOL, ETS Research Bulletin Series 1972, no.11 (Aug 2014): i–67.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1972.tb00437.xLewis R. Aiken Attitudes Toward Mathematics, Review of Educational Research 40, no.44 (Jun 2016): 551–596.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543040004551