Time and Heritage
2005; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 57; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1468-0033.2005.00525.x
ISSN1468-0033
Autores Tópico(s)Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
ResumoClick to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1. Michel De Certeau, Histoire et psychanalyse entre science et fiction [History and Psychoanalysis between Science and Fiction], p. 89, Paris, Gallimard, 1987; see Jean Leduc, Les Historiens et le temps, Conceptions, problématiques, écritures [Historians and Time, Conceptions, Problematics, Writings], Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1999. [Google Scholar] 2. François Hartog, ‘Marshall Sahlins et l'anthropologie de l'histoire [Marshall Sahlins and the Anthropology of History]’, Annales ESC, Vol. 6, 1983, pp. 125–63. [Google Scholar] 3. Reinhart Koselleck, Le futur passé [The Past Future] (trans. by J. Hoock and M.-C. Hoock), pp. 307–29. Paris, Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 1990, [Google Scholar] 4. Paul Ricoeur, La Mémoire, l'histoire, l'oubli [Memory, History, Forgetting],, p. 480–98, Paris, Editions du Seuil, 2000; ‘Mémoire: approches historiennes, approche philosophique [Memory’: Historic Approaches, Philosophical Approach]’, Le Débat [The Debate], Vol. 122, 2002, pp.42–4. [Google Scholar] 5. Jean François Lyotard, ‘Les Indiens ne cueillent pas de fleurs [Indians Do Not Pick Flowers]’, Annales, Vol. 20, 1965, p. 65 (see the article concerning The Savage Mind by Claude Lévi-Strauss). [Google Scholar] 6. For example, Günter Grass, Toute une histoire [A Long Story] (trans. by C. Porcell and B. Lortholary), Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1997; Cees Nooteboom, Le Jour des morts [The Day of the Dead] (trans. by P. Noble), Arles, Actes Sud, 2001. [Google Scholar] 7. François Etienne, ‘Reconstruction allemande [German reconstruction]’, in Jacques Le Goff (ed.), Patrimoine et passions identitaires [Heritage and Identity Passions] p. 313, Paris, Fayard, 1998, (see the quotation by Scharoun); Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper, ‘Les monuments de l'histoire contemporaine à Berlin: ruptures, contradictions et cicatrices [Monuments of Contemporary History in Berlin: Ruptures, Contradictions and Scars]’, in Régis Debray (ed.), L'Abus monumental [Monumental Abuse], pp. 363–70. Paris, Fayard, 1999. [Google Scholar] 8. See the website of the World Heritage Centre, which counted 730 hits at the end of 2002. [Google Scholar] 9. Debray, op. cit., particularly ‘Le monument ou la transmission comme tragédie [The Monument or Transmission as Tragedy]’, pp. 11–32; see also Tzvetan Todorov, Les abus de la mémoire [The Misuses of Memory], Paris, Arléa, 1995. [Google Scholar] 10. Marc Bourdier, ‘Le mythe et l'industrie ou la protection du patrimoine culturel au Japon [Myth and Industry or the Protection of Cultural Heritage in Japan]’, Genèses, Vol. 11, 1993, pp. 82–110. [Google Scholar] 11. Nicolas Fiévé, ‘Architecture et patrimoine au Japon: les mots du monument historique [Architecture and Heritage in Japan: the Words of the Historic Monument]’, in Debray, op. cit, p. 333. [Google Scholar] 12. This is the exact title of a text by the Italian architect Camillo Boito, published in 1893, where he tries to define an intermediary position between that illustrated by Viollet-le-Duc – (‘Restoring a building is not maintaining, repairing or rebuilding it, it is restoring it in a finished state that may have never existed at any specific moment’, (Dictionnaire de l'architecture [Dictionary of Architecture]) – and that of Ruskin – (‘preserve absolutely, to the point of creating ruins if necessary’), see Leniaud, op. cit. p. 186–8. [Google Scholar] 13. Masahiro Ogino, ‘La logique d'actualization. Le patrimoine au Japon [The Logic of Actualization. The Heritage of Japan]’, Ethnologie française [French Ethnology], Vol. 25, 1995, pp.57–63. [Google Scholar] 14. Françoise Choay, foreword by Alois Riegl, ibid.. p. 9. [Google Scholar] 15. The Athens conference was held at the initiative of the International Commission for the Intellectual Co-operation of the Society of Nations and the International Council of Museums, see below. [Google Scholar] 16. The number of protected buildings rose from 24,000 in 1960 to 44,709 in 1996. [Google Scholar] 17. Hervé Glevarec and Guy Saez, Le patrimoine saisi par les associations [Heritage in the Hands of Associations], La Documentation française, 2002, pp. 129–93. [Google Scholar] 18. Ibid. p. 263. [Google Scholar] 19. Koichiro Matsuura, ‘Eloge du patrimoine culturel immatériel [Eulogy of Intangible Cultural Heritage]’, Le Monde, 11 September 2002. [Google Scholar]
Referência(s)