Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
2006; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 114; Issue: 25 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/circulationaha.106.610907
ISSN1524-4539
AutoresJonas A. Cooper, Joel D. Cooper, Joshua M. Cooper,
Tópico(s)Trauma Management and Diagnosis
ResumoHomeCirculationVol. 114, No. 25Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Free AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissionsDownload Articles + Supplements ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toSupplemental MaterialFree AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBCardiopulmonary ResuscitationHistory, Current Practice, and Future Direction Jonas A. Cooper, Joel D. Cooper and Joshua M. Cooper Jonas A. CooperJonas A. Cooper From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (J.A.C.); and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (J.D.C.) and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine (J.M.C.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia. , Joel D. CooperJoel D. Cooper From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (J.A.C.); and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (J.D.C.) and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine (J.M.C.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia. and Joshua M. CooperJoshua M. Cooper From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (J.A.C.); and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (J.D.C.) and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine (J.M.C.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia. Originally published19 Dec 2006https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.610907Circulation. 2006;114:2839–2849At least 350 000 people will suffer cardiac arrest each year in the United States, 1 every 90 seconds.1 Many will then undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by bystanders and emergency medical services in a desperate attempt to restore life. Numerous studies report that the majority of these efforts will not succeed. Prolonged anoxia, the inability to restore spontaneous circulation, neurological devastation, and other complications combine to limit survival. Nonetheless, thousands will surmount these obstacles and resume normal lives. CPR is a triumph of medicine but also is frequently performed in vain. It is a young science; the term "CPR" was first publicized less than 50 years ago. The roots of resuscitation, however, extend back centuries, with a gradual course of evolution that has been periodically impeded by rejection of inadequate techniques, curiously slow adoption of proven interventions, and even a cyclic process of abandonment and subsequent rediscovery. Examining the history of resuscitation is an essential first step to understanding and following the evolution to modern practices. A detailed review of more current observations, inventions, and clinical trials, in the context of the disappointing statistics of conventional CPR, will elucidate the rationale behind the most recently published resuscitation guidelines, as well as provide fuel for future research. Although components of life support apply to the predominantly asphyxia-related arrests seen in pediatrics, the focus of this review is on resuscitation after cardiopulmonary arrest in the adult.The History of ResuscitationAirway"But that life may… be restored to the animal, an opening must be attempted in the trunk of the trachea, into which a tube of reed or cane should be put."— Andreas Vesalius, 1540 2The Babylonian Talmud, a sixth century collection of Jewish oral tradition, records that a lamb with a neck injury was saved by a hole into the trachea, supported by a hollow reed.3 Andreas Vesalius, the Belgian anatomist quoted above, conducted experiments with similar design a millennium later.2 This knowledge lay dormant until the 18th century, however, because of a lack of appreciation for its applicability to humans. In 1768, the Dutch Humane Society was founded, in which physicians and laypersons collaborated to aid victims of drowning in the waterways. Rules for resuscitation were created and disseminated, and monetary rewards were distributed for success.4On the basis of the prevailing impression that death from drowning resulted from inhaled water obstructing the airway, early revival efforts centered on clearing the trachea by suspending the injured upside down or rolling them inverted on a barrel.5 Early endotracheal cannulae were also used to secure access to the airway, and in 1895 Alfred Kirstein invented the laryngoscope to aid visualization of the trachea.6 In the mid-20th century, Peter Safar methodically investigated techniques for airway management. In a series of daring experiments, he paralyzed volunteers with curare or succinylcholine to demonstrate that optimal patency was achieved when the neck was extended, the mandible was supported (today known as the jaw thrust), and an oropharyngeal tube was employed to deliver oxygen.7 The development of the cuffed endotracheal tube by Sir Henry Head8 in 1889 and invention of the low-pressure cuff by Cooper to reduce airway injury9 together resulted in the modern method for securing the airway.Breathing"I applied my mouth close to his, and blowed my breath as strong as I could."— William Tossach, 1744 10The earliest recorded reference to artificial breathing is in the Old Testament, in the book of Kings, where the prophet Elisha restored the life of a boy through a technique that included placing his mouth on the mouth of the child,11 although there is little mention of this method for another 2000 years. The early efforts to clear the trachea of water were accompanied by a complementary interest in artificial breathing. Fireside bellows-to-nostril resuscitation in humans is first mentioned by Paracelsus in the 1500s, and early mouth-to-mouth techniques are described in several 18th century sources, including one by D.J. Larrey, Napoleon's chiefbattlefield surgeon.4 William Tossach, a British surgeon, used mouth-to-mouth resuscitation of a coal miner in 1732, as reported in the quotation above.10 In the 1770s, however, use of exhaled air for resuscitation was discredited when Scheele discovered oxygen12 and Lavoisier studied its relevance in respiration.13 Expired air was then perceived to be devitalized by already passing through another's lungs. Because of this concern, as well as reports of lung barotrauma from bellows, alternative methods for reproducing breathing were explored and favored. In 1857, Marshall Hall advanced the chest-pressure method, which was modified in 1861 by Silvester to become the chest-pressure arm-lift method in supine patients.14 Variants of this technique continued to be practiced with fervor until the 1960s.15 A series of elegant experiments directed by Archer Gordon, James Elam, and Peter Safar demonstrated that the prone position, which was advocated by some, did not allow a consistently patent airway for air exchange and that expired air did indeed provide sufficient oxygen for effective artificial ventilation (Figure 1).16–20Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. Figure from publication by Safar and McMahon16 illustrating the need for neck extension and jaw thrust to maintain a patent airway during mouth-to-mouth artificial ventilation. Reproduced from Safar and McMahon16 with permission. Copyright © 1958, American Medical Association. All rights reserved.Initially, tools for respiratory resuscitation were exclusively in the domain of emergency medical services and were not available in hospitals. Claude Beck, a surgeon at Western Reserve University, recounts having to call the fire department in 1921 for a "pulmotor," an artificial breathing apparatus, to attempt resuscitation in a patient who unexpectedly expired during surgery.21 Thereafter, innovations like the Drinker respirator ("iron lung") paved the way for the advent of modern intensive care units in hospitals (Figure 2). In 1952, an epidemic of poliomyelitis struck Copenhagen, overwhelming the supply of negative pressure ventilators. Dr Bjørn Ibsen proposed positive pressure ventilation as a substitute, and hundreds of medical students provided the manpower for manual ventilation via a tracheostomy tube and a rubber bag (Figure 3). Necessity overturned conventional practice, and endotracheal positive pressure ventilation became the standard of care and was routinely implemented in intensive care units, which were first formed in the 1960s.22Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. The polio ward at Rancho Los Amigos Rehabilitation Center, in 1952, was filled with rows of Drinker respirators, or "iron lungs." They assisted respiratory paralysis by cyclic negative pressure generated inside the cylinder surrounding the patients' bodies. Only their heads were not enclosed in the chamber. Photograph courtesy of the March of Dimes.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 3. Positive pressure ventilation of an awake polio victim via a tracheostomy and manual compression of a rubber bag. With permission from Elsevier, reprinted from Management of Life Threatening Poliomyelitis, Lassen, © 1956 Livingstone.Circulation"I now had to regard the patient as dead. In spite of this, I returned immediately to the direct compression of the region of the heart."— Friedrich Maass, 1892 23,24Palpation of pulses and heartbeat has been described for over 3000 years.25,26 Cardiac action was felt to be dependent on ventilation, however, because starting and stopping breathing were known to secondarily start and stop the action of the heart.2,27 The first cardiac compressions were performed in the open thorax. Moritz Schiff, in 1874, noted carotid pulsation after manually squeezing a canine heart, giving rise to the term "cardiac massage."28,29 Soon thereafter, Rudolph Boehm and Louis Mickwitz demonstrated cardiac compression in cats by pressing on the sternum and on the ribs.30 Until that time, external pressure applied to the thorax in humans had intended to assist breathing, as reported by Balassa in 1858.31,32 Friedrich Maass, quoted above, is credited with the first successful closed-chest cardiac massage in a person, reported in 1892. His contribution nevertheless would be forgotten for nearly 70 years.24In 1849, John Snow, the father of modern epidemiology, reported cases of chloroform-induced cardiac arrest.33 There was no remedy for these deaths until the first successful open-chest cardiac massage in 1901, performed by Kristian Igelsrud after anesthesia-induced arrest.34 Thereafter, in the first half of the 20th century, sudden cardiac death was only survivable in an operating room or urgent hospital setting, where direct cardiac massage was possible. Almost 60 years later, Guy Knickerbocker was researching defibrillation in dogs and noticed by chance that when he pressed the electrode paddles firmly on the thorax, a simultaneous rise in arterial pressure resulted. This led to the rediscovery of external cardiac massage, today known as chest compression, which was reintroduced to patient care in 1958 by William Kouwenhoven (Figure 4).35 Because this method did not require scalpels or significant technical expertise, it became widely taught and quickly eclipsed the open-thorax approach. Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 4. Demonstration of the technique of closed-chest cardiac massage. Reproduced from Kouwenhoven et al35 with permission. Copyright © 1960, American Medical Association. All rights reserved.Defibrillation"Abildgard… in 1775 relates to having shocked a single chicken into lifelessness and on repeating the shock, the bird took off and eluded further experimentation."— Bernard Lown, 2002 36,37Electricity was discovered in the mid-1700s, and its ability to cause muscle tissue to contract was appreciated by Galvani in 1791.38 The experiment of Abildgard cited above was not appreciated to have affected the heart, and therefore early application of electricity was designed to nonspecifically stimulate unconscious victims or verify their unconscious state. That electric current could cause irregular quivering of the ventricles was appreciated in 1850 but was considered only a curiosity (Figure 5).39,40 Dr John McWilliam systematically studied the effects of electricity on mammalian hearts and described that death was not associated with immediate cardiac standstill, but instead "fibrillar" motions took place. In 1889, he published his view that this fibrillation of ventricles probably took place in humans, with fatal results.41 Prevost and Battelli applied alternating and direct current shocks to fibrillate dog ventricles and discovered that a repeat shock or "countershock" could reverse or "de-fibrillate" the ventricles.42 Gurvich and Yuniev, working under Negovsky in the Soviet Union, discovered that direct current shocks stored in capacitors could successfully defibrillate dogs,43 while in America, Wiggers's experiments prompted human studies of defibrillation.4 Hooker and Kouwenhoven, funded by the Edison Electric Institute to study accidental electrocution, showed that defibrillation could take place in an intact thorax, without applying current directly to the heart muscle.44 Combining the observations of closed-chest current application with Willem Einthoven's invention of the string galvanometer in 1901 allowed quality noninvasive recording, diagnosis, and treatment of abnormal electric cardiac activity.45Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 5. Dr Carl Ludwig and his discovery of electrically induced quivering of the ventricles. The clinical significance of this finding was not yet appreciated.The first successful (open) human defibrillation with recovery of the patient was performed by Claude Beck in 1947 (Figure 6).46 A 14-year-old boy underwent surgery to repair a sternal deformity and, during wound closure, his pulse stopped, the chest was reopened, and he was found to be in ventricular fibrillation. Open cardiac massage was performed for 70 minutes, and, after 2 series of electric shocks were delivered to the heart, a regular pulse was restored, and no adverse neurological sequelae resulted. Paul Zoll recorded the first successful closed-chest human defibrillation in 1955 on a man with recurrent syncope and ventricular fibrillation,47 and Bernard Lown showed that direct current was superior to alternating current defibrillation in 1962.48 In 1979, the first portable automatic external defibrillator was developed, with a pharyngeal electrode for sensing, shocking electrodes on the abdomen and tongue, and a simple algorithm to detect abnormal rhythms and automatically deliver rescue pacing or a defibrillation shock, as appropriate. It is remarkable that the automatic external defibrillator, which has recently revolutionized resuscitation via mass deployment,49 was first shown to be effective more than 25 years ago. Michel Mirowski's landmark 1981 article that described the use of an implantable automatic defibrillator in humans, along with prospective studies that have demonstrated mortality benefit of implantable defibrillators in patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias, has transformed the field by preventing sudden death.50–52Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 6. Dr Claude Beck and his first cardiac defibrillator. Images courtesy of Dr Igor Efimov (left) and the Dittrick Medical History Center, Case Western Reserve University (right).Education and DisseminationThe tools of resuscitation are useless in the absence of people who are trained to apply them. In the 1930s, Drs Beck and Leighninger formed and trained one of the first in-hospital resuscitation teams to administer emergency life-saving care to inpatients with sudden death.4 Because most cardiac arrests do not occur in the hospital, however, mobile intensive care unit ambulances, staffed by physicians, were created in the 1960s. Dr Pantridge demonstrated that these mobile intensive care units could be used successfully by medical personnel to resuscitate outpatients with sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction.4,53 To provide the means by which resuscitation techniques could be demonstrated and taught, Åsmund Laerdal, whose plastic-toy company manufactured a popular doll named Anne, created a mannequin to facilitate CPR education, calling it "Resusci Anne." He modeled the mannequin's face after the famous visage of an unnamed girl who drowned in the Seine river (the story that his daughter drowned and served as the inspiration for Anne is apocryphal).54 After Kouwenhoven's publication of the technique for external cardiac massage in 1960, the paradigm of integrating modern airway, breathing, and closed-chest circulation methods was published and advocated by Safar et al in 1961.55 In 1966, the first CPR guidelines were published, encouraging practice with mannequins but disapproving of teaching resuscitation to laypersons out of concern for iatrogenic complications.4,56The concept of educating the lay public in the techniques of resuscitation was advocated by Dr Beck in the late 1950s, when he created a short teaching film in which he introduced a group of 11 patients who were successfully resuscitated and in which he stated that "a massive teaching program is needed" (see movie in the online-only Data Supplement). Dr Beck and Lois Horwitz, a motivated layperson, first educated a group of lay rescuers in 1961 in Cleveland. Large-scale promulgation of community resuscitation, however, was championed by Drs Cobb, Kopass, Eisenberg, and colleagues in Seattle. Beginning in 1970, they developed and implemented an ambitious project that instructed 100 000 citizens to perform CPR, taught 911 dispatchers to coach bystander basic life support over the telephone, intensively trained paramedics in a tiered emergency response system with the fire department, delivered a rapid response to fallen victims, and efficiently transported them to hospitals.57 Their early access to patients, early CPR delivery by bystanders and paramedics, and rapid transportation for definitive care all increased the likelihood of survival to hospital discharge.58 Training of laypersons was formally sanctioned in 1974.59Advanced Life Support and the Chain of SurvivalThe final step for out-of-hospital resuscitation was the instruction of paramedics in advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), which allowed medications to be administered in the field. These included epinephrine, discovered in 189460 and used in human resuscitation since 1922,61 and atropine, whose properties were recognized by Linnaeus in the 18th century (the genus of its source, the deadly nightshade plant, he named Atropa, after the oldest of the 3 Fates that determined the life and mortality of humans in Greek mythology).62 Endotracheal intubation was also to be performed by trained paramedics for definitive airway management before arrival in the emergency department. The American Heart Association highlights the stepwise nature of successful out-of-hospital resuscitation, framing it as a "chain of survival" with 4 links: early access (alerting emergency medical services), early CPR, early defibrillation, and early ACLS (Figure 7).63 A study from the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) Study Group determined that the odds ratios for increased survival attributable to the presence of the first 3 links were 4.4, 3.7, and 3.4, respectively.64 Data supporting the fourth link, early ACLS, has been less definitive. Although a meta-analysis suggested that the odds ratio of survival from outpatient arrest by resuscitation with ACLS versus without ACLS was 2.3,65 the OPALS study found no improvement in outpatient survival with the addition of ACLS.64Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 7. The chain of survival was first introduced in 1991 as a model of efficiency and synergy in resuscitation efforts. Reproduced with permission from American Heart Association, 1991.The Modern Era of ResuscitationStatistics of SurvivalModern published studies of resuscitation for cardiac arrest (all cardiac rhythms) show rates of survival to hospital discharge that range from 1% to 25% for outpatients64,66–69 and 0% to 29% for inpatients.70,71 A compilation of the mortality statistics from the largest of these recent studies is reported in the Table, revealing overall survival rates of 6.4% after out-of-hospital arrest and 17.6% after in-hospital arrest. Survival varied greatly by initial cardiac rhythm, with higher success rates for resuscitation from ventricular arrhythmias and markedly worse outcomes if asystole or pulseless electric activity was initially noted. These statistics are somewhat sobering, especially when the rates of survival that were achieved when resuscitative techniques were first being developed and reported are considered. Of the first 20 patients who underwent closed-chest cardiac massage, only 3 had ventricular fibrillation, and yet 14 survived the arrest (70% survival).35 In 1953, a review of 1200 in-hospital cardiac arrests reported that, despite only 11% having ventricular fibrillation, 28% were resuscitated to "permanent survival."74 The disparity between these historical reports and modern data might be explained by a higher level of acuity in present-day hospitals or different causes of the arrests. In the cardiac arrest cohort from over 50 years ago, the majority of patients were undergoing surgery, and they were therefore healthy enough to attempt an operation. These patients also benefited from intensive perioperative monitoring. Adult Survival Rates to Hospital Discharge After Inpatient and Outpatient ArrestInpatient71Outpatient*64,72,73Summary of results from 4 large studies of arrest survival,64,71–73 showing proportions of presenting cardiac rhythm and percentage survival to hospital discharge, divided by location of arrest. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) are proportionally more common in the outpatient than the inpatient setting, as is asystole, whereas the reverse is true for pulseless electric activity. Survival rates to hospital discharge show an increased likelihood of survival for all rhythms when the arrest occurred in hospital setting.*Outpatient data are pooled from the 3 studies cited.LocationUnited States, CanadaUnited States, Canada, England, Norway, SwedenDates included1/00–3/042/98–6/02 3/02–10/03 1/99–12/00Total No. (% survival)36 902 (17.6)5234 (6.4)% VF or VT (% survival)22.7 (36.0)33.2 (16.1)% Pulseless electric activity (% survival)32.4 (11.2)24.7 (2.7)% Asystole (% survival)35.3 (10.6)39.0 (0.9)% Unknown rhythm9.63.0In addition to overall survival rates, recent statistics on neurological recovery after resuscitation are also disappointing when put into historical perspective. Dr Stephenson's 1953 article reported that 56% of the 1200 resuscitations were successful in restarting the heart, and only 8 of these patients were rendered decerebrate.74 The first successful human defibrillation, in 1947, involved cardiac massage for over an hour, and yet the patient had no long-term neurological deficits.46 These data contrast with the current experience, in which brain damage is a frequent cause of death after cardiac arrest.75 The impact of cerebral anoxic damage today may even be underreported because resuscitation efforts may be terminated solely because of elapsed time before return of spontaneous circulation is achieved, amid concern for neurological sequelae if the heart is eventually restarted. Because intracranial catastrophes are rarely the cause of cardiac arrest, neurological injury after resuscitation from a witnessed arrest almost universally signifies a failure to provide sufficient cerebral oxygen flow during CPR efforts. It is therefore with the dual goal of achieving cardiopulmonary and neurological recovery that novel CPR techniques are being investigated and resuscitation guidelines are being revised to optimize the basic steps of life support: airway, breathing, circulation, and defibrillation. The American Heart Association guidelines were most recently revised in 2005, with recommendations being strongly driven by evidence-based medicine.76 The following sections summarize the study data that have resulted in changes to the guidelines and report the most recent developments that will likely shape the future of resuscitative practices.Improving Airway and BreathingBag-mask airway management has traditionally been viewed as inferior to endotracheal intubation; no prospective randomized trial has adequately addressed this question, however. The OPALS study did not demonstrate mortality benefit from the addition of ACLS, including endotracheal intubation, to survival after out-of-hospital resuscitation.64 Insertion of an endotracheal tube can be time consuming, interrupting chest compressions and thereby halting cerebral blood flow at times for >60 seconds. Unrecognized misplacement into the esophagus can also occur. Therefore, the benefits of an endotracheal tube in protecting the airway from aspiration and ensuring air delivery to the lungs must be weighed against these potential detriments. If undertaken, an advanced airway should be placed rapidly by experienced rescuers, with minimal interruption of chest compressions.76 Consideration should also be given to laryngeal mask airways because of the ease and rapidity of their insertion.Extensive recent human data have indicated that ventilation during CPR is usually overzealous. Both emergency medical personnel and in-hospital resuscitation teams have been shown to deliver artificial breaths at rates far exceeding the published recommendations of the time (12 to 15 breaths per minute), averaging 20 to 30 breaths per minute.77,78 Despite retraining efforts, ventilation remained excessive with rates that, although slower, still exceeded guidelines, with an observed increase in breath duration as well.77 Positive pressure in the thoracic cavity hinders circulation by decreasing venous return, increasing intracranial pressure, and decreasing coronary perfusion pressure, a critical predictor of return of spontaneous circulation.79,80 In animals, hyperventilation during 4 minutes of resuscitation reduced absolute survival by 70%.77 Furthermore, before a secure airway is obtained, breathing efforts interrupt chest compression, and 2 breaths take the average lay rescuer >15 seconds (stopping circulation for at least 25% of each minute).79 In an intriguing randomized trial of CPR technique, Seattle's 911 telephone staff randomly instructed bystanders to perform both ventilation and chest compressions versus performing chest compressions alone. Both groups had similar outcomes, with a trend toward higher survival to hospital discharge in patients assigned to the latter.81 The apparent benefit of withholding artificial respiration in this trial was likely the exclusive consequence of maintaining uninterrupted circulation because the human unconscious airway is often obstructed, and chest compressions do not provide any meaningful airflow.70Animal models show that arterial blood is completely desaturated in <2 minutes of chest compression without ventilation, and therefore at least some air exchange is necessary to oxygenate blood.82 Recently published guidelines advocate delivering a slower ventilatory rate of 8 to 10 breaths per minute.76 Even slower rates may be optimal, and ongoing experiments will clarify the necessary ventilation rate in states of low blood flow. Furthermore, breaths should be delivered quickly, over approximately 1 second, because prolonged breaths increase the duration of positive intrathoracic pressure. Keeping artificial ventilation rates low is difficult because the high-adrenaline state of the rescuer alters time perception, and the rapidly refilling bag-ventilation systems set up a reflex in which rescuers are inclined to deliver breaths as soon as the bag inflates. Because even focused reeducation did not ensure compliance with the guidelines, the use of adjunct devices that indicate when 6 to 7.5 seconds have elapsed (for delivery of 8 to 10 breaths per minute) should be encouraged.Optimizing CirculationFriedrich Maass, who resuscitated a teenager for 60 minutes with closed-chest cardiac massage in 1891 (with return of mental function), described that the optimal technique was to apply forceful pressure and to do so at a rapid rate.24 The quality of modern chest compression efforts in and out of hospitals has been quantified through use of an accelerometer placed on the sternum. Results demonstrated that chest compressions were frequently interrupted, and cardiac massage was withheld for an astonishing 48% of pulseless resuscitation time. Furthermore, compression depth was frequently too shallow.72,78 The observation that modern chest compressions are not performed adequately is disconcerting in the context of the current statistics of survival and neurological recovery after cardiac arrest, with the healthy appreciation that cerebral perfusion is zero in the absence of both native and artificial circulation. The 2005 American Heart Association resuscitation guidelines therefore advocate that chest compressions be performed at 100 per minute ("push hard and fast") with few and very brief interruptions for ventilation and pulse checks. There is also a new recommended ratio of compressions to breathing of 30:2, and compressions should be immediately reinitiated after shock delivery instead of reassessing the rhythm or pulse.76 These interventions increase the number of chest compressions delivered each minute. If retraining life support personnel does not improve performance of external cardiac massage, feedback devices that evaluate the quality of each compression should be employed to promote proper technique.Data on arterial blood pressure achieved during CPR in humans have been disappointing, with systolic and diastolic pressures rarely exceeding 60 and
Referência(s)