Do Female Flies Choose Their Mates?
1982; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 119; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/283942
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Insect behavior and control techniques
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessDo Female Flies Choose Their Mates?Eliot B. SpiessEliot B. Spiess Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 119, Number 5May, 1982 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283942 Views: 3Total views on this site Citations: 28Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1982 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Alex R. De Serrano, Mitchel J. Daniel, F. Helen Rodd Experimentally altered male mating behaviour affects offspring exploratory behaviour via nongenetic paternal effects, Behavioural Brain Research 401 (Mar 2021): 113062.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113062Brian Hollis, Tadeusz J. Kawecki, Laurent Keller No evidence that within‐group male relatedness reduces harm to females in D rosophila , Ecology and Evolution 5, no.44 (Jan 2015): 979–983.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1417Russell L. Burke, Lance E. Little Drosophila do not skew offspring sex ratio as predicted by trivers and willard (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Journal of Insect Behavior 8, no.22 (Mar 1994): 231–239.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01988907B. Kaufman, D. Wool Gene flow by immigrants into isolated recipient populations: a laboratory model using flour beetles, Genetica 85, no.22 (Jan 1992): 163–171.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120323C. Dernoncourt-Sterpin, J. Lechien, A. Elens Sex ratio, relative frequency, and mating success in two genotypes ofDrosophila malanogaster, Behavior Genetics 21, no.55 (Sep 1991): 471–485.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066725Ignacio Marin Sexual isolation in Drosophila I. Theoretical models for multiple-choice experiments, Journal of Theoretical Biology 152, no.22 (Sep 1991): 271–284.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80458-8G Ribó, J Ocaña, A Prevosti Effect of larval crowding on adult mating behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster, Heredity 63, no.22 (Oct 1989): 195–202.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1989.92J. A. Sanchez Prado, G. Blanco Lizana Mating patterns of differentAdh genotypes ofDrosophila melanogaster. II. Testing rare-male mating advantage, Behavior Genetics 19, no.55 (Sep 1989): 701–716.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066032Linda Partridge Frequency-dependent mating preferences in female fruitflies?, Behavior Genetics 19, no.55 (Sep 1989): 725–728.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066034Eliot B. Spiess Comments on some criticisms of minority mating advantage experiments inDrosophila, Behavior Genetics 19, no.55 (Sep 1989): 729–733.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066035 Valerie Keegan-Rogers , and R. Jack Schultz Sexual Selection Among Clones of Unisexual Fish (Poeciliopsis: Poeciliidae): Genetic Factors and Rare-Female Advantage, The American Naturalist 132, no.66 (Oct 2015): 846–868.https://doi.org/10.1086/284893M Santos, A Ruiz, A Barbadilla, J E Quezada-Diaz, E Hasson, A Fontdevila The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XIV. Larger flies mate more often in nature, Heredity 61, no.22 (Oct 1988): 255–262.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1988.113Rudolf Harmsen, David R. Clark The effects of inbreeding and ventilation on mating behavior in Drosophila pseudoobscura, Behavioural Processes 15, no.2-32-3 (Dec 1987): 181–190.https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(87)90006-4H. Roberta Koepfer SELECTION FOR SEXUAL ISOLATION BETWEEN GEOGRAPHIC FORMS OF DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS. II. EFFECTS OF SELECTION OF MATING PREFERENCE AND PROPENSITY, Evolution 41, no.66 (May 2017): 1409–1413.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb02479.xPeter Knoppien Rare-male mating advantage: An artifact caused by differential storage conditions?, Behavior Genetics 17, no.44 (Jul 1987): 409–425.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068139Eliot B. Spiess, Deborah A. Bowbal Minority mating advantage of certain eye color mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster. IV. Female discrimination among three genotypes, Behavior Genetics 17, no.33 (May 1987): 291–306.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065508Kenneth Y. Kaneshiro, L. Val Giddings The Significance of Asymmetrical Sexual Isolation and the Formation of New Species, (Jan 1987): 29–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6986-2_3Gerald S. Wilkinson EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER, Evolution 41, no.11 (May 2017): 11–21.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05767.xMauro Santos, Rosa Tarrío, Carlos Zapata, Gonzalo Alvarez Sexual selection on chromosomal polymorphism in Drosophila subobscura, Heredity 57, no.22 (Oct 1986): 161–169.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1986.106 M. J. Van den Berg A Model for Drosophila melanogaster Mating Behavior, The American Naturalist 127, no.66 (Oct 2015): 796–808.https://doi.org/10.1086/284525Leif Søndergaard Mating competition in artificial populations of Drosophila melanogaster polymorphic for ebony : II. A test for minority male mating advantage, Genetical Research 47, no.33 (Apr 2009): 205–208.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300023144Bryan F. J. Manly Tests of the theory of natural selection: An overview, Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 15, no.44 (Dec 1985): 411–432.https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.1985.10421719PETER KNOPPIEN RARE MALE MATING ADVANTAGE: A REVIEW, Biological Reviews 60, no.11 (Feb 1985): 81–117.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1985.tb00418.xP. O'DONALD, M. E. N. MAJERUS Polymorphism of melanic ladybirds maintained by frequency-dependent sexual selection, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23, no.2-32-3 (Jan 2008): 101–111.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00131.xEliot B. Spiess, Charles M. Wilke STILL ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO ACHIEVE ASSORTATIVE MATING BY DISRUPTIVE SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA, Evolution 38, no.33 (May 2017): 505–515.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00316.x Peter O'Donald Do Female Flies Choose Their Mates? A Comment, The American Naturalist 122, no.33 (Oct 2015): 413–416.https://doi.org/10.1086/284143 Linda Partridge , and Andrew Gardner Failure to Replicate the Results of an Experiment on the Rare Male Effect in Drosophila menlanogaster, The American Naturalist 122, no.33 (Oct 2015): 422–427.https://doi.org/10.1086/284145J.S. Jones, Linda Partridge Population genetics: Tissue rejection: the price of sexual acceptance?, Nature 304, no.59265926 (Aug 1983): 484–485.https://doi.org/10.1038/304484a0
Referência(s)