Science, Politics, and the Renegotiation of Expertise at EPA
1992; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 7; Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/368710
ISSN1933-8287
Autores Tópico(s)Environmental Impact and Sustainability
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessExpertise & NegotiationScience, Politics, and the Renegotiation of Expertise at EPASheila JasanoffSheila JasanoffPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Osiris Volume 7, Number 11992Science after '40 Published for the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/368710 Views: 99Total views on this site Citations: 50Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1992 The History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Georg Rilinger Discursive multivocality: how the proliferation of economic language can undermine the political influence of economists, Socio-Economic Review 20, no.44 (Feb 2022): 1991–2015.https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac004S. T. A. Pickett, M. L. Cadenasso, A. M. Rademacher Toward pluralizing ecology: Finding common ground across sociocultural and scientific perspectives, Ecosphere 13, no.99 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4231Frank Hüesker, Robert Lepenies Why does pesticide pollution in water persist?, Environmental Science & Policy 128 (Feb 2022): 185–193.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.016Harro Maas Politicizing the Environment, History of Political Economy 53, no.S1S1 (Dec 2021): 293–323.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-9414889Christopher Neumaier Technological Solutions and Contested Interpretations of Scientific Results: Risk Assessment of Diesel Emissions in the United States and in West Germany, 1977–1995, NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 28, no.44 (Oct 2020): 547–588.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-020-00276-2Matthias Gross, Marco Sonnberger How the diesel engine became a "dirty" actant: Compression ignitions and actor networks of blame, Energy Research & Social Science 61 (Mar 2020): 101359.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101359Keely Maxwell, Bryan Hubbell, Emily Eisenhauer Institutional insights on integrating social and environmental science for solutions-driven research, Environmental Science & Policy 101 (Nov 2019): 97–105.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.003David Demortain Une société (de l'analyse) du risque ?, Natures Sciences Sociétés 27, no.44 (Mar 2020): 390–398.https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2020005Adrian Eugenio Beling Sinergias Sur-Norte para una "transición civilizatoria" hacia la sustentabilidad: diálogos de saberes entre buen vivir, decrecimiento y desarrollo humano, Revista Colombiana de Sociología 42, no.22 (Jul 2019): 279–300.https://doi.org/10.15446/rcs.v42n2.73250Liliana Doganova, Brice Laurent Carving out a domain for the market: boundary making in European environmental markets, Economy and Society 48, no.22 (Jul 2019): 221–242.https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1624071Ben Almassi Expertise in Agriculture: Scientific and Ethical Issues, (Jun 2019): 848–855.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_278Jakob Lundgren No "Real" Experts: Unexpected Agreement Over Disagreement in STS and Philosophy of Science, Perspectives on Science 26, no.66 (Dec 2018): 722–735.https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00295Michael Zarkin Policy Learning Mechanisms and the Regulation of US Drinking Water, Public Organization Review 17, no.22 (Feb 2016): 275–291.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0341-zBrice Laurent The Politics of Governance: Nanotechnology and the Transformations of Science Policy, (Mar 2017): 15–32.https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527697724.ch2Henri Boullier Gouverner les molécules « sans données ». Généalogie de l'interdiction par l'autorisation dans REACH, Annales des Mines - Gérer et comprendre N° 126, no.44 (Dec 2016): 61–70.https://doi.org/10.3917/geco1.126.0061Henri Boullier Évaluer des dossiers « vides », Terrains & travaux N° 28, no.11 (Sep 2016): 41–61.https://doi.org/10.3917/tt.028.0041Karen Hébert Chronicle of a disaster foretold: scientific risk assessment, public participation, and the politics of imperilment in Bristol Bay, Alaska, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 22, no.S1S1 (Apr 2016): 108–126.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12396Brice Laurent Boundary-making in the International Organization: Public Engagement Expertise at the OECD, (Jan 2016): 217–235.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514509_10Brice Laurent Operations for a problem of existence: dealing with the ontological uncertainty of nano substances, Foundations of Chemistry 17, no.33 (Jul 2015): 207–224.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-015-9233-0Stéphanie Lacour, Sacha Loeve, Brice Laurent, Virginie Albe, Aurélie Delemarle, Bernard Bartenlian, Sophie Lanone Deliberating responsibility: a collective contribution by the C'Nano IdF Nanoscience & Society Office, Foundations of Chemistry 17, no.33 (Jul 2015): 225–245.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-015-9234-zSteven Shapin Truth and Credibility in Science, (Jan 2015): 673–678.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85039-4Soraya Boudia, David Demortain La production d'un instrument générique de gouvernement, Gouvernement et action publique VOL. 3, no.33 (Oct 2014): 33–53.https://doi.org/10.3917/gap.143.0033Lisa M. Campbell, Catherine Corson, Noella J. Gray, Kenneth I. MacDonald, J. Peter Brosius Studying Global Environmental Meetings to Understand Global Environmental Governance: Collaborative Event Ethnography at the Tenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Global Environmental Politics 14, no.33 (Aug 2014): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_e_00236Ben Almassi Expertise in Agriculture: Scientific and Ethical Issues, (Apr 2014): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_278-2Soraya Boudia Observing the Environmental Turn through the Global Environment Monitoring System, (Jan 2014): 195–212.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137438744_10Brice Laurent Nanomaterials in Political Life: In the Democracies of Nanotechnology, (Aug 2012): 379–399.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4213-3_15Nicholas S. Paliewicz Global Warming and the Interaction Between the Public and Technical Spheres of Argument: When Standards for Expertise Really Matter, Argumentation and Advocacy 48, no.44 (Feb 2017): 231–242.https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2012.11821774Sheila Jasanoff Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology, Science and Engineering Ethics 17, no.44 (Aug 2011): 621–638.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9302-2CAROL MORRIS Environmental knowledge and small-scale rural landholding in south-west England, Geographical Journal 176, no.11 (Mar 2010): 77–89.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00332.xAnna Maerker Political Order and the Ambivalence of Expertise: Count Rumford and Welfare Reform in Late Eighteenth-Century Munich, Osiris 25, no.11 (Jul 2015): 213–230.https://doi.org/10.1086/657270Sheila Jasanoff Thin air, (Jan 2010): 191–202.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.745Robert A. Montgomery, C. Nichole Rubeck-Schurtz, Kelly F. Millenbah, Gary J. Roloff, Mark E. Whalon, Larry G. Olsen Modeling Protected Species Habitat and Assigning Risk to Inform Regulatory Decisions, Environmental Management 44, no.11 (Mar 2009): 12–23.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9289-5Carol Morris, Lewis Holloway Genetic technologies and the transformation of the geographies of UK livestock agriculture: a research agenda, Progress in Human Geography 33, no.33 (Dec 2008): 313–333.https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508096033Ryan Holifield How to speak for aquifers and people at the same time: Environmental justice and counter-network formation at a hazardous waste site, Geoforum 40, no.33 (May 2009): 363–372.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.02.005Silke Beck Von der Beratung zur Verhandlung – Der Fall IPCC, (Jan 2009): 120–144.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91639-2_6Benjamin K. Sovacool Spheres of Argument Concerning Oil Exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: A Crisis of Environmental Rhetoric?, Environmental Communication 2, no.33 (Jan 2009): 340–361.https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030802396745Lewis Holloway, Carol Morris Boosted bodies: Genetic techniques, domestic livestock bodies and complex representations of life, Geoforum 39, no.55 (Sep 2008): 1709–1720.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.03.006Christian Pohl From science to policy through transdisciplinary research, Environmental Science & Policy 11, no.11 (Feb 2008): 46–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.06.001Rebecca Slayton Discursive Choices, Social Studies of Science 37, no.11 (Jun 2016): 27–66.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706063787Carol Morris Negotiating the boundary between state-led and farmer approaches to knowing nature: An analysis of UK agri-environment schemes, Geoforum 37, no.11 (Jan 2006): 113–127.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.01.003Michael E. Gorman Earth systems engineering management: human behavior, technology and sustainability, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 44, no.33 (Jun 2005): 201–213.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.01.002Richard Harvey Brown, Elizabeth L. Malone Reason, Politics, and the Politics of Truth: How Science is Both Autonomous and Dependent, Sociological Theory 22, no.11 (Jun 2016): 106–122.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2004.00206.xSheila Jasanoff Breaking the Waves in Science Studies, Social Studies of Science 33, no.33 (Jun 2016): 389–400.https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333004Dominique Pestre Références bibliographiques, (Jan 2003): 181–197.https://doi.org/10.3917/quae.pestr.2003.01.0181S. Shapin Truth and Credibility: Science and the Social Study of Science, (Jan 2001): 15926–15932.https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03149-1Patrick van Zwanenberg, Erik Millstone Beyond Skeptical Relativism: Evaluating the Social Constructions of Expert Risk Assessments, Science, Technology, & Human Values 25, no.33 (Aug 2016): 259–282.https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500301I. Scoones New Ecology and the Social Sciences: What Prospects for a Fruitful Engagement?, Annual Review of Anthropology 28, no.11 (Oct 1999): 479–507.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.479Reiner Grundmann Wo steht die Risikosoziologie?, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 28, no.11 (Jan 1999).https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1999-0103N Oreskes Evaluation (not validation) of quantitative models., Environmental Health Perspectives 106, no.suppl 6suppl 6 (Dec 1998): 1453–1460.https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.98106s61453Sheila Jasanoff, Justus Lentsch, Peter Weingart Quality control and peer review in advisory science, (): 19–35.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777141.002
Referência(s)