Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher’s runaway process of sexual selection
1993; Royal Society; Volume: 253; Issue: 1337 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1098/rspb.1993.0099
ISSN1471-2954
AutoresAndrew Pomiankowski, Yoh Iwasa,
Tópico(s)Animal Behavior and Reproduction
ResumoRestricted accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Pomiankowski Andrew and Iwasa Yoh 1993Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher's runaway process of sexual selectionProc. R. Soc. Lond. B.253173–181http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1993.0099SectionRestricted accessArticleEvolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher's runaway process of sexual selection Andrew Pomiankowski Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Yoh Iwasa Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Andrew Pomiankowski Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed and Yoh Iwasa Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Published:23 August 1993https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1993.0099AbstractThe evolution of multiple female preferences by Fisher's runaway process is investigated. The main factor determining the evolutionary equilibrium is the joint cost of female choice. Multiple preferences evolve when the joint cost of two preferences is little more than the maximum of either cost alone. However, as the joint choice cost increases, one preference tends to dominate. Other preferences persist but are much weaker. The dominant preference is the one which gives the female the greatest Fisherian benefit (more attractive male offspring) relative to the cost of choice. The genetic mechanism controlling preference and the male trait are not crucial in determining equilibrium. Only when the joint cost becomes extreme will all but one preference be lost. Fisher's process readily explains the presence of multiple sexual ornaments.FootnotesThis text was harvested from a scanned image of the original document using optical character recognition (OCR) software. As such, it may contain errors. Please contact the Royal Society if you find an error you would like to see corrected. Mathematical notations produced through Infty OCR. Previous ArticleNext Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by Waffender A and Henshaw J (2022) Long‐term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.14127, 36:1, (45-56), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023. Maisonneuve L, Smadi C and Llaurens V (2022) Evolutionary origins of sexual dimorphism: Lessons from female‐limited mimicry in butterflies, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.14599, 76:10, (2404-2423), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022. Henshaw J, Fromhage L and Jones A (2022) The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.2206262119, 119:33, Online publication date: 16-Aug-2022. Fry J (2022) A reexamination of theoretical arguments that indirect selection on mate preference is likely to be weaker than direct selection, Evolution Letters, 10.1002/evl3.276, 6:2, (110-117), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022. Iwasa Y and Yamaguchi S (2022) Evolution of male nuptial gift and female remating: A quantitative genetic model, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110939, 533, (110939), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022. Rivera C, Hedin M, Mason A, Maddison W and Elias D Complex courtship in the Habronattus clypeatus group (Araneae: Salticidae), The Journal of Arachnology, 10.1636/JoA-S-18-045, 48:3 Salmon C (2021) Female Choice and Sexual Conflict Theory Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3697, (2991-2994), . Wakefield C, Wightman P, Martin J, Bond B, Lowrey D, Cohen B, Collier B and Chamberlain M (2019) Hunting and Nesting Phenology Influence Gobbling of Wild Turkeys, The Journal of Wildlife Management, 10.1002/jwmg.21804, 84:3, (448-457), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2020. Henshaw J and Jones A (2020) Fisher's lost model of runaway sexual selection, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.13910, 74:2, (487-494), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2020. Iwasa Y (2019) Conflict theory of genomic imprinting in mammals, Population Ecology, 10.1002/1438-390X.12016, 62:1, (28-37), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020. Xu M and Shaw K (2019) Genetic coupling of signal and preference facilitates sexual isolation during rapid speciation, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286:1913, Online publication date: 23-Oct-2019. Bailey N and Kölliker M (2019) Social runaway: Fisherian elaboration (or reduction) of socially selected traits via indirect genetic effects, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.13791, 73:8, (1549-1563), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019. Ligon R, Diaz C, Morano J, Troscianko J, Stevens M, Moskeland A, Laman T, Scholes E and Price T (2018) Evolution of correlated complexity in the radically different courtship signals of birds-of-paradise, PLOS Biology, 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006962, 16:11, (e2006962) Douglas H, Kitaysky A and Kitaiskaia E (2018) Odor is linked to adrenocortical function and male ornament size in a colonial seabird, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/ary032, 29:3, (736-744), Online publication date: 9-May-2018. Dhole S, Stern C and Servedio M (2018) Direct detection of male quality can facilitate the evolution of female choosiness and indicators of good genes: Evolution across a continuum of indicator mechanisms, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.13466, 72:4, (770-784), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018. Salmon C (2018) Female Choice and Sexual Conflict Theory Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3697-1, (1-4), . Romano A, Saino N and Møller A (2017) Viability and expression of sexual ornaments in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica : a meta-analysis , Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.13151, 30:10, (1929-1935), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017. Gomes A, Funghi C, Soma M, Sorenson M and Cardoso G (2017) Multimodal signalling in estrildid finches: song, dance and colour are associated with different ecological and life‐history traits, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.13102, 30:7, (1336-1346), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017. Pascoal S, Mendrok M, Wilson A, Hunt J and Bailey N (2017) Sexual selection and population divergence II. Divergence in different sexual traits and signal modalities in field crickets ( Teleogryllus oceanicus ) , Evolution, 10.1111/evo.13239, 71:6, (1614-1626), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017. Roff D, Fairbairn D and Prokuda A (2017) A new method for statistical detection of directional and stabilizing mating preference, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/arx038, 28:3, (934-942), Online publication date: 1-May-2017. Sharma M, Wilson A and Hosken D (2016) Fisher's sons' effect in sexual selection: absent, intermittent or just low experimental power?, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.12973, 29:12, (2464-2470), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016. Arnold S and Houck L (2016) Can the Fisher‐Lande Process Account for Birds of Paradise and Other Sexual Radiations?, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/686258, 187:6, (717-735), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016. Chou C, Iwasa Y and Nakazawa T (2016) Incorporating an ontogenetic perspective into evolutionary theory of sexual size dimorphism, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.12857, 70:2, (369-384), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016. Rubi T and Stephens D (2015) Should receivers follow multiple signal components? An economic perspective, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/arv121, 27:1, (36-44), . Jones A (2016) Sexual Selection, Theory of Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1016/B978-0-12-800049-6.00151-7, (119-127), . Girard M, Elias D and Kasumovic M (2015) Female preference for multi-modal courtship: multiple signals are important for male mating success in peacock spiders, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282:1820, Online publication date: 7-Dec-2015. Roff D (2015) The evolution of mate choice: a dialogue between theory and experiment, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 10.1111/nyas.12743, 1360:1, (1-15), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015. Roff D and Fairbairn D (2015) Bias in the heritability of preference and its potential impact on the evolution of mate choice, Heredity, 10.1038/hdy.2014.117, 114:4, (404-412), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2015. Tazzyman S, Iwasa Y and Pomiankowski A (2014) THE HANDICAP PROCESS FAVORS EXAGGERATED, RATHER THAN REDUCED, SEXUAL ORNAMENTS, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.12450, 68:9, (2534-2549), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2014. Roff D and Fairbairn D (2014) The evolution of phenotypes and genetic parameters under preferential mating, Ecology and Evolution, 10.1002/ece3.1130, 4:13, (2759-2776), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2014. Leighton G and Sorci G (2014) The Relative Effectiveness of Signaling Systems: Relying on External Items Reduces Signaling Accuracy while Leks Increase Accuracy, PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0091725, 9:3, (e91725) Singh A and Singh B (2013) Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila, Genetica, 10.1007/s10709-013-9751-4, 142:1, (23-41), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2014. Tazzyman S, Iwasa Y and Pomiankowski A (2013) SIGNALING EFFICACY DRIVES THE EVOLUTION OF LARGER SEXUAL ORNAMENTS BY SEXUAL SELECTION, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.12255, 68:1, (216-229), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014. Sal Moyano M, Silva P, Luppi T and Gavio M (2014) Female mate choice by chemical signals in a semi-terrestrial crab, Journal of Sea Research, 10.1016/j.seares.2013.05.015, 85, (300-307), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014. Chiarle A and Isaia M (2013) Signal complexity and modular organization of the courtship behaviours of two sibling species of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae), Behavioural Processes, 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.04.004, 97, (33-40), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013. Dakin R and Montgomerie R (2013) Eye for an eyespot: how iridescent plumage ocelli influence peacock mating success, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/art045, 24:5, (1048-1057), ., Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013. Kuijper B, Pen I and Weissing F (2012) A Guide to Sexual Selection Theory, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160245, 43:1, (287-311), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2012. Bailey N and Moore A (2012) RUNAWAY SEXUAL SELECTION WITHOUT GENETIC CORRELATIONS: SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS AND FLEXIBLE MATE CHOICE INITIATE AND ENHANCE THE FISHER PROCESS, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01647.x, 66:9, (2674-2684), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012. Priklopil T (2012) Chaotic dynamics of allele frequencies in condition-dependent mating systems, Theoretical Population Biology, 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.06.001, 82:2, (109-116), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012. Tanaka C and Iwasa Y (2012) Cultural evolution of a belief controlling human mate choice: Dynamic modeling of the hinoeuma superstition in Japan, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.06.001, 309, (20-28), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012. Ran Cheng , Min Yao , Xiaowei Xue and Bin Shen (2012) Bisexual evolution: A novel bisexual evolutionary framework based on the Fisher's runaway process 2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 10.1109/CEC.2012.6256463, 978-1-4673-1509-8, (1-8) ELIAS D, MADDISON W, PECKMEZIAN C, GIRARD M and MASON A (2012) Orchestrating the score: complex multimodal courtship in the Habronattus coecatus group of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01817.x, 105:3, (522-547), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2012. Frame A (2012) The role of sexual preferences in intrasexual female competition, BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10.1186/1471-2148-12-218, 12:1, (218), . Kimball R, Mary C and Braun E (2011) A Macroevolutionary Perspective on Multiple Sexual Traits in the Phasianidae (Galliformes), International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.4061/2011/423938, 2011, (1-16), Online publication date: 2-May-2011. Gordon S and Uetz G (2011) Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: evidence for behavioural plasticity, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.003, 81:2, (367-375), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2011. Uhl G and Elias D (2011) Communication Spider Behaviour, 10.1017/CBO9780511974496.006, (127-189) Prum R (2010) THE LANDE-KIRKPATRICK MECHANISM IS THE NULL MODEL OF EVOLUTION BY INTERSEXUAL SELECTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MEANING, HONESTY, AND DESIGN IN INTERSEXUAL SIGNALS, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01054.x, 64:11, (3085-3100), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010. Elias D, Sivalinghem S, Mason A, Andrade M and Kasumovic M (2010) Vibratory Communication in the Jumping Spider Phidippus clarus: Substrate-borne Courtship Signals are Important for Male Mating Success, Ethology, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01815.x, 116:10, (990-998), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010. Hohenlohe P and Arnold S (2010) Dimensionality of mate choice, sexual isolation, and speciation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.1003537107, 107:38, (16583-16588), Online publication date: 21-Sep-2010. Fuller R and Noa L (2010) Female mating preferences, lighting environment, and a test of the sensory bias hypothesis in the bluefin killifish, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.017, 80:1, (23-35), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2010. Tazzyman S and Iwasa Y (2009) SEXUAL SELECTION CAN INCREASE THE EFFECT OF RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT-A QUANTITATIVE GENETIC MODEL OF POLYMORPHISM IN OOPHAGA PUMILIO, THE STRAWBERRY POISON-DART FROG, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00923.x, 64:6, (1719-1728), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2010. Palmer C, Watts R, Hastings A, Houck L and Arnold S (2010) Rapid Evolution of Plethodontid Modulating Factor, a Hypervariable Salamander Courtship Pheromone, is Driven by Positive Selection, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 10.1007/s00239-010-9342-2, 70:5, (427-440), Online publication date: 1-May-2010. Clark C and Feo T (2010) Why Do Calypte Hummingbirds "Sing" with Both Their Tail and Their Syrinx? An Apparent Example of Sexual Sensory Bias , The American Naturalist, 10.1086/648560, 175:1, (27-37), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010. Aisenberg A, Baruffaldi L and González M (2009) Behavioural evidence of male volatile pheromones in the sex-role reversed wolf spiders Allocosa brasiliensis and Allocosa alticeps, Naturwissenschaften, 10.1007/s00114-009-0612-z, 97:1, (63-70), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010. Currie T and Little A (2009) The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.005, 30:6, (409-416), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009. van Dongen W and Mulder R (2009) Multiple ornamentation, female breeding synchrony, and extra-pair mating success of golden whistlers (Pachycephala pectoralis), Journal of Ornithology, 10.1007/s10336-009-0371-9, 150:3, (607-620), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2009. Jones A and Ratterman N (2009) Mate choice and sexual selection: What have we learned since Darwin?, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.0901129106, 106:supplement_1, (10001-10008), Online publication date: 16-Jun-2009. Uyeda J, Arnold S, Hohenlohe P and Mead L (2009) DRIFT PROMOTES SPECIATION BY SEXUAL SELECTION, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00589.x, 63:3, (583-594), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2009. Elias D, Kasumovic M, Punzalan D, Andrade M and Mason A (2008) Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.032, 76:3, (901-910), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2008. Thompson J, Bissell A and Martins E (2008) Inhibitory interactions between multimodal behavioural responses may influence the evolution of complex signals, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.12.015, 76:1, (113-121), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2008. Burke E and Murphy C (2007) How female barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa, use multiple call characteristics to select a mate, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.02.017, 74:5, (1463-1472), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2007. Klappert K, Mazzi D, Hoikkala A and Ritchie M (2007) MALE COURTSHIP SONG AND FEMALE PREFERENCE VARIATION BETWEEN PHYLOGEOGRAPHICALLY DISTINCT POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MONTANA, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00125.x, 61:6, (1481-1488), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2007. Spaulding A (2007) Rapid courtship evolution in grouse (Tetraonidae): contrasting patterns of acceleration between the Eurasian and North American polygynous clades, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274:1613, (1079-1086), Online publication date: 22-Apr-2007. Doorn G and Weissing F (2006) Sexual Conflict and the Evolution of Female Preferences for Indicators of Male Quality, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/508634, 168:6, (742-757), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2006. Elias D, Hebets E and Hoy R (2006) Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/arl005, 17:5, (765-771), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2006. Chapman T (2006) Evolutionary Conflicts of Interest between Males and Females, Current Biology, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.020, 16:17, (R744-R754), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2006. Arnqvist G (2006) Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361:1466, (375-386), Online publication date: 28-Feb-2006. Trainor B and Basolo A (2006) Location, location, location: stripe position effects on female sword preference, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.04.007, 71:1, (135-140), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2006. Loyau A, Saint Jalme M, Cagniant C and Sorci G (2005) Multiple sexual advertisements honestly reflect health status in peacocks (Pavo cristatus), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-005-0958-y, 58:6, (552-557), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2005. Martins E, Ord T and Davenport S (2005) Combining motions into complex displays: playbacks with a robotic lizard, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-005-0954-2, 58:4, (351-360), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2005. VAN DONGEN W and MULDER R (2005) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for paternity assessment in the golden whistler (Pachycephala pectoralis: Aves), Molecular Ecology Notes, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.00804.x, 5:1, (4-6), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005. Scheuber H, Jacot A and Brinkhof M (2004) Female preference for multiple condition–dependent components of a sexually selected signal, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271:1556, (2453-2457), Online publication date: 7-Dec-2004. Henry C and Wells M (2004) Adaptation or random change? The evolutionary response of songs to substrate properties in lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla), Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.032, 68:4, (879-895), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2004. van Doorn G and Weissing F (2004) The Evolution of Female Preferences for Multiple Indicators of Quality, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/422203, 164:2, (173-186), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2004. Mead L and Arnold S (2004) Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.003, 19:5, (264-271), Online publication date: 1-May-2004. Cotton S, Fowler K and Pomiankowski A (2004) Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis?, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271:1541, (771-783), Online publication date: 22-Apr-2004. Scheuber H, Jacot A and Brinkhof M (2003) Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.2003.2083, 65:4, (721-727), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2003. Bonduriansky R (2003) Layered sexual selection: a comparative analysis of sexual behaviour within an assemblage of piophilid flies, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 10.1139/z03-031, 81:3, (479-491), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2003. Skamel U (2003) Beauty and Sex Appeal: Sexual Selection of Aesthetic Preferences Evolutionary Aesthetics, 10.1007/978-3-662-07142-7_6, (173-200), . Takahashi D and Kohda M (2002) Female Preference for Nest Size in the Stream Goby Rhinogobius sp. DA, Zoological Science, 10.2108/zsj.19.1241, 19:11, (1241-1244), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2002. Hegyi G, Török J and Tóth L (2002) Qualitative population divergence in proximate determination of a sexually selected trait in the collared flycatcher, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00449.x, 15:5, (710-719), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2002. Basolo A and Trainor B (2002) The conformation of a female preference for a composite male trait in green swordtails, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.2001.1933, 63:3, (469-474), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2002. Brooks R (2002) Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: Population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism Genetics of Mate Choice: From Sexual Selection to Sexual Isolation, 10.1007/978-94-010-0265-3_16, (343-358), . Brooks R and Endler J (2007) DIRECT AND INDIRECT SEXUAL SELECTION AND QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MALE TRAITS IN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA), Evolution, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00617.x, 55:5, (1002-1015) Brooks R and Endler J (2001) DIRECT AND INDIRECT SEXUAL SELECTION AND QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MALE TRAITS IN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA), Evolution, 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[1002:DAISSA]2.0.CO;2, 55:5, (1002), . Johnson (2000) The evolution of courtship display repertoire size in the dabbling ducks (Anatini), Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00200.x, 13:4, (634-644), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2000. Rowe C (1999) Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.1999.1242, 58:5, (921-931), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1999. Iwasa Y and Pomiankowski A (1999) Good Parent and Good Genes Models of Handicap Evolution, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0979, 200:1, (97-109), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999. Brooks R and Couldridge V (1999) Multiple Sexual Ornaments Coevolve with Multiple Mating Preferences, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/303219, 154:1, (37-45), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1999. BORGIA G and PRESGRAVES D (1998) Coevolution of elaborated male display traits in the spotted bowerbird: an experimental test of the threat reduction hypothesis, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.1998.0908, 56:5, (1121-1128), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998. Mateos C (1998) Sexual selection in the ring-necked pheasant: a review, Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 10.1080/08927014.1998.9522846, 10:4, (313-332), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1998. Pomiankowski A and Iwasa Y (1998) Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5106, 95:9, (5106-5111), Online publication date: 28-Apr-1998. Kamo M, Kubo T and Iwasa Y (1998) Neural network for female mate preference, trained by a genetic algorithm, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 353:1367, (399-406), Online publication date: 29-Mar-1998.Magurran A, May R and Magurran A (1998) Population differentiation without speciation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 353:1366, (275-286), Online publication date: 28-Feb-1998. Iwasa Y (1998) 7 The Conflict Theory of Genomic Imprinting: How Much Can Be Explained? , 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)60369-5, (255-293), . Ezoe H and Iwasa Y (2018) Evolution of condition‐dependent dispersal: A genetic‐algorithm search for the ESS reaction norm, Population Ecology, 10.1007/BF02765258, 39:2, (127-137), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1997. JENNIONS M and PETRIE M (2007) VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES, Biological Reviews, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00015.x, 72:2, (283-327) Kirkpatrick M (2017) GOOD GENES AND DIRECT SELECTION IN THE EVOLUTION OF MATING PREFERENCES, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03603.x, 50:6, (2125-2140), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1996. Tomlinson I and O'Donald P (1996) The influence of female viability differences on the evolution of mate choice, Heredity, 10.1038/hdy.1996.144, 77:3, (303-312), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1996. Johnstone R (1997) Multiple displays in animal communication: 'backup signals' and 'multiple messages', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 351:1337, (329-338), Online publication date: 29-Mar-1996. Iwasa Y and Pomiankowski A (1995) Continual change in mate preferences, Nature, 10.1038/377420a0, 377:6548, (420-422), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1995. Brooks R and Caithness N (1997) Manipulating a seemingly non-preferred male ornament reveals a role in female choice, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 261:1360, (7-10), Online publication date: 22-Jul-1995. FITZPATRICK S, BERGLUND A and ROSENQVIST G (2008) Ornaments or offspring: costs to reproductive success restrict sexual selection processes, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1995.tb01063.x, 55:3, (251-260), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1995. JOHNSTONE R (2008) SEXUAL SELECTION, HONEST ADVERTISEMENT AND THE HANDICAP PRINCIPLE: REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE, Biological Reviews, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1995.tb01439.x, 70:1, (1-65), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1995. Gilburn A and Day T (1997) Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and the αβ chromosomal inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 257:1350, (303-309), Online publication date: 22-Sep-1994. Pagel M (1994) Parents prefer pretty plumage, Nature, 10.1038/371200a0, 371:6494, (200-200), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1994. Iwasa Y and Pomiankowski A (2017) THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01367.x, 48:3, (853-867), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1994. Houde A (1997) Effect of artificial selection on male colour patterns on mating preference of female guppies, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 256:1346, (125-130), Online publication date: 23-May-1994.Gilburn A and Day T (1997) Evolution of female choice in seaweed flies: fisherian and good genes mechanisms operate in different populations, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 255:1343, (159-165), Online publication date: 22-Feb-1994. This Issue23 August 1993Volume 253Issue 1337 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1993.0099Published by:Royal SocietyPrint ISSN:0962-8452Online ISSN:1471-2954History: Manuscript received05/05/1993Manuscript accepted01/06/1993Published online01/01/1997Published in print23/08/1993 License:Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society Citations and impact Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad
Referência(s)