Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Regulation of glut1 mRNA by Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1

2001; Elsevier BV; Volume: 276; Issue: 12 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1074/jbc.m010144200

1083-351X

Changhu Chen, Nabendu Pore, Alireza Behrooz, Faramarz Ismail‐Beigi, Amit Maity,

RNA Research and Splicing

Oncogenic transformation and hypoxia both induceglut1 mRNA. We studied the interaction between theras oncogene and hypoxia in up-regulating glut1mRNA levels using Rat1 fibroblasts transformed with H-ras (Rat1-ras). Transformation with H-ras led to a substantial increase in glut1mRNA levels under normoxic conditions and additively increasedglut1 mRNA levels in concert with hypoxia. Using a luciferase reporter construct containing 6 kilobase pairs of theglut1 promoter, we showed that this effect was mediated at the transcriptional level. Promoter activity was much higher in Rat1-ras cells than in Rat1 cells and could be down-regulated by cotransfection with a dominant negative Ras construct (RasN17). A 480-base pair (bp) cobalt/hypoxia-responsive fragment of the promoter containing a HIF-1 binding site showed significantly higher activity in Rat1-ras cells than in Rat1 cells, suggesting that Ras might mediate its effect through HIF-1 even under normoxic conditions. Consistent with this, Rat1-ras cells displayed higher levels of HIF1-α protein under normoxic conditions. In addition, a promoter construct containing a 4-bp mutation in the HIF1 binding site showed lower activity in Rat1-ras cells than a construct with an intact HIF1 binding site. The activity of the latter construct but not the former could be down-regulated by RasN17, supporting the importance of the HIF1 binding site in regulation by Ras. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor LY29004 down-regulated glut1 promoter activity and mRNA levels under normoxia and also decreased HIF1α protein levels in these cells. Collectively these results indicate that H-Ras up-regulates theglut1 promoter, at least in part, by increasing HIF-1α protein levels leading to transactivation of promoter through the HIF-1 binding site. Oncogenic transformation and hypoxia both induceglut1 mRNA. We studied the interaction between theras oncogene and hypoxia in up-regulating glut1mRNA levels using Rat1 fibroblasts transformed with H-ras (Rat1-ras). Transformation with H-ras led to a substantial increase in glut1mRNA levels under normoxic conditions and additively increasedglut1 mRNA levels in concert with hypoxia. Using a luciferase reporter construct containing 6 kilobase pairs of theglut1 promoter, we showed that this effect was mediated at the transcriptional level. Promoter activity was much higher in Rat1-ras cells than in Rat1 cells and could be down-regulated by cotransfection with a dominant negative Ras construct (RasN17). A 480-base pair (bp) cobalt/hypoxia-responsive fragment of the promoter containing a HIF-1 binding site showed significantly higher activity in Rat1-ras cells than in Rat1 cells, suggesting that Ras might mediate its effect through HIF-1 even under normoxic conditions. Consistent with this, Rat1-ras cells displayed higher levels of HIF1-α protein under normoxic conditions. In addition, a promoter construct containing a 4-bp mutation in the HIF1 binding site showed lower activity in Rat1-ras cells than a construct with an intact HIF1 binding site. The activity of the latter construct but not the former could be down-regulated by RasN17, supporting the importance of the HIF1 binding site in regulation by Ras. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor LY29004 down-regulated glut1 promoter activity and mRNA levels under normoxia and also decreased HIF1α protein levels in these cells. Collectively these results indicate that H-Ras up-regulates theglut1 promoter, at least in part, by increasing HIF-1α protein levels leading to transactivation of promoter through the HIF-1 binding site. hypoxia-inducible factor-1 serum-responsive element phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium base pair(s) kilobase pair(s) polymerase chain reaction mitogen-activated protein vascular epidermal growth factor Oncogenic transformation of mammalian cells is associated with many alterations in metabolism (see Ref. 1Dang C.V. Semenza G.L. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1999; 24: 68-72Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (927) Google Scholar for review). An increased rate of glucose transport is among the most characteristic biochemical markers of the transformed phenotype. The Glut1 glucose transporter is one of the proteins responsible (reviewed in Ref. 2Mueckler M. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994; 219: 713-725Crossref PubMed Scopus (958) Google Scholar). A number of oncogenes, including fps, src, and rashave been shown to increase glucose transport and to up-regulateglut1 mRNA and protein levels (3Flier J.S. Mueckler M.M. Usher P. Lodish H.F. Science. 1987; 235: 1492-1495Crossref PubMed Scopus (692) Google Scholar, 4Birnbaum M.J. Haspel H.C. Rosen O.M. Science. 1987; 235: 1495-1498Crossref PubMed Scopus (245) Google Scholar, 5Racker E. Resnick R.J. Feldman R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1985; 82: 3535-3538Crossref PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholar). glut1gene expression and glucose transport are also stimulated in a variety of cells under hypoxic conditions, a response that is mediated by the transcription factor HIF-1.1 HIF-1 binds to acis-acting binding sites located within the 5′- flanking region of the glut1 gene (8Murakami T. Nishiyama T. Shirotani T. Shinohara Y. Kan M. Ishii K. Kanai F. Nakazuru S. Ebina Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 9300-9306Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 9Ebert B.L. Firth J.D. Ratcliffe P.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 29083-29089Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (449) Google Scholar). Because hypoxia and oncogenic mutations are both commonly present in tumors, we set out to examine the interaction between the two in up-regulating glut1 mRNA levels. Mutations in Ras are seen in a third of human cancers (6Bos J.L. Cancer Res. 1989; 49: 4682-4689PubMed Google Scholar); therefore, as our model system we used Rat1 fibroblasts transformed with H-ras. Transformation with H-ras led to a substantial increase in glut1mRNA levels under normoxic conditions and additively increasedglut1 mRNA levels in concert with hypoxia. Our results indicate that a HIF-1 binding site located in the glut1promoter is important in its regulation by Ras. We further show that oncogenic H-Ras leads to increased promoter activity by up-regulating the steady-state level of HIF-1α protein and that this involves the PI3K pathway, known to be downstream of Ras (7Schlessinger J. Cell. 2000; 103: 211-225Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3557) Google Scholar). Rat1 cells were maintained in culture in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals) and cultured in a humidified 95% air/5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. To establish stable cell lines, Rat1 cells were transfected with an H-ras plasmid using Fugene (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, Rat1 cells were plated into a 100-mm dish 24 h before transfection. Cells were transfected using 6 μl of Fugene and 2 μg of the plasmid pAL8-H-ras, which contains the H-ras genomic DNA and a neomycin-resistance gene. Transfected cells were selected in DMEM supplemented with 400 μg/ml G418 (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) for 1 week. Colonies were isolated using cloning cylinders, trypsinized, then expanded as cell lines. The expression of the H-ras gene was confirmed by Western blotting with an anti-H-Ras monoclonal antibody. Twelve G418-resistant colonies were expanded, all of which expressed high levels of H-Ras protein compared with the Rat1 parental cells. We used clone 12, which expressed approximately 10-fold the level of H-Ras as the parental Rat1 cells (data not shown) for most of our experiments. Rat1-ras cell lines were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 400 μg/ml G418. PD098059 and LY294002 (from Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA) were dissolved in Me2SO at stock concentrations of 100 mm and 40 mm, respectively. Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol (Life Technologies Inc.) following the manufacturer's instructions. 5–10 μg of total RNA was run on a 0.9% agarose gel containing formaldehyde, transferred to a Duralon-UV membrane (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), and UV cross-linked prior to hybridization. Labeling of radioactive DNA probes was performed using [32P]dCTP and a Prime-It kit (Stratagene). Hybridization was carried out at 65 °C, after which the membranes were washed to a stringency of 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65 °C. Autoradiography was carried out at −80 °C with intensifying screens. A 400-bp mouse glut1cDNA fragment (from M. Birnbaum, University of Pennsylvania) was used to make radioactive probes. For protein isolation, cells were washed once with cold phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mm EDTA, then solubilized by adding lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 20 mm Tris, pH 7.6, 150 mm NaCl, 2 mm EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mm dithiothreitol, 1 mm orthovanadate, 2 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) directly on the cells. Lysates were transferred into 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were transferred to a fresh tube and frozen on dry ice. Protein concentrations were determined using a BCA Protein Assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). For Western blotting, an equal amount of total protein was separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 6% polyacrylamide gel. After completion of gel electrophoresis, protein was transferred onto a Transblot nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) using a blotting apparatus. For detection of H-Ras protein, we used a anti-human H-Ras monoclonal antibody (Quality Biotech, Camden, NJ) at a dilution of 1:1000 followed by a secondary goat anti-mouse antibody (Bio-Rad) at a dilution of 1:2000. For detection of the HIF-1α protein, we used an anti-HIF-1α antibody (clone H1α67, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO) at a dilution of 1:1000 followed by a secondary goat anti-mouse antibody (Bio-Rad). Antibody binding was detected by chemiluminescence using an ECL kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). For hypoxia experiments, 5–7 × 105 cells were plated on day 1 into 60-mm Permanox dishes (Nunc) and maintained in a 5% CO2 incubator. Permanox plastic was used because of its high permeability to oxygen, permitting the efficient evacuation of oxygen from the dishes before hypoxia induction. On day 2, immediately before the induction of hypoxia, standard media was replaced with media containing 50 mmHEPES, 0.15% (w/v) glucose, and 10 mm NaOH to maintain pH. Dishes were then placed into airtight aluminum chambers. The oxygen concentration was decreased by sequentially replacing a given percentage of the total gas within a chamber with 95% nitrogen/5% CO2 using a precision vacuum gauge. The oxygen concentration was reduced from 21% to 5% with one gas exchange, from 5% to 1% with a second gas exchange, then with an additional gas exchange to 0.2%. The aluminum chambers were then placed on an orbital shaker in a warm room maintained at 37 °C. A series of constructs containing various fragments from the 5′-flanking region of the rat glut1 gene were used. Constructs A, C, E, and K are described elsewhere (8Murakami T. Nishiyama T. Shirotani T. Shinohara Y. Kan M. Ishii K. Kanai F. Nakazuru S. Ebina Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 9300-9306Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). As shown in Fig.2 (see below), constructs A, C, and E contain, respectively, 6, 3.5, and 3 kbp of the 5′-flanking region of the rat glut1 gene. Construct K contains a 480-base pair sequence from the 5′-region of the rat glut1 promoter located at −3.5 to −3.0 kbp relative to the transcription start site (GenBank™ accession number U82755). This 480-bp enhancer contains a potential HIF-1 binding site at nucleotides +398 to +401. Construct N was made by PCR amplification in the following manner. The primer pair (1A, 5′-TAATAGGTACCCAACAGAGCCTTTTC-3′; 2B, 5′-TAATAGGCTAGCGAGCTCCCAGGAACTTG-3′) was used for amplifying using construct K as a template. Construct N contains 184 bp of theglut1 promoter located at approximately −3.2 to −3.0 kbp relative to the transcription start site (from nucleotides +297 to +480; GenBank™ accession number U82755). These primers were chosen to eliminate the SRE (at nucleotides +287 to +296), which has been shown to have a positive role in stimulation of the glut1 promoter (8Murakami T. Nishiyama T. Shirotani T. Shinohara Y. Kan M. Ishii K. Kanai F. Nakazuru S. Ebina Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 9300-9306Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), while retaining the potential HIF-1 binding site (nucleotides +398 to +401). Primer 1A has incorporated within it a KpnI restriction site and primer 2B an NheI restriction site, so the PCR product could be restricted with these two enzymes and subcloned into the KpnI/NheI sites of the reporter plasmid pGL3-Promoter. pGL3-Promoter contains its own SV-40 promoter, which was required because the fragment that was PCR-amplified lacks the glut1 TATA box and transcription start site. Construct M was made using a two-step overlapping PCR strategy. In step one, two separate pairs of primers were used in PCR amplification, primer 1A (listed above) and primer 1B, 5-TGCGTGTCAGCCAGACATCCTGTG-3′ in one reaction, and primer 2A, 5′CACAGGATGTCTGGCTGACACGCA-3′ and primer 2B (listed above) in the second. Primers 1B and 2A overlapped the HIF-1 binding site but introduced a 4-bp mutation, which isunderlined. After the first PCR amplification with these two sets of primers in separate reactions, the product was then amplified using primers 1A and 2B to generate a 184-bp fragment containing the desired mutation, which was restricted withKpnI/NheI and subcloned into the pGL3-Promoter vector. The amplified sequence is shown in Fig. 2 B (see below). For reporter gene assays, transfections were performed using LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were plated into 60-mm dishes so that 24 h later they were ∼50% confluent. Cells in each dish were transfected using 10–15 μl of LipofectAMINE, 2 μg of reporter plasmid, and 1 μg of pSV-β-galactosidase (Promega, Madison, WI) to control for transfection efficiency. 24 h later, cells were harvested by removing the media, washing twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and directly adding 100 μl of lysis buffer per dish. Of this lysate, an aliquot was used for luciferase assays and another aliquot for β-galactosidase determination. Luciferase and β-galactosidase assays were performed using the LucLite kit (Packard Instrument Co.) and the β-galactosidase Enzyme Assay System (Promega, Madison WI), respectively. Luciferase readings were performed on a TopCount Microplate scintillation and luminescence counter (Packard Instrument Co.). To examine how oncogenic transformation by human H-ras affects expression of the glut1 gene, we stably transfected Rat1 cells with an H-ras expression vector. We compared the expression of glut1 mRNA in Rat1 cells relative to Rat1-ras cells. Rat1 cells expressed very low levels of glut1 mRNA but exhibited a 2.8-fold increase in glut1 mRNA levels after 6 h of hypoxia (Fig.1; lanes 1 versus 3). In contrast, Rat1-ras cells exhibited increased levels of glut1 mRNA under normoxic conditions (2.5-fold over Rat1 cells; lanes 2 versus 1) and showed an additional 2-fold induction after 6 h of hypoxia (lanes 4 versus 2). Thus, H-ras overexpression both increases the basal level ofglut1 mRNA and interacts with hypoxia to additively increase the level of this message. Similar results were obtained using a second independent H-ras transformed subclone (data not shown). To investigate whether the increased expression of glut1mRNA by H-ras and hypoxia was due to increased promoter activity, we transfected a rat glut1 promoter-luciferase construct (construct A; "A" in Fig.2) into Rat1-ras and Rat1 cells. 24 h after transfection, half the dishes were subjected to hypoxia (0.2% oxygen) for 6 h and half were maintained in 21% oxygen. Subsequently cells from all the dishes were harvested and assayed for luciferase activity. In Rat1 cells there was a 2.2-fold induction of the glut1 promoter by hypoxia (Fig.3 A). Rat1-ras cells showed a 9-fold higher luciferase activity than Rat1 cells under normoxic conditions and exhibited a further 3.3-fold increase when exposed to hypoxia (Fig. 3 A). To demonstrate that theglut1 promoter activity in Rat1-ras cells was specifically due to the effect of H-Ras, we cotransfected a construct expressing dominant negative RasN17 into these cells, which resulted in a decrease in glut1 promoter activity (Fig. 3 B). Thus, the activity of the glut1 promoter is increased in Rat1-ras cells compared with Rat1 cells, and it can be further increased by hypoxia. To better characterize the elements in the 5′-flanking region of the ratglut1 gene responsive to H-Ras, a series of deletion mutants of the promoter was used in transient transfection experiments in both Rat1 and Rat1-ras cells under normoxia and hypoxia (Fig.4). glut1 promoter activity was weak in the Rat1 parental cells with all of the constructs tested. There was approximately a 2-fold induction of promoter activity by hypoxia with constructs A, C, and K, but only a 1.3-fold induction with construct E, which lacks a potential HIF-1 binding site. Similar to results shown in Fig. 3, in Rat1-ras cells, the basal level of glut1 promoter activity with construct A was 5-fold greater than in Rat1 cells, and hypoxia led to a 3.5-fold induction of activity compared with normoxia in Rat1-ras cells. Construct K gave a higher level of expression in Rat1-ras cells under normoxia or hypoxia that either construct A or C, possibly due to the fact that construct K contains a minimal c-fospromoter instead of the native glut1 TATA box and transcription start site found in constructs A and C. The basal level of expression of construct E was higher in Rat1-ras cells than Rat1 cells; the reason for this is unknown. However, as expected, there was no significant induction of the glut1 promoter activity by hypoxia with construct E in Rat1-ras cells. Theglut1 promoter is known to contain a HIF-1 binding site, which is required for its transactivation by hypoxia through the transcription factor HIF-1 (9Ebert B.L. Firth J.D. Ratcliffe P.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 29083-29089Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (449) Google Scholar). To test whether this site is important for transactivation of the promoter by H-Ras under normoxic conditions we made a pair of reporter constructs, construct N, which contains 184 bp of the promoter, including the HIF-1 binding site, and construct M, which is identical except for a 4-bp mutation, which abolishes the HIF-1 binding site (Fig. 2). As expected, construct N (Fig.5 A) but not construct M (Fig.5 B) was inducible by hypoxia. We performed transient transfections of both constructs into Rat1-ras cells with and without cotransfection of a dominant negative RasN17 expression vector. Fig. 5 C shows that the basal promoter activity using construct M, which has a mutated HIF-1 binding site, was 37% less than that of construct N, which has an intact HIF-1 binding site. In two additional independent experiments we found the promoter activity of construct M to be 27 and 33% less than the activity of construct N (data not shown). Fig. 5 C also shows that promoter activity is inhibited by ∼40% in cells cotransfected with construct N and RasN17, whereas RasN17 had no effect on luciferase expression in cells transfected with construct M. These results support the premise that H-Ras exerts a positive effect on the glut1 promoter transcription through the HIF-1 binding site. Having found that the HIF-1 binding site in theglut1 promoter was important for its regulation by H-Ras, we speculated that H-Ras might increase the level of the HIF-1α protein. We found that Rat1-ras cells contained higher levels of the protein under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions than did Rat1 cells (Fig. 6). This figure also shows that cobalt chloride, which is a hypoxia mimic, leads to higher steady-state levels of HIF-1α in Rat1-ras cells than Rat1 cells. Both the PI3K and MAP kinase pathways have been show to be activated by Ras (7Schlessinger J. Cell. 2000; 103: 211-225Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3557) Google Scholar). Therefore, to define the signal transduction pathways through which expression of Glut1 is regulated by Ras, we transiently transfected cells with glut1promoter/luciferase constructs (either construct A or K), then treated them with either a PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) or an inhibitor of MAP kinase (PD098059) under normoxic or hypoxic conditions before harvesting cells for luciferase assays. PD098059 and LY294002 both down-regulated glut1 promoter activity using construct A in Rat-ras cells under normoxic conditions, and both inhibited the induction of glut1 mRNA by hypoxia (Fig.7). Similar results were obtained using construct K (Fig. 7). Therefore, both PI3K and MAP kinase inhibition have a negative effect on the glut1 promoter. To determine whether they have an effect on glut1 mRNA levels, Rat1-ras cells were treated with either inhibitor under normoxic or hypoxic conditions before harvesting cells for RNA. Under normoxic conditions, treatment with either inhibitor led to a decrease in glut1 mRNA levels (Fig. 8; compare lanes 3 and 4 with lane 2), and treatment with both drugs led to a greater decrease in the level (Fig. 8; comparelane 5 with 2). We also treated Rat1-ras cells with bisindolylmaleimide I, a protein kinase C inhibitor, and found that this had no effect on VEGF mRNA levels (data not shown). We then treated Rat1-ras cells with the inhibitors prior to exposure to hypoxia. Neither drug alone had a detectable effect on glut1 message level (Fig. 8; comparelanes 8 or 9 with lane 7); however, using both drugs together reduced glut1 mRNA levels by ∼30% (Fig. 8; compare lane 10 with lane 7). To determine whether the effect of PD098059 and LY294002 in decreasingglut1 mRNA levels in normoxia might be mediated through HIF-1α, we examined HIF-1α levels in Rat1-ras cells after drug treatment. Fig. 9 shows that treatment with LY294002 led to a decrease in the level of HIF-1α, whereas treatment with PD098059 had no such effect. Two additional independent experiments confirmed this result (data not shown). For decades it has been known that tumors display numerous metabolic changes compared with normal cells. Tumors frequently display increased glycolytic metabolism even under aerobic conditions, an effect named after Warburg who originally described it (10Warburg O. The Metabolism of Tumors. Constable and Co., London1930Google Scholar). To keep up with this increased glycolysis, there must be an increased uptake of the substrate, glucose. Human tumors have been shown to have increased glucose uptake in vivo compared with normal tissues (see Ref. 11Holm E. Hagmuller E. Staedt U. Schlickeiser G. Gunther H.J. Leweling H. Tokus M. Kollmar H.B. Cancer Res. 1995; 55: 1373-1378PubMed Google Scholar and references within). One of the proteins responsible for the uptake of glucose into cells is Glut1, which was the first of a family of glucose transporters to be cloned (12Mueckler M. Caruso C. Baldwin S.A. Panico M. Blench I. Morris H.R. Allard W.J. Lienhard G.E. Lodish H.F. Science. 1985; 229: 941-945Crossref PubMed Scopus (1149) Google Scholar). Glut1 is expressed in most normal tissues and is responsible for basal glucose transport. Numerous factors have been shown to regulate glut1 mRNA expression, including phorbol esters, oncogenes, hypoxia, growth factors, and mitogens (reviewed in Refs. 2Mueckler M. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994; 219: 713-725Crossref PubMed Scopus (958) Google Scholar and 13Merrall N.W. Plevin R. Gould G.W. Cell. Signalling. 1993; 5: 667-675Crossref PubMed Scopus (140) Google Scholar). Over a decade ago it was observed that transformation of rodent fibroblasts by Fujiyama sarcoma virus (4Birnbaum M.J. Haspel H.C. Rosen O.M. Science. 1987; 235: 1495-1498Crossref PubMed Scopus (245) Google Scholar) or by the ras or src oncogenes (3Flier J.S. Mueckler M.M. Usher P. Lodish H.F. Science. 1987; 235: 1492-1495Crossref PubMed Scopus (692) Google Scholar) resulted in a marked increase in glucose uptake, which was accompanied by an increase in Glut1 protein and mRNA expression. In the case of Fujiyama sarcoma virus, it was shown that the increase inglut1 mRNA occurred at the level of transcription (4Birnbaum M.J. Haspel H.C. Rosen O.M. Science. 1987; 235: 1495-1498Crossref PubMed Scopus (245) Google Scholar). Glut1 levels have been found to be increased in a variety of human cancers (14Younes M. Lechago L.V. Somoano J.R. Mosharaf M. Lechago J. Cancer Res. 1996; 56: 1164-1167PubMed Google Scholar, 15Yamamoto T. Seino Y. Fukumoto H. Koh G. Yano H. Inagaki N. Yamada Y. Inoue K. Manabe T. Imura H. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1990; 170: 223-230Crossref PubMed Scopus (447) Google Scholar). One study found that Glut1 expression increased with increasing grade of malignancy in human colon cancers and was associated with a higher proportion of lymph node metastases (14Younes M. Lechago L.V. Somoano J.R. Mosharaf M. Lechago J. Cancer Res. 1996; 56: 1164-1167PubMed Google Scholar). Cells subjected to hypoxia must undergo metabolic adaptations to survive. Hypoxia induces the expression of many genes to allow for this to occur (reviewed in Refs. 16Semenza G.L. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000; 88: 1474-1480Crossref PubMed Scopus (1503) Google Scholar and 17Zhu H. Bunn H.F. Respir. Physiol. 1999; 115: 239-247Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar). Part of this adaptation to hypoxia involves up-regulation of genes that encode the enzymes required for anaerobic glycolysis, thus allowing cells to switch to this form of metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation. Under hypoxic conditions there is also a parallel increase in glucose uptake, which is facilitated by up-regulation of Glut1 expression. Hypoxia is a potent stimulus for glut1 mRNA induction in a variety of tissue types, including endothelial cells (18Loike J.D. Cao L. Brett J. Ogawa S. Silverstein S.C. Stern D. Am. J. Physiol. 1992; 263: C326-C333Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), hepatic cells (19Behrooz A. Ismail-Beigi F. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 5555-5562Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar), various tumor cell lines (9Ebert B.L. Firth J.D. Ratcliffe P.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 29083-29089Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (449) Google Scholar), and alveolar epithelial cells (20Ouiddir A. Planes C. Fernandes I. VanHesse A. Clerici C. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1999; 21: 710-718Crossref PubMed Scopus (93) Google Scholar). The mechanism of glut1 message induction by hypoxia is complicated and is dually controlled by low oxygen concentrationsper se and by inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation (19Behrooz A. Ismail-Beigi F. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 5555-5562Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar). The former can be mimicked by cobalt chloride and the latter by sodium azide. The cobalt-responsive element in the rat glut1promoter has been mapped and is homologous to the mouse Enhancer-1 sequence (9Ebert B.L. Firth J.D. Ratcliffe P.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 29083-29089Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (449) Google Scholar, 19Behrooz A. Ismail-Beigi F. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 5555-5562Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar). Transactivation through this element in the promoter is mediated by HIF-1 (9Ebert B.L. Firth J.D. Ratcliffe P.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 29083-29089Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (449) Google Scholar) a heterodimeric transcription factor that binds to a specific DNA consensus sequence, 5′-RCGTG-3′, found in the promoters of many hypoxia-inducible genes (for review see Ref. 16Semenza G.L. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000; 88: 1474-1480Crossref PubMed Scopus (1503) Google Scholar). The HIF-1 transcription factor consists of two subunits, HIF-1α and HIF-1β, both of which are basic helix-loop-helix proteins. HIF-1β is a component of several transcription factors, and its protein level is not significantly induced by hypoxia. In contrast, HIF-1α protein, which is unique to the HIF-1 complex, is rapidly degraded in oxygenated cells by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (21Huang L.E. Gu J. Schau M. Bunn H.F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; 95: 7987-7992Crossref PubMed Scopus (1855) Google Scholar). HIF-1α protein is specifically induced by hypoxia in a graded response dependent on the oxygen concentration (22Jiang B.H. Semenza G.L. Bauer C. Marti H.H. Am. J. Physiol. 1996; 271: C1172-C1180Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Although the mechanism by which hypoxia increases glut1mRNA expression through HIF-1 is relatively well understood, it is less clear how oncogenes such as Ras increase glut1 mRNA levels. The phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, which activates protein kinase C, is known to increase glut1 mRNA levels (23Hiraki Y. Rosen O.M. Birnbaum M.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 13655-13662Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar); however, Glut1 induction by growth factors and oncogenes such as K-ras occurs via a protein kinase C-independent pathway (23Hiraki Y. Rosen O.M. Birnbaum M.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 13655-13662Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar,24Hiraki Y. McMorrow I.M. Birnbaum M.J. Mol. Endocrinol. 1989; 3: 1470-1476Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar). We were interested in understanding how a specific oncogene, mutant H-ras, led to increased glut1 mRNA levels and in studying its interaction with hypoxia in regulating message expression. For our model system we used Rat1 cells transformed with this oncogene. We found that H-ras transformation increased the basal level of glut1 mRNA under normoxia compared with Rat1 cells, consistent with what others have found using other oncogenes (3Flier J.S. Mueckler M.M. Usher P. Lodish H.F. Science. 1987; 235: 1492-1495Crossref PubMed Scopus (692) Google Scholar, 4Birnbaum M.J. Haspel H.C. Rosen O.M. Science. 1987; 235: 1495-1498Crossref PubMed Scopus (245) Google Scholar). We also found that H-ras interacts additively with hypoxia to increase mRNA expression (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the effect of Ras on glut1 mRNA levels is mediated at the level of the promoter, since the promoter activity is greater in Rat1-ras cells than in Rat1 cells (Fig.3 A). In analyzing the 5′-flanking region of the glut1 gene using deletion constructs in transient transfection experiments, we found that construct K, which contains a HIF-1 binding site, was sufficient to mediate up-regulation of promoter activity by H-ras. However, construct K contains a 480-base pair sequence from the 5′-region of the rat glut1 promoter located between −3.5 and −3.0 kbp relative to the transcription start site. In addition to a HIF-1 binding site (nucleotides +398 to +401; GenBank™ accession numberU82755), this 480-bp stretch contains sites for several other transcription factors, including AP-1 binding sites (at nucleotides +248 to +254 and +320 to +327) and an SRE (at nucleotides +287 to +296), which have been previously implicated in the regulation of this promoter (8Murakami T. Nishiyama T. Shirotani T. Shinohara Y. Kan M. Ishii K. Kanai F. Nakazuru S. Ebina Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 9300-9306Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Therefore, to rigorously test the importance of the HIF-1 binding site, we created reporter constructs M and N, neither of which contain the SRE. These constructs contain 184 bp of theglut1 promoter located from approximately −3.2 to −3.0 kb relative to the transcription start site (from nucleotide +297 to +480; GenBank™ accession number U82755). Constructs M and N are identical except that the former contains a 4-base pair mutation of the HIF-1 binding site. Therefore, as expected, construct N was inducible by hypoxia, but not construct M. Both constructs showed activity in Rat1-ras cells under normoxic conditions, but a key difference is that the activity of construct N, but not construct M, could be down-regulated by mutant RasN17. Therefore, this strongly suggests the HIF-1 binding site is important in regulation by H-Ras. Construct M also exhibited lower basal luciferase activity in Rat1-ras cells than did construct N, between 25 and 40% less. We speculate that the reason that the difference is not greater is because both of these constructs (M and N) are driven by an SV40 minimal promoter rather than the TATA box intrinsic to theglut1 promoter; therefore, there is a high basal level of activity. The 480-bp sequence for the rat glut1 5′-region shows significant homology to the 5′-Enhancer-1 region of the mouseglut1 gene that was cloned by Murakami et al.(8Murakami T. Nishiyama T. Shirotani T. Shinohara Y. Kan M. Ishii K. Kanai F. Nakazuru S. Ebina Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 9300-9306Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). This group found that the mouse glut1 Enhancer-1 was inducible by H-Ras. They showed that the SRE and two AP-1 sites within this enhancer were important in promoter activity, although they did not specifically examine the role that these sites played in regulation by Ras. However, they found that these three elements were insufficient for full basal activity of Enhancer-1. Subsequently, the HIF-1 binding site within the mouse glut1 Enhancer-1 was identified (9Ebert B.L. Firth J.D. Ratcliffe P.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 29083-29089Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (449) Google Scholar). Our data indicate that this HIF-1 binding site is important in the regulation of the rat glut1 promoter by H-Ras. Of note, activation of the mouse glut1 promoter by oxidative stress in L6 myotubes was shown to involve both the SRE and the AP-1 binding sites in Enhancer-1 but was independent of the Ras/MAP kinase pathway (25Kozlovsky N. Rudich A. Potashnik R. Ebina Y. Murakami T. Bashan N. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 33367-33372Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (54) Google Scholar). How does H-Ras regulate activity of the HIF-1 binding site in theglut1 promoter? One mechanism is by increasing the level of HIF-1α protein. Rat1-ras cells contain higher levels of the protein than do Rat1 cells under both hypoxic and normoxic conditions. Although HIF-1α was originally described as a transcription factor, which was undetectable under normoxic conditions and inducible only under hypoxia (26Wang G.L. Jiang B.H. Rue E.A. Semenza G.L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995; 92: 5510-5514Crossref PubMed Scopus (5105) Google Scholar), there is accumulating evidence that it is also important in gene regulation under normoxic conditions.Src-transformed cells have been found to contain higher levels of HIF-1α under normoxic conditions than nontransformed parental cells (27Jiang B.H. Agani F. Passaniti A. Semenza G.L. Cancer Res. 1997; 57: 5328-5335PubMed Google Scholar). HIF-1α has been found to be induced in tumor cell lines by a variety of hormones and growth factors, including epidermal growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin, and angiotensin II (28Richard D.E. Berra E. Pouyssegur J. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 26765-26771Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 29Zhong H. Chiles K. Feldser D. Laughner E. Hanrahan C. Georgescu M.M. Simons J.W. Semenza G.L. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 1541-1545PubMed Google Scholar, 30Zelzer E. Levy Y. Kahana C. Shilo B.Z. Rubinstein M. Cohen B. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 5085-5094Crossref PubMed Scopus (498) Google Scholar, 31Feldser D. Agani F. Iyer N.V. Pak B. Ferreira G. Semenza G.L. Cancer Res. 1999; 59: 3915-3918PubMed Google Scholar). Both inhibitors of the MAP kinase and the PI3K pathways led to decreased glut1 promoter activity and glut1mRNA levels under normoxia. In contrast, neither drug by itself appeared to block the induction of glut1 mRNA by hypoxia, although the two together did have an inhibitory effect. This apparent discrepancy between the effects of these inhibitors onglut1 message under normoxia and hypoxia might be explained by the fact that the induction of glut1 mRNA by hypoxia involves mRNA stabilization in addition to transactivation of the promoter (19Behrooz A. Ismail-Beigi F. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 5555-5562Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar). Therefore, in transfection experiments using promoter constructs, we are specifically examining transcriptional regulation, whereas in the Northern blots, the results are complicated by the fact that RNA stabilization, which may be independent of PI3K and MAP kinase, also plays a role. Even though we found that both MAP kinase and PI3K inhibitors decreasedglut1 mRNA promoter activity, only the latter led to a detectable decrease in HIF-1α protein levels. A possible role for the PI3K pathway in regulating HIF-1α protein levels has been suggested in the context of PTEN expression in glioblastoma cells (32Zundel W. Schindler C. Haas-Kogan D. Koong A. Kaper F. Chen E. Gottschalk A.R. Ryan H.E. Johnson R.S. Jefferson A.B. Stokoe D. Giaccia A.J. Genes Dev. 2000; 14: 391-396Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) and epidermal growth factor stimulation in prostate carcinoma cells (29Zhong H. Chiles K. Feldser D. Laughner E. Hanrahan C. Georgescu M.M. Simons J.W. Semenza G.L. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 1541-1545PubMed Google Scholar). In regard to MAP kinase, both p42 and p44 MAP kinase have been shown to phosphorylate HIF-1α in vitro and to stimulate HIF-1α transcription activity without affecting the level of the protein (33Richard D.E. Berra E. Gothie E. Roux D. Pouyssegur J. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 32631-32637Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (719) Google Scholar). Therefore, it is conceivable that the drug PD098059 might decreaseglut1 mRNA levels and promoter activity through an effect on HIF-1α function without affecting the level of the protein itself. Our results suggest a link between H-ras transformation, HIF-1α up-regulation, and glut1 mRNA transactivation. In the future we plan to pursue this path of investigation to understand how H-Ras leads to HIF-1α up-regulation. Although we have examined the expression of a specific gene, glut1, as a downstream target of H-Ras, it is likely that the up-regulation of other hypoxia-inducible genes such as VEGF occurs by a similar mechanism. A number of groups have shown that mutant Ras leads to increased VEGF levels in diverse cell types (34Grugel S. Finkenzeller G. Weindel K. Barleon B. Marme D. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 25915-25919Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (312) Google Scholar, 35Mazure N.M. Chen E.Y. Yeh P. Laderoute K.R. Giaccia A.J. Cancer Res. 1996; 56: 3436-3440PubMed Google Scholar, 36Rak J. Mitsuhashi Y. Bayko L. Filmus J. Shirasawa S. Sasazuki T. Kerbel R.S. Cancer Res. 1995; 55: 4575-4580PubMed Google Scholar). In NIH3T3 cells, activated H-Ras has been postulated to increase VEGF reporter expression only when an intact HIF-1 binding site is present (37Mazure N.M. Chen E.Y. Laderoute K.R. Giaccia A.J. Blood. 1997; 90: 3322-3331Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Thus, mutations in H-ras can not only lead to transformation but may also help cells survive in a hypoxic environment by increasing the expression of specific genes through up-regulation of HIF-1α. We are grateful to Don Solomon for technical assistance and Dr. Xiaoling Su for her help with data analysis. We thank Eric Bernhard, Frank Lee, and Ruth Muschel for reading the manuscript and offering helpful comments. We are grateful to Amita Sehgal for use of the TopCount Microplate scintillation and luminescence counter.