Institutional Barriers to Risk Communication
1989; Wiley; Volume: 9; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb00995.x
ISSN1539-6924
Autores Tópico(s)Evaluation and Performance Assessment
ResumoRisk AnalysisVolume 9, Issue 3 p. 301-308 Institutional Barriers to Risk Communication Susan G. Hadden, Susan G. Hadden LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78713.Search for more papers by this author Susan G. Hadden, Susan G. Hadden LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78713.Search for more papers by this author First published: September 1989 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb00995.xCitations: 18AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1 R. L. Keeney and D. von Winterfeldt, “Improving Risk Communication,” Risk Analysis 6, 417–424 (1986). 2 B. Hance, C. Chess, and P. Sandman, Improving Dialog with Communities: A Short Guide for Government Risk Communication (Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton , New Jersey , 1988). 3 Seven Rules for Risk Communication,” in V. T. Covello, P. M. Sandman, and P. Slovic (eds.), Risk Communication, Risk Statistics, and Risk Comparisons: A Manual for Plant Managers (Chemical Manufacturers Association, Washington , D.C. , 1988). 4 S. Rayner and R. Cantor, “How Fair is Safe Enough Risk Analysis 7, 3–9, (1987). 5 R. E. Kasperson, “Six Propositions on Public Participation and Their Relevance for Risk Communication,” Risk Analysis 6, 275–281 (1986). 6 S. G. Hadden, Read the Label: Reducing Risk by Providing Information (Westview Press, Boulder , Colorado , 1986). 7 S. G. Hadden, “ Community Right to Know: Results of Four Surveys,” ( Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, Working Paper 44, Austin, Texas: LBJ School, July 1988). 8 S. G. Hadden, A Citizen's Right to Know: Risk Communication and Public Policy (Westview Press, Boulder , Colorado , 1989). 9 J. Fessenden-Raden, J. M. Fitchen, and J. S. Heath, “Providing Risk Information in Communities: Factors Influencing What Is Heard and Accepted,” Science, Technology, and Human Values 12 94–101 (1987). 10 51 Fed. Reg. 41570ff (November 17, 1986), especially pp. 41575, 41580. 11 Statement by Barry Lampke, OMB Watch, at public meeting in Austin, Texas, July 20, 1988. 12 P. W. Bradshaw et al., “Recall of Medical Advice: Comprehensibility and Specificity,” British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 14 55, (1975). 13 D. E. Kanouse and B. Hayes-Roth, “ Cognitive Considerations in the Design of Product Warnings,” in L. A. Morris, M. B. Mazis, and I. Barofsky (eds.), Product Labeling and Health Risks (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor , N.Y. (1980), p. 149. 14 P. Huber, “Injury Litigation and Liability Insurance Dynamics,” Science 238, 33 (1987). 15 S. G. Hadden, “Providing Citizens with Information about Health Effects of Hazardous Chemicals,” Journal of Occupational Medicine, 31, 528–534, (1989). 16 National Governors' Association, The Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act: A State of State Actions ( Washington , D.C. : NGA, April 1988). Citing Literature Volume9, Issue3September 1989Pages 301-308 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)