Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

A new method for detecting the fake good response set on the MMPI

1968; Wiley; Volume: 24; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/1097-4679(196804)24

1097-4679

Beth Wales, William Seeman,

Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Journal of Clinical PsychologyVolume 24, Issue 2 p. 211-216 Studies of Personality Inventories A new method for detecting the fake good response set on the MMPI Beth Wales, Beth Wales University of CincinnatiSearch for more papers by this authorWilliam Seeman, William Seeman University of CincinnatiSearch for more papers by this author Beth Wales, Beth Wales University of CincinnatiSearch for more papers by this authorWilliam Seeman, William Seeman University of CincinnatiSearch for more papers by this author First published: April 1968 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(196804)24:2 3.0.CO;2-UCitations: 19AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 Buechley, R. and Ball, H. A new test of “validity” for the group MMPI. J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 299–301. 10.1037/h0053897 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 2 Cofer, C. N., Chance, J. and Judson, A. J. A study of malingering on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. J. Psychol., 1949, 27, 491–499. 10.1080/00223980.1949.9917439 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 Dahlstrom W. D. and Welsh, G. S. An MMPI Handbook. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1960. Google Scholar 4 Drasgow, J. and Barnette, W. L. F-K in a motivated group. J. consult. Psychol., 1957, 21, 399–401. 10.1037/h0047771 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 Grayson H. M. and Olinger, L. B. Simulation of “normalcy” by psychiatric patients on the MMPI. J. consult. Psychol., 1957, 3, 73–77. 10.1037/h0048300 Web of Science®Google Scholar 6 Gough, H. G. The F minus K dissimulation index for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. J. consult. Psychol., 1950, 14, 408–413. 10.1037/h0054506 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 7 Hartshorne, H. and May, M. A. Studies in Deceit. New York: Macmillan, 1928. Google Scholar 8 Hays, W. L. Statistics for Psychologists. New York; Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963. Google Scholar 9 Hunt, H. F. The effect of deliberate deception on Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory performance, J. consult. Psychol., 1948, 12, 396–402. 10.1037/h0055712 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Maclean, A. G., Tait A. T. and Campbell, C. D. The F minus K index on the MMPI. J. appl. Psychol., 1953, 37, 315–316. 10.1037/h0060135 Web of Science®Google Scholar 11 Seeman, W. “Subtlety” in structured personality tests, J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 278–283. 10.1037/h0059494 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 12 Seeman, W. Concept of “subtlety” in structured psychiatric and personality tests: An experimental approach. J. abn. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 239–247. 10.1037/h0056988 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13 Wiener, D. N. Subtle and Obvious keys for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. J. consult. Psychol., 1948, 12, 164–170. 10.1037/h0055594 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 Wiener, D. N. Selecting salesmen with subtle-obvious keys for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Amer. Psychologist, 1948, 364. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume24, Issue2April 1968Pages 211-216 ReferencesRelatedInformation