Medullary pathways regulating sympathetic outflow: the need for more lateral thinking
2004; American Physiological Society; Volume: 286; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1152/ajpregu.00696.2003
ISSN1522-1490
Autores Tópico(s)Sleep and Wakefulness Research
ResumoEDITORIAL FOCUSMedullary pathways regulating sympathetic outflow: the need for more lateral thinkingRoger DampneyRoger DampneyDepartment of Physiology and Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, AustraliaPublished Online:01 Mar 2004https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00696.2003MoreSectionsPDF (57 KB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInWeChat studies carried out more than 50 years ago demonstrated that electrical stimulation of sites within a large part of the dorsolateral reticular formation in the medulla oblongata can produce large increases in arterial pressure (1, 21). These early studies led to the view that neurons controlling the sympathetic outflow to the heart and blood vessels are distributed diffusely throughout this pontomedullary area. In the 1980s, however, attention shifted to the role of the ventrolateral medulla in cardiovascular regulation, when a series of functional and anatomical studies carried out by several laboratories led to the discovery that a discrete group of spinally projecting neurons within the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) is of crucial importance in the tonic and phasic control of sympathetic vasomotor activity and arterial pressure (for reviews, see Refs. 6, 8, 11). Around the same time, it was also discovered that there are neurons within the caudal ventrolateral medulla (CVLM) that, when excited, produce depressor and sympathoinhibitory effects (5, 6). Furthermore, experiments in the rat and rabbit demonstrated that some CVLM neurons are a critical component in the central baroreceptor reflex pathway by relaying baroreceptor inhibitory inputs to RVLM sympathetic premotor neurons (6, 8, 11).The fact that profound pressor effects can be produced by electrical stimulation of sites within a large part of the dorsolateral medulla is believed to reflect the fact that, at least to a large extent, these responses arise from excitation of axons of passage rather than neuronal cell bodies. Nevertheless, electrophysiological studies carried out by Drs. Barman and Gebber and their coworkers during the 1980s demonstrated that there are neurons within the dorsolateral reticular formation that have firing patterns indicative of neurons that regulate the sympathetic outflow to the heart and blood vessels. This group focused their attention on the medullary lateral tegmental field (LTF), which lies within the dorsolateral reticular formation and includes portions of the nucleus reticularis parvocellularis and nucleus reticularis ventralis (19). In these early studies, Drs. Barman and Gebber (9) demonstrated that many LTF neurons with sympathetic-related activity responded to baroreceptor inputs, either by a decrease in their firing rate or an increase. LTF neurons inhibited by baroreceptor inputs (putative sympathoexcitatory neurons) and those excited by baroreceptor inputs (putative sympathoinhbitory neurons) project to the regions containing sympathetic premotor neurons in the RVLM and midline raphe, respectively (2-4).A more recent study from the same group demonstrated that blockade of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in the LTF abolished baroreceptor reflex control of sympathetic activity (19), indicating for the first time that LTF neurons do not merely receive inputs from baroreceptors, but are an essential link in the central pathways mediating the baroreceptor-sympathetic reflex. This was an important observation, because until that time the generally accepted model of the medullary baroreceptor reflex pathway did not include LTF neurons as a critical component (6, 8, 11). The study by Orer et al. (19) also made a further observation: blockade of non-NMDA receptors in the LTF reduced the basal level of sympathetic discharge, but without affecting baroreflex control of sympathetic discharge. Thus this group has proposed that LTF sympathoexcitatory neurons play an important role in both the tonic and baroreflex control of the sympathetic vasomotor outflow, via activation of non-NMDA and NMDA receptors, respectively.The latest study by this group (20) in this issue of American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology shows that non-NMDA receptors in the LTF are also an important component of the central pathways subserving reflex sympathoexcitatory responses to some, but not all, stimuli. In particular, they found that blockade of non-NMDA receptors in the LTF significantly attenuated the reflex increase in cardiac and vertebral sympathetic nerve activity evoked by electrical stimulation of vagal afferents or by activation of arterial chemoreceptors. On the other hand, the reflex sympathoexcitation evoked by electrical stimulation of trigeminal or sciatic nerve afferents or of sites in the posterior hypothalamus or midbrain periaqueductal gray were not attenuated. As the authors point out, vagal and chemoreceptor afferent fibers (like baroreceptor afferent fibers) terminate in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), whereas trigeminal and sciatic afferents do not, suggesting the possibility that, at least in the cat, the LTF may be a critical component in all sympathetic reflex pathways in which the primary afferents terminate in the NTS.How do these observations fit in with the currently accepted functional organization of cardiovascular reflex pathways in the medulla, which are based largely on experiments in the rat and rabbit? To take the example of the chemoreceptor-sympathetic reflex, an electrophysiological study in the rat by Koshiya and Guyenet (14) showed that about one-third of NTS neurons that were antidromically activated from the RVLM could be activated by chemoreceptor stimulation. Consistent with this, Hirooka et al. (12) showed that hypoxia in the conscious rabbit induced c-fos expression (indicative of neuronal activation) in a similar proportion of NTS neurons that were retrogradely labeled from the RVLM. These studies in the rat and rabbit thus support the hypothesis that chemosensitive neurons in the NTS convey excitatory inputs to RVLM sympathoexcitatory neurons via a direct pathway, rather than an indirect pathway including the LTF, as suggested by Orer and coworkers.These observations in the rat and rabbit would be compatible with the findings reported by Orer et al. (20) in the cat if there are separate parallel pathways by which chemoreceptor signals are conveyed from the NTS to the RVLM, one of which includes a synapse on LTF neurons (see Fig. 1). Similarly, the medullary pathways conveying excitatory inputs from vagal afferents to the RVLM via the NTS could also consist of both direct and indirect parallel components. Such an organization is consistent with the previous observation that the chemoreceptor-sympathetic reflex is abolished by blockade of glutamate receptors in the RVLM (15). Fig. 1.Simplified schematic diagram illustrating postulated medullary pathways subserving the chemoreceptor reflex control of the sympathetic outflow, showing both direct and indirect [via neurons in the medullary lateral tegmental field (LTF)] pathways from the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) to the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM). There is evidence that there are also supramedullary pathways subserving this reflex (15) that are not shown here. IML, intermediolateral cell column.Download figureDownload PowerPoint As already mentioned, a previous study from the laboratory of Barman and Gebber and coworkers (19) demonstrated that blockade of NMDA receptors in the LTF abolishes baroreceptor reflex inhibition of sympathetic activity. Previously, however, it was shown in both the rat (7, 10) and rabbit (17) that the baroreceptor-sympathetic reflex is also abolished or greatly reduced by inhibition of neurons in a restricted region within the CVLM. This raises an important question: assuming that the functional organization of the medullary pathways subserving the baroreceptor reflex in the cat is not fundamentally different from that in the rat or rabbit, how can these different observations be reconciled? One possibility that should be considered is that the LTF neurons in the cat that relay baroreceptor signals to RVLM sympathetic premotor neurons are homologous to the baroreceptor inhibitory interneurons that have been identified within the CVLM in the rat and rabbit. This would imply that they are displaced by a considerable distance with respect to the CVLM. Nevertheless, this is conceivable, because the LTF is immediately adjacent to the rostral part of the CVLM (19). Furthermore, in both the LTF of the cat and the CVLM of the rat the baroreceptor reflex is mediated by NMDA receptors (10, 19). It is also important to note that Orer et al. (19) also showed that blockade of NMDA receptors within the rostral and/or caudal CVLM of the cat did not prevent baroreflex sympathoinhibition, although this was abolished by blockade of NMDA receptors within the LTF.As Orer et al. (19) pointed out, the role of the CVLM in mediating the baroreceptor reflex in the cat needs to be evaluated more fully. Perhaps, however, the relationship between the LTF and CVLM needs to be considered in a broader context. Just as Barman and Gebber and coworkers showed with respect to the LTF in the cat, it has become clear from studies in the rat and rabbit (13, 18) that the CVLM contains functionally different groups of cardiovascular neurons, including both sympathoexcitatory and sympathoinhibitory neurons. Furthermore, some sympathoinhibitory neurons in the CVLM relay baroreceptor signals to the RVLM, whereas others do not (7). In addition, there is evidence that the CVLM is a source of excitatory as well as inhibitory inputs to RVLM sympathetic premotor neurons (18). If there is some homology between the LTF in the cat and the CVLM in the rat, it might be predicted that blockade of non-NMDA receptors in the CVLM of the rat would lead to a reduction of the reflex sympathoexcitation evoked by activation of vagal afferents or peripheral chemoreceptors, as Orer et al. (20) described in the case of non-NMDA receptors in the LTF of the cat.The suggestion that there may be some homology between the LTF in the cat and the CVLM in other species is of course highly speculative, but nevertheless may be worth testing. In addition, the alternative hypothesis that the CVLM and LTF are functionally distinct regions should also be tested. It has been shown recently that the LTF in the rat does contain neurons that have a pressor function (16), and it would be interesting to test, for example, whether blockade of non-NMDA receptors in this region in the rat has similar effects to that described by Orer et al. (20) in their study in the cat.In any case, the excellent study by Orer et al. (20), together with previous studies from their laboratory on the role of the medullary LTF in the reflex regulation of sympathetic activity certainly suggests that the medullary pathways subserving these reflexes are more complex than the essential circuitry proposed in earlier reviews. This is not to say that these earlier representations of the reflex pathways are incorrect; instead, it is more likely that they are crucial components of a more elaborate functional organization that has so far been only partly elucidated.I thank Dr. Robin McAllen for helpful discussions concerning some of the issues raised in this commentary. References 1 Alexander RS. Tonic and reflex functions of medullary cardiovascular centers. J Neurophysiol 9: 205-217, 1946.Link | ISI | Google Scholar2 Barman SM and Gebber GL. Lateral tegmental field neurons of cat medulla: a source of basal activity of ventrolateral medullospinal sympathoexcitatory neurons. J Neurophysiol 57: 1410-1424, 1987.Link | ISI | Google Scholar3 Barman SM and Gebber GL. Lateral tegmental field neurons of cat medulla: a source of basal activity of raphespinal sympathoinhibitory neurons. J Neurophysiol 61: 1011-1024, 1989.Link | ISI | Google Scholar4 Barman SM, Orer HS, and Gebber GL. The role of the medullary lateral tegmental field in the generation and baroreceptor reflex control of sympathetic nerve discharge in the cat. Ann NY Acad Sci 940: 270-285, 2001.PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar5 Blessing WW and Li YW. Inhibitory vasomotor neurons in the caudal ventrolateral region of the medulla oblongata. Prog Brain Res 81: 83-97, 1989.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar6 Blessing WW. The Lower Brainstem and Bodily Homeostasis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar7 Cravo SL, Morrison SF, and Reis DJ. Differentiation of two cardiovascular regions within caudal ventrolateral medulla. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 261: R985-R994, 1991.Link | ISI | Google Scholar8 Dampney RAL. Functional organization of central pathways regulating the cardiovascular system. Physiol Rev 74: 323-364, 1994.Link | ISI | Google Scholar9 Gebber GL and Barman SM. Lateral tegmental field neurons of cat medulla: a potential source of basal sympathetic nerve discharge. J Neurophysiol 54: 1498-1512, 1985.Link | ISI | Google Scholar10 Gordon FJ. Aortic baroreceptor reflexes are mediated by NMDA receptors in caudal ventrolateral medulla. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 252: R628-R633, 1987.Link | ISI | Google Scholar11 Guyenet PG. Role of the ventral medulla oblongata in blood pressure regulation. In: Central Regulation of Autonomic Functions, edited by Loewy AD and Spyer KM. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, p. 145-167.Google Scholar12 Hirooka Y, Polson JW, Potts PD, and Dampney RAL. Hypoxia-induced Fos expression in neurons projecting to the pressor region in the rostral ventrolateral medulla. Neuroscience 80: 1209-1224, 1997.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar13 Horiuchi J and Dampney RAL. Evidence for tonic disinhibition of RVLM sympathoexcitatory neurons from the caudal pressor area. Auton Neurosci 99: 102-110, 2002.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar14 Koshiya N and Guyenet PG. NTS neurons with carotid chemoreceptor inputs arborize in the rostral ventrolateral medulla. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 270: R1273-R1278, 1996.Link | ISI | Google Scholar15 Koshiya N, Huangfu DH, and Guyenet PG. Ventrolateral medulla and sympathetic chemoreflex in the rat. Brain Res 609: 174-184, 1993.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar16 Marchenko V and Sapru HN. Cardiovascular responses to chemical stimulation of the lateral tegmental field and adjacent medullary reticular formation in the rat. Brain Res 977: 247-260, 2003.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar17 Masuda N, Terui N, Koshiya N, and Kumada M. Neurons in the caudal ventrolateral medulla mediate the arterial baroreceptor reflex by inhibiting barosensitive reticulospinal neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla in rabbits. J Auton Nerv Syst 34: 103-117, 1991.Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar18 Natarajan M and Morrison SF. Sympathoexcitatory CVLM neurons mediate responses to caudal pressor area stimulation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 279: R364-R374, 2000.Link | ISI | Google Scholar19 Orer HS, Barman SM, Gebber GL, and Sykes SM. Medullary lateral tegmental field: an important synaptic relay in the baroreceptor reflex pathway of the cat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 277: R1462-R1475, 1999.Link | ISI | Google Scholar20 Orer HS, Gebber GL, Phillips SW, and Barman SM. Role of the medullary lateral tegmental field in reflex-mediated sympathoexcitation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 286: R451-R464, 2004.Link | ISI | Google Scholar21 Wang SC and Ranson SW. Autonomic responses to electrical stimulation of the lower brain stem. J Comp Neurol 71: 437-455, 1939.Crossref | Google ScholarAUTHOR NOTES Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. A. L. Dampney, Dept. of Physiology, F13, The Univ. of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia (E-mail: [email protected]). Download PDF Previous Back to Top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedInformationCited ByThe time-course of thermoregulatory responses during treadmill running is associated with running duration-dependent hypothalamic neuronal activation in rats9 August 2019 | Brain Structure and Function, Vol. 224, No. 8Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Syncope9 September 2016Role of sympathetic nerve activity in the process of fainting15 September 2014 | Frontiers in Physiology, Vol. 5The ventral hippocampus NMDA receptor/nitric oxide/guanylate cyclase pathway modulates cardiovascular responses in ratsAutonomic Neuroscience, Vol. 177, No. 2Neuroimmune communication in hypertension and obesity: A new therapeutic angle?Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Vol. 138, No. 3Brain angiotensin peptides regulate sympathetic tone and blood pressureJournal of Hypertension, Vol. 28, No. 8Physical (in)activity-dependent alterations at the rostral ventrolateral medulla: influence on sympathetic nervous system regulationPatrick J. Mueller1 June 2010 | American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol. 298, No. 6Facial cooling and peripheral chemoreflex mechanisms in humansActa Physiologica, Vol. 194, No. 2Physiological basis for a causal relationship of obstructive sleep apnoea to hypertension12 January 2007 | Experimental Physiology, Vol. 92, No. 1COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFECTS ON HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES OF CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL INFUSIONS OF HYPERTONIC NACL DURING HEMORRHAGE IN CONSCIOUS AND ISOFLURANCE-ANESTHETIZED SHEEPShock, Vol. 26, No. 1Intricacies of brain angiotensin II signalling pathwaysJournal of Hypertension, Vol. 24, No. 1 More from this issue > Volume 286Issue 3March 2004Pages R446-R448 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2004 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00696.2003PubMed14761866History Published online 1 March 2004 Published in print 1 March 2004 Metrics
Referência(s)