Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Minimally Invasive Fixation versus Conservative Treatment of Undisplaced Scaphoid Fractures: A Cost-Effectiveness Study

2004; SAGE Publishing; Volume: 29; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.10.009

1532-2211

Michaël Papaloïzos, Cesare Fusetti, Thomas Christen, Lisa M. Nagy, JB Wasserfallen,

Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues

This study compares the direct and indirect costs of conservative and minimally invasive treatment for undisplaced scaphoid fractures. Costs data concerning groups of non-operated and operated patients were analysed. Direct costs were higher in operated patients. Although highly variable, indirect costs were significantly smaller in operated patients and the total costs were higher in nonoperated patients. In conclusion, operative treatment of scaphoid fractures is initially more expensive than conservative treatment but markedly decreases the work compensation costs.