Increased Yield of PCR Product from Degenerate Primers with Nondegenerate, Nonhomologous 5′ Tails
2005; Future Science Ltd; Volume: 38; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2144/05381bm02
ISSN1940-9818
Autores Tópico(s)Polar Research and Ecology
ResumoBioTechniquesVol. 38, No. 1 BenchmarksOpen AccessIncreased yield of PCR product from degenerate primers with nondegenerate, nonhomologous 5′ tailsJerome C. Regier & Diane ShiJerome C. Regier*Address correspondence to: Jerome Regier, Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 5140 Plant Sciences Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA. e-mail: E-mail Address: regier@umd.eduUniversity of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, College Park, MD, USA & Diane ShiUniversity of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, College Park, MD, USAPublished Online:30 May 2018https://doi.org/10.2144/05381BM02AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail PCR amplification of homologous genes using degenerate primers followed by direct sequencing is a standard approach to generate a data set for evolutionary analysis. In our laboratory, we are systematically designing and testing primers that can amplify by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) a wide array of messenger RNA (mRNA) sequences across extant Panarthropoda, a diverse and ancient assemblage of taxa (i.e., tardigrades, onychophorans, crustaceans, hexapods, myriapods, and chelicerates) whose phylogenetic relationships are of interest (1). Primers (17–24 nucleotides in length) are made to protein coding-invariant regions of Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST)-aligned orthologs from human, fly, and roundworm with complete degeneracy added (typically≤256-fold) wherever synonymous changes might occur (Regier, Cunningham, Ganley, Shi, and Ball, unpublished data). Since before 1995 (2), we have used bipartite PCR primers that include a 5′ tail of nondegenerate, nonhomologous M13REV or M13(-21) sequence to facilitate direct sequencing of PCR products. In this report, we demonstrate that M13 or other nonhomologous sequences attached to the 5′ ends of degenerate primers can also greatly improve the yield of PCR amplification. This finding expands on that of Rose et al. (3,4), who used bipartite primers with degenerate 3′ ends (approximately 12 nucleotides in length) and nondegenerate but homologous 5′ ends (approximately 20 nucleotides in length) to amplify homologous sequences.Total nucleic acids were extracted using the SV Total RNA Isolation kit, with the DNase step omitted (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and used as template for reverse transcription. Ten microliters reverse transcription reactions occurred at 42°C for 35 min and included 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 2 mM of each dNTP (optimal dNTP concentration varies with batch), 1 U/µL RNase inhibitor (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 2.5 U/µL murine leukemia virus (MuLV) RTase (Applied Biosystems), and 4.0 pmol/µL gene-specific reverse primer or 2.5 pmol/µL dT12–18. Fifty-microliter PCRs occurred in the same tube and included final concentrations of 2.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 0.4 mM of each dNTP, 0.025 U/µL AmpliTaq® DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems), 0.035 µM Taq antibody (BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA), 1.0 pmol/µL forward primer, and 0.4 pmol/µL gene-specific reverse primer (in addition to that already present) or 1.0 pmol/µL gene-specific reverse primer if dT12–18 had been used for reverse transcription. In one set of experiments, the gene-specific primer concentrations were increased 3.9-fold. Gene-specific primers were made both with and without 5′ tails (Table 1 and Table 2).Table 1. Gene-Specific Primers and Sequences (Without 5′ Tails)Table 2. Nondegenerate 5′ Tails and SequencesPTC-200™ thermal cycler (MJ Research, Waltham, MA, USA) conditions for PCR were set for Touchdown (5) with the annealing temperature set to decrease uniformly from 55° to 45°C over 25 cycles, followed by 13 more cyles at 45°C. To visualize the PCR products, equal volume aliquots of the RT-PCRs were fractionated by electrophoresis on a 1.4% agarose gel containing 0.5 µg/mL ethidium bromide and 1× TAE buffer (0.04 M Tris-acetate, 0.001 M EDTA, approximate pH 8.3). Semiquantification was performed by comparing band intensities over a range of photographic exposures.Figure 1 is illustrative of our results. Addition of M13REV/M13(-21) 5′ tails onto degenerate primers can increase the product yield well over 10-fold, making otherwise invisible bands visible [c.f., +M tails and -tails for 63fin2F_3R (Figure 1, upper panel), 44fin2F_3R (Figure 1, lower panel), and 226fin1F_4R (Figure 1, lower panel)]. This effect is not specific to M13 sequences, as their substitution with T3/T7 tails yields similar results [c.f., +M tails and +T tails for 63fin2F_3R (Figure 1, upper panel)]. Part of the 5′ tail effect can be accounted for by the increased length of primers [a correlate of increased melting temperature (Tm)], as evidenced by the approximately 2-fold greater PCR product yield using nondegenerate and perfectly matched gene-specific primers with 5′ tails than without [c.f., +M tails and -tails for 44Lpofin2F_5R (Figure 1, lower panel)]. However, a comparable comparison of degenerate primers that bind to the exact same region displays a greater than 10-fold difference [c.f., +M tails and -tails for 44fin4F_5R (Figure 1, lower panel)]. A reasonable, though as yet untested, hypothesis for this additional effect is that 5′ tails enhance amplification through incorporation of degenerate primers of greater mismatch than in the absence of 5′ tails; that is, following the initial PCR cycle, the nondegenerate 5′ tails increase the overall Tm of the bipartite primer in subsequent cycles and thereby allow a more diverse array of mismatched gene-specific primers to amplify.Figure 1. Quantification of reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) products by agarose gel electrophoresis using primers with and without nondegenerate, nonhomologous 5′tails.RNA from six diverse panarthropod taxa (L, N, H, P, Q, T) plus a "minus template" negative control (0) were reverse-transcribed and then amplified by PCR. Sets of reactions are demarcated by horizontal lines above the three panels. The upper horizontal line in each panel identifies the gene-specific primer pair tested. Primer pairs were either degenerate (63fin2F_3R, 44fin2F_3R, 226fin1F_4R, 44fin4F_5R) or nondegenerate (44Lpofin4F_5R) in their 3′ regions. 44Lpofin4F_5R primers were designed to be a perfect match with the corresponding cDNA sequence from Limulus polyphemus (L). The lower horizontal line in each panel identifies whether 5′ tails were present and their type [+M tails = M13REV and M13(-21), +T tails = T3 and T7], whether 5′ tails were absent (-tails), whether the primer concentration was increased 3.9-fold above normal [±M tails (3.9×)], and whether dT12–18 was used to prime the reverse transcription reaction followed by gene-specific primers with or without tails for PCR (dT/±tails). As a further negative control, RT-PCRs were primed with 5′ tail sequences only, but no products of the expected size were observed (unpublished observations). L, Limulus polyphemus (Chelicerata); N, Narceus americanus (Myriapoda); H, Nebalia hessleri (Crustacea); P, Podura aquatica (Hexapoda: Collembola); Q, Prodoxus quinquepunctella (Hexapoda: Lepidoptera); T, Thulina stephaniae (Tardigrada); 0, negative control; m, length standard (300–1000 bp, every 100 bp).Increasing the overall primer concentration (with or without 5′ tails) might be another means of increasing PCR product yield. Indeed, a 3.9-fold increase in primer concentration does result in an approximate 2-fold increase in product yield when using primers with 5′ tails [c.f., +M tails and +M tails (3.9×) (Figure 1, middle panel)], although any increase with primers lacking 5′ tails remains below the limit of detection [c.f., -tails and -tails (3.9×) (Figure 1, middle panel)]. This illustrates that adding 5′ tails is likely to be a more effective means of increasing product yield than simply increasing primer concentration. Finally, the 5′ tail effect is likely to be specific to the PCR, since the use of dT12–18 as a primer in the reverse transcription reaction (rather than the usual gene-specific degenerate primer) does not dampen the differential amplification during the subsequent PCR phase [c.f., dT/+M tails and dT/-tails (Figure 1, middle panel)].Although this report illustrates the 5′ tail effect with four degenerate primer pairs, we have performed equivalent direct comparisons between ± 5′ tails for 49 primer pairs total, representing 25 genes. Thirty-seven of the 49 primer pairs with 5′ tails amplified appropriately sized visible bands for a larger fraction of the six test taxa (see Figure 1 legend) than the same primers without 5′ tails. For 11 primer pairs, the same number of taxa were amplified. Only one primer pair amplified more taxa without 5′ tails. Averaged across all taxa, primers with 5′ tails amplified 50% more specific bands than the same primers without tails. Furthermore, in most cases, the intensity and purity of the PCR products were greater with 5′ tails than without. We conclude that the addition of nondegenerate, nonhomologous 5′ tails to degenerate gene-specific primers is a useful tool for improving the yield of PCR products and has the added benefit of allowing for convenient direct sequencing.AcknowledgmentsWe thank Austen Ganley and Cliff Cunningham for performing the gene alignments used in defining primers, Jeffrey Shultz and Diane Nelson for specimens, and David O'Brochta and Vikram Vakharia for helpful comments. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (award no. DEB-0120635).Competing Interests StatementThe authors declare no competing interests.References1. Regier, J.C. and J.W. Shultz. 2001. Elongation factor-2: a useful gene for arthropod phylogenetics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20:136–148.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar2. Cho, S., A. Mitchell, J.C. Regier, C. Mitter, R.W. Poole, T.P. Friedlander, and S. Zhao. 1995. A highly conserved nuclear gene for low-level phylogenetics: elongation factor-1( recovers morphology-based tree for heliothine moths. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:650–656.Medline, CAS, Google Scholar3. Rose, T.M., E.R. Schultz, J.G. Henikoff, S. Peitrokovski, C.M. McCallum, and S. Henikoff. 1998. Consensus-degenerate hybrid oligonucleotide primers for amplification of distantly related sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:1628–1635.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar4. Rose, T.M., J.G. Henikoff, and S. Henikoff. 2003. CODEHOP (COnsensus-DEgenerate Hybrid Oliognucleotide Primer) PCR primer design. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:3763–3766.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar5. Don, R.H., P.T. Cox, B.J. Wainwright, K. Baker, and J.S. Mattick. 1991. 'Touchdown' PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene ampification? Nucleic Acids Res. 19:4008.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByPhylogeny of true ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae: Coccinellini) reveals pervasive convergent evolution and a rapid Cenozoic radiation4 April 2021 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 46, No. 3Tools for monitoring and study of peregrine pheretimoid earthworms (Megascolecidae)Pedobiologia, Vol. 83Longitudinal Analysis of the Human B Cell Response to Ebola Virus InfectionCell, Vol. 177, No. 6A biting commentary: Integrating tooth characters with molecular data doubles known species diversity in a lineage of sea slugs that consume "killer algae"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 126Molecular phylogeny reveals food plasticity in the evolution of true ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Coccinellini)26 June 2017 | BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 17, No. 1Phylotranscriptomics resolves ancient divergences in the Lepidoptera23 November 2016 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 42, No. 2Further progress on the phylogeny of N octuoidea ( I nsecta: L epidoptera) using an expanded gene sample7 September 2016 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 42, No. 1Phylogeographic analysis of invasive Asian earthworms ( Amynthas ) in the northeast United States13 October 2016 | Invertebrate Biology, Vol. 135, No. 4A Tale of Tails: Dissecting the Enhancing Effect of Tailed Primers in Real-Time PCR10 October 2016 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, No. 10Phylogeny of the subfamily Larentiinae (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): integrating molecular data and traditional classifications20 July 2016 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 41, No. 4DNA Barcoding Reveals High Cryptic Diversity in the North Eurasian Moina Species (Crustacea: Cladocera)24 August 2016 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, No. 8Universal Primers Used for Species Identification of Foodstuff of Animal Origin: Effects of Oligonucleotide Tails on PCR Amplification and Sequencing Performance1 September 2015 | Food Analytical Methods, Vol. 9, No. 5Phylogeny and feeding trait evolution of the mega-diverse Gelechioidea (Lepidoptera: Obtectomera): new insight from 19 nuclear genes4 September 2015 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 41, No. 1A molecular phylogeny for the oldest (nonditrysian) lineages of extant Lepidoptera, with implications for classification, comparative morphology and life-history evolution28 May 2015 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 40, No. 4Characterization, distribution, biology and impact on Italian walnut orchards of the invasive North-American leafminer Coptodisca lucifluella (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae)29 January 2015 | Bulletin of Entomological Research, Vol. 105, No. 2A molecular phylogeny and revised classification for the oldest ditrysian moth lineages (Lepidoptera: Tineoidea), with implications for ancestral feeding habits of the mega-diverse Ditrysia20 October 2014 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 40, No. 2A Global Phylogeny of Leafmining Ectoedemia Moths (Lepidoptera: Nepticulidae): Exploring Host Plant Family Shifts and Allopatry as Drivers of Speciation18 March 2015 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 10, No. 3Taxonomic revision of the Taractrocera ilia (Waterhouse) complex (Lepidoptera : Hesperiidae) from north-western Australia and mainland New Guinea based on morphological and molecular dataInvertebrate Systematics, Vol. 29, No. 5Inferring the Provenance of an Alien Species with DNA Barcodes: The Neotropical Butterfly Dryas iulia in Thailand13 August 2014 | PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, No. 8Inclusive taxon sampling suggests a single, stepwise origin of ectolecithality in Platyhelminthes21 February 2014 | Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 111, No. 3Molecular characterization of trophic ecology within an island radiation of insect herbivores (Curculionidae: Entiminae: Cratopus )24 September 2013 | Molecular Ecology, Vol. 22, No. 21A Large-Scale, Higher-Level, Molecular Phylogenetic Study of the Insect Order Lepidoptera (Moths and Butterflies)12 March 2013 | PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 3Molecular phylogeny, larval case architecture, host-plant associations and classification of European Coleophoridae (Lepidoptera)15 February 2012 | Zoologica Scripta, Vol. 41, No. 3ITS‐2 and 18S rRNA data from Macrobiotus polonicus and Milnesium tardigradum (Eutardigrada, Tardigrada)21 April 2011 | Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, Vol. 49, No. s1Phylogenetic relationships of selected European Ennominae (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)European Journal of Entomology, Vol. 108, No. 2An aminotransferase from bacterium ATCC 55552 deaminates hydrolyzed fumonisin B122 June 2010 | Biodegradation, Vol. 22, No. 1Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences10 February 2010 | Nature, Vol. 463, No. 7284Degradation of fumonisin B1 by the consecutive action of two bacterial enzymesJournal of Biotechnology, Vol. 145, No. 2Single copy nuclear DNA markers for the onychophoran Phallocephale tallagandensis24 April 2009 | Conservation Genetics Resources, Vol. 1, No. 1Phylogeny and Biogeography of Hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae): Evidence from Five Nuclear Genes28 May 2009 | PLoS ONE, Vol. 4, No. 5Resolving Arthropod Phylogeny: Exploring Phylogenetic Signal within 41 kb of Protein-Coding Nuclear Gene Sequence1 December 2008 | Systematic Biology, Vol. 57, No. 6Genomic Outposts Serve the Phylogenomic Pioneers: Designing Novel Nuclear Markers for Genomic DNA Extractions of Lepidoptera1 April 2008 | Systematic Biology, Vol. 57, No. 2Phylogenetic relationships of wild silkmoths (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) inferred from four protein-coding nuclear genes4 February 2008 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 33, No. 2A phylogenetic study of the 'bombycoid complex' (Lepidoptera) using five protein-coding nuclear genes, with comments on the problem of macrolepidopteran phylogeny14 January 2008 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 33, No. 1Molecular phylogeny of Anthelidae and other bombycoid taxa (Lepidoptera: Bombycoidea)14 January 2008 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 33, No. 1Phylogenetic utility of dynamin and triose phosphate isomerase17 April 2007 | Systematic Entomology, Vol. 32, No. 2A specific and versatile genome walking techniqueGene, Vol. 381Conserved linkage of two genes on the same macronuclear chromosome in spirotrichous ciliates7 March 2006 | Chromosoma, Vol. 115, No. 2Phylogenetics of Eggshell Morphogenesis in Antheraea (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae): Unique Origin and Repeated Reduction of the Aeropyle Crown1 April 2005 | Systematic Biology, Vol. 54, No. 2 Vol. 38, No. 1 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics History Received 7 July 2004 Accepted 3 September 2004 Published online 30 May 2018 Published in print January 2005 Information© 2005 Author(s)AcknowledgmentsWe thank Austen Ganley and Cliff Cunningham for performing the gene alignments used in defining primers, Jeffrey Shultz and Diane Nelson for specimens, and David O'Brochta and Vikram Vakharia for helpful comments. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (award no. DEB-0120635).Competing Interests StatementThe authors declare no competing interests.PDF download
Referência(s)