Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Principle of Alternation and the Tyrant's Happiness in Bacchylidean Epinician

2011; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 85; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1080/00397679.2011.631356

1502-7805

Douglas Cairns,

Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods

Abstract The principle of alternation, according to which human happiness is unstable and subject to change, is characteristic of the archaic world-view, as represented especially in epic and tragedy. In epinician, the principle retains its pessimistic orientation, but emphasizes by contrast the value of whatever happiness humans can achieve. Bacchylides' epinicia share this background, but his odes for non-tyrants are sparing in their use of vicissitude foil. In the two major odes (3 and 5) for Hieron of Syracuse, however, the motif of alternation appears in a somewhat different guise, in that both the negative and the positive aspects are deepened. These odes are darker in their use of vicissitude foil, yet hold out stronger hopes of overcoming vicissitude than the odes for non-tyrant victors. They present Hieron with analogues, in the form of Heracles (in 5), Croesus, and Admetus (in 3), for exceptional and greater possibilities, the possibility of overcoming vicissitude in a final and positive change of fortune, a possibility sustained by sufficient reminiscences of the language of mystery cult to allow us to make a link to Hieron's attested interest in his own post-mortem existence. Notes I.e. man is ephēmeros: see Fränkel (1946) Fränkel, H. (1946) "Man's 'Ephemeros' Nature according to Pindar and Others", TAPA 77: 131-45. [Google Scholar], Dickie (1976) Dickie, M.W. (1976) "On the Meaning of ἐφήμερος", ICS 1: 7-14. [Google Scholar], and Theunissen (2002) Theunissen, M. (2002) Pindar: Menschenlos und Wende der Zeit. Munich. [Google Scholar] 45-53. See A. Ag. 928-9; E. Alc. 782-802, Hcld. 865-6, Tro. 509-10; Hdt. 1. 32. 7; cf. Arist. EN 1. 9-10, 1100a4-1101b9. See Hes. Op. 498-501, Sem. fr. 1. 6-10 West, Thgn. 637-8, Sol. fr. 13. 33-6 West, Pi. O. 12. 5-6, P. 3. 21-3, N. 8. 45, 11. 45–6, I. 2. 43, S. Ant. 614-16, E. Supp. 479-80, Antiph. B 58 DK, Thuc. 5. 103; in Bacchylides, cf. 9. 18 and 35–6, 13.157–8 (combined with notion of man's ephemerality); but contrast the positive hopes of 1. 163–5, 13. 220-1 (and cf. 3. 83); a positive form of hope is also implied by prayers for continued good fortune, such as 5. 36, 199-200. See A. Ag. 1327-9; S. Aj. 118-33, 485-90, 646-92 (with Cairns (2006) Cairns, D. L. (2006) "Virtue and Vicissitude: The Paradoxes of the Ajax", in: D. L. Cairns and V. Liapis (eds.), Dionysalexandros: Essays on Aeschylus and his Fellow-Tragedians in Honour of A. F. Garvie, pp. 99-132. Swansea. [Google Scholar]), Ant. 1155-67 (with Sim. 521 PMG), Tr. 1-3, 29-30, 126-31, 129-31, 296-302, 943-6, OT 1186-1221, [1529], OC 394, 607-20, fr. 871 R; E. Med. 1224-30, Hipp. 1105-10, Supp. 331, Oedipus frr. 549, 554 Kannicht; cf. Hdt. 1. 5. 4, 1. 207. 1, 7. 50. 2. See further the article by Anastasia Maravela in this fascicule. See Bundy (1986) Bundy, E.L. (1986) Studia Pindarica. Berkeley [orig. University of California Publications in Classical Philology 18. 1-2 (1962)]. [Google Scholar] 47-53, 74-5. Cf. Cairns (2005) Cairns, D. L. (2005) "Myth and the Polis in Bacchylides' Eleventh Ode", JHS 125: 35-50. [Google Scholar], (2010) 107-28, 268-99 passim. For the purposes of this paper I leave the short Ode 4, also for Hieron, out of account. Cf. Cairns (2010) Cairns, D. L. (2010) Bacchylides: Five Epinician Odes (3, 5, 9, 11, 13). Cambridge. [Google Scholar] 21-9. See Race (1990) Race, W.H. (1990) Style and Rhetoric in Pindar's Odes. Atlanta. [Google Scholar] 184, Stenger (2004) Stenger, J. (2004) Poetische Argumentation: die Funktion der Gnomik in den Epinikien des Bakchylides. Berlin. [Google Scholar] 122, 124, Cairns (2010) Cairns, D. L. (2010) Bacchylides: Five Epinician Odes (3, 5, 9, 11, 13). Cambridge. [Google Scholar] 216. On the latter, see Norden (1957) Norden, E. (ed.) (1957) Aeneis Buch VI (4th edn.). Stuttgart. [Google Scholar] 5, 163, 206, 223-4, 237-8, 258, 275, 300, 465-6; on the lost poem's Eleusinian-Orphic nature and its existence already in the sixth century, see Graf (1974) Graf, F. (1974) Eleusis und die orphische Dichtung Athens in vorhellenistischer Zeit. Berlin. [Google Scholar] 142-50 (esp. 149). Cf. Il. 24. 524, (οὐ γάρ τις πρῆξις πέλεται κρυεροῖο γόοιο, "For there is no purpose in icy lamentation"), 549–50 (ἄνσχεο, μὴ δ' ἀλίαστον ὀδύρεο σὸν κατὰ θυμόν· | οὐ γάρ τι πρήξεις ἀκαχήμενος υἷος ἑῆος . . ., "Bear up, and do not grieve without cessation in your heart. You will achieve nothing by grieving for your son . . ."). Cf. also Heracles' thambos at Meleager (θάμβησεν, 5. 84) with Achilles' towards Priam (θάμβησεν, Il. 24. 483); cf. also their mutual admiration (θαυμάζειν) at 629-31. Note also the similarity between 5. 154, ἀγλαὰν ἥβαν προλείπων ("leaving behind my glorious youth") and λιποῦσ' ἀνδροτῆτα καὶ ἥβην ("leaving behind youth and manhood") at Il. 16. 857 (death of Patroclus) = 22. 363 (death of Hector), i.e. the two events which prompt the grief of Achilles and Priam (resp.) in Il. 24. Brannan (1972) Brannan, P.T. (1972) "Hieron and Bacchylides: An Analysis of Bacchylides' Fifth Ode", CF 26: 185-278. [Google Scholar] 262-3 and Lefkowitz (1976) Lefkowitz, M.R. (1976) The Victory Ode: An Introduction. Park Ridge NJ. [Google Scholar] 72 go further, arguing that the use of vegetation imagery of Hieron's success here echoes its earlier use of the ψυχαί (65), of Meleager (87, 141-2, 168), and of Deianira (172), suggesting that all that blooms must similarly fade and die. See Pi. fr. dub. 346 S-M, E. Her. 613, Xen. Hell. 6. 3. 6, [Pl.] Axioch. 371e, D. S. 4. 14. 3, 4. 25. 1, 4. 26. 1, Plut. Thes. 30. 5, Apollod. 2. 5. 12, schol. Ar. Ran. 501, Plut. 845, 1013; cf. Graf (1974) Graf, F. (1974) Eleusis und die orphische Dichtung Athens in vorhellenistischer Zeit. Berlin. [Google Scholar] 69, 143-4; Lloyd-Jones (1990) Lloyd-Jones, H. (1990) "Heracles at Eleusis", in: The Academic Papers: Greek Epic, Lyric, and Tragedy 167-87 [orig. Maia 19 (1967) 206-29]. [Google Scholar]; Boardman (1975) Boardman, J. (1975) "Heracles, Peisistratos, and Eleusis", JHS 95: 1-12. [Google Scholar] and in LIMC iv. 1 (1988), 805-6; Parker (1996) Parker, R.C.T. (1996) Athenian Religion: A History. Oxford. [Google Scholar] 98-100; on the iconography, cf. Clinton (1992) Clinton, Κ. (1992) Myth and Cult: The Iconography of the Eleusinian Mysteries. Stockholm. [Google Scholar] 16, 81. For the Deinomenids' hereditary priesthood of Demeter and Persephone, see Hdt. 7. 153. 2, with Zuntz (1971) Zuntz, G. (1971) Persephone: Three Essays on Religion and Thought in Magna Graecia. Oxford. [Google Scholar] 135-9; cf. Hieron's own dedication of a temple to the two goddesses after his victory at Himera in 480, D. S. 11. 26. 7; Pi. O. 6. 94-6. On the gold leaves see Zuntz (1971) Zuntz, G. (1971) Persephone: Three Essays on Religion and Thought in Magna Graecia. Oxford. [Google Scholar] 277–86, Cole (2003) Cole, S. G. (2003) "Landscapes of Dionysus and Elysian Fields", in: M. B. Cosmopoulos (ed.), Greek Mysteries: The Archaeology and Ritual of Ancient Greek Secret Cults, pp. 193-217. London. [Google Scholar], Edmonds (2004) Edmonds, R.G. (2004) Myths of the Underworld Journey: Plato, Aristophanes, and the "Orphic" Gold Tablets. Cambridge. [Google Scholar] 29–110, Bernabé (2005) Bernabé, A. (ed.) (2005) Poetae epici Graeci: testimonia et fragmenta. Pars 2, Fasc. 2, Orphicorum et Orphicis similium testimonia et fragmenta. Munich. [Google Scholar], Graf and Johnston (2007) Graf, F. and S.I. Johnston (2007) Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. London. [Google Scholar], and Bernabé and Jiménez San Cristóbal (2008) Bernabé, A. and A. I. Jiménez San Cristóbal (2008) Instructions for the Netherworld: The Orphic Gold Tablets. Leiden. [Google Scholar]; for the possibility of allusion in B. 5. 186, cf. Garner (1992) Garner, R. (1992) "Mules, Mysteries, and Song in Pindar's Olympia 6", Cl.Ant. 11: 45-67. [Google Scholar] 65 n. 62. See D. S. 4. 57-8, Apollod. 2. 8. 2-5. See D. S. 11. 49. 2, 11. 66. 4. Hes. Op. 826-8, Alcm. 1. 37-9; Thgn. 1012-15, 1172-3. h. Cer. 480-2, 486-9, Pi. fr. 137 S-M, S. fr. 837 R, E. Ba. 73-82, 902-11; cf. the gold leaf F 488. 9 Bernabé. Cf. also Hes. Th. 954-5 on the immortality of Heracles: Pi. P. 1. 94, οὐ φθίνει Κροίσου φιλόφρων ἀρετά ("the kindly excellence of Croesus does not perish"). For comparison of Hdt.'s and B.'s versions of the Croesus story, see Gentili (1958) Gentili, B. (1958) Bacchilide: Studi. Urbino. [Google Scholar] 84–91, Segal (1971 Segal, C.P. (1971) "Croesus on the Pyre: Herodotus and Bacchylides", WS 84: 39-51 [reprinted in Segal (1998) 280-93]. [Google Scholar]) = (1998) 281–93, Bright (1976) Bright, D.F. (1976) "The Myths of Bacchylides III", CF 30: 174-90. [Google Scholar] 176–88, Crane (1996) Crane, G. (1996) "The Prosperity of Tyrants: Bacchylides, Herodotus, and the Contest for Legitimacy", Arethusa 29: 57-85. [Google Scholar], Howie (2005) Howie, J. G. (2005) "Apollo's Dealings with Chiron and Croesus: Ambiguity and Hymnic Predication in Hesiod's Theogony, Pindar's 9th Pythian, and Herodotus 1", in: P. Sandin and M. W. Schiebe (eds.), Dais Philēsistephanos: Studies in Honour of Professor S. Fogelmark, pp. 21-69. Uppsala. [Google Scholar] 51–64, Cairns (2010) Cairns, D. L. (2010) Bacchylides: Five Epinician Odes (3, 5, 9, 11, 13). Cambridge. [Google Scholar] 65-7. For the view that Croesus in B. 3 is a symbol of the barbarian opponents that Hieron was proud to have vanquished (P. 1. 72-80), a warning of the excess that Hieron is to avoid, see Reichel (2000) Reichel, M. (2000) "Zum literarischen und historischen Hintergrund von Bakchylides 3", in: A. Bagordo and B. Zimmermann (eds.), Bakchylides: 100 Jahre nach seiner Wiederentdeckung, pp. 147–59. Zetemata 106, Munich 2000. [Google Scholar] 153-6. Cf. B. 1. 163-5, ὁ δ' εὖ ἔρδων θεοὺς | ἐλπίδι κυδροτέραι | σαίνει κέαρ (''the man who treats the gods well soothes his heart with firmer hope''). For the issue of where Apollo's direct speech ends (in 82 or 84), see Stenger (2004) Stenger, J. (2004) Poetische Argumentation: die Funktion der Gnomik in den Epinikien des Bakchylides. Berlin. [Google Scholar] 89–90, 93, 95–6, Cairns (2010) Cairns, D. L. (2010) Bacchylides: Five Epinician Odes (3, 5, 9, 11, 13). Cambridge. [Google Scholar] 211. Cf. P. Derv. col. 7. 9-10 = F 3 Bernabé; Emped. B 3. 4 DK; Pl. Smp. 218b; further parallels in Bernabé ad F 1a. See also Krummen (1990) Krummen, E. (1990) Pyrsos Hymnon: festliche Gegenwart und mythisch-rituelle Tradition als Voraussetzung einer Pindarinterpretation (Isthmie 4, Pythie 5, Olympie 1 und 3). Berlin. [Google Scholar] 258; Currie (2005) Currie, B. (2005) Pindar and the Cult of Heroes. Oxford. [Google Scholar] 386-7, 389-90. For further thoughts on these lines, at least in connexion with Aj., see Cairns (2006) Cairns, D. L. (2006) "Virtue and Vicissitude: The Paradoxes of the Ajax", in: D. L. Cairns and V. Liapis (eds.), Dionysalexandros: Essays on Aeschylus and his Fellow-Tragedians in Honour of A. F. Garvie, pp. 99-132. Swansea. [Google Scholar]. The fundamental resource for intimations of hero-cult in epinician is, of course, Currie (2005) Currie, B. (2005) Pindar and the Cult of Heroes. Oxford. [Google Scholar].