Direct Identification of a Second Distinct Site of Contact between Cholecystokinin and Its Receptor
1998; Elsevier BV; Volume: 273; Issue: 21 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1074/jbc.273.21.12988
ISSN1083-351X
AutoresElizabeth M. Hadac, Delia I. Pinon, Zongshi Ji, Eileen L. Holicky, Randal M. Henne, Terry P. Lybrand, Laurence J. Miller,
Tópico(s)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
ResumoWe have developed a biologically active analogue of cholecystokinin (CCK) that incorporates a photolabile benzoylphenylalanine (Bpa) moiety in the middle of its pharmacophoric domain, which efficiently establishes a covalent bond with an interacting domain of the CCK receptor. This probe incorporatedl-Bpa in the position of Gly29 of the well characterized, radioiodinatable CCK analogue,d-Tyr-Gly-[(Nle28,31)CCK-26–33]. It was a potent pancreatic secretagogue (EC50 = 28 ± 6 nm) that was equally efficacious with natural CCK, and bound to the CCK receptor with moderate affinity (IC50 = 450 ± 126 nm). This was adequate to allow specific covalent labeling of the receptor. The labeled domain was within the cyanogen bromide fragment of the receptor including the top of TM6 (the sixth transmembrane domain), the third extracellular loop, and TM7 (the seventh transmembrane domain), as proven by direct Edman degradation sequencing. When this fragment was modified by the replacement of Val342 with Met to generate an additional site of cyanogen bromide cleavage, the labeled fragment was reduced in apparent size consistent with its representing the carboxyl-terminal portion of this fragment. Radiochemical sequencing of that fragment demonstrated covalent attachment of the probe to His347 and Leu348 in this domain. This represents the second experimentally demonstrated contact between a CCK analogue and this receptor, complementing the labeling of the domain just above TM1 (the first transmembrane domain) by a photolabile residue at the carboxyl terminus of CCK (Ji, Z. S., Hadac, E. M., Henne, R. M., Patel, S. A., Lybrand, T. P., and Miller, L. J. (1997)J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24393–24401). Both contacts are consistent with the conformational model of CCK binding proposed on the basis of the initial contact. We have developed a biologically active analogue of cholecystokinin (CCK) that incorporates a photolabile benzoylphenylalanine (Bpa) moiety in the middle of its pharmacophoric domain, which efficiently establishes a covalent bond with an interacting domain of the CCK receptor. This probe incorporatedl-Bpa in the position of Gly29 of the well characterized, radioiodinatable CCK analogue,d-Tyr-Gly-[(Nle28,31)CCK-26–33]. It was a potent pancreatic secretagogue (EC50 = 28 ± 6 nm) that was equally efficacious with natural CCK, and bound to the CCK receptor with moderate affinity (IC50 = 450 ± 126 nm). This was adequate to allow specific covalent labeling of the receptor. The labeled domain was within the cyanogen bromide fragment of the receptor including the top of TM6 (the sixth transmembrane domain), the third extracellular loop, and TM7 (the seventh transmembrane domain), as proven by direct Edman degradation sequencing. When this fragment was modified by the replacement of Val342 with Met to generate an additional site of cyanogen bromide cleavage, the labeled fragment was reduced in apparent size consistent with its representing the carboxyl-terminal portion of this fragment. Radiochemical sequencing of that fragment demonstrated covalent attachment of the probe to His347 and Leu348 in this domain. This represents the second experimentally demonstrated contact between a CCK analogue and this receptor, complementing the labeling of the domain just above TM1 (the first transmembrane domain) by a photolabile residue at the carboxyl terminus of CCK (Ji, Z. S., Hadac, E. M., Henne, R. M., Patel, S. A., Lybrand, T. P., and Miller, L. J. (1997)J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24393–24401). Both contacts are consistent with the conformational model of CCK binding proposed on the basis of the initial contact. A molecular understanding of agonist-binding determinants provides important insights that may be useful in the development of drugs acting at the receptor of interest. While such insights are available for small, non-peptidyl agonists (2Coughlin S.R. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1994; 6: 191-197Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar, 3Strader C.D. Fong T.M. Tota M.R. Underwood D. Dixon R.A.F. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1994; 63: 101-132Crossref PubMed Scopus (996) Google Scholar, 4Schwartz T.W. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1994; 5: 434-444Crossref PubMed Scopus (281) Google Scholar), our understanding of the molecular basis for peptide and protein hormone binding is much more primitive. Most insights have been derived from mutagenesis studies in which functional changes in ligand binding have been correlated with the modification of distinct receptor domains or residues (2Coughlin S.R. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1994; 6: 191-197Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar, 3Strader C.D. Fong T.M. Tota M.R. Underwood D. Dixon R.A.F. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1994; 63: 101-132Crossref PubMed Scopus (996) Google Scholar, 4Schwartz T.W. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1994; 5: 434-444Crossref PubMed Scopus (281) Google Scholar). In favorable situations, a direct causal relationship can be established between a specific mutation and modified receptor function (5Zhou W. Flanagan C. Ballesteros J.A. Konvicka K. Davidson J.S. Weinstein H. Millar R.P. Sealfon S.C. Mol. Pharmacol. 1994; 45: 165-170PubMed Google Scholar). However, the vast majority of mutation studies have only interfered with a receptor function. The ability to interpret such observations is, therefore, quite limited, because point mutations may alter receptor function via indirect mechanisms such as modification of receptor processing, conformation, or even regulation, rather than by eliminating a direct site of contact with an agonist. Photoaffinity labeling has been a powerful approach to directly identify sites of interaction between a photolabile ligand and its receptor. However, it has been limited by the low efficiency of covalent labeling and selective nature of some labeling reagents (6Wong S.S. Chemistry of Protein Conjugation and Cross-linking. CRC Press, Boston1991: 7-73Google Scholar). When these problems are added to their application toward site characterization within a sparse and physicochemically difficult target, the challenges of this approach become apparent. We have recently been successful in using this approach to identify the site of contact between a photolabile nitrophenylalanine positioned at the carboxyl terminus of cholecystokinin (CCK) 1The abbreviations used are: CCK, cholecystokinin; Bpa, benzoylphenylalanine; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; Fmoc, N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl; KRH, Krebs-Ringers-Hepes; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; TM, transmembrane; Tricine,N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine. and its receptor (1Ji Z. Hadac E.M. Henne R.M. Patel S.A. Lybrand T.P. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 24393-24401Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar). While a single contact between ligand and receptor allows for an initial placement of the ligand into a potential binding site within the receptor, additional contacts would provide additional constraints that could be extremely useful for refining our understanding of this molecular interaction. In this work, we have developed an additional novel analogue of CCK that incorporates a photolabile benzoylphenylalanine (Bpa) into the mid-region of the peptide pharmacophore in the position of Gly29. Incorporation of such a benzophenone moiety has many theoretical and practical advantages (7Kauer J.C. Erickson-Viitanen S. Wolfe H.R. DeGrado W.F. J. Biol. Chem. 1986; 261: 10695-10700Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Such reagents are reactive enough to insert into alkyl carbon residues to establish a bond (6Wong S.S. Chemistry of Protein Conjugation and Cross-linking. CRC Press, Boston1991: 7-73Google Scholar, 7Kauer J.C. Erickson-Viitanen S. Wolfe H.R. DeGrado W.F. J. Biol. Chem. 1986; 261: 10695-10700Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). They are not quenched by water in the medium, making more reagent available to establish a covalent bond with adjacent proteins. When such a residue is optimally sited within a ligand, such that it is positioned adjacent to a receptor target upon binding, the efficiencies of covalent labeling can be very high (8Servant G. Boulay G. Bossé R. Escher E. Guillemette G. Mol. Pharmacol. 1993; 43: 677-683PubMed Google Scholar). Indeed, there are examples reported of efficiencies of covalent labeling of 60–100% of bound receptor (9Shoelson S.E. Lee J. Lynch C.S. Backer J.M. Pilch P.F. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 4085-4091Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Characterization of this CCK analogue demonstrated that it is a full agonist and is an effective and efficient photoprobe. It specifically labeled His347 and Leu348 just outside of TM7 in the third extracellular loop of the CCK receptor. This has been a site previously targeted by mutation studies of other structurally related peptide hormone receptors (4Schwartz T.W. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1994; 5: 434-444Crossref PubMed Scopus (281) Google Scholar, 10Huang R.-R.C. Yu H. Strader C.D. Fong T.M. Mol. Pharmacol. 1994; 45: 690-695PubMed Google Scholar). It is also the site predicted to be adjacent to Gly29 of CCK in a conformational model of the ligand-occupied receptor we recently reported (1Ji Z. Hadac E.M. Henne R.M. Patel S.A. Lybrand T.P. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 24393-24401Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar). Additional well defined constraints should enhance our understanding of the molecular basis of binding and activation of this important receptor. Wheat germ agglutinin-agarose was purchased from EY Laboratories, Inc., San Mateo CA, chromatographically purified collagenase and soybean trypsin inhibitor were from Worthington, and cholecystokinin-8 was from Peninsula Laboratories (Belmont, CA). The well characterized CCK analogues,d-Tyr-Gly-[(Nle28,31)CCK-26–33] andd-Tyr-Gly-[(Nle28,31,pNO2-Phe33)CCK-26–33] were synthesized as we have described previously (11Pearson R.K. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1987; 262: 869-876Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 12Powers S.P. Fourmy D. Gaisano H. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 5295-5300Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Other reagents were analytical grade. t-Butoxycarbonyl-dl-Bpa was synthesized starting from p-chloromethylbenzophenone (Aldrich) as described by Kauer et al. (7Kauer J.C. Erickson-Viitanen S. Wolfe H.R. DeGrado W.F. J. Biol. Chem. 1986; 261: 10695-10700Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). This was incorporated into a standard solid phase peptide synthetic protocol (13Powers S.P. Pinon D.I. Miller L.J. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1988; 31: 429-434Crossref PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar). Fmoc-Gly-Asp-Tyr-Nle-(dl-Bpa)-Trp-Nle-Asp-Phe-NH2was synthesized as we have reported, using standard solid phase methodology with t-butoxycarbonyl protection (except for the last residue) and using a p-methylbenzhydrylamine resin (13Powers S.P. Pinon D.I. Miller L.J. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1988; 31: 429-434Crossref PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar). This was cleaved from the resin by anisole/HF, lyophilized, and purified by semipreparative reversed-phase C-18 high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), with a gradient of 10 to 60% acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The peptide was then sulfated on the Tyr residue using sulfur trioxide pyridine complex, and purified by reversed-phase HPLC with a gradient of acetonitrile in triethylamine-acetate, pH 5. The Fmoc group was removed with 20% piperidine/N,N-dimethylformamide, and the purified peptide was reacted with Bis-Fmoc-d-Tyr-ONSU or sulfosuccinimidyl-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate (to yield a probe with blocked amino terminus), as we have described (13Powers S.P. Pinon D.I. Miller L.J. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1988; 31: 429-434Crossref PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar). Fmoc protection was again removed, and the products were purified by HPLC. The probe with the blocked amino terminus was always used in experiments leading to Edman degradation sequencing. Amino acid analysis and mass spectrometry confirmed the expected identity of the synthetic peptides. The d and lstereoconformers were separated by HPLC and identified by the method of Miller and Kaiser (14Miller W.T. Kaiser E.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988; 85: 5429-5433Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar). The l-Bpa analogue was used for the present series of studies. This receptor probe was iodinated with both 125I and127I, using oxidative methods and HPLC purification, as described previously (15Hadac E.M. Ghanekar D.V. Holicky E.L. Pinon D.I. Dougherty R.W. Miller L.J. Pancreas. 1996; 13: 130-139Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). The radioiodinated probe achieved a specific radioactivity of 2000 Ci/mmol, while the unlabeled iodinated probe was used to provide increased yields for ultimate efforts to purify and sequence the labeled receptor fragment. Dispersed rat pancreatic acini were prepared as we previously described (16Lutz M.P. Sutor S.L. Abraham R.T. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 11119-11124Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Briefly, pancreatic tissue was harvested from 80–120-g male Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats, and placed in iced, oxygenated Krebs-Ringers-Hepes (KRH) medium containing 25 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, 104 mm NaCl, 5 mm KCl, 1 mm KH2PO4, 1.2 mm MgSO4, 2 mmCaCl2, 2.5 mmd-glucose, essential and nonessential amino acids, and 2 mm glutamine, with 0.2% bovine serum albumin and 0.01% soybean trypsin inhibitor. The pancreas was injected with 250 units of purified collagenase in 4 ml of KRH, followed by shaking in a 37 °C water bath at 120 strokes/min for 5 min, followed by mincing and manual shaking for 10 min. Dispersed acini were then filtered through 200-μm nytex, and washed twice with KRH. CHO-CCKR cells, representing a rat CCK-A receptor-bearing CHO cell line which we previously established and characterized (15Hadac E.M. Ghanekar D.V. Holicky E.L. Pinon D.I. Dougherty R.W. Miller L.J. Pancreas. 1996; 13: 130-139Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar), were grown as a monolayer in flasks containing Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 5% Fetal Clone-2 (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT). Cells were harvested mechanically and used as a source of receptor-bearing plasma membranes. These were prepared by suspending the cells in 0.3 msucrose containing 0.01% soybean trypsin inhibitor and 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and sonicating in a Sonifier cell disrupter (Heat Systems-Ultrasonics, Inc., Plainview, NY) at setting 7 for 10 s. The concentration of sucrose in the homogenate was adjusted to 1.3 m with 2.0 msucrose, and this was overlaid with 0.3 m sucrose prior to centrifugation at 225,000 × g for 1 h. The membrane band at the sucrose interface was then harvested and diluted with ice water. This was pelleted by centrifugation at 225,000 × g for 30 min and resuspended in KRH for storage at −80 °C. The wild-type rat type A CCK receptor construct in m13mp18 (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) was used as template for an oligonucleotide-directed method of mutagenesis (Sculptor system of Amersham Life Science). This was directed to change Val342 to Met, to provide a new site of cyanogen bromide cleavage. The mutant construct was then subcloned into pcDNA3 eukaryotic expression vector (InVitrogen, San Diego, CA), and the sequence was proven by direct dideoxynucleotide DNA sequence analysis (17Sanger F. Nicklen S. Coulson A.R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1977; 74: 5463-5467Crossref PubMed Scopus (52769) Google Scholar). CHO cells not expressing any endogenous type A or B CCK receptors (15Hadac E.M. Ghanekar D.V. Holicky E.L. Pinon D.I. Dougherty R.W. Miller L.J. Pancreas. 1996; 13: 130-139Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar) were transfected by lipofection, and neomycin-resistant cells were selected in 1 mg/ml G418. Surviving cells expressing an appropriate receptor density were selected by sequential rounds of fluorescence-activated cell sorting after incubation with a fluorescein-conjugated CCK receptor ligand, as we previously described (15Hadac E.M. Ghanekar D.V. Holicky E.L. Pinon D.I. Dougherty R.W. Miller L.J. Pancreas. 1996; 13: 130-139Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). These cells were cultured as described above for the CHO-CCKR cell line. Amylase release assay was utilized to determine the biological activity of the receptor probe (16Lutz M.P. Sutor S.L. Abraham R.T. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 11119-11124Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). For this, dispersed rat pancreatic acini were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in the absence or presence of secretagogue. At the end of the incubation, cells were separated from medium by centrifugation through Nyosil oil (William F. Nye, Inc., New Bedford MA). The phadebas assay (18Ceska M. Birath K. Brown B. Clin. Chim. Acta. 1969; 26: 437-444Crossref PubMed Scopus (681) Google Scholar) for amylase (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala Sweden) was applied to aliquots of a total cellular lysate and to each supernatant, allowing the calculation of percentages of cellular content secreted. Receptor binding was characterized using 2–5 μg of CHO-CCKR membranes or intact cells grown in 24-well culture dishes (approximately 500,000 cells/well), incubated at room temperature for 1 h in KRH medium with radioligand (3–5 pm) and various concentrations of competing cold peptide. For membrane binding, bound and free radioligand were separated using a Cell Harvester (Skatron Instruments, Inc. Sterling, VA) with receptor-binding filter mats. Cells were lysed with 0.5 mNaOH to release cell-bound ligand. Bound radioligand was quantified in a gamma spectrometer. Affinity labeling was performed similarly, using a larger quantity of membrane (50–100 μg) and iodinated ligand (50–100 pm). When incubations were complete, samples were transferred to siliconized glass tubes and photolyzed at 4 °C for 30 min in a Rayonet photochemical reactor (Southern New England Ultraviolet Company, Hamden, CT) equipped with 3500 Å lamps. Membrane pellets were washed and either solubilized in SDS-sample buffer and directly applied to a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel for electrophoresis under the conditions described by Laemmli (19Laemmli U.K. Nature. 1970; 227: 680-685Crossref PubMed Scopus (207537) Google Scholar), or solubilized with 1% Nonidet P-40 in KRH medium, prior to wheat germ agglutinin-agarose affinity chromatography and subsequent SDS-PAGE. The efficiency of covalent labeling was determined by excising and counting the region of the gel in which the CCK receptor is known to migrate, subtracting any counts in that region in the absence of CCK stimulation from those in that region after hormone stimulation. Efficiency was compared for the Bpa analogue probe and for the established photoaffinity labeling reagent,125I-d-Tyr-Gly-[(Nle28,31,pNO2-Phe33)CCK-26–33], which we have extensively characterized (12Powers S.P. Fourmy D. Gaisano H. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 5295-5300Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Affinity labeled, lectin-purified receptor was washed twice with 0.5 m NaCl containing 0.1% Nonidet P-40, and once with water. It was then resuspended in endoglycosidase F buffer (0.1 m NaH2PO4, pH 6.1, 50 mm EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, 1% 2-mercaptoethanol) with 2 units of endoglycosidase F, and incubated for 18 h at 37 °C. The sample was diluted with SDS-sample buffer and resolved on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. Affinity labeled receptor, which had been adsorbed to lectin and separated on SDS-PAGE, was visualized by autoradiography, eluted, and lyophilized. It was then suspended in water and precipitated with 85% ethanol at −20 °C overnight. The precipitate was pelleted at 14,000 × g for 30 min. Pellets were rinsed with 500 μl of iced ethanol and then dried in a vacuum centrifuge. Samples were suspended in cyanogen bromide (2.5 mg/tube) in 70% trifluoroacetic acid or formic acid for 72 h at room temperature in the dark. Sample volumes were reduced under vacuum and washed twice with water in preparation for separation on a NuPAGE gel using MES running buffer. The affinity labeled receptor was visualized by autoradiography, cut out, eluted, and lyophilized. Samples were suspended in water and precipitated with 90% acetone in 1 mm HCl for 3 h at −20 °C. The precipitate was pelleted by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min and rinsed with iced acetone, prior to being dried under vacuum. This was then further purified by HPLC. Two sequential HPLC steps were utilized to further purify the receptor fragments to homogeneity for Edman degradation sequencing. The first HPLC step was performed with a Vydac analytical C-4 column (catalog no. 214TP5415), utilizing a 1 ml/min flow rate and a gradient of 10 to 80% solution B (A, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and B, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile). Peak fractions were then injected onto a Perkin-Elmer/Brownlee microbore C-18 HPLC column (catalog no. 401966), utilizing a flow rate of 5 μl/min and 10 min of 1% solution B, followed by a linear gradient up to 80% solution B over 190 min (A, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and B, 0.085% trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile). The C-4 separation was monitored at 220 nm, and the C-18 separation was monitored at 280 nm, with a UV absorbance detector. The eluant from the microbore column was collected directly onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane that was subsequently exposed to x-ray film for detection of the position of the radioactive peak. This was then analyzed by densitometry. The peak area was excised from the membrane and subjected to Edman degradation sequencing using an Applied Biosystems automated instrument. The radiolabeled cyanogen bromide fragment of the V342M mutant receptor was purified following analogous steps. Radiochemical sequencing of the peak labeled fraction eluting from HPLC was also performed, in manner analogous to that previously reported (1Ji Z. Hadac E.M. Henne R.M. Patel S.A. Lybrand T.P. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 24393-24401Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar). For this, the relevant labeled receptor-containing fraction was coupled toN-(2-aminoethyl)-3-aminopropyl glass beads either through its α-carboxyl group with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide at pH 5.0 or through a cysteine sulfhydryl side chain. The latter was accomplished by derivatizing amino group-expressing glass beads withm-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester at pH 7.0, quenching remaining amino reactivity with Tris, and then adding the labeled receptor fragment. The peptide-bound beads were treated with triethylamine, dried, and derivatized with triethylamine:methanol:phenylisothiocyanate (1:7:1, v:v) for 5 min at 50 °C. They were then washed three times with 400 μl of ethyl acetate and dried under vacuum. Beads were then incubated with 50 μl of trifluoroacetic acid for 5 min at 25 °C, and elution was achieved with three successive 200-μl aliquots of methanol. Cycles were repeated for up to 15 complete cycles. Radioactivity in each pooled eluate was quantified in a gamma spectrometer. Noncovalently bound radiolabeled fragments were eluted from the beads with a minimum of three complete cycles excluding the phenylisothiocyanate, before initiating formal cycle number one. The photolabile CCK receptor probe incorporating the l-Bpa residue was synthesized and purified to homogeneity on reversed phase HPLC. Its identity was confirmed by mass spectrometry and it was quantified by amino acid analysis. The determination of the identity of the l- andd-Bpa stereoisomers was based on the differential sensitivity to digestion by aminopeptidase M (14Miller W.T. Kaiser E.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988; 85: 5429-5433Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar). Only digestion of the earlier eluting peak (identified as the l-Bpa analogue) yielded a product that comigrated with a parabenzoylphenylalanine standard, while the specificity of this protease did not permit the release of this residue from the d-Bpa analogue. The probe was radioiodinated using the solid phase oxidant, iodobeads (Pierce), and its products were purified by reversed phase HPLC, using methods analogous to those we have reported (20Pearson R.K. Hadac E.M. Miller L.J. Gastroenterology. 1986; 90: 1985-1991Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar). The radioiodinated product was fully resolved from unlabeled peptide to yield a specific radioactivity of 2000 Ci/mmol. This reagent was stored in the dark at −70 °C until ready for use. The probe was an agonist, stimulating dispersed rat pancreatic acini to secrete amylase in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig.1, left). These are cells that naturally express the wild type CCK receptor. The probe was also a potent secretagogue (EC50 = 28 ± 6 nm), and was as efficacious as the native hormonal agonist, CCK-8. Competition binding studies were performed with a well characterized native CCK-like radioligand (125I-d-Tyr-Gly-[(Nle28,31)CCK-26–33]) (11Pearson R.K. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1987; 262: 869-876Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), and enriched plasma membranes were prepared from CHO-CCKR cells (15Hadac E.M. Ghanekar D.V. Holicky E.L. Pinon D.I. Dougherty R.W. Miller L.J. Pancreas. 1996; 13: 130-139Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). The l-Bpa analogue competed for binding of this radioligand in a concentration-dependent manner, with an IC50 of 450 ± 126 nm (Fig. 1,right). When used in affinity labeling experiments, the photolabile probe covalently labeled a protein that migrated on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel in the M r 85,000–95,000 position of the CCK receptor (11Pearson R.K. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1987; 262: 869-876Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 21Pearson R.K. Miller L.J. Hadac E.M. Powers S.P. J. Biol. Chem. 1987; 262: 13850-13856Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Its identity was further supported by its migration at M r 42,000 after deglycosylation with endoglycosidase F (Fig. 2), a position well established for the core protein of the CCK receptor (21Pearson R.K. Miller L.J. Hadac E.M. Powers S.P. J. Biol. Chem. 1987; 262: 13850-13856Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). As can also be seen in Fig. 2, unlabeled CCK inhibited the affinity labeling of the receptor band in a concentration-dependent manner. The efficiency of covalent labeling of the CCK receptor with thel-Bpa analogue was 14-fold greater than that using125I-d-Tyr-Gly-[(Nle28,31,pNO2-Phe33)CCK-26–33] (12Powers S.P. Fourmy D. Gaisano H. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 5295-5300Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 22Klueppelberg U.G. Powers S.P. Miller L.J. Receptor. 1990; 1: 1-11PubMed Google Scholar), as determined by cutting out and counting the receptor band from an SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Peptide mapping after cyanogen bromide cleavage was utilized to gain insight into the receptor domain representing the site of covalent attachment of the l-Bpa analogue probe. This was chosen because of the nicely spaced distribution of methionine residues in the CCK receptor sequence (Fig.3), and the efficient and specific cleavage of peptide chains at such residues with this reagent. After reduction, alkylation, and cyanogen bromide cleavage of the radiochemically pure affinity-labeled receptor, only a single labeled band was observed which migrated on urea-SDS-polyacrylamide, NuPAGE or Tris-Tricine gels at M r 6,700 ± 400 (Fig.3). When corrected for the mass of the receptor probe (M r 1,647), this best corresponded with the calculated mass of the fragment extending from residue 329 to 374 (5,129 + 1,647 = 6,776). Consistent with this assignment, as expected, treatment with endoglycosidase F did not modify the electrophoretic migration of this peptide (data not shown). As definitive evidence for the identity of the labeled fragment, it was also exposed to Edman degradation sequencing after extensive purification, as described under “Materials and Methods” (Fig.4). This resulted in the identification of Ile-Phe-Ser-X-Asn-Ala-Trp in cycles two through eight. The residues in cycles one and five were ambiguous. This sequence exists only in fragment 14, and residues are in the appropriate positions relative to the site of cyanogen bromide cleavage at Met328, thus confirming its identity. The location of labeling within this receptor domain was further defined by mutagenesis to introduce an additional site for cyanogen bromide cleavage within this fragment (V342M). CCK bound to this mutant receptor similarly to the wild type CCK receptor (Fig.5). The mutant receptor was affinity labeled efficiently (Fig. 6), and cleavage with cyanogen bromide demonstrated the labeling of a fragment of M r 5,500, consistent with its representing the carboxyl-terminal portion of the previously described fragment, extending from residue 343 to 374.Figure 6A typical autoradiograph of a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel used to separate the products of affinity labeling the V342M mutant CCK receptor-bearing membranes with125I-d-Tyr-Gly-[(Nle28,31,Bpa29)CCK-26–33] in the absence or presence of competing unlabeled CCK (left). Also shown is a representative autoradiograph of a 16% Tris-Tricine gel used to separate cyanogen bromide fragments of the wild type CCK receptor and the V342M mutant receptor affinity labeled with this reagent (right). The labeled cyanogen bromide fragment of the mutant receptor migrated as a fragment smaller than that of the wild type receptor. It had an approximateM r 5,500, corresponding to the fragment extending from residue 343 to 374. This was typical of 11 similar experiments.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) The site of covalent attachment of probe to receptor was further defined by radiochemical sequencing using Edman degradation with quantification of the radioactivity in the released cleavage products, analogous to that recently reported (1Ji Z. Hadac E.M. Henne R.M. Patel S.A. Lybrand T.P. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 24393-24401Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar). Fig.7 shows the profile of eluted radioactivity above background in each cycle. This was repeated with five independent samples, with the peak in radioactivity in four samples corresponding to His347 in cycle five, and in one sample the peak corresponded to Leu348 in cycle six, with substantial radioactivity also present in cycle five. This suggests that both the His347 and Leu348 in the third extracellular loop can be labeled, with the His labeling most efficient. No additional significant radioactivity was released through fifteen cycles. Affinity labeling approaches are ideal to define sites of contact between molecules that interact with high affinity and structural specificity, such as a ligand and its receptor. The specificity of this interaction is provided by the reproducible spatial geometry of the interacting functionalities within those molecules. If a photolabile moiety can be introduced into an agonist ligand, without interfering with its ability to bind and activate its receptor, it can function as a probe of receptor domains adjacent to it. The most useful such probes incorporate a photolabile moiety into a domain that is intrinsic to the pharmacophore, thereby being in a position to potentially define critical sites of molecular contact. In designing such “intrinsic” probes, there is often a trade-off between the use of a relatively small moiety that may be less likely to interfere with conformation and function, and the use of a bulkier substituent that may have more ideal characteristics of photolability or reactivity. An example of the former may involve replacing an existing aryl group with an aryl-azide (6Wong S.S. Chemistry of Protein Conjugation and Cross-linking. CRC Press, Boston1991: 7-73Google Scholar). Given the advantages provided by a benzophenone which were discussed in the introduction (6Wong S.S. Chemistry of Protein Conjugation and Cross-linking. CRC Press, Boston1991: 7-73Google Scholar,7Kauer J.C. Erickson-Viitanen S. Wolfe H.R. DeGrado W.F. J. Biol. Chem. 1986; 261: 10695-10700Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), we attempted to find a position for this residue within the receptor-binding domain of CCK. Extensive primary structure-activity data exist for the action of this hormone at the type A CCK receptor (23Ondetti M.A. Rubin B. Engel S.L. Pluscec J. Sheehan J.T. Am. J. Dig. Dis. 1970; 15: 149-156Crossref PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar). The position of Gly29 was utilized, due to experimental data indicating that modifications of that residue are tolerated (24Yanaihara C. Sugiura N. Kashimoto K. Kondo M. Kawamura M. Naruse S. Yasui A. Yanaihara N. Biomed. Res. 1985; 6: 111-115Crossref Scopus (16) Google Scholar), and a recent molecular model of the ligand-bound receptor that suggests that a Bpa substitution would be tolerated at this position (1Ji Z. Hadac E.M. Henne R.M. Patel S.A. Lybrand T.P. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 24393-24401Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar). We have often utilizedd-Tyr-Gly-[(Nle28,31)CCK-26–33] as a “parent” probe for the CCK receptor that is stable in oxidizing conditions and radioiodinatable (25Miller L.J. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1992; 65: 441-448PubMed Google Scholar). In this work, we further modified that CCK analogue to replace Gly29 with l-Bpa. This analogue was a potent pancreatic secretagogue that bound with adequate affinity to allow efficient covalent attachment to the receptor. Like previous analogues of CCK, which incorporate photolabile residues within the pharmacophore of this hormone (12Powers S.P. Fourmy D. Gaisano H. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 5295-5300Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 26Klueppelberg U.G. Gaisano H.Y. Powers S.P. Miller L.J. Biochemistry. 1989; 28: 3463-3468Crossref PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar), the Bpa analogue affinity labeled the same M r 85,000–95,000 molecule previously described to represent the CCK receptor on the pancreatic acinar cell. We have recently demonstrated the identity of that molecule with the recombinant receptor molecule encoded by the cDNA clone originally isolated (15Hadac E.M. Ghanekar D.V. Holicky E.L. Pinon D.I. Dougherty R.W. Miller L.J. Pancreas. 1996; 13: 130-139Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). In this work, we took further advantage of the CHO-CCKR cell line that we established to express 25-fold more receptors on the surface than on the pancreatic acinar cell (15Hadac E.M. Ghanekar D.V. Holicky E.L. Pinon D.I. Dougherty R.W. Miller L.J. Pancreas. 1996; 13: 130-139Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar), to provide an enriched source of this receptor for biochemical characterization. The Bpa analogue covalently labeled that molecule with efficiency 14-fold greater than that of the established CCK receptor probe,125I-d-Tyr-Gly-[(Nle28,31,pNO2-Phe33)CCK-26–33] (12Powers S.P. Fourmy D. Gaisano H. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 5295-5300Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 22Klueppelberg U.G. Powers S.P. Miller L.J. Receptor. 1990; 1: 1-11PubMed Google Scholar). The purification of the affinity labeled receptor could not utilize the most efficient purification modality now available, a specific ligand-affinity column (27Miller L.J. Hadac E.M. Gates L.K. Gaisano H.Y. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992; 183: 396-404Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar), since the ligand-binding site was already occupied. Instead, we utilized more traditional physical methods for purification, following the receptor and ultimately the fragment of interest by monitoring the position of elution of the radioactivity. This approach requires efficient covalent labeling of the receptor, since a very small labeled receptor fragment might be expected to elute differently than the same fragment not covalently bound to the probe. For this, the benzophenone-containing probe offers substantial advantage over a variety of previously described reagents that have substantially lower efficiencies of covalent labeling of the receptor (22Klueppelberg U.G. Powers S.P. Miller L.J. Receptor. 1990; 1: 1-11PubMed Google Scholar). The active sites of G protein-coupled receptors have been of substantial interest (2Coughlin S.R. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1994; 6: 191-197Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar, 3Strader C.D. Fong T.M. Tota M.R. Underwood D. Dixon R.A.F. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1994; 63: 101-132Crossref PubMed Scopus (996) Google Scholar, 4Schwartz T.W. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1994; 5: 434-444Crossref PubMed Scopus (281) Google Scholar). This is particularly true as we enter the era of rational drug design. Receptors have long been very effective drug targets. Anything that can be done to improve the ability to develop reagents with improved selectivity, potency, or bioavailability would be very useful. Until recently, most of our knowledge of G protein-coupled receptor agonist binding sites was restricted to those receptors that bind small ligands, such as the 11-cis-retinal chromophore and biogenic amines, in binding sites within the helical bundle transmembrane domain (2Coughlin S.R. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1994; 6: 191-197Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar, 3Strader C.D. Fong T.M. Tota M.R. Underwood D. Dixon R.A.F. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1994; 63: 101-132Crossref PubMed Scopus (996) Google Scholar, 4Schwartz T.W. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1994; 5: 434-444Crossref PubMed Scopus (281) Google Scholar). With the cloning of cDNAs that encode peptide and protein ligand receptors in this superfamily, attention has focused much more on extracellular loop regions as the principle ligand-binding domain. The rules are not nearly as clear for such receptors as for the small ligand receptors. It is of particular interest that the domain labeled in this study includes the carboxyl-terminal half of the third extracellular loop and TM7 of the CCK receptor. Indeed, this is a domain that includes residues that have substantial impact in mutagenesis studies of the substance P receptor (10Huang R.-R.C. Yu H. Strader C.D. Fong T.M. Mol. Pharmacol. 1994; 45: 690-695PubMed Google Scholar, 28Huang R.R.C. Yu H. Strader C.D. Fong T.M. Biochemistry. 1994; 33: 3007-3013Crossref PubMed Scopus (136) Google Scholar). It is reassuring that the same domain is identified with two quite distinct experimental approaches. The specific residues that were labeled with this probe included His347 and or Leu348 just outside of TM7 in the third extracellular loop. This contact is fully compatible with the model we recently proposed for the peptide agonist ligand-occupied receptor, which was based on an initial contact between the carboxyl terminus of the ligand and Trp39 in the domain just above TM1 (1Ji Z. Hadac E.M. Henne R.M. Patel S.A. Lybrand T.P. Miller L.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 24393-24401Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar). Indeed, these residues were even predicted to represent the best receptor contact for the mid-region of CCK in that work. We acknowledge the advice and assistance of D. J. McCormick, Ph.D., and B. J. Madden of the Mayo Peptide Core Laboratory, helpful discussions with S. P. Powers, Ph.D., and the excellent secretarial assistance of S. Erickson.
Referência(s)