Urine sediment analysis: Analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX® — A new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser
2009; Elsevier BV; Volume: 411; Issue: 3-4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.cca.2009.10.018
ISSN1873-3492
AutoresZahur Zaman, Giovanni B. Fogazzi, Giuseppe Garigali, Maria Daniela Croci, Gabor Bayer, Tunde Kránicz,
Tópico(s)Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
ResumoWe evaluated the analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX (77 Elektronika, Budapest, Hungary), a new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser (which in some countries is also called Urised) in comparison with visual phase-contrast microscopy.Precision, linearity, carry-over and method comparison were carried out according to well-established guidelines. The diagnostic performance with respect to visual phase-contrast microscopy was evaluated with results from two centres (n(1)=910, n(2)=1233). Uncentrifuged urine samples were used in visual microscopy in centre 1, while urine sediments were used in centre 2.Within-run precision for RBC was 17.8% and 6.7% at 18xE6 RBC/L and 447xE6 RBC/L respectively and for WBC it was 17% and 4.4% at 4xE6 WBC/L and 258xE6/L respectively. Between-run imprecision for RBC was 14.7% for 30xE6/L and 7.2% for 283xE6/L. For WBC it was 5.4% at 25xE6/L and 3% at 166xE6/L. In both studies areas under ROC curves (AUC) were 80-90% for RBC, WBC, squamous epithelial cells, yeast and calcium-oxalate crystals. For non-squamous epithelial cells and pathological and hyaline casts the AUC ranged 73-74%. There was no carry-over.The sediMAX is well able to count and identify RBC, WBC, squamous epithelial cells, yeast, bacteria and calcium-oxalate crystals. Recognition of pathological casts and non-squamous epithelial cells is adequate but needs to be improved.
Referência(s)