Nonindependence of Feature Processing in Initial Consonants
1977; American Speech–Language–Hearing Association; Volume: 20; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1044/jshr.2003.519
ISSN0022-4685
Autores Tópico(s)Multisensory perception and integration
ResumoNo AccessJournal of Speech and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Sep 1977Nonindependence of Feature Processing in Initial Consonants Joanne L. Miller Joanne L. Miller Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2003.519 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Mutual dependence in the processing of manner and place of articulation was investigated in two experiments. The first study assessed the location of the voiced-voiceless boundary as a function of place of articulation, and the second investigated the location of the labial-alveolar boundary as a function of manner class. In both experiments, the location of the phonetic boundary systematically varied as a function of the nontarget feature value. These results indicate that the processing of phonetic feature information occurs in parallel, with decisions about one feature influencing the particular value assigned to another feature. Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Brain and Language187 (41-61)1 Dec 2018EEG mu rhythms: Rich sources of sensorimotor information in speech processingTim Saltuklaroglu, Andrew Bowers, Ashley W. Harkrider, Devin Casenhiser, Kevin J. Reilly, David E. Jenson and David Thornton Language and Speech58:4 (549-562)1 Dec 2015Generalization of Phonetic Detail: Cross-Segmental, Within-Category Priming of VOTSusannah V. Levi The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America136:5 (2762-2772)1 Nov 2014Burst spectrum as a cue for the stop voicing contrast in American EnglishEleanor Chodroff and Colin Wilson The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America119:2 (1092)On the perception of voicing in syllable-initial plosives in noiseJintao Jiang, Marcia Chen and Abeer Alwan Perception & Psychophysics67:5 (759-769)1 Jul 2005Use of visual information in speech perception: Evidence for a visual rate effect both with and without a McGurk effectLawrence Brancazio and Joanne L. Miller Phonetica60:2 (129-157)1 Jun 20031 Jun 2003Analysis of English Nonsense Syllable Recognition in NoiseJosé R. Benkí Journal of Phonetics29:1 (1-22)1 Jan 2001Place of articulation and first formant transition pattern both affect perception of voicing in EnglishJosé R. Benkı́ Perception & Psychophysics63:4 (746-758)1 May 2001Ability in perceiving nonnative contrasts: Performance on natural and synthetic speech stimuliPeter C. Gordon, Lisa Keyes and Yiu-Fai Yung Journal of Phonetics28:1 (43-67)1 Jan 2000Acoustic analysis of simple vowels preceding a nasal in Standard ChineseMarilyn Y. Chen Brain and Language75:2 (153-162)1 Nov 2000Identification Reaction Times of Voiced/Voiceless Continua: A Right-Ear Advantage for VOT Values near the Phonetic BoundaryV. Laguitton, J.B. De Graaf, P. Chauvel and C. Liegeois-Chauvel Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research40:3 (646-665)1 Jun 1997Acoustic Cues to Place of Articulation and the McGurk EffectKerry P. Green and Linda W. Norrix Perception & Psychophysics58:4 (510-526)1 Jun 1996Measuring the difference limen for identification of order of onset for complex auditory stimuliRichard E. Pastore and Shannon M. Farrington KATHLEEN M. KUROWSKI and SHEILA E. BLUMSTEIN (1993) ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES FOR THE PERCEPTION OF NASAL CONSONANTS Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum10.1016/B978-0-12-360380-7.50012-0 Perception & Psychophysics45:1 (34-42)1 Jan 1989The role of visual information in the processing ofKerry P. Green and Patricia K. Kuhl Speech Communication8:1 (17-25)1 Jun 1989Perception of voicing in Dutch two-obstruent sequences: Covariation of voicing cuesR.J.H. Van den Berg Perception & Psychophysics44:3 (257-271)1 May 1988Temporal order identification for tone/noise stimuli with onset transitionsRichard E. Pastore, Jody Kaplan Layer, Crystle B. Morris and Robert J. Logan Richard E. Pastore (1987) Possible Acoustic Bases for the Perception of Voicing Contrasts The Psychophysics of Speech Perception10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_14 Dominic W. Massaro (1987) Psychophysics versus Specialized Processes in Speech Perception: An Alternative Perspective The Psychophysics of Speech Perception10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_3 Language and Speech30:2 (115-129)1 Apr 1987Difference in Second-Formant Transitions between Aspirated and Unaspirated Stop Consonants Preceding [α]Bruno H. Repp and Hwei-Bing Lin Joanne L. Miller and Peter D. Eimas (1982) Feature Detectors and Speech Perception: A Critical Evaluation Recognition of Pattern and Form10.1007/978-3-642-93199-4_7 (1981) References The Cognitive Representation of Speech10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60222-8 Language and Speech23:1 (45-66)1 Jan 1980Speech PerceptionMichael Studdert-Kennedy Brain and Language5:3 (310-330)1 May 1978Stimulus dominance and ear dominance in the perception of dichotic voicing contrastsBruno H. Repp Volume 20Issue 3September 1977Pages: 519-528 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Jan 14, 1976Accepted: Mar 4, 1977 Published in issue: Sep 1, 1977PubMed ID: 904313 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1977 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...
Referência(s)