Artigo Revisado por pares

Is There a Simpler Method for Predicting Lower Pole Stone Clearance after Shockwave Lithotripsy than Measuring Infundibulopelvic Angle?

2000; Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; Volume: 14; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1089/end.2000.14.475

ISSN

1557-900X

Autores

John Tuckey, Antony Devasia, L.N.S. Murthy, Peter Ramsden, D C Thomas,

Tópico(s)

Methemoglobinemia and Tumor Lysis Syndrome

Resumo

Several anatomic factors influence the clearance of lower pole stones treated with shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). One of these is the infundibulopelvic angle, but its measurement is complex.We proposed a more simple measure of caliceal dependence, the caliceal pelvic height (CPH), which we defined as the distance between a horizontal line from the lowermost point of the calix containing the stone to the highest point of the lower lip of the renal pelvis.In 62 patients who had SWL for solitary lower pole stones, a CPH < 15 mm was associated with a stone clearance rate of 92%, whereas with a CPH > or = 15 mm, the clearance rate was only 52% (p < 0.05). A majority (74%) of the patients with an infundibular width of > or = 5 mm were rendered stone free compared with 40% of those with a width of < 5 mm (p < 0.05).Measurement of the CPH, in conjunction with other anatomic factors, may more accurately predict the outcome of SWL in patients with lower pole stones.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX